Marina Bykova e-mail(Inicie sesión)

Contenido principal del artículo

Autores/as

Marina Bykova e-mail(Inicie sesión)

Resumen

399
This paper discusses the relation between Kant’s doctrine of pure apperception (the doctrine of the “I think”) and Fichte’s theory of self-positing. It shows that Kant’s conception of the transcendental unity of apperception is closer to Fichte’s principle of self-positing than is usually thought, and that Kant’s “I think,” and not Reinhold’s “principle of consciousness”, may have been a source of inspiration for Fichte in his attempt to justify transcendental idealism. As in Kant, in Fichte’s Wissenschaftslehre, the activity of “self-positing” is the fundamental feature of the I-hood. Similar to Kant, in Fichte, too, the fi rst principle expresses a peculiar kind of unity, which he calls the original unity of self-consciousness (Tathandlung).

Referencias

F. BEISER, German Idealism: The Struggle against Subjectivity (Harvard University Press, London, 2002).

D. BREAZEALE, Check or Checkmate? On the Finitude of the Fichtean Self, in K. AMERIKS, D. STURMA (eds.), The Modern Subject: Conceptions of the Self in Classic German Philosophy (SUNY, Albany, 1995) 87-114.

D. BREAZEALE, Fichte’s Nova Methoda Phenomenologica: On the methodological role of “intellectual intuition” in the later Jena Wissenschafslehre, “Revue Internationale de Philosophie” 52/4 (1998) 587-618.

J. G. FICHTE, Fichtes Werke (De Gruyter, Berlin, 1971) 11 vols.

J. G. FICHTE, Introductions to the Wissenschaftslehre and Other Wri tings, trans. and ed. by D. Breazeale (Hackett, Indianapolis, 1994).

J. G. FICHTE, Foundations of Transcendental Philosophy (Wissenschaftslehre) nova methodo (1769/99), translated and edited by D. Breazeale (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 1992).

J. G. FICHTE, Grundlage der gesamten Wissenschaftslehre (Meiner, Hamburg, 1997).

M. FRANK, “Intellektuele Anschauung.” Drei Stellungnahmen zu eimen Deutungsversuch von Selbstbewußtsein: Kant, Fichte, Hölderlin/ Novalis, in E. BEHLER, J. HÖRISCH (eds.), Die Aktualität der Frühromantik (Schöningh, Paderborn, 1987) 96-126.

P. GUYER, The Transcendental Deduction of the Categories, in P. GUYER (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1992) 123-160.

I. KANT, Critique of Pure Reason, translated and edited by Paul Guyer, Allen Wood (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1998).

B. LONGUENESSE, Kant on the Identity of Persons, “Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society” 107 (2017) (1pt2) 149-167.

T. ROCKMORE, Fichte’s Antifoundationalism, Intellectual Intuition, and Who One Is, in D. BREAZEALE, T. ROCKMORE (eds.), New Perspectives on Fichte (Humanities, Atlantic Highlands, 1996) 79-94.

Métricas

Search GoogleScholar




Detalles

Detalles del artículo

Sección
Estudios
Biografía del autor/a

Marina Bykova, North Carolina State University. Pleinlaan 2, office 5C447

1050, Brussels