Social Media: useful for high-risk industries? A study of nuclear energy in Spain
Article Sidebar
250)
Main Article Content
Authors
Abstract
511
Social Media has become an unquestionable communicative tool for most organizations. Companies want to participate in the conversation on the network for various purposes: attracting new customers, promoting their products, exalting their brand, searching for prescribers, etc. However, those corporations that belong to risk sectors –as is the case of nuclear power plants– show initial suspicion because they consider that new forms of communication contribute to encouraging criticism of their business model, producing a deterioration in their image. The methodology used in this research is based on three pillars: a review of the literature on CSR, corporate reputation, Social Media and Nuclear Communication; exploration of Social Media in search of official profiles of nuclear power plants; and interviews with those responsible for communicating atomic plants to know their perception in the use of these supports. Spanish nuclear power plants do not actively use Social Media. These facilities rely on monologic communication tools and tactics, although they need dialogue for acceptance and long-term operation. Social Media are essential tools for risk sectors: to disseminate the science they make, to collect feedback and respond to criticism, and to seek consensus.
Keywords
References
Alcázar, Juan Pedro. Jefe de Comunicación de CNAT (2016). Entrevista en profundidad: Sede corporativa Centrales Nucleares Almaraz-Trillo (Madrid), December 21, 2016.
Bachmann, P. & Ingenhoff, D. (2016). Legitimacy through CSR disclosures? The advantage outweighs the disadvantages. Public Relations Review, 42(3), 386–394. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2016.02.008
Balmer, J. M. & Gray, E. R. (1998). Managing Corporate Image and Corporate Reputation. Long Range Planning, 31(5), 695-702. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301(98)00074-0
Balmer, J. M. & Worcester, R. (2009). Reflections on corporate reputations. Management Decision, 47(4), 573-589.
Benítez-Eyzaguirre, L. (2016). Análisis de la recomendación entre iguales en la reputación online de las organizaciones. El Profesional de la Información, 25(4), 652-660. https://www.doi.org/10.3145/epi.2016.jul.15
Broon, P. S. (2007). Relationships outcomes as determinants of reputation. Corporate Communication: An International Journal, 12(4), 376-393. https://www.doi.org/10.1108/13563280710832524
Butterick, K. (2011). Introducing public relations: theory and practice. Los Angeles: SAGE.
Campos-Freire, F. (2010). La gestión de la “conversación” mediática y la reputación on line. Chasqui, 112, 36-44. https://www.doi.org/10.16921/chasqui.v0i112.302
Carrillo-Durán, M. V. (2016). Importancia del profesional de la información en la dirección de comunicación de las organizaciones. El Profesional de la Información, 25(2), 272-278. https://www.doi.org/10.3145/epi.2016.mar.14
Caruana, A. (1997). Corporate reputation: concept and measurement. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 6(2), 109-118.
Castelló, I., Morsing, M. & Schultz, F. (2013). Communicative Dynamics and the Polyphony of Corporate Social Responsibility in the Network Society. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(4), 683-694. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1954-1
Castillo, A. & Ponce, D. G. (2015). Comunicación de crisis 2.0. Madrid: Fragua.
Chaarlas, L. J. (2012). Utilitarianism in CSR Reporting: The Maximum Good for Stakeholders. Journal of Economic Development, Management, IT, Finance & Marketing, 4(1), 38-48.
Cobos, E. (2017). La energía nuclear en España y el bien común: el diálogo como propuesta comunicativa para la aceptación social. Ruta Comunicación, 8, 27-44.
Cobos, E. & Recoder, M. J. (2019a). La comunicación de crisis en el sector atómico: protocolo, características, y recomendaciones en eventos nucleares. Revista Española de Comunicación en Salud (RECS). Monográfico sobre Periodismo y comunicación en situaciones de crisis, emergencias y desastres, 19-29. https://www.doi.org/10.20318/recs.2019.4372
Cobos, E. & Recoder, M. J. (2019b). Modelo de análisis web para centrales nucleares: estudio del caso de España. Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico, 25(2), 727-745. https://www.doi.org/10.5209/esmp.64799
Cobos, E. & Recoder, M. J. (2019c). La imagen de la energía nuclear en la prensa española de proximidad: ¿Son los medios de comunicación un stakeholder relevante para el sector atómico? Anàlisi: Quaderns de comunicació i cultura, 61, 31-53. https://www.doi.org/10.5565/rev/analisi.3181
Cornadó, Antonio. Director de Comunicación de Nuclenor y Presidente del Foro Nuclear (2013-2017). Entrevista en profundidad: Foro de la Industria Nuclear Española (Madrid), December 21, 2016.
Cruz, Jesús. Responsable de Comunicación de Cofrentes (1984-2015). Entrevista en profundidad: Valencia, February 16, 2017.
Cuesta, U. (2013). Fundamentos psicosociales de la reputación online: propuesta de un modelo y un caso de análisis. Estudios sobre el mensaje periodístico, 19(2), 691-700. https://www.doi.org/10.5209/rev_ESMP.2013.v19.42152
De la Cierva, Y. (2015). Comunicar en aguas turbulentas. Un enfoque ético para la comunicación de crisis. Pamplona: EUNSA.
Devin, B. (2016). Half-truths and dirty secrets: Omissions in CSR communication. Public Relations Review, 42, 226–228. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2015.09.004
Elving, W. J. L., Golob, U., Podnar, K., Ellerup-Nielsen, A. & Thomson, C. (2015). The bad, the ugly and the good: new challenges for CSR communication. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 20(2), 118-127. https://www.doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-02-2015-0006
Enrique Jiménez, A. M. (2013). La gestión de comunicación de crisis en las redes sociales. Orbis. Revista científica ciencias humanas, 8(24), 116-131.
Fombrun, C. J. & Rindova, V. (2000). Reputation as strategy. In M. Schultz, M. J. Hatch & M. H. Larsen. The Expressive Organization. Linking identity, reputation and the corporate brand (pp. 73-93). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Foratom (2016). Guidelines on stakeholder dialogue. Brussels: Foratom.
Fracarolli Nunes, M. & Lee Park, C. (2016). Self-claimed sustainability: Building social and environmental reputations with words. Sustainable Production and Consumption 1-12. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2016.04.002
Garicano, T. (2011). El gobierno corporativo y la reputación corporativa. In J. Villafane (Ed.), La comunicación empresarial y la gestión de los intangibles en España y Latinoamérica (pp. 189-195). Madrid: Pearson Educación.
Godall, Monserrat. Directora de Comunicación de ANAV (2016). Entrevista en profundidad: Central Nuclear de Vandellós I (Tarragona), November 3, 2016.
Gómez, Carlos. Responsable del Centro de Información de Cofrentes (2017). Entrevista en profundidad: Central Nuclear de Cofrentes, February 17, 2017.
Greyser, S. A. (1999). Advancing and enhancing corporate reputation. Communications: An International Journal, 4(4), 177-181. https://www.doi.org/10.1108/13563289910299292
Grunig, J. E. (1993). Image and substance: From symbolic to behavioral relationships. Public Relations Review 19(2), 121-139. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/0363-8111(93)90003-U
Grunig J. E. & Hung C. F (2002). The effect of relationships on reputation and reputation on relationships: a cognitive behavioral study, Paper presented for the 5th Edition Educator’s Academy, Public Relations Society of America. Miami, FL.
Heath, R. L. (2011). External Organizational Rhetoric: Bridging Management and Sociopolitical Discourse. Management Communication Quarterly, 25(3), 415-435. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0893318911409532
Hernández Velasco, J. (2011). Reputación online: necesidad de un marco conceptual y un modelo de gestión. In J. Villafane (Ed.), La comunicación empresarial y la gestión de los intangibles en España y Latinoamérica (pp. 197-214). Madrid: Pearson Educación.
IAEA (1994). Nuclear communications: a handbook for guiding good communications practices at nuclear fuel cycle facilities. Wien: Internat. Atomic Energy Agency.
IAEA (2012). Manual de Operaciones para la Comunicación de Incidentes y Emergencias. Wien: International Atomic Energy Agency.
Itoiz, M. (2015). En la era digital, ¿reputación o reputación online? In El nuevo diálogo social: organizaciones, públicos y ciudadanos (pp. 137-148). Valencia: Campgráfic.
Kantanen, H. (2012). Identity, image and stakeholder dialogue. Corporate Communications, 17(1), 56-72. https://www.doi.org/10.1108/13563281211196353
Kelm, O., Dohle, M. & Bernhard, U. (2017). Social Media Activities of Political Communication Practitioners: The Impact of Strategic Orientation and In-Group Orientation. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 1-18. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2017.1323756
Kent, M. L. & Taylor, M. (2002). Toward a dialogic theory of public relations. Public Relations Review, 28(1), 21-37. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(02)00108-X
Kent, M. L. & Taylor, M. (2016). From Homo Economicus to Homo dialogicus: Rethinking social media use in CSR communication. Public Relations Review, 42(1), 60–67. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2015.11.003
Leiva, J. (2012). Gestión de la reputación online: crea fácilmente tu estrategia de presencia en la red. Barcelona: UOC.
L’Etang, J. (1994). Public relations and Corporate Social Responsibility: Some Issues Arising. Journal of Business Ethics, 13(2), 111-123. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/BF00881580
Losada Díaz, J. C. (2018). (NO) crisis. Comunicación de crisis en un mundo conectado. Barcelona: UOC.
Lueg, K., Rainer, L., Andersen, K. & Dancianu, V. (2016). Integrated reporting with CSR practices: A pragmatic constructivist case study in a Danish cultural setting. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 21(1), 20-35. https://www.doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-08-2014-0053
Martín Herrero, J. M. (2015). La Imagen de la energía nuclear en España. Características, causas y soluciones de futuro de la industria energética en las relaciones sociales. TFM. Madrid: Universidad Camilo José Cela.
Melo, Antonio. Director de Organización y Recursos Humanos de CNAT. Interview by email, January 25, 2017.
Morsing, M. & Schultz, M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility communication: stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies. Business Ethics: A European Review 4, 323-338. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8608.2006.00460.x
Muñoz, N. (2012). La seguridad nuclear en el siglo XXI: transparencia y pedagogía informativas. Economía Industrial, 384, 33-36.
O’Connor, A. (2005). Reputation Management. In R. L. Heath (Ed.), Encyclopedia of public relations. Vol. II (pp. 745-746). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Pruzan, P. (2001). Corporate reputation: image and identity. Corporate Reputation Review 4(1), 50-64. https://www.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540132
Sala, Javier. Portavoz de Cofrentes y Jefe de Producción (2017). Entrevista en profundidad: Central Nuclear de Cofrentes, February 17, 2017.
Schultz, F. & Wehmeier, S. (2010). Institutionalization of corporate social responsibility within corporate communications: Combining institutional, sensemaking and communication perspectives. Corporate Communications 15(1), 9-29. https://www.doi.org/10.1108/13563281011016813
Shim, K.v & Yang, S. (2016). The effect of bad reputation: The occurrence of crisis, corporate social responsibility, and perceptions of hypocrisy and attitudes toward a company. Public Relations Review, 42, 68–78. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2015.11.009
Smith, B. G. (2012). Public relations identity and the stakeholder-organization relationship: A revised theoretical position for public relations scholarship. Public Relations Review, 38(5), 838-845. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.06.011
Sun Young Lee (2016). How can companies succeed in forming CSR reputation? Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 21(4), 435-449. https://www.doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-01-2016-0009
Sundstrom, B. & Levenshus, A.B. (2017). The art of engagement: dialogic strategies on Twitter. Journal of Communication Management, 21(1), 17-33. https://www.doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-07-2015-0057
Vallentin, S. (2009). Private management and public opinion: Corporate social responsiveness revisited. Business and Society, 48(1), 60-87. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0007650307300443
Verčič, A. T., Verčič, D. & Žnidar, K. (2016). Exploring academic reputation-is it a multidimensional construct? Corporate Communications: An International Journal 21(2), 160-176. https://www.doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-01-2015-0003
Villafañe, J. (2004). La buena reputación: claves del valor intangible de las empresas. Madrid: Pirámide.
Walker, K. (2010). A systematic review of the corporate reputation literature: Definition, measurement, and theory. Corporate Reputation Review, 12(4), 357-387. https://www.doi.org/10.1057/crr.2009.26
Weigelt, K. & Camerer, C. (1988). Reputation and Corporate Strategy: A Review of Recent Theory and Applications. Strategic Management Journal, 9(5), 443-454. https://www.doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250090505
Yoon, Y., Gürhan-Canli, Z. & Schwartz, N. (2006). The effect of corporate social responsibility activities on companies with bad reputations. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(4), 377–390. https://www.doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1604_9
Details
Article Details
RIGHTS TRANSFER
By submitting the article for evaluation and subsequent publication in Communication & Society, the AUTHOR exclusively assigns the rights of public communication, reproduction, distribution and sale for commercial exploitation to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, for the maximum legal term in force -the entire life of the author and seventy years after his death or declaration of death-, in any country, and in any of the current and future edition modalities, both in print and electronic versions.
In the event that the article is not accepted for publication , this transfer of rights lapses with the communication of the refusal to the AUTHOR.
The AUTHOR affirms that the article is unpublished, that it has not been sent simultaneously to another publication medium and that the rights have not been transferred exclusively previously. He is responsible to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service for the authorship and originality of his work, as well as for all pecuniary charges that may arise for the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, in favor of third parties due to actions, claims or conflicts arising from the breach of obligations by the AUTHOR.
