Surgery for urogenital propalse

Abstract

60

Urogenital prolapse can have a significant impact on quality of life. As the population continues to age, the prevalence of urogenital prolapse is increasing, and the lifetime risk of requiring surgery for urogenital prolapse or incontinence is now approximately 11%. The majority of women presenting with symptomatic prolapse suffer from multiple defects of pelvic support and require comprehensive repair to relieve symptoms. An understanding of normal pelvic support structures provides the basis for the anatomic approach to repair. Many appropriate options exist for surgical correction of urogenital prolapse.

Procedures to reestablish apical support include culdoplasty techniques, uterosacral ligament suspension, sacrospinous suspension and colpopexy. Repair of the anterior compartment can be achieved with colporrhaphy and paravaginal repair. Posterior compartment defects are repaired with colporrhaphy, site-specific rectovaginal repair and perineorrhaphy.

Most often, surgical correction of urogenital prolapse can be performed vaginally, which avoids the risks associated with laparotomy. Laparoscopic approaches for apical support and paravaginal repair may reduce the risks associated with laparotomy, but long-term follow-up data are not yet available with these techniques. The use of graft reinforcement for anterior and posterior repairs may offer improved success rates, particularly in patients with recurrent prolapse. However, further outcome studies are needed and the risks associated with the use of mesh must be considered.

Keywords

Urogenital prolapse, Anterior compartment, Cystocele, Paravaginal deffect, Posterior compartment, Rectocele, Support procedures