The Political and Economic Dependence of the Press in Macao under Portuguese and Chinese Rule: Continuity and Change
Article Sidebar
310)
Main Article Content
Authors
Abstract
330
The article analyses the media system in Macao, a special administrative region of China that transitioned from Portuguese to Chinese sovereignty in 1999, becoming one of cities in the world with the largest number of published newspapers per capita. Combining historical research with the analysis of contemporary empirical data collected through interviews with journalists working on the ground, the research demonstrates how there is a long tradition of state control that goes back to the colonial era and that has assumed different forms, ranging from outright censorship to physical intimidation of journalists and economic dependence on the government. Limitations and control strategies imposed on news reporting during the Portuguese administration continue to be practiced today by the Chinese authorities. Even so, journalists operating on the Macao media market tend to overstate the level of freedom they are given, which can be attributed to media outlets being economically dependent on the state. Nevertheless, the level of freedom attributed to the press is today higher than it had been during the colonial period with some critical voices being allowed to reach the media. This needs to be understood in the context of what has been defined as the Chinese safety valve strategy.
Keywords
References
Aresta, A. & Oliveira, C. V. (2009). Macau: Uma História Cultural. Lisboa: Fundação Jorge Álvares.
Braga, J. M. (1965). Primórdios da Imprensa em Macau. Macau: Diocese de Macau.
Chan, J. M. & Lee, C. (1988). Press Ideology and Organizational Control in Hong Kong. Communication Research, 15(2), 185-197. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/009365088015002004
Chen, D. (2016) Review Essay: the Safety Valve Analogy in Chinese Politic. Journal of East Asian Studies, 16(2), 281-294. https://www.doi.org/10.1017/jea.2016.4
Clarim (2016). Quem Somos. Retrieved from http://www.oclarim.com.mo/quem-somos/
Clayton, C. H. (2009). Soverignity at the Edge. Macau & the Question of Chineseness. Cambridge & London: Harvard University Asia Center.
Dinis, J. R. (2011). Editorial – 29 Anos Depois, Jornal Tribuna de Macau, 30 October.
DSEC (2017). Resultados Globais dos Intercensos 2016. Retrieved from http://www.dsec.gov.mo/Statistic/Demographic/GlobalResultsOfBy-Census/2016中期人口統計.aspx
European Commission (2015). Relatório Conjunto ao Parlamento Europeu e ao Conselho – Região Administrativa Especial de Macau: Relatório Anual 2015. Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/PT/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52015JC0013
Gomes, C. (2001). Freedom of the Portuguese Press during the transition period (1987-99) in Macau. Master’s dissertation. Leicester: University of Leicester.
Hallin, D. & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing Media Systems: Three models of media and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Joint Declaration of the Portuguese and Chinese Governments about the Issue of Macau (1999). Retrieved from http://bo.io.gov.mo/bo/i/88/23/dc/pt/
Hassid, J. (2016). China’s Unruly Journalists. How Committed Professionals are changing the People’s Republic. London & New York: Routledge.
Keane, J. (1991). The Media and Democracy. Cambridge: Polity.
Lusa (2016). Memória de Pessanha quase desaparecida de Macau, 90 anos depois da sua morte, Retrieved from http://noticias.sapo.tl/portugues/lusa/artigo/20372945.html
Macau Hoje (1999). Retrieved from the edition of June 7, 1999.
Matias, J. C. (2016). “Os Últimos Dias da Transição”. In J. Figueira (Ed.), 15 Anos Depois: A Imprensa Portuguesa de Macau (1999-2014) (pp. 29-48). Macau: Fundação Rui Cunha/ Livros do Oriente.
Mosco, V. (2009). The Political Economy of Communication. London: Sage.
IBP [International Business Publications] (2016). Macao – Business and Investment Opportunities Yearbook, vol. 3. Washington: IBP.
Museu das Comunicações (2016). A Rádio em Macau. Retrieved from http://macao.communications.museum/por/exhibition/secondfloor/moreinfo/2_9_3_RadioMacau.html
Nielsen, R. K. & Linnebank, G. (2011). Public Support for the Media: A Six-Country Overview of Direct and Indirect Subsidies, report from the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, University of Oxford.
RAEM (2015). Macau Yearbook 2015. Macau: The Government Information Bureau of the Macao Special Administrative Region.
Patrão, C. (2004). A Imprensa Portuguesa em Macau. Um Fenómeno de Sobrevivência. Coimbra: thesis presented at the Faculty of Letters, University of Coimbra.
Picard, R. G. (2013). State Support for News: Why Subsidies? Why Not? What Kinds? In P. Murschetz (Ed.), State Aid for Newspapers. Theories, Cases, Actions. Berlin: Springer.
Puppis, M. (2009). Media Regulation in Small States. The International Communication Gazette, 71(1–2), 7–17. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1748048508097927
Ribeiro, N. (2014) Broadcasting to the Portuguese Empire in Africa: Salazar's singular broadcasting policy. Critical Arts: South-North Cultural and Media Studies, 28(6), 920-937. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/02560046.2014.990630
Ribeiro, N. (2015). Censorship and Scarcity. Controlling new and old media in Portugal, 1936-1945. Media History, 21(1), 74-88. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/13688804.2014.950951
Shirk, S. L. (2011). Changing Media, Changing China. In S. Shirk, Changing Media, Changing China. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Simões, J. M. (2017). Jornalismo Multicultural em português: Estudo de Caso em Macau. Lisboa: Media XXI.
Trappel, J. (2010). Squeezed and Uneasy: PSM in Small States — Limited Media Governance Options in Austria and Switzerland. In P. Iosifidis (Ed.), Reinventing Public Service Communication (pp. 209-221). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Weller, R. (2012) Responsive Authoritarianism and Blind-Eye Governance in China. In N. Bandelj & D. J. Solinger (Eds.), Socialism Vanquished, Socialism Challenged: Eastern Europe and China, 1989-2009 (pp. 83-99). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zhao, Y. (2008). Communication in China: Political Economy, Power, and Conflict. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Details
Article Details
RIGHTS TRANSFER
By submitting the article for evaluation and subsequent publication in Communication & Society, the AUTHOR exclusively assigns the rights of public communication, reproduction, distribution and sale for commercial exploitation to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, for the maximum legal term in force -the entire life of the author and seventy years after his death or declaration of death-, in any country, and in any of the current and future edition modalities, both in print and electronic versions.
In the event that the article is not accepted for publication , this transfer of rights lapses with the communication of the refusal to the AUTHOR.
The AUTHOR affirms that the article is unpublished, that it has not been sent simultaneously to another publication medium and that the rights have not been transferred exclusively previously. He is responsible to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service for the authorship and originality of his work, as well as for all pecuniary charges that may arise for the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, in favor of third parties due to actions, claims or conflicts arising from the breach of obligations by the AUTHOR.
