Theodora-A. Maniou e-mail(Login required) , Venetia Papa e-mail(Login required)

Main Article Content


Theodora-A. Maniou e-mail(Login required)
Venetia Papa e-mail(Login required)



This study explores the specific characteristics of science news stories posted on social media platforms during the first phase of the global pandemic crisis (the first semester of 2020). The focus of the study is to enhance our understanding of the selection criteria for science-related news content posted on social media platforms. Our approach takes into consideration the evolving technological environment of these platforms and the new relationships between media professionals and social media users. Our findings indicate that, under specific circumstances, scientific discoveries may be prioritized in the selection of news stories. We also suggest specific additions to the framework proposed by Harcup and O’Neil (2017), indicating that news stories during crisis situations are more internationally oriented, where audience proximity is created not around “nearby” events but those occurring in other countries around the world. In times of crisis, the main target of news stories is not simply to attract the audience’s interest with classic clickbait tactics but to respond to the immediate socio-political context in a meaningful way.


Science news, social media, news criteria, news characteristics, Covid-19


Ahuvia, A. (2008). Traditional, interpretive, and reception-based content analyses: Improving the ability of content analysis to address issues of pragmatic and theoretical concern. In R. P. Franzosi (Ed.), Content analysis (Volume 1): What is content analysis? Defining the methodological playing field (pp. 185-209). London, UK: Sage.

Al-Zaman, M. S. (2021). Social media and COVID-19 misinformation: How ignorant Facebook users are? Heliyon, 7(5), e07144.

Baek, K., Holton, A., Harp, D. & Yaschur, C. (2011). The links that bind: Uncovering novel motivations for linking on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2243-2248.

Cinelli, M., Quattrociocchi, W., Galeazzi, A., Valensise, C. M., Brugnoli, E., Schmidt, A. L., Zola, P., Zollo, F. & Scala, A. (2020). The covid-19 social media infodemic. arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.05004.

Cohen, E. L. (2002). Online journalism as market-driven journalism. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 46(4), 532-548.

Condor, S. & Gibson, S. (2007). 'Everybody's entitled to their own opinion': Ideological dilemmas of liberal individualism and active citizenship. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 17(2), 115-140.

Deuze, M. (2003). The web and its journalisms: Considering the consequences of different types of newsmedia online. New Media & Society, 5(2), 203-230. 10.1177/1461444803005002004

Ferrara, E. (2020). #covid-19 on Twitter: Bots, conspiracies, and social media activism. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.09531.

Gallotti, R., Valle, F., Castaldo, N., Sacco, P. & De Domenico, M. (2020). Assessing the risks of 'infodemics' in response to COVID-19 epidemics. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2004.03997.

Galtung, J. & Ruge, M. H. (1965). The structure of foreign news: The presentation of the Congo, Cuba and Cyprus crises in four Norwegian newspapers. Journal of Peace Research, 2(1), 64-90.

Grabe, M. E., Zhou, S. & Barnett, B. (2001). Explicating sensationalism in television news: Content and the bells and whistles of form. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 45(4), 635-655.

Hamilton, J. (2004). All the news that's fit to sell: How the market transforms information into news. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Hammad, M. A. & Alqarni, T. M. (2021). Psychosocial effects of social media on the Saudi society during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: A cross-sectional study. PLoS One, 16(3), e0248811.

Harcup, T. & O'Neill, D. (2001). What is news? Galtung and Ruge revisited. Journalism Studies, 2(2), 261-280.

Harcup, T. & O'Neill, D. (2017). What is news? News values revisited (again). Journalism Studies, 18(12), 1470-1488.

Islam, M. S., Sarkar, T., Khan, S. H., Kamal, A. H. M., Hasan, S. M. et al. (2020). COVID-19-related infodemic and its impact on public health: A global social media analysis. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 103(4), 1621-1629.

Kepplinger, H. M. & Ehmig, S. C. (2006). Predicting news decisions. An empirical test of the two-component theory of news selection. Communications, 31(1), 25-43.

Kim, L., Fast, S. M. & Markuzon, M. (2019). Incorporating media data into a model of infectious disease transmission. PloS One, 14(2) e0197646.

Lee, C. S. & Ma, L. (2012). News sharing in social media: The effect of gratifications and prior experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 331-339.

McGregor, J. (2002). Restating news values: Contemporary criteria for selecting the news. In M. Power (Ed.), Communication: Reconstructed for the 21st Century: Refereed Proceedings of the Australian and New Zealand Communication Association International Conference (pp. 1-7). Australian and New Zealand Communication Association (ANZCA).

McQuail, D. (1994). Mass communication theory. London: Sage.

Mendoza, M., Poblete, B. & Castillo, C. (2010). Twitter under crisis: Can we trust what we RT? In P. Melville, J. Leskovec & F. Provost (Eds.), Proceedings of the First Workshop on Social Media Analytics (pp. 71-79). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.

Newman, N. (2011). Mainstream media and the distribution of news in the age of social media. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. Oxford: University of Oxford.

O'Neill, D. & Harcup, T. (2020). News values and news selection. In K. Wahl-Jorgensen & T. Hanitzsch (Eds.), Handbook of journalism studies (2nd ed.) (pp. 213-228). New York: Routledge.

Papa, V. & Maniou, T.A. (2020). Recurrent narratives around the COVID-19 crisis in social networks: a case study analysis on Facebook. Tripodos, 2(47), 11-28.

Phillips, A. (2012). Sociability, speed and quality in the changing news environment. Journalism Practice, 6(5-6), 669-679.

Russell-Neuman, W., Guggenheim, L., Mo Jang, S. & Bae, S. Y. (2014). The dynamics of public attention: Agenda-setting theory meets big data. Journal of Communication, 64(2), 193-214.

Shifman, L., Coleman, S. & Ward, S. (2007). Only joking? Online humour in the 2005 UK general election. Information, Community and Society, 10(4), 465-487.

Shoemaker, P. J. & Vos, T. (2009). Gatekeeping theory. London: Routledge.

Starbird, K., Maddock, J., Orand, M., Achterman, P. & Mason, R. M. (2014). Rumors, false flags, and digital vigilantes: Misinformation on Twitter after the 2013 Boston marathon bombing (pp. 654-662). IConference 2014 Proceedings.

Tewksbury, D. (2003). What do Americans really want to know? Tracking the behavior of news readers on the Internet. Journal of Communication, 53(4), 694-710.

Thorson, E. (2008). Changing patterns of news consumption and participation: News recommendation engines. Information, Communication & Society, 11(4), 473-489.

Thurman, N. & Myllylahti, M. (2009). Taking the paper out of news: A case study of Taloussanomat, Europe's first online-only newspaper. Journalism Studies, 10(5), 691-708.

Tumber, H. (1999). News: A reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Villar-Rodríguez, G., Souto-Rico, M. & Martín, A. (2022). Virality, only the tip of the iceberg: ways of spread and interaction around COVID-19 misinformation in Twitter. Communication & Society, 35(2), 239-256.

WHO (2020). WHO Situation Report 13. Retrieved from . (Accessed: 2010-09-30).

Zarocostas, J. (2020). How to fight an infodemic. The Lancet, 395(10225), 676.


Search GoogleScholar


Article Details