The Power of Data Journalism: The Effects of Data-Driven News Reports in Correcting Climate Change Misinformation
Article Sidebar
221)How to Cite
391
Abstract
The alarming increase of misinformation poses a significant threat to complex issues such as climate change, especially considering the proliferation of new media, which has significantly contributed to the dissemination and reception of misinformation. The present study aimed to examine how a corrective news article featuring data visualisation influences the reduction of misconceptions and the correction of misinformation regarding climate change after readers are exposed to the stimulus. The study investigated how readers’ preexisting beliefs influence the mitigation of misconceptions when exposed to news content. This study adds to ongoing conversations about creating corrective news reports to reduce the negative impacts of misinformation surrounding climate change. A quasi-experimental study was carried out online involving 186 members of the Egyptian community. The results indicate that data journalism can reduce the cognitive dissonance that causes audiences to accept misinformation. The findings indicate that data-driven journalism utilising interactive graphs is effective in altering the public’s existing beliefs and knowledge while also demonstrating its ability to persuade and counter misinformation. The audience with low to moderate prior knowledge of climate change may demonstrate a diminished ability to thoroughly analyse and compare the information presented.
References
Abdallah, M. M. & Youssef, M. (2023). Role of social media in enhancing climate change literacy among Egyptian users. Journal of Public Relations and Advertising Research, 25, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.21608/sjocs.2023.299518
Abdelaty, H., Weiss, D., & Mangelkramer, D. (2023). Climate policy in developing countries: Analysis of climate mitigation and adaptation measures in Egypt. Sustainability, 15(11), 9121. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15119121
Abdellatif, M. A. (2023). Framing climate change on TV news websites: A study of Nile News, Sky News Arabia, and CGTN Arabic. Arab Media & Society, 34, 21-38. https://doi.org/10.70090/mama22fc
Allen, D. & McAleer, M. (2018). Fake news and indifference to scientific fact: President Trump’s confused tweets on global warming, climate change and weather. Scientometrics, 117(1), 625-629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2847-y
Álvarez-García, O., Sureda-Negre, J., Comas-Forgas, R., & Oliver-Trobat, M. (2023). The Spanish population’s interest in climate change based on Internet searches. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01736-5
Apuke, O. D., Omar, B., & Tunca, E. A. (2022). Effect of fake news awareness as an intervention strategy for motivating news verification behaviour among social media users in Nigeria: A quasi-experimental research. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 58(6), 888-903. https://doi.org/10.1177/00219096221079320
Bode, L. & Vraga, E. (2015). In Related News, That Was Wrong: The Correction of Misinformation Through Related Stories Functionality in Social Media. Journal of Communication, 65(4), 619-638. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12166
Campbell, D. T. & Stanley, J. C. (2015). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Ravenio Books.
Chan, M.-P. S., Jones, C., Hall Jamieson, K., & Albarracín, D. (2017). Debunking: A Meta-Analysis of the Psychological Efficacy of Messages Countering Misinformation. Psychological Science, 28(11), 1531-1546. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617714579
Chang, C.-T. & Van, L. (2023). Influence of Online User Information Verification on the Effect of Health Misinformation Correction Provided by a Peer: A Natural Quasi-Experiment. Communication Reports. [Preprint], 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934215.2023.2232412
Chen, H., Ning, X., Wang, L., & Yang, J. (2018). Acquiring New Factual Information: Effect of Prior Knowledge. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01734
Cheng, H. & González-Ramírez, J. (2021). Trust and the Media: Perceptions of Climate Change News Sources Among US College Students. Postdigit Sci Educ, 3(3), 910-933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00163-y
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd Ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Connor Desai, S. & Reimers, S. (2023). Does explaining the origins of misinformation improve the effectiveness of a given correction? Memory & Cognition, 51(2), 422-436. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-022-01354-7
Cook, J. (2022). Teaching about Our Climate Crisis: Combining Games and Critical Thinking to Fight Misinformation. American Educator, 45(4), 12-19. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1321545
Cook, J., Ecker, U., Trecek-King, M., Schade, G., Jeffers-Tracy, K., Fessmann, J., Claire Kim, S., Kinkead, D., Orr, M., Vraga, E., Roberts, K., & McDowell, J. (2022). The cranky uncle game —combining humor and gamification to build student resilience against climate misinformation. Environmental Education Research, 29(4), 613-629. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2022.2085671
Dakhode, S., Chaware, A., Muntode, P., Ingole, A., & Joshi, A. (2021). Perception about myths and facts regarding COVID-19 pandemic infection among science and technology faculties. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 10(288), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_870_20
Del Vicario, M., Alessandro, B., Zollo, F., Petroni, F., Scala, A., Caldarelli, G., Stanley, E., & Quattrociocchi, W. (2016). The spreading of misinformation online. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(3), 554-559. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1517441113
Deters, F. G. & Mehl, M. R. (2012). Does posting Facebook status updates increase or decrease loneliness? An online social networking experiment. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(5), 579-586. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550612469233
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308385
Fazio, L., Brashier, N., Payne, K., & Marsh, E. (2015). Knowledge does not protect against illusory truth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(5), 993-1002. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000098
Flynn, D., Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2017). The Nature and Origins of Misperceptions: Understanding False and Unsupported Beliefs about Politics. Political Psychology, 38(1), 127-150. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12394
Garreton, M., Morini, F., Celhay, P., Dörk, M., & Parra, D. (2023). Attitudinal effects of data visualisations and illustrations in data stories. IEEE Transactions on Visualisation and Computer Graphics, 29(8), 3501-3516. https://doi.org/10.1109/tvcg.2023.3248319
Geidner, N., Pjesivac, I., Imre, I., Coman, I., & Yuran, D. (2015). The Role of Interactive Graphics in Reducing Misperceptions in the Electorate. Visual Communication Quarterly, 22(3), 133-145. https://doi.org/10.1080/15551393.2015.1069195
Guan, T. & Wang, Q. (2022). Examining the democratic potential of data journalism in curing misinformation. Journalism Practice, 16(10), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2022.2124433
Hadlington, L., Harkin, L., Kuss, D., Newman, K., & Ryding, F. (2022). Perceptions of fake news, misinformation, and disinformation amid the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative exploration. Psychology of Popular Media, 11(3), 315-330. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000387
Holmes, D. & Richardson, L. (2020). Research Handbook on Communicating Climate Change. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789900408
Hullman, J., & Diakopoulos, N. (2011). Visualization Rhetoric: Framing Effects in Narrative Visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 17(12), 2231-2240. https://doi.org/10.1109/tvcg.2011.255
Junco, R., Heiberger, G., & Loken, E. (2010). The effect of Twitter on college student engagement and grades. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(2), 119-132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00387.x
Lazard, A. & Atkinson, L. (2014). Putting Environmental Infographics Center Stage. Science Communication, 37(1), 6-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547014555997
Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U., & Cook, J. (2017). Beyond Misinformation: Understanding and Coping with the “Post-Truth” Era. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6(4), 353-369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.07.008
Li, J. & Wagner, M. (2020). The Value of Not Knowing: Partisan Cue-Taking and Belief Updating of the Uninformed, the Ambiguous, and the Misinformed. Journal of Communication, 70(5), 646-669. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqaa022
Liao, Q. V. & Fu, W.-T. (2013). Beyond the filter bubble: Interactive effects of perceived threat and topic involvement on selective exposure to information. In CHI ‘13: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2359-2368). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2481326
Lim, V. Y., Peralta, L. M. M., Rubel, L. H., Jiang, S., Kahn, J. B., & Herbel-Eisenmann, B. (2023). Keeping pace with innovations in data visualizations: A commentary for mathematics education in times of crisis. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 55(1), 109-118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01449-0
Lopezosa, C., Pérez-Montoro, M., & Guallar, J. (2022). Data visualization in the news media: Trends and challenges. In L. M. G. González & L. F. Romero Rodríguez (Eds.), Technology, business, innovation, and entrepreneurship in Industry 4.0 (pp. 315-334). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17960-0_16
Lwin, M., Lee, S. Y., Panchapakesan, C., & Tandoc, E. (2021). Mainstream News Media’s Role in Public Health Communication During Crises: Assessment of Coverage and Correction of COVID-19 Misinformation. Health Communication, 38(1), 160-168. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2021.1937842
Ma, S. & Zhang, H. (2021). Opinion expression dynamics in social media chat groups: An integrated quasi-experimental and agent-based model approach. Complexity, 2021, 2304754. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/2304754
Mahmoud, M. A. (2017). Impact of climate change on the agricultural sector in Egypt, The handbook of environmental chemistry, 74, 213-227. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/698_2017_48
Mena, P. (2021). Reducing misperceptions through news stories with data visualisation: The role of readers’ prior knowledge and prior beliefs. Journalism, 24(4), 729-748. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849211028762
Metzger, M., Hartsell, E., & Flanagin, A. (2015). Cognitive dissonance or credibility? A comparison of two theoretical explanations for selective exposure to partisan news. Communication Research, 47(1), 3-38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215613136
Moore, C., Ruisch, B., Granados Samayoa, J., Shelby, L., Ladanyi, J., & Fazio, R. (2021). Contracting COVID-19: a longitudinal investigation of the impact of beliefs and knowledge. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 20460. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99981-8
Naguimbing-Manlulu, M. F. (2021). Climate change narratives in Philippine print news media. Media Asia, 48(3), 190-206.” https://doi.org/10.1080/01296612.2021.1944541
Nyhan, B. (2021). Why the backfire effect does not explain the durability of political mispercep-tions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(15), e1912440117. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1912440117
Onwuegbuzie, A. & Collins, K. (2007). A typology of mixed methods sampling designs in social science research. The Qualitative Report, 12(2), 281-316. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2007.1638
Oshikawa, S. (1968). The Theory of Cognitive Dissonance and Experimental Research. Journal of Marketing Research, 5(4), 429-430. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150270
Pandey, A. V., Manivannan, A., Nov, O., Satterthwaite, M., & Bertini, E. (2014). The Persuasive Power of Data Visualisation. IEEE Transactions on Visualisation and Computer Graphics, 20(12), 2211-2220. https://doi.org/10.1109/tvcg.2014.2346419
Pettigrew, A. M. (1990). Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice. Organization Science, 1(3), 267-292. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1.3.267
Petty, R. & Cacioppo, J. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In R. E. Petty & J. T. Cacioppo (Eds.), Communication and persuasion (pp. 1-24). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4964-1_1
Reichardt, C. S. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Social Service Review, 76(3), 510-514. https://doi.org/10.1086/345281
Rosner, B. A. (2006). Fundamentals of biostatistics (6th Ed.). Thomson-Brooks/Cole.
Schulz, K. F. & Grimes, D. A. (2002). Allocation concealment in randomised trials: Defending against deciphering. The Lancet, 359(9306), 614-618. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07750-4
Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.
Tappin, B., Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. (2020). Rethinking the link between cognitive sophistication and politically motivated reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 150(6), 1095-1114. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000974
Tasnim, S., Hossain, M., & Mazumder, H. (2020). Impact of Rumors or Misinformation on Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) in Social Media. Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, 53(3), 171-174. https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.20.094
Treen, K., Williams, H., & O’Neill, S. (2020). Online misinformation about climate change. WIREs Climate Change, 11(5), 665. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.665
Urban, J. & Schweiger, W. (2013). News Quality from the Recipients’ Perspective. Journalism Studies, 15(6), 821-840. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670x.2013.856670
Vidigal, R. & Jerit, J. (2022). Issue Importance and the Correction of Misinformation. Political Communication, 39(6), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2022.2123580
Weir, C. J. & Lees, K. R. (2003). Comparison of stratification and adaptive methods for treatment allocation in an acute stroke clinical trial. Statistics in Medicine, 22(5), 705-726. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1366
Welch, C., Piekkari, R., Plakoyiannaki, E., & Paavilainen-Mäntymäki, E. (2011). Theorising from case studies: Towards a pluralist future for international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(5), 740-762. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2010.55
Wood, T. & Porter, E. (2019). The Elusive Backfire Effect: Mass Attitudes’ Steadfast Factual Adherence. Political Behaviour, 41(1), 135-163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-018-9443-y
Yin, R. K. (1981). The case study crisis: Some answers. Administrative science quarterly, 26(1), 58-65.”
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th Ed., Vol. 5). Sage.
Zhao, H., Xu, J., Iyendo, T. O., Apuke, O. D., & Gever, V. C. (2023). The effectiveness of using audio-visual based media intervention for promoting social media literacy skills to curtail fake news on social media: A quasi-experimental investigation. Information Development, 39(4), 502-518. https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669231217236
Section
RIGHTS TRANSFER
By submitting the article for evaluation and subsequent publication in Communicaton & Society, the AUTHOR grants exclusive economic and/or exploitation rights: reproduction, distribution, public communication, transformation/translation/creation of derivative works, and commercialisation to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, for the maximum legal period in force -the author's lifetime and seventy years after his or her death or declaration of death-, in any country, and in any of the current and future publishing modalities, both in print and electronic versions.
In the event that the article is not accepted for publication, this transfer of rights lapses with the communication of the refusal to the AUTHOR.
The AUTHOR affirms that the article is unpublished, that it has not been sent simultaneously to another publication medium and that the rights have not been transferred exclusively previously. He is responsible to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service for the authorship and originality of his work, as well as for all pecuniary charges that may arise for the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, in favor of third parties due to actions, claims or conflicts arising from the breach of obligations by the AUTHOR.