Conversational bots used in political news from the point of view of the user’s experience: Politibot
Article Sidebar
322)
Main Article Content
Authors
Abstract
669
The production and distribution of news is changing. At the same time, the relationship between journalism and artificial intelligence systems is becoming stronger. Within this context, conversational bots have appeared, which are software applications that distribute personalised content (Al Johri et al., 2016) through social networks, online instant messaging apps, and mobile devices. This research presents a case study on the conversational political news bot known as Politibot, which is a pioneering, successful Spanish project that emerged during the 2016 election campaign. The study analyses users’ perceptions of the bot as a news and conversational tool based on their experience of use. An experimental methodology has been used in combination with other qualitative and quantitative research techniques (documentary analysis, direct observation, registration forms, as well as pre-test and post-test by means of questionnaires). The results show widespread acceptance in terms of reliability, comprehension, and the format regarding the information received from the bot, as well as its immediacy and customisation. However, the possibility of interacting with bots is still limited, which is also true of the case under study herein.
Keywords
References
Aguado, J. M. & Martínez, I. (2006). El proceso de mediatización de la telefonía móvil: de la interacción al consumo cultural. Zer. Revistas de Estudios en Comunicación, 20, 31943.
Anderson, C. W. (2012). Towards a sociology of computational and algorithmic journalism. New Media and Society, 15(7), 1005-1021. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1461444812465137
Anderson, C. W. (2013). What aggregators do: Towards a networked concept of journalisticexpertise in the digital age. Journalism, 14(8), 1008–1032. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1464884913492460
Cairo, A. (2011). El arte funcional: infografía y visualización de la información. Madrid: Alamut Ediciones.
Campos, E. & García, B. (2018). Comunicación algorítmica en los partidos políticos: automatización de producción y circulación de mensajes. El profesional de la información, 27(4), 769-777. https://www.doi.org/10.3145/epi.2018.jul.06
Coller, X. (2000). Estudio de casos. (Cuadernos metodológicos, 30). Madrid: CIS.
Bauman, Z. (2002). Modernidad líquida. México D.F.: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Bunz, M. (2010). In the US, algorithms are already reporting the news. The Guardian, 30th March 2010. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/media/pda/2010/mar/30/digital-media-algorithms-reporting-journalism
Carlson, M. (2015). The robotic reporter: Automated journalism and the redefinition of labor, compositional forms, and journalistic authority. Digital journalism, 3(3), 416-431. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2014.976412
Coddington, M. et al. (2014). Fact Checking the Campaign. How Political Reporters Use Twitter to Set the Record Straight (or Not). The lntemational Joumal of Press/Politics, 19(4), 391–409. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1940161214540942
Fernández, R. (2004). Evaluación psicológica. Conceptos, métodos y estudio de casos. Madrid: Pirámide.
Frasca, G. (2013). Newsgames: el crecimiento de los videojuegos periodísticos. In C. Scolari (Ed.), Homo videoludens 2.0. De Pacman a la gamification. (pp. 254-263). Barcelona: Col·lecció Transmedia XXI. Laboratori de Mitjans Interactius. Universitat de Barcelona.
Gaudenzi, S. (2009). Digital interactive documentary: from representing reality to co-creating reality. London: University of London. Centre for Cultural Studies (CCS) of Goldsmiths.
Gutiérrez-Rubí, A. (2016). Bots para la comunicación política. Gutierrez-rubi.es, 2nd November 2016. Retrieved from https://www.gutierrez-rubi.es/2016/11/02/bots-en-comunicacion-politica/
Hassan, Y. (2015). Experiencia de usuario: principios y métodos. Retrieved from http://yusef.es/Experiencia_de_Usuario.pdf
Interactive Advertising Bureau Spain (2017). Estudio Anual de Redes Sociales. Retrieved from http://iabspain.es/wpcontent/uploads/iab_estudioredessociales_2017_vreducida.pdf
Johri, A. Han, E. (Sam) & Mehta, D. (2016). Domain Specific Newsbots. Live Automated Reporting Systems involving Natural Language Communication. Computation + Journalism Symposium 2016. University of Standford, California. Retrieved from https://journalism.stanford.edu/cj2016/files/Newsbots.pdf
Ling, R. & Haddon, L. (2003). Mobile telephony and the coordination of mobility in everyday life. In J. Katz (Ed.), Machines That Become Us. The Social Context of Personal Communication Technology (pp. 245-266). New York: Routledge.
Oksman, V. & Rautiainen, P. (2002). Toda la vida en la palma de mi mano. La comunicación móvil en la vida diaria de niños adolescentes de Finlandia. Revista de Estudios de la Juventud, 57, 25-32.
Manchón, E. (2016). Por qué los chatbots matarán tu web, tu app y quizás también a Google. Eduardomanchon.com, 6th April 2016. Retrieved from https://eduardomanchon.com/por-qu%C3%A9-los-chatbots-matar%C3%A1n-tu-web-tu-app-y-quiz%C3%A1s-tambi%C3%A9n-a-google-6c612aac4bfc#.24hy6d2bv
Manovich, L. (2013). Software takes command. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Martín, V. (2009). Identidades juveniles móviles: la sociedad de la comunicación personal. Educación, Lenguaje y Sociedad, 6, 53-68.
Martini, S. (2000). Periodismo, noticia y noticiabilidad. Bogotá: Norma.
Martínez, J. L. (1993). Curso general de redacción periodística. Lenguaje, estilos y géneros periodísticos en prensa, radio, televisión y cine. Madrid: Paraninfo.
Nielsen, J. (2012). Usability 101: introduction to usability. Nielsen Norman Group, 4th January. Retrieved from https://www.nngroup.com/articles/usability-101-introduction-to-usability/
Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Nyhan, B. & Reifler, J. (2016). Estimating Fact-checking’s Efects. Evidence from a long-term experiment during campaign 2014. American Press Jnstitute, August. Retrieved from https://www.americanpressinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Estimating-Fact-Checkings-Effect.pdf
Lemelshtrich, N. (2015). The New World of Transitioned Media. In G. Einav (Ed.), The Economics of Information, Communication, and Entertainment. Digital Realignment and Industry Transformation (pp. 65-80). USA: Sprinter. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-09009-2_6#page-1
Lewis, S. C. & Nikki, U. (2013). Open source and Journalism: Toward New Frameworks for Imagining News Innovation. Media, Culture and Society, 35(5), 602-619. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0163443713485494
Lokot, T. & Diakopoulos, N. (2016). News Bots. Automating news and information dissemination on Twitter. Journal Digital Journalism, 4(6), 682-699. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2015.1081822
Pachico, E. (2016). Lo que necesitas saber para crear un bot de noticias. IJnet, 2nd November 2016. Retrieved from https://ijnet.org/es/blog/lo-que-necesitas-saber-para-crear-un-bot-de-noticias
Pérez, A. (2017). El Vocento Media Lab lanza InfoEsquí, un experimento de “periodismo-robot” para la temporada de nieve. Periodista Digital, 23rd February 2017. Retrieved from http://www.periodistadigital.com/periodismo/internet/2017/02/23/el-vocento-media-lab-lanza-infoesqui-un-experimento-de-periodismo-robot-para-la-temporada-de-nieve.shtml
Persily, N. (2016). Can democracy survive the internet? Journal of democracy, 28(2), 63-76. Retrieved from
https://www-cdn.law.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/07_28.2_Persily-web.pdf
Politibot (2017). Politibot: términos de uso. Retrieved from http://telegra.ph/Politibot-términos-de-uso-03-05
Rosique, G. & Barranquero, A. (2015). Periodismo lento (slow journalism) en la era de la inmediatez. Experiencias en Iberoamérica. El profesional de la información, 24(4), 451-462. https://www.doi.org/10.3145/epi.2015.jul.12
Sábada, Ch. & Salaverría, R. (2016). Los ‘labs’ de medios en España: modelos y tendencias. In A. Casero Ripollés (Coord.), Periodismo y democracia en el entorno digital (pp. 149-164). Salamanca: Sociedad Española de Periodística (SEP).
Sainz, M./Vocento Media Lab (2016). Los bots han llegado… ¿para quedarse? Medium.com, 16th July 2016. Retrieved from https://medium.com/@VocentoLab/los-bots-han-llegado-para-quedarse-214448cbc442
Sánchez, M., Palomo, B. & Sánchez, H. M. (Coords.) (2017). La influencia de la innovación en la verificación periodística. Mesa de debate propuesta para el Congreso Latina de Comunicación Social. Universidad La Laguna, Tenerife, 7th December 2017. Retrieved from http://www.revistalatinacs.org/17SLCS/2017_convocatoria_9_congreso.html#926
Sánchez, H. M. & Sánchez, M. (2017). Los bots como servicio de noticias y de conectividad emocional con las audiencias. El caso de Politibot. Doxa, 25, 63-84. Retrieved from http://doxacomunicacion.es/es/hemeroteca/articulos?id=218
Sánchez, H. M. & Martos, F. J. (2018). Telegram, nueva estrategia de comunicación e información periodística. In A. De Vicente Domínguez & Á. García Gómez (Eds.), Post-periodismo. Entre lo real y lo virtual (pp. 88-89). Málaga: Sociedad Española de Periodística (SEP).
Sánchez, H. M. (2012). Los dispositivos móviles y la conectividad emocional con el usuario TechPuntoCero. Retrieved from http://www.techpuntocero.com/los-dispositivos-moviles-y-la-conectividad-emocional-con-el-usuario/
Sánchez, M. (2013). Movilidad y participación. In M.ª Á. Cabrera González (Coord.), Evolución de los cibermedios. De la convergencia digital a la distribución multiplataforma (pp. 129-143). Madrid: Fragua.
Sánchez, M. (2011). Los smartphones como herramienta para el periodismo móvil: potencial y tendencias de uso por profesionales de la información, usuarios y empresas periodísticas. Contribution to III Congreso Latina de Comunicación Social. Universidad La Laguna, December 2011. In Actas, en CD-rom, del III Congreso. Retrieved from http://www.revistalatinacs.org/11SLCS/actas_2011_IIICILCS/076.pdf
Santana, J. (2017). ¿Qué son los bots? Tipos y usos en Enredia. Retrieved from https://www.enredia.es/que-son-los-bots-tipos-usos/
Scolari, C. A. (2013). Narrativas transmedia: cuando todos los medios cuentan. Barcelona: Deusto.
Soberman, J. (2013). User testing: how news designers and developers add context to quantitative data. Knight Lab, August 27. Retrieved from https://knightlab.northwestern.edu/2013/08/27/user-testing-how-news-designers-and-developers-add-context-to-quantitative-data/index.html
Suárez, E. (2016). Interview conducted in Sinercom (Networking entre proyectos universitarios y empresas) organized by the Laboratorio de Proyectos en Comunicación (LabProCom). Universidad de Sevilla.
Thurman, N., Dörr, K. & Kunert, J. (2017). When Reporters Get Hands-on with Robo-Writing. Professionals consider automated journalism’s capabilities and consequences. Journal Digital Journalism, 5. Special Issue: Journalism, Citizenship and Surveillance Society, 1-20. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1289819
Yin, R. K. (1998). Case study research. Design and methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Woolley, S. C. & Howard, P. N. (2017). Computational Propaganda Worldwide: Executive Summary. Working Paper, 11, 2017. Oxford: OII, University of Oxford. Retrieved from http://blogs.oii.ox.ac.uk/politicalbots/wp-content/uploads/sites/89/2017/06/Casestudies-ExecutiveSummary.pdf
Metrics
|
|
Details
Article Details
RIGHTS TRANSFER
By submitting the article for evaluation and subsequent publication in Communication & Society, the AUTHOR exclusively assigns the rights of public communication, reproduction, distribution and sale for commercial exploitation to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, for the maximum legal term in force -the entire life of the author and seventy years after his death or declaration of death-, in any country, and in any of the current and future edition modalities, both in print and electronic versions.
In the event that the article is not accepted for publication , this transfer of rights lapses with the communication of the refusal to the AUTHOR.
The AUTHOR affirms that the article is unpublished, that it has not been sent simultaneously to another publication medium and that the rights have not been transferred exclusively previously. He is responsible to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service for the authorship and originality of his work, as well as for all pecuniary charges that may arise for the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, in favor of third parties due to actions, claims or conflicts arising from the breach of obligations by the AUTHOR.
