Fact-checkers on social networks: analysis of their presence and content distribution channels
Main Article Content
Abstract
Fact-checking is a thriving journalistic discipline that, in recent years, has gained great prominence as a tool in combating disinformation. The effectiveness of the work carried out by these journalistic initiatives depends not only on the quality of their content, but also on their ability to reach large audiences through the same channels by which disinformation spreads. In this context, we consider it important to know to what extent fact-checkers use social networks and other types of digital channels in order to deliver their fact-checks to a wide audience, whether there are differences between the practices developed by these actors according to the type of organisation to which they belong and whether there is a distinguishing element in this regard for Ibero-American fact-checkers. This article focuses on analysing the presence on social networks and the use of content distribution tools by 104 fact-checkers from all over the world pertaining to the International Fact-Checking Network in 2020. The results show significant differences in terms of network presence based on the type of entity to which fact-checkers belong, the independent fact-checkers being the ones using a wider variety of distribution channels. It has also been confirmed that Ibero-American fact-checkers have a greater presence on social networks, use more digital tools and provide more channels to share their content than the rest of the international sample.
Keywords
References
Amorós, M. (2018). Fake News. La verdad de las noticias falsas. Barcelona: Plataforma Editorial.
Andı, S. (2021). How and Why do Consumers Access News on Social Media? In N. Newman, R. Fletcher, A. Schultz, S. Andı, C. T. Robertson & R. K. Nielsen (Eds.), Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2021. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. Retrieved from https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2020-06/DNR_2020_FINAL.pdf
Ardèvol-Abreu, A., Delponti, P. & Rodríguez-Wangüemert, C. (2020). Intentional or inadvertent fake news sharing? Fact-checking warnings and users’ interaction with social media content. El profesional de la información (EPI), 29(5). https://www.doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.sep.07
Barrera, O., Guriev, S., Henry, E. & Zhuravskaya, E. (2020). Facts, alternative facts, and fact checking in times of post-truth politics. Journal of Public Economics, 182. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2019.104123
Bechmann, A. (2020). Tackling Disinformation and Infodemics Demands Media Policy Changes. Digital Journalism, 8(6), 855-863. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.1773887
Bradshaw, S., Bailey, H. & Howard, P. N. (2021). Industralized Disinformation: 2020 Global Inventory of Organized Social Media Manipulation. (Project on Computational Propaganda). Oxford Internet Institute.
Brandtzaeg, P. B., Følstad, A. & Chaparro Domínguez, M. Á. (2018). How Journalists and Social Media Users Perceive Online Fact-Checking and Verification Services. Journalism Practice, 12(9), 1109-1129. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2017.1363657
Brennen, J. S., Simon, F., Howard, P. N. & Nielsen, R. K. (2020). Types, sources, and claims of COVID-19 misinformation. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. Retrieved from https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/types-sources-and-claims-covid-19-misinformation
Buchanan, T. (2020). Why do people spread false information online? The effects of message and viewer characteristics on self-reported likelihood of sharing social media disinformation. PLoS ONE, 15(10 October). https://www.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239666
Calvo, E. & Aruguete, N. (2021). Chequeado en Argentina. Fact checking y la propagación de noticias falsas en las redes sociales. Chequeado and University of Maryland. Retrieved from https://chequeado.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Chequeado-en-Argentina.-Fact-checking-y-la-propagacion-de-noticias-falsas-en-redes-sociales.pdf
Costera Meijer, I. (2020). Understanding the Audience Turn in Journalism: From Quality Discourse to Innovation Discourse as Anchoring Practices 1995-2020. Journalism Studies, 21(16), 2326-2342. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1847681
Cueva Chacón, L. M. & Saldaña, M. (2021). Stronger and Safer Together: Motivations for and Challenges of (Trans)National Collaboration in Investigative Reporting in Latin America. Digital Journalism, 9(2), 196-214. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.1775103
Dafonte-Gómez, A., Corbacho-Valencia, J. M. & García-Mirón, S. (2021). El fact-checking en Iberoamérica: evolución reciente y mapa de situación. In J. Sotelo González & J. González García (Eds.), Digital Media. El papel de las redes sociales en el ecosistema educomunicativo en tiempo de COVID-19 (pp. 877-889). Madrid: McGraw-Hill. https://www.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.14185283
Dafonte-Gómez, A., Míguez-González, M.-I. & Martínez-Rolán, X. (2022). Los fact-checkers iberoamericanos frente a la COVID-19. Análisis de actividad en Facebook. Observatorio (OBS*), 16(1), 160-182. https://www.doi.org/10.15847/obsOBS16120221823
Díaz-Campo, J., Segado-Boj, F. & Fernández-Gómez, E. (2021). Hábitos del usuario y tipo de red social como predictores de consumo y difusión de noticias. Profesional de la Información, 30(4). https://www.doi.org/10.3145/epi.2021.jul.17
Ecker, U. K. H., Butler, L. H. & Hamby, A. (2020). You don’t have to tell a story! A registered report testing the effectiveness of narrative versus non-narrative misinformation corrections. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 5(1). https://www.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-020-00266-x
Edgerly, S., Mourão, R. R., Thorson, E. & Tham, S. M. (2020). When Do Audiences Verify? How Perceptions About Message and Source Influence Audience Verification of News Headlines. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 97(1), 52-71. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1077699019864680
Elizabeth, J. (2014, May 20). Who are you calling a fact checker? American Press Institute. Retrieved from https://www.americanpressinstitute.org/fact-checking-project/fact-checker-definition/
European Commission (2018). A multi-dimensional approach to disinformation. Report of the High-Level Group on fake news and online disinformation. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/document.cfm?doc_id=50271
Festinger, L. (1962). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Graves, L. (2016). Deciding What’s True: The Rise of Political Fact-Checking in American Journalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
Graves, L. & Cherubini, F. (2016). The Rise of Fact-Checking Sites in Europe. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. Retrieved from https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/our-research/rise-fact-checking-sites-europe
Guallar, J., Codina, L., Freixa, P. & Pérez-Montoro, M. (2020). Desinformación, bulos, curación y verificación. Revisión de estudios en Iberoamérica 2017-2020. Telos: revista de Estudios Interdisciplinarios en Ciencias Sociales, 22(3), 595-613. https://www.doi.org/10.36390/telos223.09
Guess, A. M., Nyhan, B. & Reifler, J. (2020). Exposure to untrustworthy websites in the 2016 US election. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(5), 472-480. https://www.doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0833-x
Haigh, M., Haigh, T. & Kozak, N. I. (2018). Stopping Fake News: The work practices of peer-to-peer counter propaganda. Journalism Studies, 19(14), 2062-2087. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2017.1316681
Hameleers, M. (2019). Susceptibility to mis- and disinformation and the effectiveness of fact-checkers: Can misinformation be effectively combated? SCM Studies in Communication and Media, 8(4), 523-546. https://www.doi.org/10.5771/2192-4007-2019-4-523
Humprecht, E. (2020). How Do They Debunk “Fake News”? A Cross-National Comparison of Transparency in Fact Checks. Digital Journalism, 8(3), 310-327. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1691031
Kuklinski, J. H. & Quirk, P. J. (2000). Reconsidering the Rational Public: Cognition, Heuristics, and Mass Opinion. In A. Lupia, M. D. McCubbins & S. L. E. Popkin (Eds.), Elements of Reason: Cognition, Choice, and the Bounds of Rationality (pp. 153-182). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://www.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805813.008
Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., Seifert, C. M., Schwarz, N. & Cook, J. (2012). Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(3), 106-131. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1529100612451018
Margolin, D. B., Hannak, A. & Weber, I. (2018). Political Fact-Checking on Twitter: When Do Corrections Have an Effect? Political Communication, 35(2), 196-219. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2017.1334018
Mena, P. (2020). Cleaning Up Social Media: The Effect of Warning Labels on Likelihood of Sharing False News on Facebook. Policy and Internet, 12(2), 165-183. https://www.doi.org/10.1002/poi3.214
Mesquita, L. & de-Lima-Santos, M.-F. (2021). Collaborative Journalism from a Latin American Perspective: An Empirical Analysis. Journalism and Media, 2(4), 545-571. https://www.doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia2040033
Mioli, T. & Nafría, I. (2017). Periodismo innovador en América Latina. Knight Center for Journalism in the Americas at the University of Texas at Austin. Retrieved from https://journalismcourses.org/ebook/innovative-journalism-in-latin-america/
Mioli, T. & Nafría, I. (2018). Innovadores en el periodismo latinoamericano. Knight Center for Journalism in the Americas at the University of Texas at Austin. Retrieved from https://journalismcourses.org/ebook/innovators-in-latin-american-journalism/
Mitchelstein, E. & Boczkowski, P. J. (2021). What a Special Issue on Latin America Teaches Us about Some Key Limitations in the Field of Digital Journalism. Digital Journalism, 9(2), 130-135. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1873813
Molina-Cañabate, J. P. & Magallón-Rosa, R. (2021). Desinformación y fact-checking en las elecciones uruguayas de 2019. El caso de Verificado Uruguay. Perspectivas de la Comunicación, 14(1), 89-112.
Moreno-Espinosa, P. & Román-San-Miguel, A. (2021). Medios y comunicación en tiempos de posverdad. In R. Mancinas-Chávez & M. L. Cárdenas-Rica (Eds.), Las fake news en el periodismo audiovisual. El caso del podcasting y el vodcasting. Madrid: Fragua. Retrieved from https://idus.us.es/handle/11441/106475
Nekmat, E. (2020). Nudge Effect of Fact-Check Alerts: Source Influence and Media Skepticism on Sharing of News Misinformation in Social Media. Social Media and Society, 6(1). https://www.doi.org/10.1177/2056305119897322
Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Kalegeropoulos, A., Levy, D. A. L. & Nielsen, R. K. (2017). Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2017. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. Retrieved from https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/Digital-News-Report-2016.pdf
Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Kalogeropoulos, A. & Nielsen, R. K. (2019). Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2019. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. Retrieved from https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2019-06/DNR_2019_FINAL_1.pdf
Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Levy, D. A. L., Nielsen, R. K. & Kalogeropoulos, A. (2018). Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2018. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. Retrieved from http://media.digitalnewsreport.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/digital-news-report-2018.pdf
Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Schultz, A., Andı, S. & Nielsen, R. K. (2020). Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. Retrieved from https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2020-06/DNR_2020_FINAL.pdf
Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Schultz, A., Andı, S., Robertson, C. T. & Nielsen, R. K. (2021). Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2021. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. Retrieved from https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2020-06/DNR_2020_FINAL.pdf
Nyhan, B., Porter, E., Reifler, J. & Wood, T. J. (2020). Taking Fact-Checks Literally But Not Seriously? The Effects of Journalistic Fact-Checking on Factual Beliefs and Candidate Favorability. Political Behavior, 42(3), 939-960. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s11109-019-09528-x
Nyhan, B. & Reifler, J. (2010). When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions. Political Behavior, 32(2), 303-330. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s11109-010-9112-2
Nyhan, B. & Reifler, J. (2015). The Effect of Fact-Checking on Elites: A Field Experiment on U.S. State Legislators. American Journal of Political Science, 59(3), 628-640. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12162
Ramahí-García, D., García-Crespo, O. & Dafonte-Gómez, A. (2021). Los formatos audiovisuales en la verificación de datos. Análisis de la actividad de los fact-checkers en YouTube (2009-2020). AdComunica, 22, 73-96. https://www.doi.org/10.6035/2174-0992.2021.22.6
Robertson, C. T., Mourão, R. R. & Thorson, E. (2020). Who Uses Fact-Checking Sites? The Impact of Demographics, Political Antecedents, and Media Use on Fact-Checking Site Awareness, Attitudes, and Behavior. International Journal of Press/Politics, 25(2), 217-237. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1940161219898055
Rodríguez-Virgili, J., Serrano-Puche, J. & Fernández, C. B. (2021). Digital Disinformation and Preventive Actions: Perceptions of Users from Argentina, Chile, and Spain. Media and Communication, 9(1), 323-337. https://www.doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i1.3521
Salaverría, R., Sádaba, C., Breiner, J. G. & Warner, J. C. (2019). A brave new digital journalism in Latin America. Communication: Innovation & Quality. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, 154, 229-247. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91860-0_14
Schmitz Weiss, A., de Macedo Higgins Joyce, V., Harlow, S. & Alves, R. C. (2020). Defining Journalism Innovation in Latin America: Exploration into Perceptions among Educators, Students, and Journalists. Journalism and Mass Communication Educator, 75(4), 419-435. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1077695820935327
Stencel, M. & Luther, J. (2021a, June 3). Fact-checking census shows slower growth. Duke Reporters’ Lab. Retrieved from https://reporterslab.org/annual-census-finds-nearly-300-fact-checking-projects-around-the-world/
Stencel, M. & Luther, J. (2021b, June 22). Annual census finds nearly 300 fact-checking projects around the world. Duke Reporters’ Lab. Retrieved from https://reporterslab.org/annual-census-finds-nearly-300-fact-checking-projects-around-the-world/
Tandoc, E. C., Jr, Lim, D. & Ling, R. (2020). Diffusion of disinformation: How social media users respond to fake news and why. Journalism, 21(3), 381-398. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1464884919868325
The Long Fuse: Misinformation and the 2020 Election (2021). Center for an Informed Public, Digital Forensic Research Lab, Graphika, & Stanford Internet Observatory; Stanford Digital Repository: Election Integrity Partnership. v1.2.0. Retrieved from https://purl.stanford.edu/tr171zs0069
Valenzuela, S., Halpern, D., Katz, J. E. & Miranda, J. P. (2019). The Paradox of Participation Versus Misinformation: Social Media, Political Engagement, and the Spread of Misinformation. Digital Journalism, 7(6), 1-22 . https://www.doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1623701
Vázquez-Herrero, J., Vizoso, Á. & López-García, X. (2019). Innovación tecnológica y comunicativa para combatir la desinformación: 135 experiencias para un cambio de rumbo. El Profesional de la Información, 28(3). https://www.doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.may.01
Vizoso, Á. & Vázquez-Herrero, J. (2019). Fact-checking platforms in Spanish. Features, organisation and method. Communication & Society, 32(1), 127-143. https://www.doi.org/10.15581/003.32.1.127-143
Vosoughi, S., Roy, D. & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146-1151. https://www.doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9559
Walter, N., Cohen, J., Holbert, R. L. & Morag, Y. (2020). Fact-Checking: A Meta-Analysis of What Works and for Whom. Political Communication, 37(3), 350-375. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1668894
Wood, T. & Porter, E. (2019). The Elusive Backfire Effect: Mass Attitudes’ Steadfast Factual Adherence. Political Behavior, 41(1), 135-163. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s11109-018-9443-y
Young, D. G., Jamieson, K. H., Poulsen, S. & Goldring, A. (2018). Fact-Checking Effectiveness as a Function of Format and Tone: Evaluating FactCheck.org and FlackCheck.org. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 95(1), 49-75. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1077699017710453
Details
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
RIGHTS TRANSFER
By submitting the article for evaluation and subsequent publication in Communication & Society, the AUTHOR exclusively assigns the rights of public communication, reproduction, distribution and sale for commercial exploitation to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, for the maximum legal term in force -the entire life of the author and seventy years after his death or declaration of death-, in any country, and in any of the current and future edition modalities, both in print and electronic versions.
In the event that the article is not accepted for publication , this transfer of rights lapses with the communication of the refusal to the AUTHOR.
The AUTHOR affirms that the article is unpublished, that it has not been sent simultaneously to another publication medium and that the rights have not been transferred exclusively previously. He is responsible to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service for the authorship and originality of his work, as well as for all pecuniary charges that may arise for the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, in favor of third parties due to actions, claims or conflicts arising from the breach of obligations by the AUTHOR.