Epistemic primacy in interactional genres: mitigation, intensification and territory
Main Article Content
Abstract
![](https://revistas.unav.edu/social-icons/view.png)
Keywords
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2004.
Briz, Antonio. El español coloquial: situación y uso. Madrid: Arco-Libros, 1996.
Briz, Antonio. El español coloquial en la conversación: esbozo de pragmagramática. Barcelona: Ariel, 1998.
Briz, Antonio, y Grupo VAL.ES.CO. Corpus de conversaciones coloquiales. Madrid: Arco-Libros, 2002.
Briz, Antonio, y Grupo VAL.ES.CO. “Las unidades del discurso oral: la propuesta VAL.ES.CO. de segmentación de la conversación (coloquial)”. Estudios de Lingüística del Español 35.1 (2014): 11-71.
Cabedo, Adrián, y Salvador Pons. Corpus VAL.ES.CO. 2.0. 3 de marzo de 2016. .
Cantavella, Juan. Manual de la entrevista periodística. Barcelona: Ariel, 1996.
Clayman, Steven E. “Sequence and Solidarity”. Advances in Group Processes: Group Cohesion, Trust, and Solidarity. Eds. Shane R. Thye y Edward J. Lawler. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 2002. 229-53.
Clift, Rebecca. “Indexing Stance: Reported Speech as an Interactional Evidential”. Journal of Sociolinguistics 10.5 (2006): 569-95.
Cornillie, Bert, y Pedro Gras. “On the Interactional Dimension of Evidentials: The Case of the Spanish Evidential Discourse Markers”. Discourse Studies 17 (2014): 1-21.
Goffman, Erving. “The Territories of the Self”. Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Public Order. Ed. Erving Goffman. New York: Basic Books, 1971. 28-61.
Hayano, Kaoru. “Territories of Knowledge in Japanese Conversation”. Tesis doctoral. Nijmegen: Radboud University Nijmegen, 2013.
Heritage, John. “Conversation Analysis as Social Theory”. The New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory. Ed. Bryan S. Turner. London: Wiley-Blackwell, 2008. 300-20.
Heritage, John. “Territories of Knowledge, Territories of Experience: Empathic Moments in Interaction”. The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation. Eds. Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada y Jacob Steensig. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2011. 159-83.
Heritage, John. “The Epistemic Engine: Sequence Organization and Territories of Knowledge”. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45.1 (2012a): 30-52.
Heritage, John. “Epistemics in Action: Action Formation and Territories of Knowledge”. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45.1 (2012b): 1-29.
Heritage, John. “Action Formation and its Epistemic (and Other) Backgrounds”. Discourse Studies 15.5 (2013): 551-78.
Heritage, John, y Geoffrey Raymond. “The Terms of Agreement: Indexing Epistemic Authority and Subordination in Talk-in-Interaction”. Social Psychology Quarterly 68.1 (2005): 15-38.
Kamio, Akio. Territory of Information. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1997.
Kawanishi, Yumiko. “On the «Theory of Territory of Information»: An Interview with Akio Kamio”. Issues in Applied Linguistics 2.5 (1994): 437-48.
Labov, William, y David Fanshel. Therapeutic Discourse: Psychotherapy as Conversation. New York: Academic Press, 1977.
Lindwall, Oskar, Gustav Lymer y Jonas Ivarsson. “Epistemic Status and the Recognizability of Social Actions”. Discourse Studies 18.5 (2016): 500-25.
Lynch, Michael, y Jean Wong. “Reverting to a Hidden Interactional Order: Epistemics, Informationism, and Conversation Analysis”. Discourse Studies 18.5 (2016): 1-24.
Méndez García de Paredes, Elena. “Lo hablado en lo escrito: la entrevista periodística”. Oralia 6 (2003): 147-68.
Pomerantz, Anita. “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes”. Structures of Social Action. Eds. J. Maxwell Atkinson y John Heritage. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1984. 57-101.
Raymond, Geoffrey, y John Heritage. “The Epistemics of Social Relationships: Owning Grandchildren”. Language in Society 35.5 (2006): 677-705.
Sacks, Harvey. “On the Preferences for Agreement and Contiguity in Sequences in Conversation”. Talk and Social Organisation. Eds. Graham Button y John R. E. Lee. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 1987. 54-69.
Schegloff, Emmanuel. “Confirming Allusions: Toward an Empirical Account of Action”. American Journal of Sociology 104 (1996): 161-216.
Schegloff, Emmanuel. “Interaction: The Infrastructure for Social Institutions, the Natural Ecological Niche for Language, and the Arena in which Culture is Enacted”. Roots of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition and Interaction. Eds. Stephen Levinson y Nick Enfiel. London: Berg, 2006. 70-96.
Sidnell, Jack. “Who Knows Best? Evidentiality and Epistemic Asymmetry in Conversation”. Pragmatics and Society 3.2 (2012): 294-320.
Stivers, Tanya. “Modified Repeats: One Method for Asserting Primary Rights from Second Position”. Research on Language and Social Interaction 38.2 (2005): 131-58.
Stivers, Tanya. “Morality and Question Design: ‘Of Course’ as Contesting a Presupposition of Askability”. The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation. Eds. Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada y Jacob Steensig. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2011. 82-106.
Stivers, Tanya, Lorenza Mondada y Jacob Steensig. “Knowledge, Morality and Affiliation in Social Interaction”. The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation. Eds. Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada y Jacob Steensig. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2011. 3-24.
Vázquez Carranza, Ariel. “Agreement and Epistemics in Mexican Spanish Talk”. MA Thesis. Essex: University of Essex, 2009.
Details
Article Details
RIGHTS TRANSFER
By submitting the article for evaluation and subsequent publication in Rilce. Revista de Filología Hispánica, the AUTHOR grants exclusive economic and/or exploitation rights: reproduction, distribution, public communication, transformation/translation/creation of derivative works, and commercialisation to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, for the maximum legal period in force -the author's lifetime and seventy years after his or her death or declaration of death-, in any country, and in any of the current and future publishing modalities, both in print and electronic versions.
In the event that the article is not accepted for publication , this transfer of rights lapses with the communication of the refusal to the AUTHOR.
The AUTHOR affirms that the article is unpublished, that it has not been sent simultaneously to another publication medium and that the rights have not been transferred exclusively previously. He is responsible to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service for the authorship and originality of his work, as well as for all pecuniary charges that may arise for the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, in favor of third parties due to actions, claims or conflicts arising from the breach of obligations by the AUTHOR.