Main Article Content
This research addresses the use of crowdfunding platforms for the development of video games in Spain. It is part of the group of platform-centred research in order to develop a quantitative analysis of the data contained in them. Specifically, the data provided by Kickstarter for Spanish video game development projects is analysed. Normality tests indicated that the variables do not follow a normal distribution, hence non-parametric tests were used. The success rate of Spanish campaigns is 28.4% for the total number of cases, 40.8% in 2020, which is a steady growth since 2015. The average funding is €16,586.76, €50,056.67 for successful campaigns; however, the median indicates that 50% of the sample does not exceed €1,653 in funding. Regression models are used to develop equations to calculate the amount of funding needed to publish on PC and console, and the number of backers needed to achieve a given amount of funding.
Agrawal, A., Catalini, C. & Goldfarb, A. (2015). Crowdfunding: Geography, Social Networks, and the Timing of Investment Decisions. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 24(2), 253-274. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/jems.12093
Aygoren, O. & Koch, S. (2021). Community Support or Funding Amount: Actual Contribution of Reward-Based Crowdfunding to Market Success of Video Game Projects on Kickstarter. Sustainability, 13, 9195. https://www.doi.org/ 10.3390/su13169195
Bielicki, M. & Rydzewski, R. (2022). How to create an engagement-friendly environment in reward-based crowdfunding? Central European Economic Journal, 9(56), 38-55. https://www.doi.org/10.2478/ceej-2022-0003
Bradford, C. (2012). Crowdfunding and the Federal Securities Laws. Columbia Business Law Review, 1, 1-150. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3kG3uHB
Cha, J. (2017). Crowdfunding for Video Games: Factors that Influence the Success of and Capital Pledged for Campaigns. International Journal on Media Management, 19(3), 240-259. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/14241277.2017.1331236
Chen, S., Thomas, S. & Kohli, C. (2016). What really makes a promotional campaign succeed on a crowdfunding platform?: Guilt, utilitarian products, emotional messaging, and fewer but meaningful rewards drive donations. Journal of Advertising Research, 56(1), 81-94. https://www.doi.org/10.2501/JAR-2016-002
Cordova, A., Dolci, J. & Gianfrate, G. (2015). The determinants of crowdfunding success: evidence from technology projects. Procedia, Social and Behavioral Sciences, 181, 115-124. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.872
Crogan, P. (2018). Indie dreams: Video games, creative economy, and the hyperindustrial epoch. Games and Culture, 13(7), 671-689. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1555412018756708
De Jong, J. (2013). Indie issues: The meaning of 'Indie' games and their incorporation into the 'Mainstream' game industry. Master Thesis, University of Amsterdam. UvA-DARE. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2YukaYu
DEV (2022). Libro blanco del desarrollo español de videojuegos 2021 [White paper]. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3l99nxc
Edmonson, S., Fisher, A., Brown, G., Irby, B., Lunenburg, F., Creighton, T., Czaja, M., Merchant, J., Christianson, J. & Christianson, J. (2001). Creating a Collaborative Culture. National Council of Professors of Educational Administration 55th Annual Summer Conference. Houston (Texas). Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3lwXfKq
Emihovich, C. & Battaglia, C. (2000). Creating cultures for collaborative inquiry: New challenges for school leaders. International journal of leadership in education, 3(3), 225-238. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603120050083918
Forbes (January 10, 2022). Take-Two Interactive To Acquire Zynga. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3mqgq5o
Fron J., Fullerton T., Morie J. F. & Pearce, C. (2007). The hegemony of play. Proceedings, DiGRA: Situated Play, 1-10. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3FlVIfB
Frydrych, D., Bock, A. J., Kinder, T. & Koeck, B. (2014). Exploring entrepreneurial legitimacy in reward-based crowdfunding. Venture capital, 16(3), 247-269. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691066.2014.916512
Gallemore, C., Nielsen, K. R. & Jespersen, K. (2019). The uneven geography of crowdfunding success: Spatial capital on Indiegogo. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 51(6), 1389-1406. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0308518X19843925
Gilbert, A. S. (2017). Crowdfunding Nostalgia: Kickstarter and the Revival of Classic PC Game Genres. The Computer Games Journal, 6(1), 17-32. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s40869-017-0031-x
Guillaud, R., Hänninen, R., Mariot, P. & Perret, E. (2013). Crowdfunding and the video-games industry. In M. Peltoniemi (Ed.), Industry Evolution, Empirical Studies on Discontinuities (pp. 99-118). Otaniemi: Aalto University.
Howe, J. (2008). Crowdsourcing: How the power of the crowd is driving the future of business. New York: Random House.
Junge, L. B., Laursen, I. C. & Nielsen, K. R. (2022). Choosing crowdfunding: Why do entrepreneurs choose to engage in crowdfunding? Technovation, 111, 1-10. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102385
Kraus, S., Richter, C., Brem, A., Cheng, C. F. & Chang, M. L. (2016). Strategies for reward-based crowdfunding campaigns. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 1(1), 13-23. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2016.01.010
Kunz, M. M., Bretschneider, U., Erler, M. & Leimeister, J. M. (2017). An empirical investigation of signaling in reward-based crowdfunding. Electronic Commerce Research, 17, 425-461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-016-9249-0
Kuppuswamy, V. & Bayus, B. L. (2018). Crowdfunding Creative Ideas: The Dynamics of Project Backers. In D. Cumming & L. Hornuf (Eds.), The Economics of Crowdfunding (pp. 151-182). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66119-3_8
Lipkin, N. (2013). Examining Indie's independence: The meaning of "indie" games, the politics of production, and mainstream co-optation. Loading, 7(11), 8-24. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/39tcOfG
Malone, T., Laubacher R. & Dellarocas, C. (2009): Harnessing Crowds: Mapping the Genome of Collective Intelligence. Cambridge: MIT Center for Collective Intelligence Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/42tYWJn https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1381502
Martín-Sánchez, M. A. & López-Meneses, E. (2012). Information society and teacher training. e-activities and collaborative learning. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 15(1), 15-35. https://www.doi.org/10.5944/ried.1.15.775
Microsoft News Center (January 18, 2022). Microsoft to acquire Activision Blizzard to bring the joy and community of gaming to everyone, across every device. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3Q2jJgR
Mollick, E. (2014). The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study. Journal of business venturing, 29(1), 1-16. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.06.005
Nucciarelli, A., Li, F., Fernandes, K. J., Goumagias, N., Cabras, I., Devlin, S., Kudenko, D. & Cowling, P. (2017). From value chains to technological platforms: The effects of crowdfunding in the digital game industry. Journal of Business Research, 78, 341-352. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.12.030
Paykacheva, V. (2014). Crowdfunding as a customer engagement channel. Doctoral dissertation, Kajaani University of Applied Sciences. Theseus. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3w3mEfT
Pérez, Ó. (2016). Indie or Mainstream? Tensions and Nuances between the Alternative and the Mainstream in Indie Games. Anàlisi Quaderns de Comunicació i Cultura, 54, 15-30. https://www.doi.org/10.7238/a.v0i54.2818
Planells, A. J. (2015). Video games and the crowdfunding ideology: From the gamer-buyer to the prosumer-investor. Journal of Consumer Culture, 17(3), 620-638. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1469540515611200
Rayna, T. & Striukova, L. (2014). 'Few to Many': Change of Business Model Paradigm in the Video Game Industry. Digiworld Economic Journal, 94, 61-82. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/38TkR5p
Rodríguez-Magda, R. M. (2004). Transmodernidad. Barcelona: Anthropos.
Sánchez-González, M. & Palomo-Torres, M. B. (2014). Knowledge and Assessment of Crowdfunding in Communication: The View of Journalists and Future Journalists. Comunicar, 43, 101-110. https://www.doi.org/10.3916/C43-2014-10
Sawhney, M., Verona, G. & Prandelli, E. (2005). Collaborating to create: The internet as a platform for customer engagement in product innovation. Journal of interactive marketing, 19(4), 4-17. https://www.doi.org/10.1002/dir.20046
Simon, B. (2013). Indie Eh? Some Kind of Game Studies. Loading, 7(11), 1-7. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3P1qheS
Smith, A. N. (2015). The backer-developer connection: Exploring crowdfunding's influence on video game production. New Media & Society, 17(2), 198-214. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814558910
Stasik, A. & Wilczyńska, E. (2018). How do we study crowdfunding? An overview of methods and introduction to new research agenda. Journal of Management and Business Administration, 26(1), 49-78. https://www.doi.org/10.7206/jmba.ce.2450-7814.219
Von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing innovation: The evolving phenomenon of user innovation. Journal für Betriebswirtschaft, 55, 63-78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-004-0002-8
Whitla, P. (2009). Crowdsourcing and Its Application in Marketing Activities. Contemporary Management Research, 5(1), 15-28. https://www.doi.org/10.7903/cmr.1145
Wulandari, Y. Y. & Arif, L. (2021). Strategy for empowering micro businesses during the COVID-19 pandemic in Surabaya City. DiA: Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 19(2), 81-99.
Zhang, H. & Chen, W. (2019). Crowdfunding technological innovations: Interaction between consumer benefits and rewards. Technovation, 84, 11-20. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2018.05.001
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
By submitting the article for evaluation and subsequent publication in Communication & Society, the AUTHOR exclusively assigns the rights of public communication, reproduction, distribution and sale for commercial exploitation to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, for the maximum legal term in force -the entire life of the author and seventy years after his death or declaration of death-, in any country, and in any of the current and future edition modalities, both in print and electronic versions.
In the event that the article is not accepted for publication , this transfer of rights lapses with the communication of the refusal to the AUTHOR.
The AUTHOR affirms that the article is unpublished, that it has not been sent simultaneously to another publication medium and that the rights have not been transferred exclusively previously. He is responsible to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service for the authorship and originality of his work, as well as for all pecuniary charges that may arise for the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, in favor of third parties due to actions, claims or conflicts arising from the breach of obligations by the AUTHOR.