Local leadership «beyond city hall»: Analysis of the public communication of Ahmed Aboutaleb, mayor of Rotterdam
Article Sidebar
60)How to Cite
100
Abstract
This article looks at the public communication of mayors and their leadership styles beyond city hall. The research takes the public communication of Ahmed Aboutaleb, mayor of Rotterdam, as a qualitative case study, looking at the narratives, roles, and rhetoric over his 12 years in office. Aboutaleb’s public communication on migrant integration, radicalization, and terrorism takes a strong visionary approach that deviates from the non-political and less partisan Dutch way of leadership. Aboutaleb combines this approach with ‘democratic guardianship’, using the law and the constitution as the criteria that decide who does (or doesn’t) belong to Dutch society. His communication style is robust and expressive, while still maintaining a typically Dutch binding-and-bonding approach to leadership. This combination of local leadership styles does not receive much attention in the literature on mayoral and local leadership, which doesn’t go much beyond the often-emphasized dichotomy of non-decisive and process-orientated leaders versus directive and strong expressions of leadership.
References
Acuto, M. (2013). City leadership in global governance. Global Governance A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 19(3), 481–498. https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-01903008
Bäck, H., Heinelt, H., & Magnier, A. (2006). The European Mayor. In VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90005-6
Barber, A., & Eastaway, M. P. (2010). Leadership challenges in the inner city: Planning for sustainable regeneration in Birmingham and Barcelona. Policy Studies, 31(4), 393–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442871003723309
Bazurli, R., Caponio, T., & De Graauw, E. (2022). Between a rock and a hard place: Mayors, migration challenges and multilevel political dynamics. Territory Politics Governance, 10(3), 297–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2022.2046633
Berg, B. L., & Lune, H. (2004). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Pearson. (No DOI).
Denters, B., Steyvers, K., Klok, P.-J., & Cermak, D. (2018). Political leadership in issue networks: How mayors rule their world? In H. Heinelt, A. Magnier, M. Cabria, & H. Reynaert (Eds.), Political leaders and changing local democracy (pp. 273–296). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67410-0_9
Karsten, N., Cachet, L., & Schaap, L. (2013). The Dutch Anomaly: Can appointed mayors cope with role changes and societal demands? Lex Localis, 11(2), 177–192. https://doi.org/10.4335/243
Griffin-Padgett, D. R., & Allison, D. (2010). Making a case for restorative rhetoric: Mayor Rudolph Giuliani & Mayor Ray Nagin’s response to disaster. Communication Monographs, 77(3), 376–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2010.502536
Hajer, M. A. (2009). Authoritative governance: Policy making in the age of mediatization. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199281671.001.0001
Hillmann, F. (2021). Becoming glocal bureaucrats: Mayors, institutions and civil society in smaller cities in Brandenburg during the ‘migration crisis’, 2015–17. Territory, Politics, Governance, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2021.1936147
Holman, M. R. (2015). Gender, political rhetoric, and moral metaphors in state of the city addresses. Urban Affairs Review, 52(4), 501–530. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087415589191
Hostetter, A. B. (2011). When do gestures communicate? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 137(2), 297–315. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022128
Jackson, B. (2019). The power of place in public leadership research and development. International Journal of Public Leadership, 15(4), 209–223. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPL-09-2019-0059
John, P., & Cole, A. (1999). Political leadership in the new urban governance: Britain and France compared. Local Government Studies, 25(4), 98–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003939908433969
Jong, W., Dückers, M. L. A., & Van Der Velden, P. G. (2016). Crisis leadership by mayors: A qualitative content analysis of newspapers and social media on the MH17 disaster. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 24(4), 286–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12124
Jong, W. (2019). Crisis leadership by mayors: an empirical multimethod study. (Dissertation, No DOI).
Karsten, N., & Hendriks, F. (2016). Don’t call me a leader, but I am one: The Dutch mayor and the tradition of bridging-and-bonding leadership in consensus democracies. Leadership, 13(2), 154–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715016651711
Karsten, N., & Jansen, M. (2013). Veranderend lokaal gezag: De gezagsbronnen van burgemeesters en wethouders verkend. B & M: Tijdschrift voor Beleid, Politiek en Maatschappij, 40(4), 378-400.
Kjaer, U. (2013). Local political leadership: The art of circulating political capital. Local Government Studies, 39(2), 253–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2012.751022
Kotter, J.P. & Lawrence, P.R. (1974). Mayors in action: Five approaches to urban governance. John Wiley and Sons. (No DOI).
Leach, S., & Wilson, D. (2002). Rethinking local political leadership. Public Administration, 80(4), 665–689. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00323
Lijphart, A. (1968). Typologies of democratic systems. Comparative Political Studies, 1(1), 3–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/001041406800100101
Lowndes, V., & Leach, S. (2004). Understanding local political leadership: Constitutions, contexts and capabilities. Local Government Studies, 30(4), 557–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/0300393042000333863
Marion, N. E., & Oliver, W. M. (2012). Crime control in the 2008 presidential election: Symbolic politics or tangible policies? American Journal of Criminal Justice, 37, 111-125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-010-9084-0
Marion, N. E., & Oliver, W. M. (2013). When the mayor speaks... Mayoral crime control rhetoric in the top US cities: Symbolic or tangible? Criminal justice policy review, 24(4), 473-491. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403412446993
Mouritzen, P. E., & Svara, J. H. (2002). Leadership at the apex: politicians and administrators in Western local governments. University of Pittsburgh Press. Perspectives On Politics, 2(1), 182–183. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1537592704820693
Mullin, M., Peele, G., & Cain, B. E. (2004). City Caesars? Institutional structure and mayoral success in three California cities. Urban Affairs Review, 40(1), 19-43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087404265391
NL Times. (2021, September 14). Rotterdam’s Ahmed Aboutaleb wins world mayor prize. https://nltimes.nl/2021/09/14/rotterdams-ahmed-aboutaleb-wins-world-mayor-prize
New York Post. (2015, January 13). Dutch mayor to Muslim immigrants: If you don’t like democracy, ‘f*ck off’! https://nypost.com/2015/01/13/dutch-mayor-to-immigrants-if-you-dont-like-democracy-f-k-off/
Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft power and American foreign policy. Political Science Quarterly, 119(2), 255–270. https://doi.org/10.2307/20202345
Schaap, L., Daemen, H., & Ringeling, A. (2009). Mayors in seven European countries: Part I. Selection procedures and statutory position. Local Government Studies, 35(1), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930802574508
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage Publications. (No DOI).
Stolz, B. A. (1999). Congress, symbolic politics and the evolution of 1994 “Violence Against Women Act”. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 10(3), 401–427. https://doi.org/10.1177/088740349901000304
Sweeting, D. (2003). How strong is the mayor of London? Policy & Politics, 31(4), 465–478. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557303322439353
Teles, F. (2015). The distinctiveness of democratic political leadership. Political Studies Review, 13(1), 22-36. https://doi.org/10.1111/1478-9302.12029
Verheul, W. J., & Schaap, L. (2010). Strong leaders? The challenges and pitfalls in mayoral leadership. Public Administration, 88(2), 439–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01824.x
Yin, R. K. (2011). Applications of case study research. Sage Publications. (No DOI).
Section
RIGHTS TRANSFER
By submitting the article for evaluation and subsequent publication in Communicaton & Society, the AUTHOR grants exclusive economic and/or exploitation rights: reproduction, distribution, public communication, transformation/translation/creation of derivative works, and commercialisation to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, for the maximum legal period in force -the author's lifetime and seventy years after his or her death or declaration of death-, in any country, and in any of the current and future publishing modalities, both in print and electronic versions.
In the event that the article is not accepted for publication, this transfer of rights lapses with the communication of the refusal to the AUTHOR.
The AUTHOR affirms that the article is unpublished, that it has not been sent simultaneously to another publication medium and that the rights have not been transferred exclusively previously. He is responsible to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service for the authorship and originality of his work, as well as for all pecuniary charges that may arise for the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, in favor of third parties due to actions, claims or conflicts arising from the breach of obligations by the AUTHOR.