Dennis Kambouchner e-mail(Login required)

Main Article Content

Authors

Dennis Kambouchner e-mail(Login required)

Abstract

39

This article aims to contribute to counteracting the negative perception of Descartes’ philosophical legacy. The article addresses a specific aspect of the supposed human dominance over nature, that of the animal question. Against the accusation of “speciesism,” a hierarchy that considers humans superior and justifies their domination and cruelty towards animals, it is argued that Descartes did not regard animals as completely insensible, that his position was not as categorical as often presented, and that he can be interpreted not as a speciesist but as an environmental advocate.

Keywords

Descartes, Animals, Speciesism, Dominion over the World

References

Cottingham, John. "A Brute to the Brutes? Descartes' Treatment of Animals". Philosophy 53 (1978): 551-559. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031819100026371

Descartes, René. Oeuvres de Descartes (11. v.). Edited by Charles Adam and Paul Tannery. Paris: Vrin, 1996-CNRS, new edition, 1964-1974.

Descartes, René. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes. Edited by John Cottingham, Robert Stoothoff, Dugald Murdoch and Anthony Kenny. Cambridge-New York: Cambridge University Press, 1985-1991. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107340824

Lamennais, Félicité Robert de. Défense de l'Essai sur l'indifférence en matière de religion. Paris-Lyon: Méquignon fils ainé & Périsse frères, 2nd ed., 1821.

Larrère, Cathérine. "Des animaux machines aux machines animales", in Qui sont les animaux?, edited by Jean Birnbaum, 88- 109. Paris: Folio-Gallimard, 2010.

Montaigne, Michel de. Les Essais. Edited by Pierre Villey. Paris: PUF, 1999.

Singer, Peter. Animal Liberation. [1975], 2nd ed. 2009, Open Road Media [on line].

Metrics

Search GoogleScholar




Details

Article Details

Section
Articles
Author Biography

Dennis Kambouchner, Professeur émérite, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne