Thematic dis/connection of Ibex35 companies to generate dialogue with their stakeholders via Twitter during the pandemic
Article Sidebar
105)
Main Article Content
Authors
Abstract
158
Studies of corporate communication and intangible management are especially interested in knowing how to establish a proper dialogue with stakeholders to integrate their concerns into internal management and to be able to have greater corporate legitimacy. The lockdown and the following months of the pandemic allow to know if the firms have succeeded in applying the principles of corporate communication and if there have been new strategies that should be known in future crises. This research wants to know what topics and contents have been communicated by the companies to promote dialogue and to detect if their strategies have influenced their audiences by promoting engagement. To this end, the behavior on Twitter of the 27 IBEX35 companies with verified corporate accounts has been analyzed using statistical methods. The results show that companies have communicated more and have generated more engagement than before the pandemic. It is also observed that they have increased their efforts to publish specific content for each stakeholder group. Finally, the results indicate that the topics most communicated were not the ones that generated the most engagement, which shows that despite the interest in dialoguing with stakeholders, companies are not able to communicate what is of real interest to their audiences. The study presents practical implications and discussions with the previous literature on online communication management and stakeholder dialogue.
Keywords
References
Abitbol, A., Meeks, J. & Cummins, R. G. (2019). Does Oil and Goodwill Mix?: Examining the Oil and Gas Industry’s Impact on Stakeholder Engagement on Facebook. Environmental Communication, 13(2), 192-208. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2018.1546751
Aced-Toledano, C. & Lalueza, F. (2018). Monologues in the conversational era: Assessing the level of dialogic communication that big firms are reaching on social media. Profesional de la Información (EPI), 27(6), 1270-1280. https://www.doi.org/https://www.doi.org/10.3145/epi.2018.nov.10
Aguinis, H. & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility a review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932-968. https://www.doi.org/https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0149206311436079
Araujo, T. & Kollat, J. (2018). Communicating effectively about CSR on Twitter: The power of engaging strategies and storytelling elements. Internet Research, 28(2), 419-431. https://www.doi.org/10.1108/IntR-04-2017-0172
Barbeito-Caamaño, A. & Chalmeta, R. (2020). Using big data to evaluate corporate social responsibility and sustainable development practices. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27, 2831-2848. https://www.doi.org/10.1002/csr.2006
Brammer, S. & Millington, A. (2006). Firm size, organizational visibility and corporate philanthropy: an empirical analysis. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(1), 6-18. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8608.2006.00424.x
Busto-Salinas, L. (2021). Will better performing health-care services have higher profiles and be more active on social media? A comparative study between hospitals from Colombia and Spain. Communication & Society, 34(1), 93-108. https://www.doi.org/10.15581/003.34.1.93-108
Capriotti, P. & Zeler, I. (2020). Disseminating Latin American companies’ corporate social responsibility on Facebook: A comparative study with global companies. Palabra Clave, 23(2), 1-28. https://www.doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2020.23.2.7
Carareto, M., Calonego, R. & Andrelo, R. (2021). New communication strategies in the face of the Covid-19 pandemic: reflections on the public role of organizational communication. Revista Internacional de Relaciones Públicas, XI(21), 227-246. https://www.doi.org/10.5783/RIRP-21-2021-12-227-246
Chae, B. & Park, E. (2018). Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): A Survey of Topics and Trends Using Twitter Data and Topic Modeling. Sustainability, 10(7), 2231. https://www.doi.org/https://www.doi.org/10.3390/su10072231
Chong, S. & Momin, M. (2021). Coping with the COVID-19 crisis: an analysis of Twitter communication of companies. Pacific Accounting Review, 5(33), 603-615. https://www.doi.org/10.1108/PAR-09-2020-0159
Colleoni, E. (2013). CSR communication strategies for organizational legitimacy in social media. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 18(2), 228-248. https://www.doi.org/https://www.doi.org/10.1108/13563281311319508
Cormier, D., Magnan, M. & van Velthoven, B. (2005). Environmental disclosure quality in large German companies: Economic incentives, public pressures or institutional conditions? European Accounting Review, 14(1), 3-39. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/0963818042000339617
Cristófol, F. J., de-San-Eugenio-Vela, J. & Paniagua-Rojano, F. J. (2020). Active listening in the management of crisis communication: case study of the 2017 terrorist attack in Barcelona. Communication & Society, 33(4), 61-76. https://www.doi.org/10.15581/003.33.4.61-74
DiMaggio, P. J. & Powell, W. W. (1991). The iron cage revisited: Isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. In P. J. DiMaggio & W. W. Powell (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 1-38). Washington: The University of Chicago Press.
DiStaso, M. W., McCorkindale, T. & Wright, D. K. (2011). How public relations executives perceive and measure the impact of social media in their organizations. Public Relations Review, 37(3), 325-328. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.06.005
Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B. & Sen, S. (2010). Maximizing Business Returns to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): The Role of CSR Communication. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 8-19. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00276.x
Eberle, D., Berens, G. & Li, T. (2013). The impact of interactive corporate social responsibility communication on corporate reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(4), 731-746. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1957-y
Ferrer-Serrano, M., Latorre-Martínez, M. P. & Lozano-Blasco, R. (2020). Universities and communication: Role of twitter during the beginning of the covid-19 health crisis. Profesional de la Información, 29(6), 1-18. https://www.doi.org/10.3145/EPI.2020.NOV.12
Fieseler, C., Fleck, M. & Meckel, M. (2010). Corporate social responsibility in the blogosphere. Journal of Business Ethics, 91(4), 599-614. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0135-8
Huang, L., Clarke, A., Heldsinger, N. & Tian, W. (2019). The communication role of social media in social marketing: a study of the community sustainability knowledge dissemination on LinkedIn and Twitter. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 7(2), 64-75. https://www.doi.org/10.1057/s41270-019-00053-8
Illia, L., Zyglidopoulos, S. C., Romenti, S., Rodríguez-Cánovas, B. & del Valle Brena, A. G. (2013). Communicating corporate social responsibility to a cynical public. MIT Sloan Management Review, 54(3), 2.
Jahdi, K. S. & Acikdilli, G. (2009). Marketing Communications and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): Marriage of Convenience or Shotgun Wedding? Journal of Business Ethics, 88(1), 103-113. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0113-1
López-Carril, S. & Anagnostopoulos, C. (2020). COVID-19 and soccer teams on Instagram: The case of corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Sport Communication, 13(3), 447-457. https://www.doi.org/10.1123/IJSC.2020-0230
Losa-Díaz, J. C., Rodríguez-Fernández, L. & Paniagua-Rojano, F. J. (2020). Government communication and emotions in the Covid-19 crisis in Spain. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 2020(78), 23-40. https://www.doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2020-1467
Lyes, A., Palakshappa, N. & Bulmer, S. (2012). Communicating Corporate Social Responsibility using social media: implications for marketing strategists. AMA Summer Educators’ Conference Proceedings, 23, 249-256. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=87025020&site=ehost-live
Macnamara, J. & Zerfass, A. (2012). Social media communication in organizations: The challenges of balancing openness, strategy, and management. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 6(4), 287-308. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2012.711402
Martínez-Cardama, S. & Pacios, A. R. (2020). Twitter communication of university libraries in the face of covid-19. Profesional de la Información, 29(6), 1-15. https://www.doi.org/10.3145/EPI.2020.NOV.18
Meyer, J. W. & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363. https://www.doi.org/10.1086/226550
Monfort, A. & Mas-Iglesias, J. M. (2021). Barreras y oportunidades para la comunicación de la responsabilidad social en redes sociales. Comunicación y Hombre, 17(17), 349-361. https://www.doi.org/10.32466/eufv-cyh.2021.17.645.349-361
Monfort, A., Villagra, N. & López-Vázquez, B. (2019). Exploring stakeholders’ dialogue and corporate social responsibility (CSR) on twitter. Profesional de la Información, 28(5), 1-15. https://www.doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.sep.13
Morsing, M., Schultz, M. & Nielsen, K. U. (2008). The ‘Catch 22’ of communicating CSR: Findings from a Danish study. Journal of Marketing Communications, 14(2), 97-111. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/13527260701856608
Mut-Camacho, M. (2020). Aprendizajes sobre el riesgo reputacional en época de Covid-19: la desinformación como riesgo corporativo. Doxa Comunicación. Revista Interdisciplinar de Estudios de Comunicación y Ciencias Sociales, 2020(31), 19-39. https://www.doi.org/10.31921/doxacom.n31a1
Navarro-Beltrá, M., García Medina, I. & Miquel-Segarra, S. (2020). Utilización de Facebook como canal de comunicación en el sector de la moda: una comparativa de su vertiente dialógica entre las marcas de moda rápida y de lujo. Palabra Clave, 23(3), 1-31. https://www.doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2020.23.3.5
Okazaki, S., Plangger, K., West, D. & Menéndez, H. D. (2020). Exploring digital corporate social responsibility communications on Twitter. Journal of Business Research, 117, 675-682. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.006
Paliwoda-Matiolanska, A., Smolak-Lozano, E. & Nakayama, A. (2020). Corporate image or social engagement: Twitter discourse on corporate social responsibility (CSR) in public relations strategies in the energy sector. Profesional de la Información, 29(3), 1-16. https://www.doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.may.33
Pavlíček, A. & Doucek, P. (2015). Corporate Social Responsibility in Social Media Environment. In K. I., N. E., T. A., X. L. & Y. I. (Eds.), Information and Communication Technology (Vol. 9357, pp. 323-332). Lugar: Springer. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24315-3_33
Ruggeri, A. & Samoggia, A. (2018). Twitter communication of agri-food chain actors on palm oil environmental, socio-economic, and health sustainability. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 17(1), 75-93. https://www.doi.org/10.1002/cb.1699
Saxton, G. D., Gomez, L., Ngoh, Z., Lin, Y. P. & Dietrich, S. (2019). Do CSR Messages Resonate? Examining Public Reactions to Firms’ CSR Efforts on Social Media. Journal of Business Ethics, 155(2), 359-377. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3464-z
Schlegelmilch, B. B. & Pollach, I. (2005). The Perils and Opportunities of Communicating Corporate Ethics. Journal of Marketing Management, 21(3), 267-290 . https://www.doi.org/10.1362/0267257053779154
Song, B. & Wen, J. (2020). Online corporate social responsibility communication strategies and stakeholder engagements: A comparison of controversial versus noncontroversial industries. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(2), 881-896. https://www.doi.org/10.1002/csr.1852
Stohl, C., Etter, M., Banghart, S. & Woo, D. (2015). Social Media Policies: Implications for Contemporary Notions of Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, Published, 142, 413-436. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2743-9
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571-610. https://www.doi.org/10.2307/258788
Tuñón-Navarro, J. & Carral-Vilar, U. (2021). Has COVID-19 promoted or discouraged a European Public Sphere? Comparative analysis of the Twitter interactions of German, French, Italian and Spanish MEPSs during the pandemic. Communication & Society, 34(3), 135-151. https://www.doi.org/10.15581/003.34.3.135-151
Villagra, N., López, B. & Monfort, A. (2015). The management of intangibles and corporate branding: Has anything changed in the relationship between business and society? Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 70, 793-812. https://www.doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2015-1072
Waddock, S. & Googins, B. K. (2011). The Paradoxes of Communicating Corporate Social Responsibility. In Ø. Ihlen, J. L. Bartlett & S. May (Eds.), The Handbook of Communication and Corporate Social Responsibility (pp. 23-43). West Sussex: Wiley‐Blackwell.
Wang, Y. & Pala, B. (2020). Communicating philanthropic CSR versus ethical and legal CSR to employees: empirical evidence in Turkey. Corporate Communications, 1, 155-175. https://www.doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-01-2020-0014
Xifra, J. (2020). Corporate communication, public relations and reputational risk management in the days of covid-19. Profesional de la Información, 29(2), 1-18. https://www.doi.org/10.3145/EPI.2020.MAR.20
Zeler, I. & Capriotti, P. (2019). Communicating corporate social responsibility issues on Facebook’s corporate fanpages of latin american companies. Profesional de la Información, 28(5), 1-9. https://www.doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.sep.07
Zimmerman, M. A. & Zeitz, G. J. (2002). Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. Academy of Management Review, 27(3), 414-431. https://www.doi.org/10.2307/4134387
Metrics
|
|
Details
Article Details
RIGHTS TRANSFER
By submitting the article for evaluation and subsequent publication in Communication & Society, the AUTHOR exclusively assigns the rights of public communication, reproduction, distribution and sale for commercial exploitation to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, for the maximum legal term in force -the entire life of the author and seventy years after his death or declaration of death-, in any country, and in any of the current and future edition modalities, both in print and electronic versions.
In the event that the article is not accepted for publication , this transfer of rights lapses with the communication of the refusal to the AUTHOR.
The AUTHOR affirms that the article is unpublished, that it has not been sent simultaneously to another publication medium and that the rights have not been transferred exclusively previously. He is responsible to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service for the authorship and originality of his work, as well as for all pecuniary charges that may arise for the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, in favor of third parties due to actions, claims or conflicts arising from the breach of obligations by the AUTHOR.
