Journalism’s ethical mission in a crisis of cultural ethos. Proposing a 10-paradigm shift in the pre-political foundations of journalism practice
Article Sidebar
238)How to Cite
360
Abstract
Following the Kuhnian theory of scientific development, this essay proposes a 10-paradigm shift regarding the pre-political foundations of journalism practice to address the crisis of cultural ethos in Western liberal democracy societies. It aims to reshape some of the current paradigms that are at the root of the ethical limitations of journalism in Western institutions. To do so, this essay explores the insights of some twentieth-century scholars who, by closely targeting specific failings of liberalism, offer a novel theoretical approach that broadens the meanings of basic pre-political concepts. Their insights offer elements that allow reshaping some 21st-century social assumptions –paradigms– rooted in the current form of the liberal West’s society that sustain contemporary social norms and practitioners’ performance. A full account of each paradigm shift is beyond the scope of this article. Rather, the goal is to sketch a disruptive theoretical starting-point to address journalism’s ethical mission in a new social context and enhance practitioner reflexivity. Finally, I refer to the New Renaissance Project as the initiative to strengthen the ethical foundation of the pre-political paradigms that drive Western democratic institutions, including journalism, at the beginning of a new era.
References
Anderson, C. W. (2019). Journalism as procedure, journalism as values. Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism, 20(1), 8-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918806732
Archer, M. S. (2009). Realist social theory: the morphogenetic approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://www.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511557675
Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Arendt, H. (1959). The origins of totalitarianism. Cleveland: Meridian Books.
Arendt, H. (1972). Crises of the Republic: Lying in politics. Civil disobedience. On violence. Thoughts on politics and revolution. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Arendt, H. (1994). Eichmann in Jerusalem: a report on the banality of evil. London: Penguin Books.
Aristotle (1998). The Nicomachean Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Aristotle (2009). The Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bakhtin, M. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Bauman, Z. (2015). Liquid modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.
Bell, D. (1979). The cultural contradictions of capitalism. London: Heinemann.
Billiet, J., Opgenhaffen, M., Pattyn, B., & van Aelst, P. (2018). The battle for the truth, fake news and disinformation in the digital media world. Royal Flemish Academy of Belgium for Science and the Arts. Retrieved from https://www.kvab.be/sites/default/rest/blobs/2127/mw_battlefortruth.pdf
Borden, S. L. (2007). Journalism as practice: MacIntyre, virtue ethics and the press. New York: Routledge.
Carlson, M. & Lewis, S. C. (2018). Temporal reflexivity in journalism studies: Making sense of change in a more timely fashion, Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism, 20(5), 642-650. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918760675
Christians, C. G. (2005), Ethical Theory in Communication Research, Journalism Studies, 6(1), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670052000328168
Christians, C. G. (2008). Between the Summits: Media Ethics Theory, Education and Literature. In J. M. Kittross (Ed.), An Ethics Trajectory. Visions of Media Past, Present and Yet to Come (pp. 29-53). Urbana (Ill): University of Illinois.
Christians, C. G. (2013). Global ethics and the problem of relativism. In S. Ward (Ed.), Global media ethics: Problems and perspectives (pp. 272-294). Wiley-Blackwell.
Christians C. G. (2015). The Problem of Communitas in Western Moral Philosophy. In B. Shan, & C. G. Christians (Eds.), Ethics of Intercultural Communication (pp. 35-55). New York: Peter Lang.
Christians, C. G. (2019). Media Ethics and Global Justice in the Digital Age: A New Theory of Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Christians, C. G., Ferrè, J. P., & Fackler, P. M. (1993). Good News. Social Ethics and the Press. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Christians, C. G., Glasser, T. L., McQuail, D., Nordenstreng, K., & White, R. A. (2009). Normative theories of the media: Journalism in democratic societies. Urbana (Ill): University of Illinois.
Codina, M. (2009). Nuevos entornos de la comunicación. Indicadores sociales de la cultura del NeoRenacimiento. Comunicación y Hombre, 5, 53-65. Retrieved from https://comunicacionyhombre.com/article/nuevos-entornos-la-comunicacion-indicadores-sociales-la-cultura-del-neorenacimiento/
D’Ors, A. (1973). Autoridad y potestad. In A. D’Ors (Ed.), Escritos varios sobre el derecho en crisis (pp.93-104). Madrid: CSIC.
Deneen, P. J. (2018). Why liberalism failed. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.
Dervin, B. (1998). Sense”making theory and practice: an overview of user interests in knowledge seeking and use. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2(2), 36-46. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673279810249369
Donati, P. (2012). Relational Sociology. A New Paradigm for the Social Sciences. New York: Routledge.
Donsbach, W. (2006). The Identity of Communication Research. Journal of Communication, 56(3), 437-448. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00294.x
Douglass, B. (1980). The common good and the public interest. Political Theory, 8(1), 103-117. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/190769
Eco, H. (1994). The Limits of Interpretation. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
Foucault, M. (1968). Las palabras y las cosas. Una arqueología de las ciencias humanas. Madrid: Siglo XXI.
Garin, E. (2006). La cultura del Rinascimento. Dietro il mito dell’età nuova. Milano: Il Saggiatore.
Guardini, R. (1994). Letters From Lake Como: Explorations on Technology and the Human Race. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark.
Guardini, R. (1996). El Contraste. Ensayo de una filosofía de lo viviente-concreto. Madrid: BAC.
Guardini, R. (2001). The End of the Modern World. Washington DC: ISI Books.
Habermas, J. (2006). Religion in the public sphere. European Journal of Philosophy, 14(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0378.2006.00241.x
Habermas, J. & Ratzinger, J. (2007). Dialectics of Secularism: On Reason and Religion. San Francisco: Ignatius Press.
Hollenbach, D. (1989). The common Good revisited. Theological Studies, 50(1), 70-94. https://doi.org/10.1177/004056398905000104
Kristeller, P. O. (1981). Renaissance Thought and its Sources. New York: Columbia University Press.
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lischka, J. A. (2019). Fluid institutional logics in digital journalism. Journal of Media Business Studies, 17(2), 113-131. https://doi.org/10.1080/16522354.2019.1699764
Llano, A. (1986). Filosofía del lenguaje y comunicación. In J. Yarce (Ed.), Filosofía de la comunicación (pp. 79-81). Pamplona: EUNSA.
Luckhurst, T. C. H. (2011). Dr Hack, I presume? Liberal journalism in the multimedia age. In J. Mair, & R. L. Keeble (Eds.), Face the Future: Tools for the Modern Media Age -the internet and journalism today (pp. 317-333). Suffolk: Abramis Academic Publishing.
Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
MacIntyre, A. (1984). After virtue: A study in moral theory. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
MacIntyre, A. (1994). Three Rival Versions of Moral Enquiry: Encyclopedia, Genealogy, and Tradition. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
MacIntyre, A. (1996). A short history of ethics: A history of moral philosophy from the Homeric age to the twentieth century. New York: Routledge.
MacIntyre, A. (2016). Ethics in the conflicts of modernity: An essay on desire, practical reasoning, and narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Muñoz-Torres, J. R. (2012). Truth and objectivity in Journalism. Journalism Studies, 13(4), 566-582. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670x.2012.662401
Murray, R., Caulier-Grice, J., & Mulgan, G. (Eds.) (2010). The open book of social innovation. NESTA (The National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts) & The Young Foundation.
Örnebring, H. (2018). Journalism cannot solve journalism’s problems. Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism, 20(1), 226-228. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918808690
Peters, J. D. (1999). Speaking into the air: a history of the idea of communication. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Pickard, V. (2015). The return of the nervous liberals: market fundamentalism, policy failure, and recurring journalism crises. The Communication Review, 18(2), 82-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2015.1031995
Plaisance, P. L. (2005). The Mass Media as Discursive Network: Building on the implications of libertarian and communitarian claims for news media ethics theory. Communication Theory, 15(3), 292-313. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/15.3.292
Plaisance, P. L. (2013). Virtue Ethics and Digital ‘Flourishing’: An application of Philippa Foot to life online. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 28(2), 91-102. https://doi.org/10.1080/08900523.2013.792691
Plaisance, P. L. (2014). Virtue in media: The Moral Psychology of Excellence in News and Public Relations. New York: Routledge.
Polo, L. (2017). Being and Communication. Journal of Polian Studies, 4, 7-23. Retrieved from https://journal.leonardopoloinstitute.org/index.php/jpols/article/view/6991
Popper, K. (2005). The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Routledge.
Quinn, A. (2007). Moral virtues for journalists. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 22(2-3), 168-186. https://doi.org/10.1080/08900520701315764
Ratzinger, J. (1996). Truth and Freedom. Communio: International Catholic Review, 23(1), 16-35. Retrieved from https://www.communio-icr.com/articles/view/truth-and-freedom
Ratzinger, J. (2007). Values in a time of upheaval: Meeting the Challenges of the Future. San Francisco: Ignatius Press.
Ratzinger, J. - Benedict XVI (2010). That Which Holds the World Together: The Prepolitical Moral Foundations of a Free State. In H. Zaborowski (Ed.), Natural Moral Law in Contemporary Society (pp. 13-23). Washington: Catholic University of America Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt2852bf.4
Reese, S. D. (1990). The news paradigm and the ideology of objectivity: A socialist at the wall street journal. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 7(4), 390-409. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295039009360187
Ricœur, P. (1976). Interpretation Theory: Discourse and the Surplus of Meaning. Texas Christian University Press.
Ricœur, P. (1977), Freud and Philosophy: An Essay on Interpretation. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Ricœur, P. (1984, 1986, 1988). Time and Narrative 1, 2, 3 vols. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Ricœur, P. (1991). From text to action: Essays in hermeneutics II. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Ricœur, P. (2006). Memory, History, Forgetting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Russell, A. (2019). “This time it’s different”: Covering threats to journalism and the eroding public sphere. Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism, 20(1), 32-35. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918809245
Sarkozy, N. (2006). La república, las religiones, la esperanza. Madrid: Gota a Gota.
Shan, B. & Christians, C. (Eds.) (2015). The ethics of intercultural communication. New York: Peter Lang.
Shoemaker, P. J. & Reese, S. D. (2013). Mediating the message in the 21st century: A Media Sociology Perspective. New York: Routledge.
Sim, S. (2010). The End of Modernity: What the Financial and Environmental Crisis is Really Telling Us. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Spaemann, R. (1980). Crítica de las utopías políticas. Pamplona: EUNSA.
Spaemann, R. (1989). Basic moral concepts. New York: Routledge.
Spaemann, R. (2005). Happiness and Benevolence. New York: T & T Clark International.
Strauss, L. (1953). Natural Right and History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Strauss, L. (1988). What is Political Philosophy? And Other Studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Taylor, Ch. (1989). Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
Taylor, Ch. (1994) The politics of recognition. In A. Gutmann (Ed.), Multiculturalism and The Politics of Recognition (pp. 25-73). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Vallor, S. (2016). Technology and the Virtues: a philosophical guide to a future Worth wanting. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://openlibrary.org/books/OL28687840M/Technology_and_the_Virtues
Van Dijck, J. & Poell, T. (2013). Understanding social media logic, Media and Communication, 1(1), 2-14. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v1i1.70
Vattimo, G. (1991). The End of Modernity: Nihilism and Hermeneutics in Post-modern Culture. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Walby, S. (2009). Globalization and Inequalities: complexity and contested modernities. London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446269145
Walzer, M. (1994). Thick and thin: Moral argument at home and abroad. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Ward, S. J. A. (2010). Global Journalism Ethics. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Zienkowski, J. (2017). Reflexivity in the transdisciplinary field of critical discourse studies. Palgrave Communications, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2017.7
Section
RIGHTS TRANSFER
By submitting the article for evaluation and subsequent publication in Communicaton & Society, the AUTHOR grants exclusive economic and/or exploitation rights: reproduction, distribution, public communication, transformation/translation/creation of derivative works, and commercialisation to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, for the maximum legal period in force -the author's lifetime and seventy years after his or her death or declaration of death-, in any country, and in any of the current and future publishing modalities, both in print and electronic versions.
In the event that the article is not accepted for publication, this transfer of rights lapses with the communication of the refusal to the AUTHOR.
The AUTHOR affirms that the article is unpublished, that it has not been sent simultaneously to another publication medium and that the rights have not been transferred exclusively previously. He is responsible to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service for the authorship and originality of his work, as well as for all pecuniary charges that may arise for the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, in favor of third parties due to actions, claims or conflicts arising from the breach of obligations by the AUTHOR.