Regina-Nino Mion e-mail(Inicie sesión)

Contenido principal del artículo

Autores/as

Regina-Nino Mion e-mail(Inicie sesión)

Resumen

1028
The aim of the article is to argue against the claim that Edmund Husserl does not adequately distinguish physical imagination from phantasy in his early texts. Thus, the article examines Husserl’s early theory of imagination according to which phantasy and image consciousness (understood as physical imagination) have similar structure of pictorialization but they differ with respect to apprehension contents and the number of apprehended objects: phantasy involves phantasms and two apprehended objects but physical imagination involves sensations and have three apprehended objects.

Referencias

A. S. ALDEA, Husserl’s Struggle with Mental Images: Imaging and Imagining Reconsidered, in “Continental Philosophy Review” 46/3 (2013) 371-94

R. BERNET, Unconscious Consciousness in Husserl and Freud, in D. WELTON (ed.), The New Husserl: A Critical Reader (Indiana University Press, Bloomington, 2003) 199-219

R. BERNET, I. KERN, E. MARBACH, An Introduction to Husserlian Phenomenology (Northwestern University Press, Chicago, 1993)

J. BROUGH, Translator’s Introduction, in E. HUSSERL, Phantasy, Image Consciousness, and Memory (1898-1925), Collected Works, Vol. XI, trans. J. BROUGH (Springer, Dordrecht, 2005) xxix–lxviii

J. BROUGH, Some Husserlian Comments on Depiction and Art, in “American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly” LXVI/2 (1992) 241-59

C. FERENCZ-FLATZ, The Neutrality of Images and Husserlian Aesthetics, in “Studia Phaenomenologica” 9 (2009) 477-93

E. HUSSERL, Phantasy, Image Consciousness, and Memory (1898-1925), Collected Works, Vol. XI, trans. J. BROUGH (Springer, Dordrecht, 2005)

E. HUSSERL, Logical Investigations., D. MORAN (ed.), vol. 2 (Routledge, New York/London, 2001)

E. HUSSERL, On the Phenomenology of the Consciousness of Internal Time (1893-1917) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1991)

E. HUSSERL, Phantasie, Bildbewusstsein, Erinnerung: Zur Phänomenologie der Anschaulichen Vergegenwärtigungen. Texte aus dem Nachlass (1898–1925), Husserliana XXIII, E. MARBACH (ed.) (Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, 1980)

J. JANSEN, Phantasy’s Systematic Place in Husserl’s Work: On the Condition of Possibility for a Phenomenology of Experience, in R. BERNET, D. WELTON, G. ZAVOTA (eds.), Edmund Husserl: Critical Assessments of Leading Philosophers, Vol. III (Routledge, New York/London, 2005) 221-43

E. MARBACH, Einleitung des Herausgebers, in E. HUSSERL, Phantasie, Bildbewusstsein, Erinnerung: Zur Phänomenologie der Anschaulichen Vergegenwärtigungen. Texte aus dem Nachlass (1898–1925), Husserliana XXIII, E. MARBACH (ed.) (Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, 1980) xxv–lxxxii

J. N. MOHANTY, The Development of Husserl’s Thought, in B. SMITH, D. W. SMITH (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Husserl (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995) 45-77

R. D. ROLLINGER, Husserl and Brentano on Imagination, in „Archiv Für Geschichte Der Philosophie“ 75 (1993) 195-210

P. SHUM, The Evolution and Implications of Husserl’s Account of the Imagination, “Husserl Studies” 31/3 (2015) 213-36

R. SOKOLOWSKI, The Formation of Husserl’s Concept of Constitution (Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, 1970)

Métricas

Search GoogleScholar




Detalles

Detalles del artículo

Sección
Estudios
Biografía del autor/a

Regina-Nino Mion, Institute of Art History. TRAV. URDAX 4 4º D

31011