Friends or just fans? Parasocial relationships in online television fiction communities
Article Sidebar
983)
Main Article Content
Authors
Abstract
2292
This paper explores parasocial phenomena on social media pages related to Spanish television fiction by analysing the development of parasociality through relationships established between users and characters and the characteristics of this type of online community. The sample consisted of 4,762 spontaneous comments posted on social media pages (1,598 on Facebook and 3,164 on Twitter) linked to television series. Comments published between 1 January 2018 and 31 May 2020 were compiled the day after the premiere of each fiction. Our findings confirm those of previous researchs on the similarity between parasocial relationships with fictional characters and relationships in real life. This study also substantiates that women’s comments show a greater tendency to draw associations between parasocial relationships and daily life. We also find a link between programme longevity and audience success on the one hand, and the intensity of parasocial relationships with the characters on the other. The relationships among community members reveal a degree of narcissism, prompting more self-disclosure than interaction with the rest of the users. Therefore, such relationships are closer to consociality (Kozinets, 2015) than parasociality, although significant differences concerning gender identity are also found in this context.
Keywords
References
Armstrong, A. & Hagel III, J. (1996). The real value of on-line communities. Harvard Business Review, 74(3), 134-141. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/1996/05/the-real-value-of-on-line-communities
Auter, P. J. & Palmgreen, P. (2000). Development and validation of a parasocial interaction measure. The audience‐persona interaction scale. Communication Research Reports, 17(1), 79-89. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/08824090009388753
Ballantine, P. W. & Martin, B. A. S. (2005). Forming parasocial relationships in online communities. Advances in consumer research, 32(1), 197-201. Retrieved from https://www.acrwebsite.org/volumes/9073/volumes/v32/NA-32
Barlovento Comunicación (2020, March 6). Informe Barlovento: Consumo TV en Mujeres. Retrieved from https://www.barloventocomunicacion.es/informesbarlovento/informe-barlovento-el-consumo-tv-en-el-grupo-mujeres/
Bernhold, Q. S. & Metzger, M. (2020). Older adults’ parasocial relationships with favorite television characters and depressive symptoms. Health Communication, 35(2), 168-179. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2018.1548336
Bond, B. J. (2016). Following your “friend”. Social media and the strength of adolescents’ parasocial relationships with media personae. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 19(1), 656-660. https://www.doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2016.0355
Bond, B. J. (2020). The development and influence of parasocial relationships with television characters. A longitudinal experimental test of prejudice reduction through parasocial contact. Communication Research, January, 1-21. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0093650219900632
Boyd, D. M. & Ellison, N. B. (2008). Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, October, 13(1), 210-230. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x
Busselle, R. & Bilandzic, H. (2009). Measuring narrative engagement. Media Psychology, 12(4), 321-347. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/15213260903287259
Caro-Castaño, L. (2015). Relaciones e interacciones parasociales en redes sociales digitales. Una revisión conceptual. Icono 14, 13(2), 23-47. https://www.doi.org/10.7195/ri14.v13i2.853
Chung, S. & Cho, H. (2014). Parasocial relationship via reality TV and social media: its implications for celebrity endorsement. In TVX 2014. ACM International conference on interactive experiences for TV and online video (pp. 47-54). Retrieved from https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5329&context=lkcsb_research
Cohen, J. (1999). Favorite characters of teenage viewers of Israeli serials. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 43(3), 327-345. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/08838159909364495
Cohen, J. (2003). Parasocial breakups: measuring individual differences in responses to the dissolution of parasocial relationships. Mass Communication & Society, 6(2), 191-202. https://www.doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0602_5
Cohen, J. (2004). Parasocial break-up from favorite television characters. The role of attachment styles and relationship intensity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21(2), 187-202. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0265407504041374
Cohen, J. (2009). Mediated relationships and media effects. Parasocial interaction and identification. In R. L. Nabi, L. Robin & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of media processes and effects (pp. 223-236). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Conway, J. C. & Rubin, A. M. (1991). Psychological predictors of television viewing motivation. Communication Research, 18(4), 443-463. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/009365091018004001
Cortés, H. (2019, June 20). Las mujeres son más fieles que los hombres y ven las series hasta el final. ABC. Retrieved from https://www.abc.es/play/television/noticias/abci-mujeres-mas-fieles-hombres-y-series-hasta-final-201906201345_noticia.html
Daniel, E. S. & Westerman, D. K. (2017). Valar morghulis (all parasocial men must die): Having nonfictional responses to a fictional character. Communication Research Reports, 34(2), 143-152. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2017.1285757
Díaz, H. (2003). Medición de la web: Una escala de interacción parasocial para los portales del world wide web. Razón y Palabra, 31. Retrieved from http://www.razonypalabra.org.mx/anteriores/n31/hdiaz.html
Dibble, J. L., Hartmann, T. & Rosaen, S. F. (2015). Parasocial interaction and parasocial relationship. Conceptual clarification and a critical assessment of measures. Human Communication Research, 42(1), 21-44. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12063
Dibble, J. L. & Rosaen, S. F. (2011). Parasocial interaction as more than friendship. Evidence for parasocial interactions with disliked media figures. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 23(3), 122-132. https://www.doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000044
Eyal, K. & Cohen, J. (2006). When good friends say goodbye. A parasocial breakup study. Journal of Broadcasting and Media, 50(3), 502-523. https://www.doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem5003_9
Eyal, K. & Dailey, R. M. (2012). Examining relational maintenance in parasocial relationships. Mass Communication and Society, 15(5), 758-781. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2011.616276
Giles, D. C. (2002). Parasocial interaction. A review of the literature and a model for future research. Media Psychology, 4(3), 279-305. https://www.doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0403_04
Hartmann, T. (2008). Parasocial interactions and paracommunication with new media characters. In E. A. Konijn, S. Utz, M. Tanis & S. B. Barnes (Eds.), Mediated Interpersonal Communication (pp. 177-199). Nueva York, NY: Routledge.
Hartmann, T. (2017). Parasocial interaction, parasocial relationships, and well-being. In L. Reinecke & M. B. Oliver (Eds), The Routledge handbook of media use and well-being. International perspectives on theory and research on positive media effects (pp. 131-144). New York, NY: Routledge.
Hartmann, T. & Goldhoorn, C. (2011). Horton and Wohl revisited: exploring viewers’ experience of parasocial interaction. Journal of Communication, 61(6), 1104-1121. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01595.x
Hataway, J. (2008). Audience media figure relationships. A critical review of parasocial Interaction. In National Communication Association. Retrieved from http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/articles/44852661/audience-media-figure-relationships-critical-review-parasocial-interaction
Hoerner, J. (1999). Scaling the web: a parasocial interaction scale for world wide web sites. In D. W. Schumann & E. Thorson (Eds.), Advertising and the world wide web (pp. 135-147). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Horton, D. & Strauss, A. (1957). Interaction in audience-participation shows. American Journal of Sociology, 62(6), 579-587. https://www.doi.org/10.1086/222106
Horton, D. & Wohl, R. R. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction. Psychiatry. Journal for the Study of Interpersonal Processes, 19(3), 215-229. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049
Hu, M. (2016). The influence of a scandal on parasocial relationship, parasocial interaction, and parasocial breakup. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 5(3), 217-231. https://www.doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000068
Kassing, J. W. & Sanderson, J. (2009). You’re the kind of guy that we all want for a drinking buddy. Expressions of parasocial interaction on Floydlandis.com. Western Journal of Communication, 73(2), 182-203. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/10570310902856063
Kim, H., Ko, E. & Kim, J. (2015). SNS users’ para-social relationships with celebrities. Social media effects on purchase intentions. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, 25(3), 279-294. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/21639159.2015.1043690
Klimmt, C., Hartmann, T. & Schramm, H. (2006). Parasocial interactions and relationships. In J. Bryant & P. Vorderer (Eds.), Psychology of entertainment (pp. 291-313). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Konijn, E. A. & Hoorn, J. F. (2005). Some like it bad. Testing a model for perceiving and experiencing fictional characters. Media Psychology, 7(2), 107-144. https://www.doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0702_1
Kozinets, R. V. (1999). E-tribalized marketing? The strategic implications of virtual communities of consumption. European Management Journal, June, 17(3), 252-264. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/S0263-2373(99)00004-3
Kozinets, R. V. (2015). Netnography: Redefined. London: Sage.
Kyewski, E., Szczuka, J. M. & Krämer, N. C. (2018). The protagonist, my Facebook friend: How cross-media extensions are changing the concept of parasocial interaction. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 7(1), 2-17. https://www.doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000109
Lather, J. & Moyer-Guse, E. (2011). How do we react when our favorite characters are taken away? An examination of a temporary parasocial breakup. Mass Communication and Society, 14(2), 196-215. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/15205431003668603
Levy, M. R. (1979). Watching TV news as para‐social interaction. Journal of Broadcasting, 23(1), 69-80. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/08838157909363919
Liebers, N. & Schramm, H. (2019). Parasocial interactions and relationships with media characters-an inventory of 60 years of research. Communication Research Trends, 38(2), 4-31. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333748971_Parasocial_Interactions_and_Relationships_with_Media_Characters_-_An_Inventory_of_60_Years_of_Research
McQuail, D., Blumler, J. G. & Brow, J. R. (1972). The television audience. A revised perspective. In D. McQuail (Ed.), Sociology of mass communications. Selected readings (pp. 135-165). Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Moyer-Gusé, E. & Nabi, R. L. (2010). Explaining the effects of narrative in an entertainment television program: Overcoming resistance to persuasion. Human Communication Research, 36(1), 26-52. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2009.01367.x
ONTSI (2019, January). Perfil Sociodemográfico de los Internautas. Análisis de datos INE 2018. Retrieved from https://www.ontsi.red.es/index.php/es/estudios-e-informes/Hogares-y-ciudadanos/Perfil-sociodemografico-de-los-internautas- %28datos-INE-2018
Perse, E. M. & Rubin, A. M. (1988). Audience activity and satisfaction with favorite television soap opera. Journalism Quarterly, 65(2), 368-375. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/107769908806500216
Reddit & Globalwebindex (2020). The era of we and the rise of online community users. Retrieved from https://www.globalwebindex.com/reports/online-communities-reddit?utm_content=111494361&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter&hss_channel=tw-85790119
Rosaen, S. F. & Dibble, J. L. (2017). The impact of viewer perceptions of media personae and viewer characteristics on the strength, enjoyment, and satisfaction of parasocial relationships. Communication Studies, 68(1), 1-21. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2016.1240701
Rosengren, K. E. & Windahl, S. (1972). Mass media consumption as a functional alternative. In D. McQuail (Ed.), Sociology of mass communications. Selected readings (pp. 119-134). Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Rubin, A. M. & Perse, E. M. (1987). Audience activity and television news gratifications. Communication Research, February, 14(1), 58-84. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/009365087014001004
Rubin, A. M., Perse, E. M. & Powell, R. A. (1985). Loneliness, parasocial interaction, and local television news viewing. Human Communication Research, 12(2), 155-180. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1985.tb00071.x
Rubin, R. B. & McHugh, M. P. (1987). Development of parasocial interaction relationships. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 31(3), 279-292. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/08838158709386664
Schiappa, E., Allen, M. G. & Peter B. (2007). Parasocial relationships and television. A meta-analysis of the effects. In R. W. Preiss, B. B. M. Gayle, N. Burrell, M. Allen & J. Bryant (Eds.), Mass media effects research. Advances through meta-analysis, (pp. 301-314). New York, NY: Routledge.
Schiappa, E., Gregg, P. B. & Hews, D. (2005). The parasocial contact hypothesis. Communication Monographs, 72(1), 92-115. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/0363775052000342544
Schmid, H. & Klimmt, C. (2011). A magically nice guy. Parasocial relationships with Harry Potter across different cultures. The International Communication Gazette, 73(3), 252-269. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1748048510393658
Schramm, H. (2008). Parasocial interactions and relationships. In W. Donsbach (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of communication (pp. 3501-3506). Oxford: Blackwell.
Schramm, H. & Hartmann, T. (2008). The PSI-process scales. A new measure to assess the intensity and breadth of parasocial processes. Communications, 33(4), 385-401. https://www.doi.org/10.1515/COMM.2008.025
Shefner-Rogers, C. L., Rogers, E. M. & Singhal, A. (1998). Parasocial interaction with the television soap operas ‘Simplemente Maria’ and ‘Oshin’. Keio communication review, 20, 3-18. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/310460646_Parasocial_Interaction_with_the_Television_Soap_Operas_ %27Simplemente_Maria %27_and_ %27Oshin %27
Shin, D. H. (2016). Do users experience real sociability through social TV? Analyzing parasocial behavior in relation to social TV. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 60(1), 140-159. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2015.1127247
Stever, G. S. & Lawson, K. (2013). Twitter as a way for celebrities to communicate with fans. Implications for the study of parasocial interaction. North American Journal of Psychology, 15(2), 339-354. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263257850_Twitter_as_a_Way_for_Celebrities_to_Communicate_with_Fans_Implications_for_the_Study_of_Parasocial_Interaction
Tian, Q. & Hoffner, C. A. (2010). Parasocial interaction with liked, neutral, and disliked characters on a popular TV series. Mass Communication and Society, 13(3), 250-269. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/15205430903296051
Tsiotsou, R. H. (2015). The role of social and parasocial relationships on social networking sites loyalty. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 401-414. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.064
Tukachinsky, R. (2011). Pararomantic love and parafriendships. Development and assessment of a multiple parasocial relationships scale. American Journal of Media Psychology, 3(1/2), 73-94. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304223049_Para-Romantic_Love_and_Para-Friendships_Development_and_Assessment_of_a_Multiple-Parasocial_Relationships_Scale
Turvey, M. (2019). “Familiarity breeds contempt”: why fascination, rather than repeat exposure, better explains the appeal of antiheroes on television. In J. Riis & A. Taylor (Eds.), Screening Characters (pp. 231-247). London-New York: Routledge.
Vaage, M. B. (2014). Blinded by Familiarity: Partiality, Morality and Engagement in Television Series. In T. Nannicelli & P. Taberham (Eds.), Cognitive Media Theory (pp. 268-284). London-New York: Routledge.
Details
Article Details
RIGHTS TRANSFER
By submitting the article for evaluation and subsequent publication in Communication & Society, the AUTHOR exclusively assigns the rights of public communication, reproduction, distribution and sale for commercial exploitation to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, for the maximum legal term in force -the entire life of the author and seventy years after his death or declaration of death-, in any country, and in any of the current and future edition modalities, both in print and electronic versions.
In the event that the article is not accepted for publication , this transfer of rights lapses with the communication of the refusal to the AUTHOR.
The AUTHOR affirms that the article is unpublished, that it has not been sent simultaneously to another publication medium and that the rights have not been transferred exclusively previously. He is responsible to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service for the authorship and originality of his work, as well as for all pecuniary charges that may arise for the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, in favor of third parties due to actions, claims or conflicts arising from the breach of obligations by the AUTHOR.
