Social mobilization and media framing in the journalistic coverage of oil survey permits in the Mediterranean
Article Sidebar
220)
Main Article Content
Authors
Abstract
416
Keywords
References
Brüggemann, M. (2014). Between Frame Setting and Frame Sending: How Journalists Contribute to News Frames. Communication Theory, 24, 61–82. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/comt.12027
Brugué, Q., Font, J. & Gomà, R. (2003). Participación y democracia. Asociaciones y poder local. In M. J. Funes & R. Adell (Eds.), Movimientos sociales: cambio social y participación (pp. 109-132). Madrid: UNED.
De Vreese, C. H. & Boomgaarden, H. (2003). Valenced news frames and public support for the EU. Communications, 28, 361-381. https://www.doi.org/10.1515/comm.2003.024
De Vreese, C. H. (2004). The Effects of Frames in Political Television News on Issue Interpretation and Frame Salience. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 81(1), 36-52. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/107769900408100104
De Vreese, C. H. (2005). News framing: Theory and typology. Information Design Journal, 13(1), 51-62. https://www.doi.org/10.1075/idjdd.13.1.06vre
Dunwoody, S. & Peters, H. (1992). Mass media coverage of technological and environmental risks. Public Understanding of Science, 1(2), 199-230. https://www.doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/1/2/004
Dunwoody, S. & Neuwirth, K. (1991). Coming to terms will the impact of communication technological risk judgements. In L. Wilkins & P. Patterson (Eds.), Risky business: Communication science, risk and public policy (pp. 11-30.). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Towards Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43, 51-58. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
Entman, R. M. (2003). Cascading activation: contesting the White House’s frame after 9/11. Political Communication, 20, 415–432. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/1058460039024417
Espluga, J., Farré, J., Gonzalo, J. & Prades, A. (2014). Factors Inhibiting the Social Mobilization: the Case of the Petrochemical Area of Tarragona. REIS. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 146, 191-216. https://doi.org/10.5477/cis/reis.146.191
European Commission (2017). Especial Eurobarómetro 459. Apoyo de los ciudadanos a la acción por el clima. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/clima/citizens/support_es
Farré, J. (2005). Comunicación del riesgo y espirales del miedo. Comunicación y Sociedad, 3, 95-119. https://www.doi.org/10.32870/cys.v0i3.4209
Farré, J. (2006). Las lógicas institucionales en el proceso de comunicación de riesgo petroquímico en Tarragona. Sphera Pública, 6, 59-75 Retrieved from http://www.redalyc.org/service/redalyc/downloadPdf/297/29700604/1
Farré, J. & Gonzalo, J. L. (2009). Discursos y prácticas en el proceso de comunicación de riesgo petroquímico. In C. Moreno Castro (Ed.), Comunicar los riesgos. Ciencia y tecnología en la sociedad de la información (pp. 115-132). Madrid: Bilioteca Nueva.
Gamson, W. A. & Wolfsfeld, G. (1993). Movements and Media as Interacting Systems. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 528(1), 114-125.
Heath, R., Lee, J. & Lemon, L. L. (2018). Narratives of risk communication: Nudging community residents to shelter-in-place. Public Relations Review, 45, 128-137. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2018.12.004
Heath, R., Lee, J., Palenchar, M. J. & Lemon, L. L. (2019). Risk Communication Emergency Response Preparedness: Contextual Assessment of the Protective Action Decision Model. Rysk Analysis, 38(2), 333-344. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/risa.12845
Horning, S. (1992). Framing risk: Audience and reader factors. Journalism Quaterly, 69(3), 679- 690. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/107769909206900316
Igartua, J. J. (2006): Métodos cuantitativos de investigación en comunicación. Barcelona: Bosch Comunicación.
Jackson, S. & Dutton, J. (1988). Discerning threats and opportunities. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33, 370-387. https://www.doi.org/10.2307/2392714
Jaspal, R. & Nerlich, B. (2014). Fracking in UK press: threat dynamics in an unfolding debate. Public Understanding of Science, 23(3), 348–363. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0963662513498835
Kosicki, G. M. & McLeod, J. M. (1990). Learning from political news. Effects of media images and information-processing strategies. In S. Kraus (Ed.), Mass communication and political information processing (pp. 69-83.) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Lundgren, R. & McMakin, A. (2018). Risk Communication: A Handbook for Communicating Environmental, Safety and Health Risks. Wiley-IEEE Press.
Mercado, M. T., Álvarez, Á. & Herránz, J. M. (2014). The fracking debate in the media: The role of citizens platforms as sources of information. Essachess. Journal for Communication Studies, 7(31), 45–62. Retrieved from https://www.essachess.com/index.php/jcs/article/view/234
Mercado, M. T., Sánchez, S. & Álvarez, Á. (2014). Los científicos como actores y fuentes en el discurso mediático sobre la energía nuclear. Prisma Social, 12, 544-580. Retrieved from http://www.isdfundacion.org/publicaciones/revista/numeros/12/secciones/tematica/t-16-cientificos-energia-nuclear.html
Mercado, M. T., Sahuquillo, F. & Sánchez, S. (2016). El encuadre del riesgo en la cobertura de la política energética en España. In M. T. Mercado & M. Chavez (Eds.), La comunicación en situaciones de riesgo y crisis (pp. 305-322). Valencia: Tirant Humanidades.
Mercado, M. T., Marco, E. & Álvarez, A. (2019). Exploring News Frames, Sources and Editorial Lines on Newspaper Coverage of Nuclear Energy in Spain. Environmental Communication, 13(4), 546-559. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2018.1435558
Nisbet, M., Brossard, D. & Kroepsch, A. (2003). Framign Science: The Stem Cell Controversy in an Age of Press/Politics. Harvard International Journal Press/politics, 8(2), 36–70. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1081180X02251047
Nisbet, M. (2008). Agenda building. www.onlinelibrary.wiley.com. https://www.doi.org/10.1002/9781405186407.wbieca035
Pan, Z. & Kosicki, G. (2001): Framing as a Strategic Action in Public Deliberation. In S. Reese, O. Gandy & A. Grant (Eds.), Framing Public Life. Perspectives on Media and Our Understanding of the Social World (pp. 35-65). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Peterson, T. & Thompson, J. (2009). Environmental Risk communication: Responding to Challenges of Complexity and Uncertainty. In R. L. Heath & D. O’Hai (Eds.), Handbook of Risk and Crisis Communication (pp. 591-606). NY: Routledge.
Prades, J., Gonzalo, J. L., de la Varga, A. & Farré, J. (2015). Participación pública en la gestión de residuos radiactivos. El emplazamiento del ATC. Papers, 100(4), 493-526. Retrieved from https://papers.uab.cat/article/view/v100-n4-prades-gonzalo-de-la-varga-farre
Rodríguez, I. & Bezunartea, M. J. (2015). El medio ambiente supeditado a la conveniencia de la economía y la política. Zer, 20(39), 85-100. Retrieved from https://www.ehu.eus/ojs/index.php/Zer/article/view/15523/14500
Sádaba, T. (2001). Orígenes, aplicación y límites de la ‘teoría del encuadre’ (framing) en comunicación. Comunicación y Sociedad, 14(2), 143-175. Retrieved from https://www.unav.edu/publicaciones/revistas/index.php/communication-and-society/article/view/36373
Sádaba, M. T., La Porte, M. T. & Rodríguez, J. (2008). La teoría del framing en la investigación en comunicación política. In M. J. Canel & M. J. Gurrionero (Eds.), Estudios de comunicación política (pp. 15-21). Madrid: Asociación Comunicación Política (ACOP).
Sahuquillo, F. (2017). Periodistas ante un conflicto energético. El caso de las prospecciones petrolíferas en el Mediterráneo. In M. Mercado (Ed.), El debate energético en los medios (pp. 147-164). Barcelona: Ed. UOC.
Sahuquillo, F. & Mercado, M. T. (2018). La movilización social contra los proyectos de prospecciones petrolíferas en el Golfo de Valencia en la prensa local. In H. Aznar, M. Pérez, A. Alonso & Aurora Edo (Eds.), El derecho de acceso a los medios de comunicación II. Participación ciudadana y sociedad civil (pp. 359-374). Valencia: Tirant Humanidades.
Sampedro, S. (1997). The Media Politics of Social Protest. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 2(2), 185-205. Retrieved from https://mobilizationjournal.org/doi/abs/10.17813/maiq.2.2.7u8q238714jj3203
Sandman, P., Sachsman, D., Greenberg, M. R. & Gochfield M. (2017). Environmental Risk and the Press. New York: Routledge.
Scheufele, D. A. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 4, 103- 122. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02784.x
Shoemaker, P. & Reese, S. (1996). Mediating the Message. London: Longman.
Schuck, A. & De Vreese, C. (2006). Between Risk and Opportunity. News Framing and its Effects on Public Support for EU Enlargement. European Journal of Communication, 21(1), 5-32. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0267323106060987
Snow, D., Soule, S. & Kriesi, H. (2006). Mapping the Terrain. In D. Snow, S. Soule & H. Kriesi (Eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements (pp. 3-16.). New Jersey: Blackwell Publishing.
Tarrow, S. (2011). Power in movement. Social Movements and Contentious Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Taylor, V. & Van Dyke, N. (2006). Get up, Stand up: Tactical Repertoires of Social Movements. In D. Snow, S. Soule & H. Kriesi (Eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements (pp. 262-293). New Jersey: Blackwell Publishing.
Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453-458. https://www.doi.org/10.1126/science.7455683
Tuchman, G. (1981). The symbolic annihilation of women by the mass media. In S. Cohen & J. Young (Eds.), The manufacture of news: Deviance, social problems and the mass media (pp. 169-185). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Valera, L. (2016). El sesgo mediocéntrico del framing en España: una revisión crítica de la aplicación de la teoría del encuadre en los estudios de comunicación. Zer. Revista de Estudios de Comunicación, 21(41), 13-31. Retrieved from https://www.ehu.eus/ojs/index.php/Zer/article/view/17259?source=/ojs/index.php/Zer/article/view/17259
Van Gorp, B. (2007). The constructionist approach to framing: Bringing culture back in. Journal of Communication, 57, 60-78. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9916.2007.00329.x
Vliegenthart, R. & Van Zoonen, L. (2011). Power to the frame: Bringing sociology back to frame analysis. European Journal of Communication, 26(2), 101-115. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0267323111404838
Vliegenthart, R. & S. Walgrave, S. (2012). The interdependency of Mass Media and Social Movements. In H. A. Semetko & M. Scammell (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Political Communication. London: Sage.
Wakefield, S. & Elliot, S. (2004). Constructing the News: The Role of Local Newspapers in Environmental Risk Communication. The Professional Geographer, 55(2), 216-226. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/0033-0124.5502009
Metrics
|
|
Details
Article Details
RIGHTS TRANSFER
By submitting the article for evaluation and subsequent publication in Communication & Society, the AUTHOR exclusively assigns the rights of public communication, reproduction, distribution and sale for commercial exploitation to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, for the maximum legal term in force -the entire life of the author and seventy years after his death or declaration of death-, in any country, and in any of the current and future edition modalities, both in print and electronic versions.
In the event that the article is not accepted for publication , this transfer of rights lapses with the communication of the refusal to the AUTHOR.
The AUTHOR affirms that the article is unpublished, that it has not been sent simultaneously to another publication medium and that the rights have not been transferred exclusively previously. He is responsible to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service for the authorship and originality of his work, as well as for all pecuniary charges that may arise for the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, in favor of third parties due to actions, claims or conflicts arising from the breach of obligations by the AUTHOR.
