"Penny Dreadful" (2014-2016). Postmodern mythology and ontology of otherness

Lourdes Monterrubio-Ibáñez

doi:10.15581/003.33.36492

Lourdes Monterrubio-Ibáñez

(Login required)

PDF (

395)

View in DADUN

Published: Jan 7, 2020

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15581/003.33.36492

How to Cite

Monterrubio-Ibáñez, L. (2020). "Penny Dreadful" (2014-2016). Postmodern mythology and ontology of otherness. Communication & Society, 33(1), 15-28. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.33.36492

Authors

Lourdes Monterrubio-Ibáñez

(Login required)

Univerisdad Complutense de Madrid.

Abstract

861

The television series Penny Dreadful (2014-2016) is an appropriation, intertextuality and transfiction exercise of four modern myths from nineteenth-century literature –Frankenstein (Mary Shelley, 1818), The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde (Robert Louis Stevenson, 1886), The Picture of Dorian Gray (Oscar Wilde, 1891) and Dracula (Bram Stoker, 1897)– to which the mythological figure of the lycanthrope is added. This myth syncretism is completed by linking these characters, located in the Victorian London of the late 19th century, with different mythologies: biblical, Egyptian, American West, Native American or witch mythology. The article aims to analyse, focusing on the final season of the series, how the narrative complexity of contemporary seriality and the different materialisations of postmodern image –multiplex-image, distance-image and excessimage– become perfect tools to both narrate the identity search of the different characters and subvert and resemantise these modern myths. Their identity searches emerge from an ontology of otherness that defines postmodernity –from otherness of conscience to otherness of other people–, using the mythical figure of the monster. It allows then the subversion and resemantisation of each mythical character, generating a kind of postmodern mythology that reflects on our contemporaneity: feminist emancipation and violent revolution, patriarchy and machismo, family institution, social marginalisation, individualism and lack of commitment, classism and racism.

Keywords

Contemporary seriality, postmodern image, myth syncretism, identity, otherness

References

Allrath, G., Gymnich, M. & Surkamp, C. (2005). Introduction: Towards a Narratology of TV Series. In G. Allrath & M. Gymnich (Ed.), Narrative Strategies in Television Series (pp. 1- 43). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Balló, J. & Pérez, X. (2005). Yo ya he estado aquí: ficciones de la repetición. Barcelona: Anagrama.

Bauman, Z. (1991). Modernity and Ambivalence. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Blanchet, R. & Vaage, M. B. (2012). Don, Peggy, and Other Fictional Friends?: Engaging with Characters in Television Series. Projections, 6(2), 18-41. Retrieved from https://www.berghahnjournals.com/view/journals/projections/6/2/proj060203.xml

Braid, B. (2017). The Frankenstein Meme: Penny Dreadful and The Frankenstein Chronicles as Adaptations. Open Cultural Studies, 1(1), 232-243. https://www.doi.org/10.1515/culture-2017-0021

Brooker, P. (2007). Postmodern Adaptation: Pastiche, Intertextuality and Re-Functioning. In D. Cartmell & I. Whelehan (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Literature on Screen (pp. 107-120). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Brunel, P. (1992). Mythocritique: théorie et parcours. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

Creeber, G. (2005). Serial Television. London: British Film Institute.

Elliott, K. (2003). Rethinking the Novel/Film Debate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Fuchs, M. (2017). It’s a monster mash! Penny Dreadful and the return to (and of) contemporary horror’s victorian roots. In L. Belau & K. Jackson, Horror Television in the Age of Consumption: Binging on Fear (pp. 148-160). New York: Routledge.

García, A. N. (Ed.) (2016). Emotions in Contemporary TV Series. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

García, A. N. & Ortiz, M. J. (Eds.) (2018). Series y cine. La promiscuidad infinita. Salamanca: Comunicación Social.

Garín, M. (2017). Infinite wounds: redefining narrative structure and serial dynamics in television series. L’Atalante. Revista de estudios cinematográficos, 24, 27-41. Retrieved from http://www.revistaatalante.com/index.php?journal=atalante&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=414&path%5B%5D=438

Green, S. (2017). Lily Frankenstein: The Gothic New Woman in Penny Dreadful. Refractory: A Journal of Entertainment Media, 28. Retrieved from http://refractory.unimelb.edu.au/2017/06/14/green/

Imbert, G. (2010). Cine e imaginarios sociales. El cine posmoderno como experiencia de los límites (1990-2010). Madrid: Cátedra.

Jameson, F. (1991). Postmodernism, Or the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Jobling, J. (2010). Fantastic Spiritualities: Monsters, Heroes and the Contemporary Religious Imagination. London: T&T Clark.

Kristeva, J. (1991). Strangers to ourselves. New York: Columbia University Press.

Lipovestky, G. & Serroy, J. (2007). L’Écran global. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.

Manea, D. (2016). A Wolf’s Eye View of London: Dracula, Penny Dreadful, and the Logic of Repetition. Critical Survey, 28(1), 40-50. https://www.doi.org/10.3167/cs.2016.280105

Mittell, J. (2015). Complex TV. The Poetics of Contemporary Television Storytelling. New York: New York University Press.

Nelson, R. (2007). State of play. Contemporary “high end” TV drama. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Pearson, R. (2018). Ampliación y cohesión en mundos transficcionales. In A. N. García & M. J.

Ortiz (Eds.), Series y cine. La promiscuidad infinita (pp. 23-42). Salamanca: Comunicación Social.

Poore, B. (2016). The Transformed Beast: Penny Dreadful, Adaptation, and the Gothic. Victoriographies, 6(1), 62-81. Retrieved from https://www.euppublishing.com/doi/pdfplus/10.3366/vic.2016.0211

Ricoeur, P. (1992). Oneself as Another. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Rose-Holt, S. (2015). Antiheroines are the New Antiheroes: The Killer Women of Penny Dreadful, Orphan Black and More. Indiwire, 3rd June. Retrieved from http://goo.gl/WGFMHr

Sanders, J. (2006). Adaptation and Appropriation. London and New York: Routledge.

Schubart, R. (2017). The Journey: Vanessa Ives and Edgework as Self-Work. Refractory: A Journal of Entertainment Media, 28, 1-38. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317778047_The_Journey_Vanessa_Ives_and_Edgework_as_Self-Work

Metrics

Details

Issue

Vol 33 No 1 (2020)

Section

Articles

RIGHTS TRANSFER

By submitting the article for evaluation and subsequent publication in Communication & Society, the AUTHOR exclusively assigns the rights of public communication, reproduction, distribution and sale for commercial exploitation to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, for the maximum legal term in force -the entire life of the author and seventy years after his death or declaration of death-, in any country, and in any of the current and future edition modalities, both in print and electronic versions.

In the event that the article is not accepted for publication , this transfer of rights lapses with the communication of the refusal to the AUTHOR.

The AUTHOR affirms that the article is unpublished, that it has not been sent simultaneously to another publication medium and that the rights have not been transferred exclusively previously. He is responsible to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service for the authorship and originality of his work, as well as for all pecuniary charges that may arise for the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, in favor of third parties due to actions, claims or conflicts arising from the breach of obligations by the AUTHOR.

Article Sidebar

Main Article Content