Manuel Atienza e-mail(Login required)

Main Article Content

Authors

Manuel Atienza e-mail(Login required)

Abstract

200
The aim of the article is to discuss Viola’s paper on The Future of Law in which he offers an alternative to legal positivism. In the opinion of the author, Viola’s position, which can be characterized as natural law constitutionalism, presents some analogies with postpositivism, but also some significant differences.

Keywords

postpositivism, natural law theory, constitutionalism

References

Atienza, M., Filosofía del Derecho y transformación social, Trotta, Madrid, 2017.

Atienza, M., «Sobre la dignidad en la Constitución española de 1978», Revista do Ministério Público, Out-Dez (2017), pp. 9-30.

Capella J.R., Fruta prohibida. Una aproximación histórico-teórica al estudio del derecho y del estado, Trotta, Madrid, 2008.

Postema, G., «Jurisprudence, the Sociable Science», Virginia Law Review, 101/4 (2015), pp. 869-901.

Schauer, F., The force of law, Harvard University Press, 2015.

Vigo, R., «¿Dos o tres iusnaturalismos?», en Iusnaturalismo y neoconstitucionalismo. Coincidencias y diferencias, Porrúa, México, 2016, pp. 415-423.

Viola, F., «Il futuro del diritto», Persona y Derecho, 79 (2018, II) [en este mismo número], pp. 9-36.

Metrics

Search GoogleScholar


Details

Article Details

Section
Articles: The Future of Law