Journalists’ Personalization: How Self-Promoting, Branding, and Ideological Positioning Redefine Journalistic Practices, Products, and Institutions
Article Sidebar
422)How to Cite
443
Abstract
This research extends the existing discussion on political personalization by examining it from a different angle: exploring how this phenomenon manifests within journalism and journalistic practice. Based on in-depth interviews with 18 prominent journalists from Israel, Italy, and the United States, alongside a quantitative content analysis of 600 tweets by 30 journalists from the same countries, our analysis compares political personalization processes with journalistic personalization, highlighting both commonalities and differences. The discussion explores how journalists' personalization—including branding and celebrification practices through social media—is intertwined with broader trends of populism and polarization that are reshaping journalism in the digital age.
References
Aalberg, T., & Curran, J. (2012). How media inform democracy: A comparative approach. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203803448
Alexandre, I., Sung Yoo, J. J., & Murthy, D. (2022). Make tweets great again: Who are opinion leaders, and what did they tweet about Donald Trump? Social Science Computer Review, 40(6), 1456-1477. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393211008859
Angser, K., Pérez, V. E., Helena, T., Menisha, P., & Sofia, C. (2017). Editorial responsibilities arising from personalization algorithms. The ORBIT Journal. https://doi.org/10.29297/orbit.v1i1.26
Balmas, M., & Sheafer, T. (2014). Charismatic Leaders and Mediated Personalization in the International Arena. Communication Research, 41(7), 991-1015. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650213510936
Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739-778. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661
Brems, C., Temmerman, M., Graham, T., & Broersma, M. (2017). Personal branding on Twitter. Digital Journalism, 5(4), 443-459. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2016.1176534
Bozdag, C., & Odag, O. (2018). Media-bridge-cultures: Exploring mediated cultural encounters. International Communication Gazette, 80(7), 597-602. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048518802199
Druckman, J. N., Klar, S., Krupnikov, Y., Levendusky, M., & Ryan, J. B. (2022). (Mis)estimating affective polarization. Journal of Politics, 84(3), 1106-1117. https://doi.org/10.1086/715603
Esser, F., Stępińska, A., & Hopmann, D. N. (2017). Populism and the media: Cross-national findings and perspectives. In T. Aalberg, F. Esser, C. Reinemann, J. Strömbäck, & C. de Vreese (Eds.), Populist political communication in Europe (pp. 365-380). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315623016
Fischer, T. S., Kolo, C., & Mothes, C. (2022). Political influencers on YouTube: Business strategies and content characteristics. Media and Communication, 10(1), 259-271. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i1.4767
Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790867
Hanusch, F., & Bruns, A. (2017). Journalistic branding on Twitter: A representative study of Australian journalists' profile descriptions. Digital Journalism, 5(1), 61-81. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2016.1152161
Hedman, U. (2020). Making the most of Twitter: How technological affordances influence Swedish journalists' self-branding. Journalism, 21(5), 670-687. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884917734054
Hemmer, A. (2016). Messengers of the right: Conservative media and the transformation of American politics. University of Pennsylvania Press. https://doi.org/10.14324/111.444.ra.2017.v2.1.014
Humayun, M. F., & Ferrucci, P. (2022). Understanding social media in journalism practice: A typology. Digital Journalism, 10(10), 1502-1525. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2086594
Jerslev, A., & Mortensen, M. (2016). What is the self in the celebrity selfie? Celebrification, phatic communication, and performativity. Celebrity Studies, 7(2), 249-263. https://doi.org/10.1080/19392397.2015.1095644
Karvonen, L. (2010). The personalization of politics: A study of parliamentary democracies. ECPR Press. http://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2010.517103
Kedem, A., & Neiger, M. (2024). Journalists' ideological branding: Bridging professional and personal branding on Twitter. Journalism Practice, 18(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2024.2313141
Klinger, U., & Svensson, J. (2015). The emergence of network media logic in political communication: A theoretical approach. New Media & Society, 17(8), 1241-1257. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814522952
Krämer, B. (2017). Populist online practices: The function of the Internet in right-wing populism. Information, Communication & Society, 20(9), 1293-1309. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1328520
Kriesi, H. (2014). The Populist Challenge. West European Politics, 37(2), 361-378. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2014.887879
Lasorsa, D. L., Suk, J., & Fadnis, D. (2018). Framing of same-sex marriage over 17 years in two newspapers is linked to ideology, especially in election years. Newspaper Research Journal, 39(2), 191-204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739532918775666
Lee, W. (2015). How party polarization affects governance. Annual Review of Political Science, 18, 43-63. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-072012-113747
Lelkes, Y., Sood, G., & Iyengar, S. (2017). The hostile audience: The effect of access to broadband internet on partisan affect. American Journal of Political Science, 61(1), 5-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12237
Lev-On, A., & Haleva-Amir, S. (2018). Normalizing or equalizing? Characterizing Facebook campaigning. New Media & Society, 20(2), 720-739. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816669160
López-Meri, A., & Casero-Ripollés, A. (2017). Journalists' strategies to build personal brands on Twitter: Positioning, content curation, personalization, and specialization. Revista Mediterránea de Comunicación, 8(1), 17-30. https://doi.org/10.14198/MEDCOM2017.8.1
Marwick, A. E., & Boyd, D. (2011a). To see and be seen: Celebrity practice on Twitter. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 17(2), 139-158. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856510394539
Marwick, A. E., & Boyd, D. (2011b). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13(1), 114-133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810365313
Marwick, A. E. (2015). Instafame: Luxury selfies in the attention economy. Public Culture, 27(1), 137-160. https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-2798379
Mason, L. (2018). Ideologues without issues: The polarizing consequences of ideological identities. Public Opinion Quarterly, 82, 866-887. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfy005
McGregor, S. (2017). Personalization, social media, and voting: Effects of candidate self-personalization on vote intention. New Media & Society, 20(3), 1139-1160. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816686103
McCorquodale, S. (2020). Influence: How social media influencers are shaping our digital future. Bloomsbury Business.
Mellado, C., Hellmueller, L., & Donsbach, W. (Eds.). (2017). Journalistic role performance: Concepts, contexts, and methods. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315768854
Mellado, C., & Alfaro, A. (2020). Journalists, platforms, and their digital selves. Digital Journalism, 8(10), 1258-1279. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.1817763
Mellado, C., & Hermida, A. (2022). A conceptual framework for journalistic identity on social media: How the personal and professional contribute to power and profit. Digital Journalism, 10(2), 284-299. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1907203
Mudde, C. (2004). The populist zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 541-563. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x
Pavlik, J. V. (2001). Journalism and new media. Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/pavl11482
Pedersen, H. H., & Rahat, G. (2019). Introduction: Political personalization and personalized politics within and beyond the behavioural arena. Party Politics, 27(2), 211-219. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068819855712
Rahat, G., & Kenig, O. (2018). From party politics to personalized politics? Party change and political personalization in democracies. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198808008.001.0001
Saltzis, K., & Dickinson, R. (2008). Inside the changing newsroom: Journalists' responses to media convergence. Aslib Proceedings, 60(3), 216-228. https://doi.org/10.1108/00012530810879097
Schudson, M., & Anderson, C. (2009). Objectivity, professionalism, and truth seeking in journalism. In K. Wahl-Jorgensen & T. Hanitzsch (Eds.), The handbook of journalism studies (pp. 88-101). Routledge.
Sheafer, T., & Rahat, G. (2007). The personalization(s) of politics: Israel 1949-2003. Political Communication, 24(1), 65-80. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600601128739
Engesser, S. S., Ernst, N., Esser, F., & Büchel, F. (2017). Populism and social media: How politicians spread a fragmented ideology. Information, Communication & Society, 20(8), 1109-1126. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1207697
Taggart, P. (2004). Populism and representative politics in contemporary Europe. Journal of Political Ideologies, 9(3), 269-288. https://doi.org/10.1080/1356931042000263528
Wagner, M. (2021). Affective polarization in multiparty systems. Electoral Studies, 69, 102199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102199
Zamir, S. (2024). Explaining online personalized politics: A cross-national comparative analysis of social media consumption of parties and leaders. Political Studies Review, 22(1), 108-137. https://doi.org/10.1177/14789299221147458
Appendix
Appendices I-III are available in the Figshare data repository under the following DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28855745
Issue
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Rights transfer
By submitting the article for evaluation and subsequent publication in Communication & Society, the AUTHOR grants exclusive economic and/or exploitation rights: reproduction, distribution, public communication, transformation/translation/creation of derivative works, and commercialisation to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, for the maximum legal period in force -the author's lifetime and seventy years after his or her death or declaration of death-, in any country, and in any of the current and future publishing modalities, both in print and electronic versions.
In the event that the article is not accepted for publication, this transfer of rights lapses with the communication of the refusal to the AUTHOR.
The AUTHOR affirms that the article is unpublished, that it has not been sent simultaneously to another publication medium and that the rights have not been transferred exclusively previously. He is responsible to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service for the authorship and originality of his work, as well as for all pecuniary charges that may arise for the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, in favor of third parties due to actions, claims or conflicts arising from the breach of obligations by the AUTHOR.
Dissemination Policy
The authors agree to the Publisher Policy, published at Open policy finder - Jisc, whereby the editor allows the author to exclusively disseminate the final editorial version through the institutional repository, once the embargo period (1 year) of the journal has expired. Dissemination of the submitted version (preprint) or the version evaluated prior to the editorial version (postprint) is not allowed. The objective of this policy is to avoid the loss of citations that are received from the data of versions different from those of the final and definitive version, which is published and indexed in the databases. If the citation received contains any minimal difference with the indexed data, it will be registered as a reference instead of being considered as a computable citation, which could be detrimental to the journal and the author. Therefore, it is important to follow this policy and share only the final version of the article.