Bienvenido León e-mail(Login required) , Maxwell-T. Boykoff e-mail(Login required) , Carmen Rodrigo-Jordán e-mail(Login required)

Main Article Content


Bienvenido León e-mail(Login required)
Maxwell-T. Boykoff e-mail(Login required)
Carmen Rodrigo-Jordán e-mail(Login required)



Climate change attitudes and perceptions vary significantly among countries and cultures through a host of factors. Within media content about climate change, framing is one of the most relevant elements. This research interrogated how framing combinations across local-global and gain-loss frames influence attitudes and perceptions about climate change. We examined varying framing approaches through case-study experimentation with university students in Spain (N = 120). Students viewed one of four videos, each one based on a different combination of frames before answering a set of survey questions, with the aim of testing (i) how do the combinations of the local-global and the gain-loss frames affect the perception of the seriousness of climate change and (ii) how do combinations of the four frames affect support for action to address climate change. Results indicate that the participants scored similar values, regarding the seriousness of climate change and the need to take action, regardless of the video they watched. This means that interaction effects and other contextual factors (e.g., previous environmental concerns) may limit efficacy of deliberately introduced frames more than previously considered. These findings help to further deepen and nuance possible explanations for wider discursive interactions that comprise our attitudes and perceptions of climate change.


Climate change, Media representation, Media effects, Framing, perception of seriousness, need to take action


Aguila Coghlan, J. C. (2013). El framing en las noticias sobre las cumbres del cambio climático en la televisión española. Anuario electrónico de estudios en Comunicación Social “Disertaciones”, 6(1), 141-171.

Blanco Castilla, E., Quesada Pérez, M. & Teruel Rodríguez, L. (2013). Entre Kioto y Durban. Posición editorial de los medios de referencia ante el cambio climático. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 68, 420-435.

Bolsen, T. & Shapiro, M. A. (2017). Strategic Framing and Persuasive Messaging to Influence Climate Change Perceptions and Decisions. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Climate Science, 3, 491-508.

Boykoff, M. T. (2011). Who speaks for the climate? Making sense of media reporting on climate change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Boykoff, M. T. (2019). Creative (Climate) Communications: A Handbook for Productive Pathways for Science, Policy and Society. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Boykoff, M. T. & Boykoff, J. (2007). Climate change and journalistic norms: A case-study of US mass-media coverage. Geoforum, 38(6), 1190-1204.

Brulle, R. J. (2010). From environmental campaigns to advancing a public dialogue: environmental communication for civic engagement. Environmental Communication – A Journal of Nature and Culture, 4(1), 82-98.

Brulle R. J., Carmichael, J. & Jenkins, J. C. (2012). Shifting public opinion on climate change: An empirical assessment of factors influencing concern over climate change in the US, 2002–2010. Climatic change, 114(2), 169-188.

Campbell, D. T. & Stanley, J. C. (1995). Diseños experimentales y cuasiexperimentales en la investigación social. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.

Clawson, R. A. & Waltenburg, E. N. (2009). Legacy and Legitimacy: Black Americans and the Supreme Court. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

Devine-Wright, P. (2013). Think global, act local? The relevance of place attachments and place identities in a climate changed world. Global Environmental Change, 23(1), 61–69.

DiFrancesco, D. A. & Young, N. (2011). Seeing climate change: The visual construction of global warming in Canadian national print media. Cultural Geographies, 18(4), 517-536.

Doyle, J. (2007). Picturing the clima(c)tic: Greenpeace and the representational politics of climate change communication. Science as Culture, 16(2), 129–150.

Dryzek, J. S. & Lo, A. Y. (2015). Reason and rhetoric in climate communication. Environmental Politics, 24(1), 1-16.

Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58.

European Comission (2017). Special Eurobarometer. Climate change. Retrieved 10 June 2018 from

Feinberg, M. & Willer, R. (2011). Apocalypse soon? Dire messages reduce belief in global warming by contradicting just-world beliefs. Psychological Science, 22, 34-38.

Feitelson, E. (1991). Sharing the globe: The role of attachment to place. Global Environmental Change, 1(5), 396-406.

Fundación Endesa (2017). Ecobarómetro. Cultura ecológica y educación. Retrieved 20 June 2018 from

Gamson, W. A. (1989). News as framing: Comments on Graber. American Behavioral Scientist, 33(2), 157-161.

Gamson, W. A. & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1-37.

Gans, H. J. (1979). Deciding What’s News: A Study of CBS News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek, and Time. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

Gifford, R. (2008), Psychology’s essential role in alleviating the impacts of climate change. Canadian Psychology, 49(4), 273–280.

Gifford, R. & Comeau, L. A. (2011). Message framing influences perceived climate change competence, engagement, and behavioral intentions. Global Environmental Change, 21(4), 1301–1307.

Graber, D. A. (1997). Mass Media and American Politics. Washington: CQ Press.

Hart, P. S. (2010). One or many? The influence of episodic and thematic climate change frames on policy preferences and individual behavior change. Science Communication, 33(1), 28–51.

Heras Hernández, F. (2008). Comunicar el cambio climático. In J. Riechmann (Ed.), ¿En Qué Estamos Fallando?: Cambio Social para Ecologizar el Mundo (pp. 201-238). Barcelona: Icaria.

Hulme, M. (2009). Why We Disagree About Climate Change: Understanding Controversy, Inaction and Opportunity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Johnson-Cartee, K. S. (2005). News Narrative and News Framing: Constructing Political Reality. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Jones, M. D. & Song, G. (2014). Making sense of climate change: How story frames shape cognition. Political Psychology, 35(4), 447-476.

Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econométrica, 47, 263–292.

Kinder, D. R. & Palfrey, T. R. (1993). On behalf of an experimental political science? In D. R. Kinder & T. R. Palfrey (Eds.), Experimental Foundations of Political Science (pp. 1-39). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Lahsen, M. (2005). Seductive simulations? Uncertainty distribution around climate models. Social Studies of Science, 35(6), 895-922.

Lakoff, G. (2010). Why it matters how we frame the environment. Environmental Communication, 4(1), 70–81.

Leiserowitz, A. (2007). Communicating the risks of global warming: American risk perceptions, affective images, and interpretive communities. In S. C. Moser & L. Dilling (Eds.), Creating a Climate for Change: Communicating Climate Change and Facilitating social change (pp. 44-63). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

León, B. (2014). El cambio climático en los medios. Una visión pluridimensional. In B. León (Ed.), Periodismo, medios de comunicación y cambio climático (pp. 11-27). Salamanca: Comunicación Social.

León, B. & Erviti, M. C. (2015). Science in pictures: Visual representation of climate change in Spain’s television news. Public Understanding of Science, 24(2), 183-199.

Lorenzoni, I. & Pidgeon, N. F. (2006). Public views on climate change: European and USA perspectives. Climatic change, 77(1-2), 73-95.

Lorenzoni, I., Nicholson-Cole, S. & Whitmarsh, L. (2007). Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Global environmental change, 17(3-4), 445-459.

Lozano Ascencio, C. (2013). El cambio climático en los telediarios: Alusiones a la catástrofe en tiempos de calma. Disertaciones: Anuario Electrónico de Estudios en Comunicación Social, 6(1), 124-140.

Maio, G. R. & Haddock, G. (2007). Attitude change. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles (pp. 565-586). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

McCright, A. M. & Dunlap, R. E. (2003). Defeating Kyoto: The conservative movement’s impact on US climate change policy. Social problems, 50(3), 348-373.

Meira, P. A. & Arto-Blanco, M. (2014). Representaciones del cambio climático en estudiantes universitarios en España: aportes para la educación y la comunicación. Educar em Revista, 3, 15-33.

Meira, P. A., Arto, M., Heras, F., Iglesias, L., Lorenzo, J. & Montero, P. (2013). La respuesta de la sociedad española ante el cambio climático. Madrid: Fundación Mapfre.

Milfont, T. L. (2010). Global warming, climate change and human psychology. In V. Corral Verdugo, C. H. García-Cadena & M. Frías-Arment (Eds.), Psychological Approaches to Sustainability: Current Trends in Theory, Practice and Research (pp. 19-42). New York, NY: Nova Science.

Morton, T. A., Rabinovich, A., Marshall, D. & Bretschneider, P. (2011). The future that may (or may not) come: How framing changes responses to uncertainty in climate change communications. Global Environmental Change, 21(1), 103–109.

Nabi, R. L., Gustafson, A. & Jensen, R. (2018). Framing climate change: Exploring the role of emotion in generating advocacy behavior. Science Communication, 40(4), 442-468.

Negredo, S. (2020, June 3). La mayoría considera que los medios informan con precisión sobre el cambio climático y cómo afrontarlo. Retrieved from

Nisbet, M. C. (2009). Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement. Environment, 51(2), 12-13.

Nisbet, E. C., Hart, P. S., Myers, T. & Ellithorpe, M. (2013). Attitude change in competitive framing environments? Open-/closed-mindedness, framing effects, and climate change. Journal of Communication, 63(4), 766–785.

Noguera, G. (2013). La representación del cambio climático en los medios. In B. León (Ed.), El periodismo ante el cambio climático. Nuevas perspectivas y retos (pp. 46-69). Barcelona: UOC.

Nordhaus, T. & Shellenberger, M. (2007). Break Through: From the Death of Environmentalism to the Politics of Possibility. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

Olausson, U. (2009). Global warming—global responsibility? Media frames of collective action and scientific certainty. Public understanding of science, 18(4), 421-436.

O’Neill, S. & Nicholson-Cole, S. (2009). Fear won’t do it. Promoting positive engagement with climate change through visual and iconic representations. Science Communication, 3(30), 355-379.

Pew Research (2015). Spring 2015 Global Attitudes Survey. Retrieved 3 June 2018, from

Pidgeon, N. (2012). Public understanding of, and attitudes to climate change: UK and international perspectives and policy. Climate Policy, 12 (Suppl. 01), S85–S106.

Rademaekers, J. & Johnson-Sheehan, R. (2014). Framing and re-framing in environmental science: Explaining climate change to the public. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 44(1), 3–21.

Rebich-Hespanha, S., Rice, R. E., Montello, D. R., Retzloff, S., Tien, S. & Hespanha, J. P. (2015). Image themes and frames in US print news stories about climate change. Environmental Communication, 9(4), 491–519.

Reese, S. D., Gandy, O. H. & Grant, A. E. (2001). Framing Public Life. Perspectives on Media and Our Understanding of the Social World. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Romsdahl, R. J. (2020). Deliberative framing: opening up discussions for local-level public engagement on climate change. Climatic Change, 1-19.

Scannell, L. & Gifford, R. (2013). Personally relevant climate change: The role of place attachment and local versus global message framing in engagement. Environmental Behavior, 45(1), 60–85.

Schäfer, M. & O’Neill, S. (2017). Frame Analysis in Climate Change Communication. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Climate Science. Retrieved 11 Jan. 2018, from

Scheufele, D. A. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of communication, 49(1), 103-122.

Shah, D. V., McLeod, D. M., Gotlieb, M. R. & Lee, N. (2009). Framing and agenda-setting. In R. L. Nabi & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Media Processes and Effects (pp. 83–98). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Shanahan, M. (2007). Talking about a revolution: Climate change and the media. COP13 Briefing and Opinion Papers. London: International Institute for Environment and Development.

Smith, K. (2009). The wisdom of crowds. Nature Reports Climate Change, 30 July. Retrieved 10 June 2018, from http://

Sobczyk, N. (2019). Committee can’t quite get past ‘partisan ridiculousness’ Energy & Environment Daily. Retrieved April 5 2018, from

Spence, A., Poortinga, W. & Pidgeon, N. (2012). The psychological distance of climate Change. Risk Analysis, 32(6), 957–972.

Spence, A, Poortinga, W., Butler, C. & Pidgeon, N. F. (2011). Perceptions of climate change and willingness to save energy related to flood experience. Nature Climate Change, 1(1), 46–49.

Spence, A. & Pidgeon, N. (2010). Framing and communicating climate change: The effects of distance and outcome frame manipulations. Global Environmental Change, 20, 656–667.

Teso Alonso, G., Piñuel Raigada, J. L. & Pacheco Rueda, M. (2013). Aplicación de un phillips 66 para desvelar la red de apelaciones recíprocas entre agentes sociales expertos en torno al riesgo del cambio climático y su contraste con las representaciones de aludidos en el discurso informativo de la TV sobre el mismo tópico. In M. Vicente Mariño, T. González Hortigüela & M. Pacheco Rueda (Eds.), Investigar la comunicación hoy. Revisión de políticas científicas y aportaciones metodológicas. Simposio internacional sobre política científica en comunicación (pp. 885-902). Segovia: Universidad de Valladolid, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Jurídicas y de la Comunicación.

Thomsen, J. (2018). Judge rules EPA must provide evidence used for Pruitt’s climate change claims. The Hill June 7. Retrieved 10 June 2018, from

Ungar, S. (2007). Public scares: Changing the issue culture. In S. C. Moser & L. Dilling (Eds.), Creating a Climate for Change: Communicating Climate Change and Facilitating Social Change (pp. 82–89). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Ungar, S. (2000). Knowledge, ignorance and the popular culture: climate change versus the ozone hole. Public Understanding of Science, 9, 297-312.

Van der Linden, S., Maibach, E. & Leiserowitz, A. (2015). Improving public engagement with climate change: Five “best practice” insights from psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(6), 758-763.

Van Dijk, T. A. (1988). News as discourse. Hillsdale, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum.

Vlek, C. (2000). Essential psychology for environmental policy making. International Journal of Psychology, 35(2), 153–167.

Whitmarsh, L. & Corner, A. (2017). Tools for a new climate conversation: A mixed-methods study of language for public engagement across the political spectrum. Global environmental change, 42, 122-135.

Wiest, S. L., Raymond, L. & Clawson, R. A. (2015). Framing, partisan predispositions, and public opinion on climate change. Global Environmental Change, 31, 187-198.

Zehr, S. (2000). Public representations of scientific uncertainty about global climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 9, 85–103.


Search GoogleScholar


Article Details