Industry or relevant market? EMFA and two different perspectives on newspaper concentration

Abstract
When media researchers and policy makers talk about media concentration, they usually mean the concentration of ownership in individual media industries nationwide. When economists and competition authorities talk about media concentration, they mean the concentration of sales or production in the relevant market under consideration. The former, the democratic perspective, emphasises the social and political consequences of concentration, such as the power of large media groups to influence the news agenda. The latter, the market perspective, is concerned with the competitive effects of concentration, such as possible abuse of market power. The article argues that both perspectives are necessary to understand the concentration process, as industry concentration always has market effects and market concentration always has democratic effects. This is also emphasised by the recent European Media Freedom Act (EMFA), which states that when assessing media mergers and acquisitions both the market and the democratic impact of the transaction must be taken into account. The paper demonstrates its argument by analysing newspaper concentration in Finland at both industry (nationwide) and relevant market (region) level in parallel. Employing newspaper net sales as a proxy for market power concentration rate is calculated by using standard measures of concentration. The results show that from the democratic perspective all markets are relevant. While at the regional level the analysis reveals an extremely concentrated market, at the national level the concentration rate is reduced by the large number of firms operating in the sector.
References
Ala-Fossi, M., Grönlund, M., Hellman, H., & Lehtisaari, K. (2020). Media- ja viestintäpolitiikan seurantaraportti 2019 [Media and communication policy monitoring report 2019]. Publications of the Ministry of Transport and Communications 2020:4. Helsinki: Ministry of Transport and Communications. Retrieved fromhttps://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/handle/10024/162144
Ala-Fossi, M., Grönvall, J., Karppinen, K., & Nieminen, H. (2021). Finland: Sustaining professional norms with fewer journalists and declining resources. In J. Trappel & T. Tomaz (Eds.), The Media for Democracy Monitor 2021. How leading news media survive digital transformation (Vol. 1) (pp. 153-196). Göteborg: Nordicom. https://doi.org/10.48335/9789188855404-4
Baker, C. E. (2007). Media concentration and democracy. Why ownership matters. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511810992
Björkroth, T., & Grönlund, M. (2014). The growth of leading regional newspapers. Nordicom Review, 35(1), 115-133. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2014-0008
Björkroth, T., & Grönlund, M. (2015). Market share mobility in regional newspaper markets. European Journal of Communication, 30(6), 714-744. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323115612214.
Cho, H. & Lacy, S. (2002). Competition for circulation among Japanese national and local daily newspapers. Journal of Media Economics 15(2), 73-89.https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327736ME1502_1
Compaine, B. M., & Gomery, D. (2000). Who owns the media? Competition and concentration in the mass media industry. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410605368
Davies, S. (1979). Choosing between concentration indices. The iso-concentration curve. Economica, 46(1), 67-75. https://doi.org/10.2307/2553097
Dertouzos, J. N., & Trautman, W. B. (1990). Economic effects of media concentration. Estimates from a model of the newspaper firm. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 39(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.2307/2098364
Doyle, G. (2002). Media ownership. The economics and politics of convergence and concentration in the UK and European media. London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446219942
Freedman, D. (2014). Metrics, models and the meaning of media ownership. International Journal of Cultural Politics, 20(2), 170-185. http://doi.org/10.1080/1028632.2012.752821
Grönlund, M., & Björkroth, T. (2011). Newspaper market concentration, competitive pressure and financial performance. The case of Finland. Journal of Media Business Studies, 8(3), 19-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/16522354.2011.11073525
Grönlund, M., & Björkroth, T. (2022). Measurement of media concentration. Empirical concepts, applications and challenges. In J. Krone & T. Pellegrini (Eds.), Handbook of media and communication economics (pp. 1-19). Wiesbaden: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-34048-3_86-1
Hellman, H. (2021). Lehtiketjut ja lehdistön "uusi normaali". Keskittymisen mittaaminen ja sanomalehdistön keskittyminen Suomessa 2009-2019 [Newspaper chains and the "new normal". Concentration of the press in Finland 2009-2019]. Media & viestintä, 44(2), 92-116. https://doi.org/10.23983/mv.109861
Hellman, H. (2022). Lehdistön alueelliset valtiaat. Sanomalehdistön kilpailu ja keskittyminen merkityksellisillä markkinoilla. [Newspaper competition and concentration in relevant markets in Finland]. Media & viestintä, 45(3), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.23983/mv.122138
Hellman, H. (2024). Ykköslehdet alakynnessä. Johtavien alueellisten lehtien kilpailuaseman kehitys 2000-luvulla [Number one newspapers going downhill. The changing business and status of the leading regional news media]. Media & viestintä, 47(2), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.23983/mv.143659
Hendrickx, J., & Van Remoortere, A. (2022). Exploring the link between media concentration and news content diversity using automated text analysis. Journalism, 25(2), 353-371. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2021.1987299
Hoskins, C., McFadyen, S. & Finn, A. (2004). Media economics. Applying economics to new and traditional media. Thousand Oaks: Sage. høst, S. (1991). The Norwegian newspaper system. Structure and development. In H. Rønning & K. Lundby (Eds.), Media and communication. Readings in methodology, history and culture (pp. 281-301). Oslo: Norwegian University Press.
Hujanen, J. (2000). Journalismin maakunnallisuus. Alueellisuuden rakentuminen maakuntalehtien teksteissä ja tekijöiden puheessa [Regional Journalism. The construction of regions and regionalism in Finnish newspaper texts and in journalists' talk]. Jyväskylä Studies in Communication 11. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.
Humprecht, E. (2019). Ownership of news media. In T. P. Vos, F. Hanusch, A. Sehl, D. Dimitrakopoulou & M. Geertsema-Sligh (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of journalism studies. Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118841570.iejs0066
Iosifidis, P. (2010). Pluralism and concentration of media ownership. Measurement issues. Javnost - The Public, 17(3), 5-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2010.11009033
Just, N. (2009). Measuring media concentration and diversity: New approaches and instruments in Europe and the US. Media, Culture & Society, 31(1), 97-117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443708098248
Jyrkiäinen, J. (1994). Sanomalehdistön keskittyminen. Joukkoviestinnän ja erityisesti sanomalehdistön keskittymisilmiö, sen kulku ja seuraukset jälkiteollisissa yhteiskunnissa 1980-luvun lopulla [Concentration in newspaper industry]. Acta Universitatis Tamperensis, Ser. A, vol. 409. Tampere: University of Tampere.
Jyrkiäinen, J. (2012). Newspaper chains in Finland 1993-2010. Journal of Media Business Studies, 9(2), 7-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/16522354.2012.11073541
Lacy, S. (1984). Competition among metropolitan daily, small daily and weekly newspapers. Journalism Quarterly, 61(3), 640-644. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769908406100323
Lacy, S., & Davenport, L. (1994). Daily newspaper market structure, concentration, and competition. Journal of Media Economics, 7(3), 33-46. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327736me0703_3
Lehtisaari, K., Grönlund, M., Hellman, H., Ranti, T., & Suikkanen, R. (2024). Median keskittyminen ja mediasisältöjen moninaisuus Suomessa [Media concentration and diversity of media content in Finland]. Publications of the Government's analysis, assessment and research activities 2024:6. Helsinki: Prime Minister's Office. Retrieved from https://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-383-168-1
Lindén, C.-G. (2014). Pakko innovoida. Sanomalehtien kilpailu pienessä maakunnassa [Newspaper competition in a small province]. In K. Lehtisaari (Ed.), Sanomalehti uudessa mediamaisemassa [Newspaper in the new media environment] (pp. 96-106). Helsinki: Taloudellinen Tiedotustoimisto TAT.
McDonald, D. G., & Dimmick, J. (2003). The conceptualization and measurement of diversity. Communication Research, 30(1), 60-79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650202239026
Meier, W. A. (2007). National and transnational media ownership concentration in Europe. A burden for democracy? In W. A. Meier & J. Trappel (Eds.), Power, performance and politics. Media policy in Europe (pp. 75-103). Baden Baden: Nomos. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845202938-75
Napoli, P. M. (1999). Deconstructing the diversity principle. Journal of Communication, 49 (4): 7-34. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/49.4.7
Napoli, P. M. (2001). Foundations of communications policy. Principles and process in the regulation of electronic media. Cresskill: Hampton Press.
Newman, N. Fletcher, R., Robertson, C. T., Arguedas, A. R., & Nielsen, R. K. (2024). Reuters Institute digital news report. 2024. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. Retrieved from https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2024-06/RISJ_DNR_2024_Digital_v10%20lr.pdf
Noam, E. M. (2009). Media ownership and concentration in the United States. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195188523.001.0001
Noam, E. M., & The International Media Concentration Collaboration (2016). Who owns the world's media? Media concentration and ownership around the world. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199987238.001.0001
Ojajärvi, S. (2014). Suomalainen paikallislehti. Perhealbumista journalismin uudistajaksi? [Local press in Finland]. Research reports 2014:1. Helsinki: University of Helsinki, Communication Research Centre CRC.
Pavic, I., Galetic, F., & Piplica, D. (2016). Similarities and differences between CR and HHI as an indicator of market concentration and market power. British Journal of Economics, Management & Trade, 13(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJEMT/2016/23193
Picard, R. G. (1985). The press and the decline of democracy. Westport: Greenwood Press. https://doi.org/10.5040/9798216000969
Picard, R. G. (1988). Measures of concentration in the daily newspaper industry. Journal of Media Economics, 1(1), 61-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/08997768809358167
Picard, R. G. (1989). Media economics. Concepts and issues. Newbury Park: Sage.
Picard, R. G. (2017). The Sisyphean pursuit of media pluralism. European efforts to establish policy and measurable evidence. Communication Law and Policy, 22(3), 255-273. https://doi.org/10.1080/10811680.2017.1331644
Rochet, J.-C., & Tirole, J. (2003). Platform competition in two-sided markets. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(4), 990-1029. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40005175 https://doi.org/10.1162/154247603322493212
Rosse, J. N. (1980). The decline of direct newspaper competition. Journal of Communication, 30(2), 65-71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1980.tb01967.x
Seuri, O., Ikäheimo, H.-P., & Huhtamäki, J. (2022). What happens when platforms mediate the audience-journalism relationship? In V. J. E. Manninen, M. K. Niemi & A. Ridge-Newman (Eds.), Futures of journalism (pp. 227-243). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95073-6_15
Stigler, G. J., & Sherwin, R. A. (1985). The extent of the market. Journal of Law and Economics, 28(3), 555-585. https://doi.org/10.1086/467101
Syvertsen, T., Enli, G., Mjøs, O. J., & Moe, H. (2014). The media welfare state. Nordic media in the digital era. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/nmw.12367206.0001.001
Tommila, P., & Salokangas, R. (1998). Sanomia kaikille. Suomen lehdistön historia [History of the Finnish press]. Helsinki: Edita.
Tomaz, T. (2024). Media ownership and control in Europe. A multidimensional approach. European Journal of Communication, 39(5), 498-511t. https://doi.org/10.1177/02673231241270994
Trappel, J., & Meier, W. A. (2022). Soaring media ownership concentration. Comparing the effects of digitalisation on media pluralism and diversity. In J. Trappel & T. Tomaz (Eds.), Success and failure in news media performance: Comparative analysis in the Media for Democracy Monitor 2021 (pp. 147-164). Göteborg: Nordicom. https://doi.org/10.48335/9789188855589-7
van der Wurff, R., & van Cuilenburg, J. (2001). Impact of moderate and ruinous competition on diversity. The Dutch television market. Journal of Media Economics, 4(4), 213-229. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327736ME1404_2
van Kranenburg, H. (2002). Mobility and market structure in the Dutch daily newspaper market segments. Journal of Media Economics, 15(2), 107-123. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327736ME1502_3
Ylikoski, M., & Ala-Fossi, M. (2024). Monitoring media pluralism in the digital era. Application of the media pluralism monitor in the European Union, Albania, Montenegro, Republic of North Macedonia, Serbia and Turkey in the year 2023 - Country report: Finland. European University Institute, Centre for Media Pluralism and Media Freedom. Retrieved from https://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/77000
Section
RIGHTS TRANSFER
By submitting the article for evaluation and subsequent publication in Communicaton & Society, the AUTHOR grants exclusive economic and/or exploitation rights: reproduction, distribution, public communication, transformation/translation/creation of derivative works, and commercialisation to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, for the maximum legal period in force -the author's lifetime and seventy years after his or her death or declaration of death-, in any country, and in any of the current and future publishing modalities, both in print and electronic versions.
In the event that the article is not accepted for publication, this transfer of rights lapses with the communication of the refusal to the AUTHOR.
The AUTHOR affirms that the article is unpublished, that it has not been sent simultaneously to another publication medium and that the rights have not been transferred exclusively previously. He is responsible to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service for the authorship and originality of his work, as well as for all pecuniary charges that may arise for the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, in favor of third parties due to actions, claims or conflicts arising from the breach of obligations by the AUTHOR.