Does TikTok allow quality debate? A case study on poverty
Article Sidebar
196)
Main Article Content
Authors
Abstract
320
This study analyses temporary employees’ perceptions and This article analyzes whether the features of TikTok allow for meaningful debates and how they are conducted. To do so, we used a case study approach: user conversations about socially excluded individuals in a context marked by the Covid-19 pandemic and subsequent economic crisis, which have exacerbated hardships in developing countries. A total of 100 videos published in Spain since 2020 on this topic, along with 38,462 comments, are examined. We performed a content analysis of the videos, considering their thematic, technical, and stylistic characteristics. Additionally, we conducted a textual analysis of the comments taking into account the authorial and conversational dimensions. The study concludes that the structure of TikTok does not enable high-quality debates in this case study. The videos provide an episodic view of the topics, and on average users participate only once expressing opinions based on personal experiences or existing biases. Moreover, the debate is muddled in this specific topic due to intergenerational conflicts. Judgmental attitudes lead to messages that are both cruel in the form of advice and expressions of humor. The analysis reveals a strong sentiment of aporophobia in the opinions expressed on this platform. Therefore, it is advisable to recommend the inclusion of this marginalized group among the protected groups in the community guidelines.
Keywords
References
Anderson, K. E. (2020). Getting acquainted with social networks and apps: It is time to talk about TikTok. Library Hi Tech News, 37(4), 7-12. https://www.doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-01-2020-0001
Basch, C. H., Yalamanchili, B. & Fera, J. (2021a). #Climate Change on TikTok: A Content Analysis of Videos. Journal of Community Health, 47, 163-167. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s10900-021-01031-x
Basch, C. H., Fera, J., Pierce I. & Basch, C. E. (2021b). Promoting Mask Use on TikTok: Descriptive, Cross-sectional Study. JMIR Public Health Surveillance, 7(2), e26392. https://www.doi.org/10.2196/26392
Bilewicz, M. & Soral, W. (2020). Hate Speech Epidemic. The Dynamic Effects of Derogatory Language on Intergroup Relations and Political Radicalization. Advances in Political Psychology, 41(1), 3-33. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/pops.12670
Bucknell Bossen, C. & Kottasz, R. (2020). Uses and gratifications sought by pre-adolescent and adolescent TikTok consumers. Young Consumers, 21(4), 463-478. https://www.doi.org/10.1108/YC-07-2020-1186
Cervi, L., Tejedor, S. & Marín Lladó, C. (2021). TikTok and the new language of political communication: the case of Podemos. Cultura, Lenguaje y Representación, 26, 267-287. https://www.doi.org/10.6035/clr.5817
Chen, Q., Chen, M., Zhang, W., Xiaoyue, M. & Evans, R. (2021). Factors Driving Citizen Engagement with Government TikTok Accounts During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Model Development and Analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(2), e21463. https://www.doi.org/10.2196/21463
Cortina, A. (2017). Aporofobia, el rechazo al pobre: un desafío para la democracia. Barcelona: Paidós.
Dobele, A., Lindgreen, A., Beverland, M., Vanhamme, J. & van Wijk, R. (2007). Why pass on viral messages? Because they connect emotionally. Business Horizons, 50(4), 291-304. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2007.01.004
Dobson, K. & Knezevic, I. (2017). 'Liking and Sharing' the stigmatization of poverty and social welfare: Representations of poverty and welfare through Internet memes on social media. tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique, 15(2), 777-795. https://www.doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v15i2.815
EAPN-ES. El estado de la pobreza. Seguimiento del indicador de pobreza y exclusión social en España 2008-2020 (11º Informe, 2021, Madrid). Retrieved from https://www.eapn.es/estadodepobreza/
Eurostat (2021). Living conditions in Europe - poverty and social exclusion (October 2021). Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Living_conditions_in_Europe_-_poverty_and_social_exclusion
Ganesh, B. (2020). Weaponizing white thymos: flows of rage in the online audiences of the alt-right. Cultural Studies, 34(6), 892-924. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2020.1714687
Gal, N. (2019). Ironic humor on social media as participatory boundary work. New Media & Society, 21(3), 729-749. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1461444818805719
Gamir-Ríos, J. & Sánchez-Castillo, S. (2022). La irrupción política del vídeo corto. ¿Es TikTok una nueva ventana para los partidos españoles? Communication & Society, 35(2), 37-52. https://www.doi.org/10.15581/003.35
Gómez-García, S., Paz-Rebollo, M. A. & Cabeza-San-Deogracias, J. (2021). Newsgames against hate speech in the refugee crisis. Comunicar, 67, 123-133. https://www.doi.org/10.3916/C67-2021-10 https://doi.org/10.3916/C67-2021-10
Grimmelmann, J. (2015). The Virtues of Moderation. The Yale Journal of Law & Technology, 17, 42-109.
Hautea, S., Parks, P., Takahashi, B. & Zeng, J. (2021). Showing They Care (Or Don't): Affective Publics and Ambivalent Climate Activism on TikTok. Social Media + Society. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/20563051211012344
Hootsuite (2022, March 9). 24 Important TikTok Stats Marketers Need to Know in 2022. Hootsuite. Retrieved from https://blog.hootsuite.com/tiktok-stats/
Informe Foessa (2019). Aporofobia. Nuevos conceptos para viejas realidades. Documento de Trabajo 5.2.
Iodice, R. & Papapicco, C. (2021). To be a TikToker in COVID-19 era: An experience of social influence. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 11(1). https://www.doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/9615
Kaye, D. B. V., Chen, X. & Zeng, J. (2020). The co-evolution of two Chinese mobile short video apps: Parallel platformization of Douyin and TikTok. Mobile Media & Communication, 9(2), 229-253. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/2050157920952120
Kennedy, M. (2020). If the rise of the TikTok dance and e-girl aesthetic has taught us anything, it's that teenage girls rule the internet right now: TikTok celebrity, girls and the Coronavirus crisis. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 23(6), 1069-1076. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1367549420945341
Kenski, K., Coe, K. & Rains, S. A. (2020). Perceptions of Uncivil Discourse Online: An Examination of Types and Predictors. Communication Research, 47(6), 795-814. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/00936502176999
Literat, I. & Kligler-Vilenchik, N. (2019). Youth collective political expression on social media: The role of affordances and memetic dimensions for voicing political views. New Media & Society, 21(9), 1988-2009. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1461444819837571
Medina Serrano, J. C., Papakyriakopoulos, O. & Hegelich, S. (2020). Dancing to the Partisan Beat: A First Analysis of Political Communication on TikTok. Southampton '20: 12th ACM Conference on Web Science. https://www.doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2004.05478 https://doi.org/10.1145/3394231.3397916
Ministerio del Interior (2021). Informe sobre la evolución de los delitos de odio en España. Ministerio del Interior. Retrieved from https://www.interior.gob.es/opencms/pdf/archivos-y-documentacion/documentacion-y-publicaciones/publicaciones-descargables/publicaciones-periodicas/informe-sobre-la-evolucion-de-los-delitos-de-odio-en-Espana/Informe_evolucion_delitos_odio_Espana_2021_126200207.pdf
Montag, C., Yang, H. & Elhai J. D. (2021). On the Psychology of TikTok Use: A First Glimpse from Empirical Findings. Frontiers in Public Health, 9. https://www.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.641673
O'Connor, C. (2021). Hatescape: An In-Depth Analysis of Extremism and Hate Speech on TikTok. Institute for Strategic Dialogue. Retrieved from https://www.isdglobal.org/isd-publications/hatescape-an-in-depth-analysis-of-extremism-and-hate-speech-on-tiktok/
Olivares-García, F. J. & Méndez-Majuelos, I. (2020). Análisis de las principales tendencias aparecidas en TikTok durante el periodo de cuarentena por la COVID-19. Revista Española de Comunicación en Salud, 243-252. https://www.doi.org/10.20318/recs.2020.5422
Omar, B. & Dequan, W. (2020). Watch, Share or Create: The Influence of Personality Traits and User Motivation on TikTok Mobile Video Usage. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 14(4), 121-137. https://www.doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v14i04.12429
Omnicore (2022, March 13). TikTok by the numbers: Stats, demographics & fun facts. Omnicore. Retrieved from https://www.omnicoreagency.com/tiktok-statistics/
Oksanen, A., Hawdo, J., Holkeri, E., Näsi, M. & Räsänen, P. (2014). Exposure to Online Hate among Young Social Media Users. Sociological Studies of Children and Youth, 18, 253-273. https://www.doi.org/10.1108/S1537-466120140000018021
Paz-Rebollo, M. A., Cáceres-Zapatero, M. D. & Martín-Sánchez, I. (2021). Suscripción a la prensa digital como contención a los discursos de odio. Profesional de la información, 30(6). https://www.doi.org/10.3145/epi.2021.nov.13
Paz-Rebollo, M. A., Mayagoitia-Soria, A. & González-Aguilar, J. M. (2021). From Polarization to Hate: Portrait of the Spanish Political Meme. Social Media + Society, 7(4). https://www.doi.org/10.1177/20563051211062920
Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective publics and structures of storytelling: Sentiment, events and mediality. Information, Communication & Society, 19(3), 307-324. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1109697
Roig, A. & Martorell, S. (2021). A fictional character in a real pandemic: humanization of the Covid-19 virus as a parody account on Twitter. Information, Communication & Society, 24(6), 886-902. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1909094
Schellewald, A. (2021). Communicative Forms on TikTok: Perspectives from Digital Ethnography. International Journal of Communication, 15, 1437-1457. Retrieved from https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/16414
Scherr, S. & Wang, K. (2021). Explaining the success of social media with gratification niches: Motivations behind daytime, nighttime, and active use of TikTok in China. Computers in Human Behavior, 124. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106893
TikTok (2022, February 8). Community Guidelines Enforcement Report. TikTok. Retrieved from https://www.tiktok.com/transparency/en/community-guidelines-enforcement-2021-3/
Weimann, G. & Masri, N. (2020). Research note: spreading hate on TikTok. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2020.1780027
Wang, Y. (2020). Humor and camera view on mobile short-form video apps influence user experience and technology-adoption intent, an example of TikTok (DouYin). Computers in Human Behavior, 110. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106373
Xiao, Y., Wang, L. & Wang, P. (2019). Research on the Influence of Content Features of Short Video Marketing on Consumer purchase intentions. 4th International Conference on Modern Management, Education Technology and Social Science, 351, 415-422. https://www.doi.org/10.2991/mmetss-19.2019.82
Yaqi, Z., Lee, Jong-Yoon, L. & Liu, S. (2021). Research on the Uses and Gratifications of Tiktok (Douyin short video). International Journal of Contents, 17(1), 37-53. https://www.doi.org/10.5392/IJoC.2021.17.1.037
Zhu, C., Xu, X., Zhang, W., Chen, J. & Evans, R. (2019). How Health Communication via TikTok Makes a Difference: A Content Analysis of TikTok Accounts Run by Chinese Provincial Health Committees. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(1), 192. https://www.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17010192
Zeng, J. & Abidin, C. (2021). '#OkBoomer, time to meet the Zoomers': studying the memefication of intergenerational politics on TikTok. Information, Communication & Society, 24(16), 2459-2481. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1961007
Zulli, D. & Zulli, D. J. (2020). Extending the Internet meme: Conceptualizing technological mimesis and imitation publics on the TikTok platform. New Media & Society. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1461444820983603
Metrics
|
|
Details
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
RIGHTS TRANSFER
By submitting the article for evaluation and subsequent publication in Communication & Society, the AUTHOR exclusively assigns the rights of public communication, reproduction, distribution and sale for commercial exploitation to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, for the maximum legal term in force -the entire life of the author and seventy years after his death or declaration of death-, in any country, and in any of the current and future edition modalities, both in print and electronic versions.
In the event that the article is not accepted for publication , this transfer of rights lapses with the communication of the refusal to the AUTHOR.
The AUTHOR affirms that the article is unpublished, that it has not been sent simultaneously to another publication medium and that the rights have not been transferred exclusively previously. He is responsible to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service for the authorship and originality of his work, as well as for all pecuniary charges that may arise for the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, in favor of third parties due to actions, claims or conflicts arising from the breach of obligations by the AUTHOR.
