Challenging hegemony and power in the sixteenth century: The Discourse of Voluntary Servitude as antecedent of critical public relations theory
Article Sidebar
270)
Main Article Content
Authors
Abstract
344
This article applies La Boétie’s concept of voluntary servitude to public relations historiography through a historic-critical analysis. Written in the same Renaissance era than other early history books of the history of public relations such as Machiavelli’s The Prince, The discourse of voluntary servitude (1552-1553) reveals to the publics the power that would lie in their refusal to engage with the authority (or in other words, the state, the prince or the monarch). The result is that, through a postmodern approach of emphasizing dissensus, the concept of voluntary servitude and its encouragement of activism and passive resistance can be considered an early precedent of critical public relations theory. Furthermore, without being judgmental, La Boétie invites us to a reflection on the role of self-responsibility of the publics in their power relationships with organizations.
Keywords
References
Albiac, G. (2011). Sumisiones voluntarias: La invención del sujeto politico. De Maquiavelo a Spinoza. Madrid: Tecnos.
Bernays, E. (1969). The engineering of consent. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.
Buron, E. (2015). La nature et ses façons: l’antropologie politique humaniste d’Etiénne de la Boétie. Fabulla/Les Colloques. Retrieved from http://www.fabula.org/colloques/document2490.php
Ciszek, E. (2015). Bridging the gap: Mapping the relationship between activism and public relations. Public Relations Review, 41(4), 447-455. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2015.05.016
Coombs, W. T. & Holladay, S. J. (2007). It is not just PR: Public relations in society. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Coombs, W. T. & Holladay, S. J. (2012). Fringe public relations: How activism moves critical pr toward the mainstream. Public Relations Review, 38, 880-887. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.02.008
Demetrious, K. (2013). Public relations, activism and social change: Speaking up. London: Routledge.
Foucault, M. (1983). Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics. Chicago: University of Chicago.
Foucault, M. (1991). Discipline & punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Vintage.
García, C. (2010). Rethinking Walter Lippmann’s legacy in the history of public relations. PRism, 7(1). Retrieved from https://www.prismjournal.org/uploads/1/2/5/6/125661607/v7-no1-a1.pdf
García, C. (2015a). Searching for Benedict of Spinoza in the history of communication: His influence on Walter Lippmann and Edward Bernays. Public Relations Review, 41(3), 172-178. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2015.01.003
García, C. (2015b). PR, clientelism and economics: A comparison of Southern Europe and Latin America. Journal of Communication Management, 19(2), 133-149. https://www.doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-03-2013-0026
García, C. (2017). Ethics and strategy: A communication response to Machiavelli’s The prince in Baltasar Gracián’s A pocket oracle. Public Relations Review, 43(1), 172-178. https://www.doi.org/10.1106/J.PUBREV.2016.11.005
Gracián, B. (1992 [1647]). The art of wordly wisdom. A pocket oracle. New York, NY: Doubleday.
Gracián, B. (1995 [1637]). A pocket mirror for heroes. New York, NY: Doubleday (2007 [1580]).
Grunig, J. E. (1992). Excellence in public relations and communication Management. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Grunig, J. E. (2001). Two-way symmetrical public relations: Past, present, and future. In R. L. Heath (Ed.), Handbook of public relations (pp. 11-30). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hallin, D. C. & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing Media Systems. Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hallin, D. & Papathanassopoulos, S. (2002). Political clientelism and the media: Southern Europe and Latin America in comparative perspective. Media, culture & Society, 24(2), 175-195. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/016344370202400202
Hegel, G. W. (1991). Elements of the philosophy of right. New York: Cambridge University Press. (1991 [1820]).
Herman, E, S. & Chomsky, N. (1988). Manufacturing Consent. New York: Pantheon Books.
Holtzhausen, D. R. (2000). Postmodern values in public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 12(1), 93-114. https://www.doi.org/10.1207/S1532754XJPRR12016
Holtzhausen, D. R. (2002). Toward a postmodern research agenda for public relations. Public Relations Review, 28, 251-264. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(02)00131-5
Holtzhausen, D. R. (2007). Activism. In E. L. Toth (Ed.), The future of excellence in public relations and communication management (pp. 357-379). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Holtzhausen, D. R. (2012). Public relations as activism: Postmodern approaches to theory and practice. New York, NY: Routledge.
Ihlen, O., van Ruler, B. & Fredriksson, M. (Eds.). (2009). Public relations and social theory: Key figures and concepts. London: Routledge.
La Boétie, E. (2015). The politics of obedience: The discourse of voluntary servitude. Auburn, AL: Mises Institute.
L’Etang, J., McKie, D., Snow, N. & Xifra, J. (2016). Introduction. In J. L’Etang., D. McKie., N. Snow. & J. Xifra (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of critical public Relations (pp. 3-16). New York: Routledge.
L’Etang, J. (2008). Public relations: Concepts, practice and critique. London: Sage.
L’Etang, J. (2016). Public Relations, activism and social movements: Critical perspectives. Public Relations Inquiry, 5(3), 207-211. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/2046147X16675665
Laskin, V. (2012). Public relations scales: Advancing the excellence theory. Journal of Communication Management, 16(4), 355-370. https://www.doi.org/10.1108/13632541211278996
Lippmann, W. (1997). Public opinion. New York, NY: Free Press. (1997 [1922]).
Machiavelli, N. (2003). The Prince. London: Penguin (2003 [1547]).
McElroy, W. (2003). Étienne de la Boétie. Oakland, CA: Independent Institute. Retrieved from http://www.independent.org/newsroom/article.asp?id=1162
McKie, D. & Munshi, D. (2011). Reconfiguring public relations: Ecology, equity and enterprise. London: Routledge.
McKie, D. (2005). Critical theory. In R. L. Heath (Ed.), Encyclopedia of public relations (pp. 226-228). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
McNamara, J. (2009). Public relations in an interactive age: the need for new practices, not just new media. Asia Pacific Public Relations Journal, 10, 1-15. Retrieved from https://opus.lib.uts.edu.au/handle/10453/11851
Mesnard, P. (1936). L’essor de la philosophie politique au XVIe siècle. Paris: Boivin et Cie.
Moore, S. (2011). Ideals and realities: Renaissance state communication in Machiavelli’s The Prince and More’s Utopia. Public Relations Review, 38, 383-389. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.11.009
Moore, S. (2014). Public relations and the history of ideas. London: Routledge.
Munshi, D., Kurian, P., & Xifra, J. (2017). An (other) ‘story’ in history: Challenging colonialist public relations in novels of resistance. Public Relations Review, 43, 366-374. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.02.016
O’Neill, J. (1995). The poverty of postmodernism. New York: Routledge.
Pieczka, M. (2006). Paradigms, systems theory and public relations. In J. L’Etang & M. Pieczka (Eds.), Public relations, critical debates and contemporary practice (pp. 333-358). Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum and N. J. Mahwah.
Pieczka, M. (2011). Public Relations as dialogic expertise. Journal of Communication Management, 15(2), 108-124. https://www.doi.org/10.1108/13632541111126346
Romele, A., Emmenegger, C., Gallino, F. & Gorgone, D. (2017). Panopticism is not enough: Social media as technologies of voluntary servitude. Surveillance & Society, 15(2), 204-221. https://www.doi.org/10.24908/ss.v15i2.6021
Roper, J. (2005). Symmetrical communication: Excellent public relations or a strategy for hegemony? Journal of Public Relations Research, 17(1), 69-86. https://www.doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr1701_6
Rothbard, M. (1970). Ending tyranny without violence. Retrieved from http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?5048-Ending-Tyranny-Without-Violence
Rothbard, M. (2015). Foreword. In La Boétie, E. The politics of obedience: The discourse of voluntary servitude. Auburn, AL: Mises Institute. 7-37.
Sriramesh, K. (2009). Globalisation and public relations: An overview looking into the future. PRism 6(2), 1-11. Retrieved from http://www.prismjournal.org/fileadmin/Praxis/Files/globalPR/SRIRAMESH.pdf
Wolf, K. (2018). Power struggles: A sociological approach to activist communication. Public Relations Review, 44(2), 308-316. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2018.03.004
Xifra, J. (2017). Recognition, symbolic capital and reputation in the seventeenth century: Thomas Hobbes and the origins of critical public relations historiography. Public Relations Review, 43, 579-586. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.03.001
Young, P. (2016). Activism and public relations. In A. Theaker (Ed.), The public relations handbook (pp. 470-486). New York: Routledge.
Details
Article Details
RIGHTS TRANSFER
By submitting the article for evaluation and subsequent publication in Communication & Society, the AUTHOR exclusively assigns the rights of public communication, reproduction, distribution and sale for commercial exploitation to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, for the maximum legal term in force -the entire life of the author and seventy years after his death or declaration of death-, in any country, and in any of the current and future edition modalities, both in print and electronic versions.
In the event that the article is not accepted for publication , this transfer of rights lapses with the communication of the refusal to the AUTHOR.
The AUTHOR affirms that the article is unpublished, that it has not been sent simultaneously to another publication medium and that the rights have not been transferred exclusively previously. He is responsible to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service for the authorship and originality of his work, as well as for all pecuniary charges that may arise for the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, in favor of third parties due to actions, claims or conflicts arising from the breach of obligations by the AUTHOR.
