Public relations and dissent: Anti-racism digital advocacy Portuguese case study
Article Sidebar
238)
Main Article Content
Authors
Abstract
282
Social media platforms are being used to shift the balance of power, functioning as tools of resistance for activist publics on social justice issues. This article uses a postmodern approach to public relations with the purpose of clarifying the role of dissensus in social media contexts, connecting it to the principles of the ethics of care that promote dialogue but not necessarily with the aim of achieving consensus. Scholars and practitioners can claim a broader role for public relations in society by considering and analyzing conflicting perspectives in digital communication as a way to engage with activist struggles in social justice and human rights causes. By applying critical discourse analysis (CDA) to a case study that articulates interdisciplinary concepts, this research analyzes the first national weekly Portuguese newspaper Expresso support for the anti-racist cause through its promotion of a manifesto and a Facebook post against racist intimidation. In a contemporary society characterized by fragmentation, taking a public stance on important social and political issues, as in the case analyzed, demands moving beyond consensus-driven communication. The data confirm that social media platforms are not necessarily dialogic spaces and that conflicting communicative perspectives may be a useful way to analyze social change in public relations theory and practice. By taking a public stand against racist intimidation, assuming the possible alienation of specific publics –and “Facebook bullying”– this private newspaper also demonstrated the practical application of the assumptions of the ethics of care.
Keywords
References
Araújo, M. & Rodríguez M. S. (2012). History textbooks, racism and the critique of Eurocentrism: beyond rectification or compensation. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 35(7), 1266-1286. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2011.600767
Berger, B. K. & Reber, B. H. (2013). Power and influence in public relations. In K. Sriramesh, A. Zerfass & J. N. Kim (Eds.), Public relations and communication management: current trends and emerging topics (pp. 178-192). London: Routledge.
Bortree, D. S. & Seltzer, T. (2009). Dialogic strategies and outcomes: an analysis of environmental advocacy groups’ Facebook profiles. Public Relations Review, 35(3), 317-319. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.05.002
Bowen, S. A. & Stacks, D. W. (2014). Understanding the ethical and research implications of social media. In M. W. DiStaso & D. S. Bortree (Eds.), Ethical practice of social media in public relations (pp. 217–234). New York: Routledge.
Burkhart, R. (2007). On Jürgen Habermas and public relations. Public Relations Review, 33(3), 249-254. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2007.05.002
Câncio, F. (2017). Persiste nos manuais a narrativa de que fomos bons colonizadores, in Diário de Notícias (online Editions, 01 Maio 2017-00:37). Retrieved from https://www.dn.pt/sociedade/persiste-nos-manuais-a-narrativa-de-que-fomos-bons-colonizadores-6257731.html
Carim, L. & Warwick, C. (2013). Use of social media for corporate communications by research-funding organisations in the UK. Public Relations Review, 39(5), 521-525. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2013.08.006
Chouliaraki, L. & Fairclough, N. (1999). Discourse in late modernity: rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Ciszek, E. L. (2016). Digital activism: how social media and dissensus inform theory and practice. Public Relations Review, 42(2), 314-321. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2016.02.002
Ciszek, E. & Logan, N. (2018). Challenging the dialogic promise: how Ben & Jerry’s support for Black Lives Matter fosters dissensus on social media. Journal of Public Relations Research, 30(3), 115–127. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2018.1498342
Coombs, W. T. & Holladay, S. J. (2012a). Fringe public relations: how activism moves critical PR toward the mainstream. Public Relations Review, 38(5), 880-887. https://www.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.02.008
Coombs, W. T. & Holladay, S. J. (2012b). Privileging an activist vs. a corporate view of public relations history in the US. Public Relations Review, 38(3), 347-353. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.11.010
Curtin, P. A. & Gaither, T. K. (2007). International public relations: negotiating culture, identity, and power. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Davidson, S. (2016). Public relations theory: an agonistic critique of the turns to dialogue and symmetry. Public Relations Inquiry, 5(2), 145–167. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/2046147X16649007
Davis, A. (2002). Public relations democracy: public relations, politics and the mass media in Britain. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Dutta, M. J. (2019). Epilogue. In M. J. Dutta & D. B. Zapata (Eds.), Communicating for social change: meaning, power, and resistance (pp. 409–410). Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.
Edgett, R. (2002). Toward an ethical framework for advocacy in public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 14(1), 1-26. https://www.doi.org/10.1207/S1532754XJPRR1401_1
Edwards, L. (2006). Rethinking power in public relations. Public Relations Review, 32(3), 229-231. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2006.05.013
Edwards, L. (2015). Power diversity and public relations. New York: Routledge.
Fairclough, N. (2001). Critical discourse analysis as a method in social scientific research. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods in critical discourse analysis (pp. 121-138). London: Sage.
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge. Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977. New York: Pantheon.
Franco, H., Gomes, H., Gonçalves, M. & Gustavo, R. (2020, August 15). “Parada Ku Klux Klan” foi vigiada, mas à distância. Jornal Expresso. Retrieved from https://expresso.pt/sociedade/2020-08-15-Parada-Ku-Klux-Klan-em-frente-ao-SOS-Racismo-foi-vigiada-mas-a-distancia
Ganesh, S. & Zoller, H. M. (2012). Dialogue, activism, and democratic social change. Communication Theory, 22(1), 66-91. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2011.01396.x
Gillies, V. & Alldred, P. (2012). The ethics of intention: research as a political tool. In T. Miller, M. Birch, M. Mauthner & J. Jessop (Eds.), Ethics in qualitative research (2nd Ed., pp. 43-60). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Boston: Harvard University Press.
Graça, F. V. S. (2017). A política e os media: o enviesamento da imprensa portuguesa em 2009 e 2015. Lisboa: ISCTE-IUL. Dissertação de mestrado. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10071/14833
Grunig, J. E. (Ed.) (1992). Excellence in public relations and communication management. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Harré, R. & van Langenhove, L. (1999). The dynamics of social episodes. In R. T. Harré & L. van Langenhove (Eds.), Positioning theory: moral contexts of intentional action (pp. 1-13). Oxford: Blackwell.
Hatch, M. J. (2006). Organization theory: modern, symbolic, and postmodern perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press.
Held, V. (2006). The ethics of care: personal, political, and global. New York: Oxford University Press.
Henderson, A. (2005). Activism in “Paradise”: identity management in a public relations campaign against genetic engineering. Journal of Public Relations Research, 17(2), 117-137. https://www.doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr1702_4
Henriques, J. G. (2018). Racismo no País dos Brancos Costumes. Lisboa: Tinta da China.
Henriques, J. G. & Fernandes, R. C. (2020, August 10). SOS Racismo faz queixa a Ministério Público por ameaças e “parada Ku Klux Klan” em frente à sede. Jornal Público. Retrieved from https://www.publico.pt/2020/08/10/sociedade/noticia/sos-racismo-faz-queixa-ministerio-publico-ameacas-parada-ku-klux-klan-frente-sede-1927650
Holtzhausen, D. R. (2000). Postmodern values in public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 12(1), 93-114. https://www.doi.org/10.1207/S1532754XJPRR1201_6
Holtzhausen, D. R. (2012). Public relations as activism: postmodern approaches to theory & practice. New York: Routledge.
Holtzhausen, D. R. & Voto, R. (2002). Resistance from the margins: the postmodern public relations practitioner as organizational activist. Journal of Public Relations Research, 14(1), 57-84. https://www.doi.org/10.1207/S1532754XJPRR1401_3
Hydock, C., Paharia, N. & Weber, T. J. (2019). The consumer response to corporate political advocacy: a review and future directions. Customer Needs and Solutions, 6, 76–83. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s40547-019-00098-x
James, M. (2011). A provisional conceptual framework for intentional positioning in public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 23(1), 93-118. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2010.505120
James, M. (2014). Positioning theory and strategic communications: a new approach to public relations research and practice. London: Routledge.
Kennedy, A. K. & Sommerfeldt, E. J. (2015). A postmodern turn for social media research: theory and research directions for public relations scholarship. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 23(1), 31-45. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2015.972406
Kent, M. L. & Lane, A. B. (2017). A rhizomatous metaphor for dialogic theory. Public Relations Review, 43(3), 568-578. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.02.017
Kent, M. L. & Taylor, M. (1998). Building dialogic relationships through the world wide web. Public Relations Review, 24(3), 321-334. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(99)80143-X
Kent, M. L. & Taylor, M. (2002). Toward a dialogic theory of public relations. Public Relations Review, 28(1), 21-37. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(02)00108-X
Kent, M. L. & Taylor, M. (2018). Understanding the rhetoric of dialogue and the dialogue of rhetoric. In O. Ihlen & R. L. Heath (Eds.), The handbook of organizational rhetoric and communication (pp. 315-327). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Kent, M. L. & Theunissen, P. (2016). Elegy for mediated dialogue: Shiva the destroyer and reclaiming our first principles. International Journal of Communication, 10, 4040-4054. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10292/12385
Kwan, G. C. E. & Skoric, M. M. (2013). Facebook bullying: an extension of battles in school. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 16-25. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.014
Lages, M., Policarpo, V., Marques, J., Matos, P. & António, J. (2006). Os Imigrantes e a População Portuguesa Imagens Recíprocas: Análise de duas sondagens. Observatório da Imigração, 21, Alto Comissariado para a Imigração e Minorias Étnicas (ACIME). Retrieved from https://www.om.acm.gov.pt/documents/58428/177157/Estudo_OI_21.pdf/4faf3dc9-6531-4849-b1f0-bddb1bfe3566
Lane, A. (2014). Toward understanding the (lack of?) significance of dialogue to the practice of public relations. Asia Pacific Public Relations Journal, 15(1), 123-142. Retrieved from https://novaojs.newcastle.edu.au/apprj/index.php/apprj/article/view/47
L’Etang, J. (2009). Radical PR – catalyst for change or an aporia? Ethical Space: The International Journal of Communication Ethics, 6(2), 13-18. Retrieved from http://www.communicationethics.net/journal/v6n2/v6n2_feat1.pdf
Lindberg, S. I. (2021). Democracy Report 2021 - Autocratization. Turns Viral, V-Dem Institute at the University of Gothenburg. Retrieved from https://www.v-dem.net/static/website/files/dr/dr_2021.pdf
Luka, M. E. & Millette, M. (2018). (Re)framing Big Data: activating situated knowledges and a feminist ethics of care in social media research. Social Media + Society, 4(2), 1-10. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/2056305118768297
Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The postmodern condition: a report on knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Madden, S., Brown, K. & Xu, S. (2019). Empowering the future practitioner: postmodernism in the undergraduate public relations classroom. Journal of Public Relations Education, 5(2), 105-131. Retrieved from https://aejmc.us/jpre/wp-content/uploads/sites/25/2019/08/MADDEN-BROWN-XU-2019-JPRE-52.pdf
Malheiros, J. M. & Mendes, M. (Coords.) (2007). Espaços e Expressões de Conflito e Tensão entre Autóctones, Minorias Migrantes e Não Migrantes na Área Metropolitana de Lisboa. Observatório da Imigração, 22, Alto Comissariado para a Imigração e Minorias Étnicas (ACIME). Retrieved from https://www.om.acm.gov.pt/documents/58428/177157/Estudo_OI_22.pdf/d0039e2d-722e-4eef-bb9e-4bd3cb3068b0
McAllister-Spooner, S. M. (2009). Fulfilling the dialogic promise: a ten-year reflective survey on dialogic Internet principles. Public Relations Review, 35(3), 320-322. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.03.008
Mickey, T. J. (1995). Sociodrama: an interpretive theory for the practice of public relations. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
Mickey, T. J. (1997). A postmodern view of public relations: sign and reality. Public Relations Review, 23(3), 271-284. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(97)90036-9
Moghaddam, F. & Harré, R. (2010). Words of conflict, words of war: how the language we use in political processes sparks fighting. Santa Barbara, CA: Prager.
Moloney, K. & McGrath, C. (2020). Rethinking public relations: persuasion, democracy and society (3rd Ed.). New York: Routledge.
Motion, J. & Weaver, C. K. (2005). A discourse perspective for critical public relations research: life sciences network and the battle for truth. Journal of Public Relations Research, 17(1), 49-67. https://www.doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr1701_5
Mouffe, C. (1998). The radical centre: a politics without adversary. Soundings, 9, 11–23. Retrieved from http://banmarchive.org.uk/collections/soundings/09_11.pdf
Okano, Y. (2016). Why has the ethics of care become an issue of global concern? International Journal of Japanese Sociology, 25(1), 85-99. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/ijjs.12048
Ortega-Sánchez, D., Blanch, J. P., Quintana, J. I., Cal, E. S. de la & de la Fuente-Anuncibay, R. (2021). Hate Speech, Emotions, and Gender Identities: A Study of Social Narratives on Twitter with Trainee Teachers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(8), 4055. MDPI AG. https://www.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18084055
Pieczka, M. (1997). Understanding in public relations. [An earlier version of this article was presented at the International Public Relations Symposium (2nd: 1995: Lake Bled, Slovenia)]. Australian Journal of Communication, 24(2), 65-79. Retrieved from https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/ielapa.980504627
Pinto, A. C. (2020). Chega alastra no Youtube. Discurso de Ventura visto 361 mil vezes, Costa só 9 mil, Jornal Expresso (April 11, 2020). Retrieved from https://expresso.pt/politica/2019-11-04-Chega-alastra-no-Youtube.-Discurso-de-Ventura-visto-361-mil-vezes-Costa-so-9-mil
Radford, G. P. (2012). Public relations in a postmodern world. Public Relations Inquiry, 1(1), 49-67. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/2046147X11422143
Rosário, E., Santos, T. & Lima, S. (2011). Discursos do racismo em Portugal: Essencialismo e inferiorização nas trocas coloquiais sobre categorias minoritárias. Observatório da Imigração, 44, Alto Comissariado para a Imigração e Diálogo Intercultural (ACIDI). Retrieved from https://www.om.acm.gov.pt/documents/58428/177157/Estudo44_WEBfin.pdf/f0cf5991-f39c-45ed-aeaa-bd9ea8862898
Sandle, P. & Heinrich, M. (2018). Web creator Berners-Lee launches contract for better internet. London Reuters, November 5, 2018, 6:53 PM. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-portugal-websummit-berners-lee-idUSKCN1NA2CX
Senar, J. C. (1990). Agonistic communication in social species. What is communicated? Behaviour, 112(3-4), 270-283. https://www.doi.org/10.1163/156853990X00239
Tao, W. & Kimb, S. (2017). Application of two under-researched typologies in crisis communication: Ethics of justice vs. care and public relations vs. legal strategies. Public Relations Review, 43(4), 690-699. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.06.003
Tronto, J. C. (1993). Moral boundaries: a political argument for an ethic of care. London: Routledge.
Vala, J., Brito R. & Lopes, D. (2015). Expressões dos racismos em Portugal (2nd Ed.) (online). Lisboa: Imprensa de Ciências Sociais.
Veil, S. R., Reno, J., Freihaut, R. & Oldham, J. (2015). Online activists vs. Kraft foods: a case of social media hijacking. Public Relations Review, 41(1), 103-108. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.11.017
Vrysis, L., Vryzas, N., Kotsakis, R., Saridou, T., Matsiola, M., Veglis, A., Arcila-Calderón, C. & Dimoulas, C. (2021). A Web Interface for Analyzing Hate Speech. Future Internet 2021, 13, 80. https://www.doi.org/10.3390/fi13030080
Wettstein, F. & Baur, D. (2016). Why should we care about marriage equality?: political advocacy as a part of corporate responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 138(2), 199-213. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/24755864
Wodak, R., De Cillia, R., Reisigl, M. & Liebhart, K. (2009). The discursive construction of national identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Yang, A. & Kent, M. (2014). Social media and organizational visibility: a sample of Fortune 500 corporations. Public Relations Review, 40(3), 562-564. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.04.006
Other sources
European Social Survey (2018) - ESS9. Retrieved from https://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/data/download.html?r=9
European Committee Report 2018 for the Prevention of Torture and Inhumane or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT). Retrieved from https://rm.coe.int/168078e1c8
Marktest (2019). Os Portugueses e as Redes Sociais. Retrieved from https://www.marktest.com/wap/private/images/Logos/Folheto_Portugueses_Redes_Sociais_2019.pdf
Metrics
|
|
Details
Article Details
RIGHTS TRANSFER
By submitting the article for evaluation and subsequent publication in Communicaton & Society, the AUTHOR grants exclusive economic and/or exploitation rights: reproduction, distribution, public communication, transformation/translation/creation of derivative works, and commercialisation to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, for the maximum legal period in force -the author's lifetime and seventy years after his or her death or declaration of death-, in any country, and in any of the current and future publishing modalities, both in print and electronic versions.
In the event that the article is not accepted for publication , this transfer of rights lapses with the communication of the refusal to the AUTHOR.
The AUTHOR affirms that the article is unpublished, that it has not been sent simultaneously to another publication medium and that the rights have not been transferred exclusively previously. He is responsible to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service for the authorship and originality of his work, as well as for all pecuniary charges that may arise for the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, in favor of third parties due to actions, claims or conflicts arising from the breach of obligations by the AUTHOR.
