«Estoppel» y derecho internacional público: la búsqueda tortuosa y difusa de una «soberanía» conceptual
Barra lateral del artículo
0)
Contenido principal del artículo
Autores/as
Resumen
0
El trabajo analiza la institución del estoppel en su desarrollo en el derecho internacional. Identifica y discute la colocación del estoppel en derecho internacional, las características de su concepción genérica y su concepción restringida. Dentro de la concepción restringida, se pone énfasis en aquellos elementos que permiten una «soberanía » conceptual del estoppel con respecto a otras formas de compromisos jurídicos internacionales del Estado. De ahí se argumenta la operatividad de esta institución con respecto a actos unilaterales, aquiescencia y acuerdos tácitos.
Palabras clave
Referencias
Abou-El-Wafa, A., ≪Les differends internationaux concernant les frontieres terrestres dans la jurisprudence de la Cour internationale de Justice≫, Recueil des Cours de l'Academie de Droit International de la Haye, vol. 343, 2009, pp. 9-570.
Bermann, G. A., ≪International Arbitration and Private International Law, General Course on Private International Law≫, Recueil des Cours de l' Academie de Droit International de la Haye, vol. 381, 2017, pp. 41-478.
Bowett, D. W., ≪Estoppel before International Tribunals and Its Relation to Acquiescence≫, British YearBook of International Law, vol. 33, 1957, pp. 176- 202.
Cheng, B., General of Principles Law as applied by International Courts and Tribunals, London Stevens & Sons Limited, 1953.
Clapham, A., Brierly's Law of Nations. An Introduction to the Role of International Law in International Relations, 7a. ed., Oxford University Press, 2012.
Cottier, T.; Müller, J. P., ≪Estoppel≫, The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (https://opil.ouplaw.com/display/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1401?prd=OPIL)
Crawford, J., Brownlie's Principles of Public International Law, 9na ed., Oxford University Press, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198737445.001.0001
Crawford, J.; Pellet, A., ≪Anglo Saxon and Continental Approaches to Pleading Before the ICJ≫, en Isabelle Buffard, James Crawford, Alain Pellet, Stephan Wittich (eds.), International Law between Universalism and Fragmentation, Festschrift in Honour of Gerhard Hafner, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden, Boston 2008, pp. 831-868.
Cuniberti, G., ≪Le fondement de l'effet des jugements etrangers≫, Recueil des Cours de l' Academie de Droit International de la Haye, vol. 394, 2019, pp. 87-283. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004411814_015
Draft conclusions on subsequent agreements and subsequent practice in relation to the interpretation of treaties, with commentaries 2018, Yearbook of the International Law Commission, 2018, vol. ii, Part Two.
Fitzmaurice, G., ≪The general principles of international law considered from the standpoint of the rule of law≫, Recueil des Cours de l' Academie de Droit International de la Haye, vol. 92, 1957, pp. 1-227.
Gaja, G., ≪General Principles of Law≫, Max Planck Encyclopedias of International Law (https://opil.ouplaw.com/display/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1410).
Garnett, R., ≪Estoppel and Enforcement of International Arbitration Awards≫, Australian Law Journal, vol. 95, num. 5, 2021, pp. 337-347.
Gutiérrez Espada, C.; Cervell Hortal, M.J., Derecho Internacional (Corazon y funciones), Civitas, Thomson Reuters, 2022.
Hartley, T. C., ≪The Modern Approach to Private International Law: International Litigation and Transactions from a Common-Law Perspective≫, Recueil des Cours de l' Academie de Droit International de la Haye, vol. 319, 2016, pp. 9-324.
Higgins, R., ≪International trade law and the avoidance, containment and resolution of disputes: General Course on Public International Law≫, Recueil des Cours de l' Academie de Droit International de la Haye, vol. 230, 1991, pp. 9-341.
Hobér, K., ≪Res Judicata and Lis Pendens in International Arbitration≫, Recueil des Cours de l' Academie de Droit International de la Haye, vol. 366, 2013, pp. 99-406.
Jennings, R. Y., The Acquisition of Territory in International Law, Manchester University Press, Manchester, 1963.
Jímenez García, F., Los comportamientos reciprocos en Derecho Internacional. A proposito de la aquiescencia, el estoppel y la confianza legitima, Dilex, 2002.
Kaijun, P., ≪A Re-Examination of Estoppel in International Jurisprudence≫, Chinese Journal of International Law, vol. 16, num. 4, 2017, pp. 751-786. https://doi.org/10.1093/chinesejil/jmy001
Kassoti, E., The Juridical Nature of Unilateral Acts of States in International Law, Brill Nijhoff, Leiden, Boston, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004300767
Kohen, M., Possession contestee et souverainete territoriale, Graduate Institute Publications, 1997. https://doi.org/10.4000/books.iheid.1292
Kolb, R., ≪General Principles of Procedural Law≫, en Andreas Zimmermann, Christian J. Tams, Karin Oellers-Frahm, Christian Tomuschat (eds.), The Statute of the International Court of Justice. A Commentary, 2da ed., Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 871-908.
Kolb, R., Good Faith in International Law, Hart Publishing, Oxford and Portland, Oregon 2017.
Lauterpacht, E., ≪The development of the law of international organization by the decisions of international tribunals≫, Recueil des Cours de l' Academie de Droit International de la Haye, vol. 152, 1976, pp. 377-478.
López Martín, A. G., ≪Principios y reglas de solucion aplicables a las controversias territoriales a la luz de la jurisprudencia de la Corte Internacional de Justicia≫, Anuario Colombiano de Derecho Internacional, vol. 6, 2013, pp. 15-45.
MacGibbon, I. C., ≪Estoppel in International Law≫, The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, vol. 7, num. 3, 1958, pp. 468-513. https://doi.org/10.1093/iclqaj/7.3.468
Mariño Menéndez, F. M., Derecho Internacional Publico (Parte General), 4ta., ed., revisada, Trotta, 2005.
McCarthy, B., ≪Judge Gerald Fitzmaurice, Separate Opinion, Temple of Preah Vihear, 1962≫, en Jill Barrett and Jean-Pierre Gauci (eds.), British Contributions to International Law, 1915-2015 (Set), Brill Nijhoff, 2021, pp. 507-522. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004386242_022
McNair, A. D., ≪The Legality of the Occupation of the Ruhr≫, British Year Book of International Law, vol. 5, 1924, pp. 17-37.
Mosk, R. M., ≪The role of facts in international dispute resolution≫, Recueil des Cours de l' Academie de Droit International de la Haye, vol. 304, 2003, pp. 9-180.
Pellet, A., ≪ Le droit international a la lumiere de la practique : l'introuvable theorie de la realite, Cours general de droit international public ≫, Recueil des Cours de l' Academie de Droit International de la Haye, vol. 414, 2021, pp. 9-547.
Pellet, A.; Müller, D., ≪Commentary of Article 38 of the Statute of the International Court of Justice≫, en Andreas Zimmermann, Christian J. Tams, Karin Oellers-Frahm, Christian Tomuschat (eds.), The Statute of the International Court of Justice: A Commentary, 3ra ed., Oxford University Press, 2019, pp. 819-962.
Pintor, R., ≪La prescription en droit international≫, Recueil des Cours de l' Academie de Droit International de la Haye, vol. 87, 1955, pp. 387-455.
Remiro Brotons, R. et al., Derecho Internacional. Curso General, Tirant lo Blanch, Valencia, 2010.
Scheuner, U., ≪L'influence du droit interne sur la formation du droit international ≫, Recueil des Cours de l'Academie de Droit International de la Haye, vol. 68, 1939, pp. 95-206.
Schwarzenberger, G., ≪The fundamental principles of international law≫, Recueil des Cours de l' Academie de Droit International de la Haye, vol. 87, 1955, pp. 191-385.
Segundo informe de Sir Humphrey Waldock, Relator Especial, Documento A/CN.4/156 y Add.l a 3, Anuario de la Comision de Derecho Internacional, vol. ii.
Shaw, M. N., International Law, 8ta. ed., Cambridge University Press, 2017.
Tercer informe sobre los principios generales del derecho presentado por Marcelo Vazquez- Bermudez, Relator Especial, Comision de Derecho Internacional, 18 de abril de 2022, A/CN.4/753.
Thirlway, H., ≪Concepts, principles, rules and analogies: international and municipal legal reasoning≫, Recueil des Cours de l' Academie de Droit International de la Haye, vol. 294, 2002, pp. 265-405.
Thirlway, H., ≪The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice 1960-1989: Part One≫, British Yearbook of International Law, vol. 60, num. 1, 1989, pp. 1-157. https://doi.org/10.1093/bybil/60.1.1
Thirlway, H., The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice: Fifty Years of Jurisprudence, vol. ii, Oxford University Press, 2015.
Tomuschat, Ch., ≪General International Law: A New Source of International Law?≫, en R. Pisillo Mazzeschi, P. De Sena (ed.), Global Justice, Human Rights and the Modernization of International Law, Springer, 2018, pp. 185-204. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90227-2_8
Venturini, G., ≪La portee et les effets juridiques des attitudes et des actes unilateraux des etats≫, Recueil des Cours de l' Academie de Droit International de la Haye, vol. 112, 1964, pp. 363-467.
Wass, J., ≪Jurisdiction by Estoppel and Acquiescence in International Courts and Tribunals≫, British Yearbook of International Law, vol. 86, num. 1, 2016, pp. 155-195. https://doi.org/10.1093/bybil/brx005
Williams, J. F., ≪La doctrine de la reconnaissance en droit international et ses developpements recents≫, Recueil des Cours de l' Academie de Droit International de la Haye, vol. 44, 1933, pp. 199-314.
Wortley, B. A., ≪The interaction of public and private international law today≫, Recueil des Cours de l'Academie de Droit International de la Haye, vol. 85, 1954, pp. 239-342.
Yee, S., ≪Article 40≫, en Andreas Zimmermann, Christian J. Tams, Karin Oellers- Frahm, Christian Tomuschat (eds.), The Statute of the International Court of Justice. A Commentary, 2da ed., Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 922-999.
Referencias jurisprudenciales
AFC Investment Solutions S.L. v. Republic of Colombia, icsid Case No. ARB/20/16.
Aguilar-Amory and Royal Bank of Canada claims (Great Britain v. Costa Rica), en Reports of International Arbitral, 18 October 1923, vol. I, United Nations.
Amco Asia Corporation and others v. Republic of Indonesia, icsid Case No. ARB/81/1, Decision on Jurisdiction, 25 September 1983.
Amco Asia Corporation v Republic of Indonesia, icsid Case No. ARB/81/1, Resubmitted Case, Decision on Jurisdiction, 10 May 1988.
American Bell International Inc. v. The Islamic Republic of Iran, the Ministry of Defense of the Islamic Republic of Iran, the Ministry of Post, Telegraph and Telephone of the Islamic Republic of Iran and the Telecommunications Company of Iran, iusct Case No. 48.
Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro), Judgment, i.c.j. Reports 2007.
Arbitration between Barbados and the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago, relating to the delimitation of the exclusive economic zone and the continental shelf between them, decision of 11 April 2006, en Reports of International Arbitral Awards, vol. xxvii.
Argentine-Chile Frontier Case, 24 November, 1966, en Reports of International Arbitral Awards, vol. xvi.
Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (New Application: 2002) (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Rwanda), Jurisdiction and Admissibility, Judgment, i.c.j. Reports 2006.
Avena and Other Mexican Nationals (Mexico v. United States of America), Judgment, i.c.j. Reports 2004.
Award in the arbitration regarding the delimitation of the maritime boundary between Guyana and Suriname, Award of 17 September 2007, en Reports of International Arbitral Awards, vol. xxx, United Nations, 2012.
Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited, Preliminary Objections, Judgment. i.c.j. Reports 1964.
Belle M. Hendry (U.S.A.) v. United Mexican States, General Claims Commission (United Mexican States, United States of America), 8 October 1930 - July 1931, en Reports of International Arbitral, vol. iv, October 8, 1930.
Border and Transborder Armed Actions (Nicaragua v. Honduras), Jurisdiction and Admissibility, Judgment, i.c.j. Reports 1988.
Boundary dispute between Argentina and Chile concerning the frontier line between boundary post 62 and Mount Fitzroy, 21 October 1994, en Reports of International Arbitral Awards, vol. xxii, United Nations, 2006.
Cambodia Power Company v. Kingdom of Cambodia and Electricite du Cambodge LLC, icsid Case No. ARB/09/18, Decision on Jurisdiction, March 22, 2011.
Canfor Corporation v. United States of America; Terminal Forest Products Ltd. v. United States of America, uncitral, Order of the Consolidation Tribunal, September 7, 2005.
Case concerning the Arbitral Award made by the King of Spain on 23 December 1906, Judgment of 18 November 1960: I.C. J. Reports 1960.
Case concerning the location of boundary markers in Taba between Egypt and Israel, 29 September 1988, en Reports of International Arbitral Awards, vol. xx, United Nations, 2006.
Case concerning the Temple of Preah Vihear (Cambodia v. Thailand), Merits, Judgment of 15 June 1962: i.c.j. Reports 1962.
Case of Salvador Prats v. the United States of America, opinions of the Commissioners, Opinion of Mr. Wadsworth, Commissioner of the United States, Mixed Commission established under the Convention concluded between the United States of America and Mexico on 4 July 1868, en Reports of International Arbitral Awards, vol. xxix, United Nations, 2012.
Case of the Representatives of Captain John Clark et al. v. Venezuela, opinion of the Commissioner, Mr. Findlay, Claims Commission established under the Convention concluded between the United States of America and Venezuela on 5 December 1885, en Reports of International Arbitral Awards, vol. xxix, United Nations, 2012.
Certain Iranian Assets (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America), Preliminary Objections Submitted by The United States of America, International Court of Justice, May 1, 2017.
Certain Iranian Assets (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America), Preliminary Objections, Judgment, i.c.j. Reports 2019.
Československa obchodni Banka, A.S. v. The Slovak Republic, icsid Case No. ARB/97/4, Decision of the Tribunal on Objections to Jurisdiction, May 24, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1093/icsidreview/15.2.542
Chagos Marine Protected Area (Republic of Mauritius v. United Kingdom), Award, 18 March 2015 (162 ILR 1). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107416116.001
Chevron Corporation (USA) and Texaco Petroleum Company (USA) v. The Republic of Ecuador, uncitral, PCA Case No. 34877, Interim Award, 1 December 2008.
Chevron Corporation and Texaco Petroleum Company v. The Republic of Ecuador, uncitral, PCA Case No. 34877, Partial Award on the Merits, March 30, 2010.
Chevron Corporation and Texaco Petroleum Corporation v. Ecuador (ii), PCA Case No. 2009-23, Second Partial Award on Track ii, 30 August 2018.
Chorzow Factory (Jurisdiction) PCIJ Rep Series A no 9 (1927).
Claim of Finnish shipowners against Great Britain in respect of the use of certain Finnish vessels during the war (Finland, Great Britain), 9 May 1934, en Reports of International Arbitral, vol. iii, United Nations.
Company General of the Orinoco Case, French-Venezuelan Commission, 1902, 31 July 1905, en Reports of International Arbitral, vol. x, United Nations.
Concurring Opinion of Richard M. Mosk, Oil Field of Texas, Inc. v. The Government of The Islamic Republic of Iran and National Iranian Oil Company, iusct (Iran-Us Claims Tribunal) iusct Case No. 43.
Cornelia J. Pringle, et al. (Santa Isabel Claims) (U.S.A.) v. United Mexican States, Mexico/U.S.A. (Special Claims Commission), 26 April 1926, en Reports of International Arbitral, vol. iv, United Nations.
Cortec Mining Kenya Limited, Cortec (Pty) Limited and Stirling Capital Limited v. Republic of Kenya, icsid Case No. ARB/15/29.
Delimitation of the Border (Eritrea-Ethiopia) 13 April 2002 - 7 November 2002, en Reports of International Arbitral Awards, vol. xxv.
Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary in the Atlantic Ocean (Ghana/Cote d'Ivoire), Judgment, ITLOS Reports 2017.
Delimitation of the maritime boundary in the Bay of Bengal (Bangladesh/Myanmar), Judgment, ITLOS Reports 2012.
Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary in the Gulf of Maine Area (Canada/United States of America), Judgment, i.c.j. Reports 1984.
Desert Line Projects LLC v. The Republic of Yemen, icsid Case No. ARB/05/17, Award, February 6, 2008, parr. 207.
Dispute Concerning Coastal State Rights in the Black Sea, Sea of Azov, and Kerch Strait (Ukraine v. the Russian Federation), PCA Case No. 2017-06, Award Concerning the Preliminary Objections of the Russian Federation, 21 February 2020.
Dissenting Opinion of Judge Wellington Koo, Case concerning the Temple of Preah Vihear (Cambodia v. Thailand), Judgment of 15 June 1962, i.c.j. Reports 1962.
Dissenting Opinion of Sir Percy Spender, Case concerning the Temple of Preah Vihear (Cambodia v. Thailand), Judgment of 15 June 1962, i.c.j. Reports 1962.
Draft conclusions on subsequent agreements and subsequent practice in relation to the interpretation of treaties, with commentaries 2018, Yearbook of the International Law Commission, 2018, vol. ii, Part Two.
Duke Energy International Peru Investments No. 1, LTD. y Republica del Peru, Caso CIADI No. ARB/03/28, Laudo de 18 de agosto de 2008.
Elettronica Sicula S.P.A. (ELSI), Judgment, i.c.j. Reports 1989.
Eritrea-Ethiopia Claims Commission - Partial Award: Civilian Claims - Eritrea's Claims 15, 16, 23 and 27-32, 17 December 2004, en Reports of International Arbitral Awards, vol. xxvi, United Nations.
Fisheries case, Judgment of December 18th, I951: i.c.j. Reports 1951.
Flegenheimer Case-Decision No. 182, 20 September 1958, en Reports of International Arbitral Awards, vol. xiv.
Gabčikovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary/Slovakia), Judgment, i.c.j. Reports 1997.
Haya de la Torre Case, Judgment of June 13th, 1951: I.C. J. Reports 1951.
Inceysa Vallisoletana S.L. v. Republic of El Salvador, icsid Case No. ARB/03/26.
Indo-Pakistan Western boundary (Rann of Kutch) between India and Pakistan, en Reports of International Arbitral Awards, vol. xvii, 19 February 1968.
Ioannis Kardassopoulos v. The Republic of Georgia, icsid Case No. ARB/05/18, Decision on Jurisdiction, 6 Jul 2007.
Joint Separate Opinion of Judges Wolfrum and Judge Cot, ≪ARA Libertad≫ (Argentina v. Ghana), Provisional Measures, Order of 15 December 2012, ITLOS Reports 2012.
Jurisdiction of the European Commission of the Danube between Galatz and Braila, Advisory Opinion of 8 December 1927 (Series B, No. 14).
Land and Maritime Boundary between Cameroon and Nigeria (Cameroon v. Nigeria), Preliminary Objections, Judgment, i.c.j. Reports 1998.
Land, Island and Maritime Frontier Dispute (El Salvador/Honduras), Application to Intervene, Judgment, i.c.j. Reports 1990.
Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Advisory Opinion, i.c.j. Reports 2004.
Legal Status of Eastern Greenland, PCIJ Series A/B. No 53, Judgment of 5 April 1933.
Maritime Delimitation in the Indian Ocean (Somalia v. Kenya), Judgment, i.c.j. Reports 2021.
Maritime Delimitation in the Indian Ocean (Somalia v. Kenya), Preliminary Objections, Judgment, i.c.j. Reports 2017.
Maritime Dispute (Peru v. Chile), Judgment, i.c.j. Reports 2014.
Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America), Jurisdiction and Admissibility, Judgment, i.c.j. Reports 1984.
Murphy Exploration & Production Company International v. Republic of Ecuador, PCA Case No. 2012-16 (formerly AA 434), Partial Award on Jurisdiction, 13 November 2013.
North Sea Continental Shelf Cases, Judgment, 20 February 1969, i.c.j. Reports 1969.
Nuclear Tests, i.c.j. Reports 1974.
Obligation to Negociate Access to the Pacific Ocean (Bolivia V. Chile), Reply of the Government of the Plurinational State of Bolivia, vol. I, 21 March 2017.
Obligation to Negotiate Access to the Pacific Ocean (Bolivia v. Chile), Rejoinder of Chile, vol. 1, 15 September 2017.
Obligation to Negotiate Access to the Pacific Ocean (Bolivia v. Chile), Judgment, i.c.j. Reports 2018.
Obligation to Negotiate Access to the Pacific Ocean (Bolivia v. Chile), Reply of Bolivia, vol. 1, 21 March 2017.
Oded Besserglik v, Republic of Mozambique, icsid Case No. ARB(AF)/14/2, Award, October 28, 2019.
Oil Platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America), Judgment, i.c.j. Reports 2003.
Opinion Disidente de M. Anzilotti, Interpretation des Arrets Nos 7 et 8 (Usine de Chorzow), C.P.J.I., Serie A, No 13.
Opinion Disidente de M. Anzilotti, Legal Status of Eastern Greenland, PCIJ Series A/B. No 53, Judgment, 5 April 1933.
Pan American Energy LLC and BP Argentina Exploration Company v. Argentine Republic, icsid Case No. ARB/03/13.
Pan American Energy LLC and BP Argentina Exploration Company v. The Argentine Republic, icsid Case No. ARB/03/13, Decision on Preliminary Objections, July 27, 2006.
Philip Morris Asia Limited v. The Commonwealth of Australia, uncitral, PCA Case No. 2012-12, Award on Jurisdiction and Admissibility, 17 December 2015.
Plama Consortium Limited v. Republic of Bulgaria, Award, icsid Case No. ARB/03/24.
Proposal of Mr. Nasrollah Entezam, Indo-Pakistan Western boundary (Rann of Kutch) between India and Pakistan, en Reports of International Arbitral Awards, vol. xvii, 19 February 1968.
Report on the Law of Treaties by Mr. H. Lauterpacht, Special Rapporteur, Document A/ CN.4/63, Yearbook of the International Law Commission, vol. ii, 1953.
Resolute Forest Products Inc. and Government of Canada, Final Award, July 25, 2022, PCA Case No. 2016-13, Separate Statement of Dean Ronald A. Cass, July 25, 2022.
Resolute Forest Products Inc. and Government of Canada, Final Award, July 25, 2022, PCA Case No. 2016-13.
RSM Production Corporation and others v. Grenada, icsid Case No. ARB/10/6, Award, December 10, 2010.
Rumeli Telekom A.S. And Telsim Mobil Telekomikasyon Hizmetleri A.S., Claimants V.
Republic of Kazakhstan, Respondent, Award, icsid Case No. ARB/05/16.
Rupert Joseph Binder v. Czech Republic, Award on Jurisdiction, 6 June 2007.
Separate Opinion by Sir Arnold McNair, International status of South-West Africa, Advisory Opinion: I.C. J. Reports 1950.
Separate Opinion of Judge Ajibola, Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, Provisional Measures, Order of 13 September 1993, I. C.J. Reports 1993.
Separate Opinion of Judge Ajibola, Territorial Dispute (Libyan Arab Jamahiriya/Chad), Judgment, i.c.j. Reports 1994.
Separate Opinion of Judge Fitzmaurice, Case concerning the Temple of Preah Vihear (Cambodia v. Thailand), Merits, Judgment of 15 June 1962, i.c.j. Reports 1962.
Separate Opinion of Judge Fouad Ammoun, North Sea Continental Shelf: Judgment, I. C. J. Reports 1969.
Separate Opinion of Sir Gerald Fitzmaurice, Case concerning the Temple of Preah Vihear (Cambodia v. Thailand), Judgment of 15 June 1962, i.c.j. Reports 1962.
Separate Opinion of Sir Percy Spender, Case concerning the Arbitral Award made by the King of Spain on 23 December 1906, Judgment of 18 November 1960: I.C. J. Reports 1960.
Separate Opinion of Vice-President Alfaro, Case concerning the Temple of Preah Vihear (Cambodia v. Thailand), Merits, Judgment of 15 June 1962: I.C. J. Reports 1962, p. 6.
Shufeldt claim (Guatemala, USA), 24 July 1930, en Reports of International Arbitral Awards, vol. ii, United Nations, 2006.
Sovereignty over Pedra Branca/Pulau Batu Puteh, Middle Rocks and South Ledge (Malaysia/ Singapore), Judgment, i.c.j. Reports 2008.
Temple of Preah Vihear (Cambodia v. Thailand), Judgment of 15 June 1962, Separate Opinion of Sir Gerald Fitzmaurice, i.c.j. Reports 1962.
The Republic of The Philippines and The People's Republic of China, Award on Jurisdiction and Admissibility, PCA Case No 2013-19, 29 October 2015.
The South China Sea Arbitration (The Republic of Philippines v. The People's Republic of China), PCA Case No. 2013-19, Award on Jurisdiction and Admissibility, 29 October 2015.
Vestey Group Ltd v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, icsid Case No. ARB/06/4, Award.
Waguih Elie George Siag and Clorinda Vecchi v. The Arab Republic of Egypt, icsid Case No. ARB/05/15, Award, June 1, 2009.
Yukos Universal Limited (Isle of Man) and The Russian Federation, Final Award, 18 July 2014, PCA Case No. AA 227.
Métricas
|
|
Detalles
Detalles del artículo
Esta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObrasDerivadas 4.0.
CESIÓN DE DERECHOS
Al enviar el artículo para su evaluación y posterior publicación en la revista Anuario Español de Derecho Internacional, el AUTOR cede de manera exclusiva los derechos de comunicación pública, reproducción, distribución y venta para su explotación comercial a la Universidad de Navarra a través de su Servicio de Publicaciones, por el plazo máximo legal vigente -toda la vida del autor y setenta años después de su muerte o declaración de fallecimiento-, en cualquier país, y en cualquiera de las actuales y futuras modalidades de edición tanto en versión impresa como electrónica.
En el caso de que el artículo no fuera aceptado para su publicación, esta cesión de derechos decae con la comunicación de la negativa al AUTOR.
El AUTOR afirma que el artículo es inédito, que no ha sido enviado simultáneamente a otro medio de publicación y que los derechos no han sido cedidos de forma exclusiva con anterioridad. Se hace responsable frente a la Universidad de Navarra a través de su Servicio de Publicaciones de la autoría y originalidad de su obra, así como de todas las cargas pecuniarias que pudieran derivarse para Universidad de Navarra a través de su Servicio de Publicaciones, a favor de terceros con motivo de acciones, reclamaciones o conflictos derivados del incumplimiento de obligaciones por parte del AUTOR.
