Like, share, influence: The role of populist content in shaping social media user engagement - A systematic review
Article Sidebar
498)How to Cite
661
Abstract
This systematic review synthesizes existing recent knowledge on the relationship between populism and user engagement on social media. The objective is to understand how populist communication style impacts user interactions on platforms like Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and TikTok. Employing the PRISMA methodology (Moher et al., 2009), we conducted a comprehensive search across Sage Research, Web of Science, and Scopus databases for articles and book chapters published between January 1, 2019, and January 1, 2024, using the keywords “populism,” “user engagement,” “social media,” and “populist.” Thirty-six sources met the predetermined eligibility criteria for full-text review, which were then analyzed and coded. Our findings suggest a positive association between populist content and visibility on social media, although conflicting evidence exists in the literature. Hence, populist communication style and message features tend to drive higher levels of user interactions, but variations arise due to platform affordances, user attitudes, and contextual elements (i.e., level of polarization). Additional factors, such as content subject, matter, and negativity also play significant roles. Moreover, given the relevance of social media for political communication, this research highlights the implications of populist messaging for democratic discourse, political polarization, and misinformation spread on the Internet. However, further research is still needed to explore mechanisms driving engagement with populist content, particularly on visually oriented platforms, and the influence of linguistic aspects (i.e., metaphors) on engagement levels.
References
Abid, A., Roy, S.K., Lees-Marshment, J., Dey, B.L., Muhammad, S.S., & Kumar, S. (2023). Political social media marketing: a systematic literature review and agenda for future research. Electron Commer Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-022-09636-7
Abromeit, J. (2017). A Critical Review of Recent Literature on Populism. Politics and Governance, 5(4), 177-186. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v5i4.1146
Bene, M., Ceron, A., Fenoll, V., Haßler, J., Kruschinski, S., Larsson, A. O., Magin, M., Schlosser, K., & Wurst, A.-K. (2022). Keep Them Engaged! Investigating the Effects of Self-centered Social Media Communication Style on User Engagement in 12 European Countries. Political Communication, 39(4), 429-453. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2022.2042435
Bennett, S., Lipiński, A., Stępińska, A., Abadi, D., Baloge, M., Bobba, G., Butkevičienė, E., Brands, C., Fischer, A., Gammeltoft-Hansen, T., Hubé, N., Ianosev, B., Karamanidou, L., Klinge, S., Kocián, J., Korkut, U., Magre, J., Mancosu, M., Marincea, A., … Žvaliauskas, G. (2020). Populist Communication on Social Media. [Research report]. Centre for Social Sciences, Centre of Excellence of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.17203/KDK420
Bennett, W. L., Freelon, D. G., Hussain, M. M., & Wells. (2012). The SAGE Handbook of Political Communication. In The SAGE Handbook of Political Communication (pp. 127-140). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446201015
Blassnig, S., & Wirz, D. S. (2019). Populist and Popular: An Experiment on the Drivers of User Reactions to Populist Posts on Facebook. Social Media + Society, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119890062
Blassnig, S., Ernst, N., Engesser, S., & Esser, F. (2019). Populism and Social Media Popularity: How Populist Communication Benefits Political Leaders on Facebook and Twitter. In Power Shift? Political Leadership and Social Media. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429466007-7
Blassnig, S., Ernst, N., Engesser, S., & Esser, F. (2020). Populism and social media popularity: How populist communication benefits political leaders on Facebook and Twitter. In R. Davis & D. Taras (Eds.), Blassnig, Sina; Ernst, Nicole; Engesser, Sven; Esser, Frank (2020). Populism and social media popularity: How populist communication benefits political leaders on Facebook and Twitter. In: Davis, Richard; Taras, David. Power shift? Political leadership and social media. New York, NY: Routledge, 97-111. (pp. 97-111). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429466007-7
Bobba, G. (2019). Social media populism: Features and 'likeability' of Lega Nord communication on Facebook. European Political Science, 18(1), 11-23. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-017-0141-8
Bossetta, M. (2018). The Digital Architectures of Social Media: Comparing Political Campaigning on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat in the 2016 U.S. Election. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 95(2), 471-496. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699018763307
Boulianne, S., Hoffmann, C. P., & Bossetta, M. (2024). Social media platforms for politics: A comparison of Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, YouTube, Reddit, Snapchat, and WhatsApp. New Media & Society, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448241262415
Bracciale, R., & Martella, A. (2017). Define the populist political communication style: The case of Italian political leaders on Twitter. Information, Communication & Society, 20(9), 1310-1329. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1328522
Bracciale, R., Andretta, M., & Martella, A. (2021). Does populism go viral? How Italian leaders engage citizens through social media. Information Communication and Society, 24(10), 1477-1494. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1874472
Canovan, M. (1981). Populism. London: London Junction.
Canovan, M. (1999). Trust the people! Populism and the two faces of democracy. Political Studies 47(1): 2-16. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00184
Canovan, M. (2002). Taking Politics to the People: Populism as the Ideology of Democracy. In Y. Mény & Y. Surel (Eds.), Democracies and the Populist Challenge (pp. 25-44). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403920072_2
Cassell, K. J. (2021a). The comparative effectiveness of populist rhetoric in generating online engagement. Electoral Studies, 72, 102359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102359
Cassell, K. J. (2021b). When "Following" the Leader Inspires Action: Individuals' Receptivity to Discursive Frame Elements on Social Media. Political Communication, 38(5), 581-603. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1829761
Ceccobelli, D., Quaranta, M., & Valeriani, A. (2020). Citizens' engagement with popularization and with populist actors on Facebook: A study on 52 leaders in 18 Western democracies. European Journal of Communication, 35(5), 435-452. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323120909292
Chaffey, D. (2024, May 01). Global social media statistics research summary. SmartInsights. Retrieved from https://www.smartinsights.com/social-media-marketing/social-media-strategy/new-global-social-media-research/#:~:text=According%20to%20the%20Datareportal%20April,online%20within%20the%20last%20year.
Christison, C. (2023). How to Increase Social Media Engagement [Free Calculator]. Hootsuite. Retrieved from https://blog.hootsuite.com/social-media-engagement/#:~:text=Social%20media%20engagement%20is%20a,Shares%20or%20retweets
Engesser, S., Ernst, N., Esser, F., & Büchel, F. (2017). Populism and social media: How politicians spread a fragmented ideology. Information, Communication & Society, 20(8), 1109-1126. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1207697
Ernst, N., Esser, F., Blassnig, S., & Engesser, S. (2019). Favorable Opportunity Structures for Populist Communication: Comparing Different Types of Politicians and Issues in Social Media, Television and the Press. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 24(2), 165-188. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161218819430
Fenoll, V. (2022). Political communications on Facebook and populism. The 2019 European Parliament election in Spain. Communication and Society, 35(3), 91-103. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.35.3.91-103
Hameleers, M. (2018). A Typology of Populism: Toward a Revised Theoretical Framework on the Sender Side and Receiver Side of Communication. International Journal of Communication, 12(0), Article 0. Retrieved from https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/7456
Hameleers, M., Schmuck, D., Bos, L., & Ecklebe, S. (2021). Interacting with the ordinary people: How populist messages and styles communicated by politicians trigger users' behaviour on social media in a comparative context. European Journal of Communication, 36(3), 238-253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323120978723
Jacobs, K., & Spierings, N. (2019). A populist paradise? Examining populists' Twitter adoption and use. Information, Communication & Society, 22(12), 1681-1696. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1449883
Jagers, J., & Walgrave, S. (2007). Populism as political communication style: An empirical study of political parties' discourse in Belgium. European Journal of Political Research, 46(3), 319-345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00690.x
Jost, P., & Dogruel, L. (2023). Radical Mobilization in Times of Crisis: Use and Effects of Appeals and Populist Communication Features in Telegram Channels. Social Media and Society, 9(3). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231186372
Jost, P., Maurer, M., & Hassler, J. (2020). Populism Fuels Love and Anger: The Impact of Message Features on Users' Reactions on Facebook. International Journal of Communication, 14(0), Article 0. Retrieved from https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/13400
Jungherr, A. (2016). Twitter use in election campaigns: A systematic literature review. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 13(1), 72-91. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2015.1132401
Kalsnes, B. (2019). Examining the populist communication logic: Strategic use of social media in populist political parties in Norway and Sweden. Central European Journal of Communication. https://doi.org/10.19195/1899-5101.12.2(23).5
Klinger, U., Koc-Michalska, K., & Russmann, U. (2023). Are Campaigns Getting Uglier, and Who Is to Blame? Negativity, Dramatization and Populism on Facebook in the 2014 and 2019 EP Election Campaigns. Political Communication, 40(3), 263-282. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2022.2133198
Krämer, B. (2017). Populist online practices: The function of the Internet in right-wing populism. Information, Communication & Society, 20(9), 1293-1309. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1328520
Kriesi, H., and T. S. Pappas, eds. 2015. European Populism in the Shadow of the Great Recession. Colchester: ECPR Press.
Laclau, E. (2005). Populism: What's in a Name. In F. Panizza (Ed.), Populism and the mirror of democracy. London: Verso.
Martella, A., & Bracciale, R. (2022). Populism and emotions: Italian political leaders' communicative strategies to engage Facebook users. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 35(1), 65-85. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2021.1951681
Mayer, N. 2013. "From Jean-Marie to Marine Le Pen: Electoral Change on the Far Right." Parliamentary Affairs 66 (1): 160-178. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gss071
Moffitt, B., & Tormey, S. (2014). Rethinking Populism: Politics, Mediatisation and Political Style. Political Studies, 62(2), 381-397. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12032
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & Group, T. P. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLOS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
Müller, P., Schemer, C., Wettstein, M., Schulz, A., Wirz, D. S., Engesser, S., & Wirth, W. (2017). The Polarizing Impact of News Coverage on Populist Attitudes in the Public: Evidence From a Panel Study in Four European Democracies. Journal of Communication, 67(6), 968-992. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12337
Müller, P., Schemer, C., Wettstein, M., Schulz, A., Wirz, D. S., Engesser, S., & Wirth, W. (2017). The Polarizing Impact of News Coverage on Populist Attitudes in the Public: Evidence from a Panel Study in Four European Democracies. Journal of Communication, 67(6), 968-992. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12337
Olaniran, B., & Williams, I. (2020). Social Media Effects: Hijacking Democracy and Civility in Civic Engagement. Platforms, Protests, and the Challenge of Networked Democracy, 77-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36525-7_5
Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470754887
Pauwels, T. (2011). Measuring Populism: A Quantitative Text Analysis of Party Literature in Belgium. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 21(1), 97-119. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2011.539483
Pérez-Curiel, C., & Rivas-de-Roca, R. (2022). Exploring Populism in Times of Crisis: An Analysis of Disinformation in the European Context during the US Elections. Journalism and Media, 3(1), 144-156. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia3010012
Rooduijn, M., de Lange, S. L., & van der Brug, W. (2014). A populist Zeitgeist? Programmatic contagion by populist parties in Western Europe. Party Politics, 20(4), 563-575. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068811436065
Schwartz, S. A., Nelimarkka, M., & Larsson, A. O. (2023). Populist platform strategies: A comparative study of social media campaigning by Nordic right-wing populist parties. Information Communication and Society, 26(16), 3220-3238. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2022.2147397
Stanley, B. (2008). The thin ideology of populism. Journal of Political Ideologies, 13(1), 95-110. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310701822289
Stepanov, A. (2021). Changes to News Feed in 2021. Facebook. Available at: https://about.fb.com/news/2021/12/changes-to-news-feed-in-2021/
X Help Center (2023). Legacy verification policy. X. Available at: https://help.x.com/en/managing-your-account/legacy-verification-policy
Taggart, P. (2000). Populism. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Toth, T. (2020). Target the enemy: Explicit and implicit populism in the rhetoric of the Hungarian right. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 28(3), 366-386. https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2020.1757415
Issue
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Rights transfer
By submitting the article for evaluation and subsequent publication in Communication & Society, the AUTHOR grants exclusive economic and/or exploitation rights: reproduction, distribution, public communication, transformation/translation/creation of derivative works, and commercialisation to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, for the maximum legal period in force -the author's lifetime and seventy years after his or her death or declaration of death-, in any country, and in any of the current and future publishing modalities, both in print and electronic versions.
In the event that the article is not accepted for publication, this transfer of rights lapses with the communication of the refusal to the AUTHOR.
The AUTHOR affirms that the article is unpublished, that it has not been sent simultaneously to another publication medium and that the rights have not been transferred exclusively previously. He is responsible to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service for the authorship and originality of his work, as well as for all pecuniary charges that may arise for the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, in favor of third parties due to actions, claims or conflicts arising from the breach of obligations by the AUTHOR.
Dissemination Policy
The authors agree to the Publisher Policy, published at Open policy finder - Jisc, whereby the editor allows the author to exclusively disseminate the final editorial version through the institutional repository, once the embargo period (1 year) of the journal has expired. Dissemination of the submitted version (preprint) or the version evaluated prior to the editorial version (postprint) is not allowed. The objective of this policy is to avoid the loss of citations that are received from the data of versions different from those of the final and definitive version, which is published and indexed in the databases. If the citation received contains any minimal difference with the indexed data, it will be registered as a reference instead of being considered as a computable citation, which could be detrimental to the journal and the author. Therefore, it is important to follow this policy and share only the final version of the article.