Francisco Jiménez-Alcarria e-mail(Login required) , Jorge Tuñón-Navarro e-mail(Login required)

Main Article Content


Francisco Jiménez-Alcarria e-mail(Login required)
Jorge Tuñón-Navarro e-mail(Login required)



If in recent years the European Union (EU) has had to face complex and multifactorial “poly-crises” (such as Brexit, refugees or the euro), the pandemic caused by COVID-19 has been an unprecedented event on a global scale with important implications at all levels. Indeed, it has reinforced public health issues aimed at protecting the population as nodal elements of the policies implemented by this organization. This research aims to analyze the different organizational communication strategies on Twitter implemented by the main EU institutions during the COVID-19 vaccination campaign, in order to examine the presence of this exceptional milestone. This study has been carried out using an eminently quantitative methodology, based on a content analysis to quantify the different variables and indicators established for the publications of the official profiles of the European Commission, the European Parliament and the European Council. The proposed categories focus on exploring their predominant thematic areas, as well as main purposes/attributed functions. In the light of the results obtained, it is concluded that the vaccination campaign is a milestone with a considerable volume of publications by all profiles. However, among the attributed functions, the distribution of aseptic information has been predominant, which is why it is discussed whether these institutions have sufficiently taken advantage of the possibilities offered by the digital environment of Twitter for the dissemination of the European message.


European communication, organizational communication, EU, Twitter, social networks, COVID-19


Andrade, H. (2005). Comunicación organizacional interna: proceso, disciplina y técnica. Madrid: Netbiblo.

Andre, F. E., Booy, R., Bock, H. L., Clemens, J., Datta, S. K., John, T. J., Lee, B. W., Lolekha, S., Peltola, H., Ruff, T. A., Santosham, M. & Schmitt, H. J. (2018). Vaccination greatly reduces disease, disability, death, and inequity worldwide. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 86, 140-146.

Antonini, M., Eid, M. A., Falkenbach, M., Rosenbluth, S. T., Prieto, P. A., Brammli-Greenberg, S., McMeekin, P. & Paolucci, F. (2022). An analysis of the COVID-19 vaccination campaigns in France, Israel, Italy and Spain and their impact on health and economic outcomes. Health Policy and Technology, 11, 100594.

Barisione, M. & Michailidou, A. (Eds.) (2017). Social Media and European Politics: Rethinking Power and Legitimacy in the Digital Era. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Belluati, M. (2021). The European Institutions and Their Communication Deficits. In J. L. Newell (Ed.), Europe and the Left. Challenges to Democracy in the 21st Century (pp. 73-91). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Benis, A., Seidmann, A. & Ashkenazi, S. (2021). Reasons for Taking the COVID-19 Vaccine by US Social Media Users. Vaccines, 9(4), 315-332.

Bertin, P., Nera, K. & Delouvée, S. (2020). Conspiracy beliefs, rejection of vaccination, and support for hydroxychloro-quine: A conceptual replication-extension in the COVID-19 pandemic context. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1-9.

Bonnevie, E., Gallegos, A., Goldbarg, J., Byrd, B. & Smyser, J. (2020). Quantifying the rise of vaccine opposition on Twitter during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Communication in Healthcare, 14, 12-19.

Boulianne, S. (2015). Social media use and participation: a meta-analysis of current research. Information, Communication & Society, 18(5), 524-538.

Bouza, L. & Tuñón, J. (2018). Personalización, distribución, impacto y recepción en Twitter del discurso de Macron ante el Parlamento Europeo el 17/04/18. Profesional de la Información, 27(6), 1239-1247.

Brüggemann, M. & Wessler, H. (2014). Transnational Communication as Deliberation, Ritual, and Strategy. Communication Theory, 24(4), 394-414.

Caiani, M. & Guerra, S. (2017). Euroescepticism, democracy and the media: Communicating Europe, contesting Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Cambon, M. & Schwarzinger, F. (2022). Increasing acceptance of a vaccination program for coronavirus disease 2019 in France: A challenge for one of the world’s most vaccine-hesitant countries. Vaccine, 40(2), 178-182.

Calvo, D., Renedo Farpón, C. & Díez Garrido, M. (2017). Podemos in the Regional Elections 2015: Online Campaign Strategies in Castille and León. RIPS. Revista de Investigaciones Políticas y Sociológicas, 16(2), 143-160.

Canel, M. J. & Sanders, K. (2012). Government communication: An emerging field in political communication research. The Sage handbook of political communication, 2, 85-96. Retrieved from

Carral, U. & Tuñón, J. (2020). Estrategia de comunicación organizacional en redes sociales: análisis electoral de la extrema derecha francesa en Twitter. Profesional de la Información, 29(6), e290608.

Castells, M. (2006). La sociedad red: una visión global. Madrid: Alianza.

Cervera Crespo, R. & Cruz Rodríguez, J. M. (2010). Comunicación institucional europea: El difícil equilibrio entre la comunicación para la formación y la comunicación política. Foro de Educación, 8(12), 317-325. Retrieved from

Clark, N. (2014). The EU’s Information Deficit: Comparing Political Knowledge across Levels of Governance. Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 15(4), 445-463.

Comisión Europea (2021). Vacunas seguras contra la COVID-19 para la población europea. Comisión Europea. Retrieved from

Congosto, M. L. (2015). Elecciones Europeas 2014: Viralidad de los mensajes en Twitter. Redes. Revista hispana para el análisis de redes sociales, 26(1). Retrieved from

D’Adamo, O. & García Beaudox, V. (2016). Comunicación Política: narración de historias, construcción de relatos políticos y persuasión. Comunicación y Hombre, 12, 23-39. Retrieved from

De Wilde, P., Michailidou, A. & Trenz, H. J. (2014). Converging on euroscepticism: Online polity contestation during European Parliament elections. European Journal of Political Research, 53(4), 766-783.

Dubé, E., Vivion, M. & MacDonald, N. E. (2015). Vaccine hesitancy, vaccine refusal and the anti-vaccine movement: Influence, impact and implications. Expert Review of Vaccines, 14(1), 99-117.

Duggan, M. (2015). Mobile messaging and social media 2015. Per Research Centre. Retrieved from

Eiroa, M. & Barranquero, A. (2017). Métodos de investigación en la comunicación y sus medios. Madrid: Síntesis.

Fazekas, Z., Adrian Popa, S., Schmitt, H., Barberá, P. & Theocharis, Y. (2020). Elite‐Public Interaction on Twitter: EU Issue Expansion in the Campaign. European Journal of Political Research, 60(2), 376-396.

Fernández Castrillo, C. (2014). Prácticas transmedia en la era del prosumidor: hacia una definición del Contenido Generado por el Usuario (CGU). CIC. Cuadernos de Información y Comunicación, 19, 53-67.

Fernández Crespo, M. (2014). Metodología para el análisis de las redes sociales. In R. Cotarelo & J. A. Olmeda (Eds.), La democracia del siglo XXI. Política, medios de comunicación, internet y redes sociales (pp. 383-408). Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales.

Gainous, J. & Wagner, K. M. (2014). Tweeting to power: The social media revolution in American politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gamson, W. (1989). News as framing: Comments on Graber. American behavioral scientist, 33(2), 157-161.

Gamson, W. A. (1992). Talking politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gehrau, V., Fujarski, S., Lorenz, H., Schieb, C. & Blöbaum, B. (2021). The Impact of Health Information Exposure and Source Credibility on COVID-19 Vaccination Intention in Germany. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(9), 4678.

Gleason, B. (2018). Thinking in hashtags: exploring teenagers’ new literacies practices on twitter. Learning, Media and Technology, 43(2), 165-180.

Gower, K. (2006). Public Relations Research at the Crossroads. Journal of public relations research, 18(2), 177-190.

Graber, D. A. (2003). The Power of Communication. Managing Information in Public Organizations. Washington: CQ Press.

Graeber, D., Schmidt-Petri, C. & Schröder, C. (2021). Attitudes on voluntary and mandatory vaccination against COVID-19: Evidence from Germany. PLoS ONE, 16(5), e0248372.

Grunig, L. A., Grunig, J. E. & Dozier, D. M. (2003). Excellent public relations and effective organizations: A study of communication management in three countries. New York: Routledge.

Guerrero Pico, M. & Scolari, C. (2016). Narrativas transmedia y contenidos generados por los usuarios: el caso de los crossovers., 8, 183-200.

Gullo, D. & Tuñón, J. (2009). Él gas ruso y la seguridad energética europea: Interdependencia tras las crisis con Georgia y Ucrania. Revista CIDOB d´Afers Internationals, 88, 177-199.

Gurevich, A. (2016). El tiempo todo en Facebook. Aposta. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 69, 217-238. Retrieved from

Gutiérrez Rubí, A. (2014). Tecnopolítica. Madrid: Bebookness.

Halpern, D., Valenzuela, S. & Katz, J. E. (2017). We face, I tweet: How different social media influence political participation through collective and internal efficacy. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(6), 320-336.

Hänska, M. & Bauchowitz, S. (2019). Can social media facilitate a European public sphere? Transnational communication and the Europeanization of Twitter during the Eurozone crisis. Social Media + Society, 5(3).

Herrera, I., Ruiz, C., Jiménez, B., Romero, C. S. & Benítez de Gracia, E. (2021). COVID-19 y vacunación: análisis del papel de las instituciones públicas en la difusión de información a través de Twitter. Revista Española de Salud Pública, 95, 1-16.

Hornsey, M., Harris, E. & Fielding, K. (2018). The psychological roots of anti-vaccination attitudes: A 24-nation investigation. Health Psychology, 37(4), 307-315.

Iyengar, S. & Simon, A. F. (2000). New perspectives and evidence on political communication and campaign effects. Annual review of psychology, 51(1), 149-169.

Jackson, N. & Lilleker, D. (2011). Microblogging, constituency service and impression management: UK MPs and the use of Twitter. The journal of legislative studies, 17(1), 86-105.

Jivkova Semova, D., Requeijo Rey, P. & Padilla Castillo, G. (2017). Usos y tendencias de Twitter en la campaña a elecciones generales españolas del 20D de 2015: hashtags que fueron trending topic. Profesional de la Información, 26(5), 824-837.

Krzyżanowski, M. (2018). Social media in/and the politics of the European Union. Politico-organizational communication, institutional cultures and self-inflicted elitism. Journal of Language and Politics, 17(2).

Lakoff, R. T. (2004). Language and woman’s place: Text and commentaries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

López Meri, A., Marcos García, S. & Casero Ripollés, A. (2017). ¿Qué hacen los políticos en Twitter? Funciones y estrategias comunicativas en la campaña electoral española de 2016. Profesional de la Información, 26(5), 795-804.

Maarek, P. J. (2011). Campaign communication and political marketing. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.

Martínez Nicolás, M. (Ed.) (2008). Para investigar la comunicación. Propuestas teórico-metodológicas. Madrid: Tecnos.

Molina Cañabate, J. P. (2017). Comunicación Corporativa. Guía de supervivencia. Madrid: Grupo 5.

Neumann-Böhme S., Elsem Varghese N., Sabat, I., Pita Barros, P., Brouwer, W., van Exel, J. et al. (2020). Once we have it, will we use it? A European survey on willingness to be vaccinated against COVID19. The European Journal of Health Economics, 21, 977-982.

Núñez, R. R. (2009). Quiero ser como Obama (me pido una red social). Cuadernos de Pensamiento Político, 21, 123-154. Retrieved from

Oleinik, A., Popova, I., Kirdina, S. & Shatalova, T. (2014). On the choice of measures of reliability and validity in the content-analysis of texts. Qual Quant, 48, 2703-2718.

Parmelee, J. H. & Bichard, S. L. (2012). Politics and the Twitter revolution: How tweets influence the relationship between political leaders and the public. Maryland: Lexington books.

Papagianneas, S. (2017). Rebranding Europe. Fundamentals for leadership communication. Brussels: ASP.

Ponte Iglesias, M. T. (2020). La Unión Europea frente a las emergencias de salud pública mundial. La crisis de la COVID-19. Araucaria: Revista Iberoamericana de Filosofía, Política, Humanidades y Relaciones Internacionales, 22(45), 337-357.

Pfetsch, B., Adam, S. & Eschner, B. (2010). The media’s voices over Europe: Issues salience, Openness and Conflict Lines in Editorials. In R. Koompans & P. Statham (Eds.), The making of a European Public Sphere. Media discourse and political contention (pp. 151-170). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rivas de Roca, R. (2020). Comunicación estratégica transnacional en Twitter para las elecciones al Parlamento Europeo de 2019. Zer, 25(48), 65-83.

Sallam, M. (2021). COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy Worldwide: A Concise Systematic Review of Vaccine Acceptance Rates. Vaccines, 9, 160 .

Scolari, C. A., Fernández de Azcárate, S., Garín, M., Guerrero, M., Jiménez, M., Martos, A., Obradors, M., Oliva, M., Pérez, O. & Pujadas, E. (2012). Narrativas transmediáticas, convergencia audiovisual y nuevas estrategias de comunicación. Quaderns del CAC, 15(1), 79-89. Retrieved from

Seoane, F. (2013). Political communication in Europe: the cultural and structural limits of European public sphere. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Sloan, L. & Quan Haase, A. (Eds.) (2017). Social Media Research Methods. London: SAGE.

Scherpereel, J., Wohlgemuth, J. & Schmelzinger, M. (2016). The adoption and use of Twitter as a representational tool among members of the European Parliament. European Politics and Society, 18(2), 111-127.

Smith, B. H. (1981). Narrative versions, narrative theories. In W. J. T. Mitchell (Ed.), On Narrative (pp. 209-232). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Spoon, J. J. & Williams, C. (2017). It Takes Two: How Eurosceptic Public Opinion and Party Divisions Influence Party Positions. West European Politics, 40, 741-762.

Steward, B. (2017). Twitter as Method: Using Twitter as a Tool to Conduct Research. In L. Sloan & A. Quan Haase (Eds.), Social Media Research Methods (pp. 251-265). London: SAGE.

Túñez López, M., Costa Sánchez, C. & Míguez González, M. (2018). Avances y retos de la gestión de la comunicación en el siglo XXI. Procesos, necesidades y carencias en el ámbito institucional. Estudios sobre el mensaje periodístico, 24(1), 921-940.

Tuñón, J. (2017). Comunicación internacional: información y desinformación global en el siglo XXI. Madrid: Fragua.

Tuñón, J. (2021). Europa Frente al Brexit, el Populismo y la Desinformación. Supervivencia en tiempos de “fake news”. Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch.

Tuñón, J. & Bouza, L. (Eds.) (2021). Europa en tiempos de desinformación y pandemia. Periodismo y Política paneuropeos ante la crisis del Covid-19 y las “fake news”. Granada: Comares.

Tuñón, J., Bouza, L. & Carral, U. (2019). Comunicación europea. ¿A quién doy “like” para hablar con Europa? Madrid: Dykinson.

Tuñón, J. & Carral, U. (2019). Twitter como solución a la comunicación europea. Análisis comparado en Alemania, Reino Unido y España. Revista latina de comunicación social, 74, 1219-1234.

Tuñón, J. & Catalán, D. (2020). Comparación de las estrategias de campaña online para albergar la Agencia Europea de Medicamentos. Profesional De La Información, 29(2).

Tuñón, J. & Oporto, E. (2023). EU Member States’ Institutional Twitter Campaigns on COVID-19 Vaccination: Analyses of Germany, Spain, France and Italy. Vaccines, 11(3), 619.

Valentini, C. (2006). Manufacturing EU consensus: the reasons behind EU promotional campaigns. Global Media Journal-Mediterranean Editions, 1(2), 80-96. Retrieved from

Wimmer, R. D. & Dominick, J. R. (1996). La investigación científica de los medios de comunicación. Una introducción a sus métodos. Barcelona: Bosch.


General results - total sample/three sub-samples.

Publication format most commonly used by each institution for publications on the vaccination campaign.

Live broadcast of Emer Cooke’s hearing on January 26, 2021.


Search GoogleScholar


Article Details