Álvaro de Silva e-mail(Login required)

Main Article Content

Authors

Álvaro de Silva e-mail(Login required)

Abstract

137
It has been sait that Thomas More, obliged by the requirements of controversy, exaggerates the visible social and juridical aspects of the Church and thereby neglects its nature of mystery. The author wants to demonstrate in this study that this affirmation is not exact. Thomas More bases his ecclesiology on a firm christological foundation which requires and at the same time makes possible an adequate consideration of the Spouse of Christ who has the Holy Spirit as her principle of life.

The so called H-extension of the Responsio ad Lutherum which is posterior to the original composition of the work, gives special testimony to the ecclesiological equilibrium established by More between the visible and the invisible. More did not limit himself to affirm without foundation what Luther denied. In the Church, as in Christ, the invisible shines in the visible, the Spirit manifest Himself in the unity of Christians, and evangelical freedom is reflected in the hierarchical institution.

More demonstrates that the idea of an invisible Church is a notion without meaning, very similar to a platonic idea. The testimony of Thomas More concerning the nature of the Church should be considered as being part of the same current which reaches from the Pauline epistles up to St. Augustine and to the medieval contributions of Alexander of Hales, St. Bonaventure and St. Thomas Aquinas.

Metrics

Search GoogleScholar




Details

Article Details

Section
En el V Centenario de Tomás Moro

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>