Decisional Institutional Analysis Development (DIAD) Framework

María-Milagros Cadillo-La-Torre
364

Resumen

El Marco Decisional para el Análisis y Desarrollo Institucional se basa en la concepción de los Agentes como sistemas complejos adaptativos libres; de esta forma, muestra el proceso de interacción entre los Agentes y cómo este influye en el logro de la permanencia de la organización en el tiempo; incorporando no sólo el aprendizaje producto de los resultados, sino también el aprendizaje producto de las decisiones de los Agentes. Este marco incorpora un enfoque decisional, poniendo en primer plano a los Agentes en conciliación con las instituciones y los contextos, explicitando sus interacciones y la propia decisión como base del sistema de gobernanza. De esta forma, ayuda a posicionar elementos que componen la complejidad de la realidad de las organizaciones que comparten recursos de uso común para gobernarla.

Palabras clave:
Decisiones, Interacciones, Interdependencia, Gobernanza, Aprendizaje, Sostenibilidad, Dinamismo, Organizaciones, Ambiente, Sistema Complejo Adaptativo Libre

Autores/as

María-Milagros Cadillo-La-Torre

Referencias

Agrawal, Arun (2003). Sustainable Governance of Common-Pool Resources: Context, Methods, and Politics. Annual Review of Anthropology, 32(1), 243-262. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25064829 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.32.061002.093112

Ahrne, Göran; Brunsson, Nils (2005). Organizations and Meta-organizations. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 21(4), 429-449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2005.09.005

Aligica, Paul Dragos; Boettke, Peter J. (2009). Challenging Institutional Analysis and Development: The Bloomington School. London: New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.23941/ejpe.v3i1.45

Anderies, John M. (2014). Understanding the Dynamics of Sustainable Social-Ecological Systems: Human Behavior, Institutions, and Regulatory Feedback Networks. Society for Mathematical Biology, 77, 259-280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-014-0030-z

Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A.; Ostrom, Elinor (2004). A Framework to Analyze the Robustness of Social-Ecological Systems from an Institutional Perspective. Ecology and Society, 9(1). http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss1/art18/ https://doi.org/10.5751/es-00610-090118

Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A.; Schlager, Edella (2016). Institutions and the Performance of Coupled Infrastructure Systems. International Journal of the Commons, 10(2), 495-516. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.651

Ansell, Chris; Gash, Allison (2008). Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543-571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032

Armitage, Derek (2008). Governance and the Commons in a Multi-LevelWorld. International Journal of the Commons, 2(1), 7-32.

Balkundi, Prasad; Kilduff, Martin (2006). The Ties that Lead: A Social Network Approach to Leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(4), 419-439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.01.001

Brisbois, Marie Claire; Morris, Michelle; de Loë, Rob (2019). “Augmenting the IAD Framework to Reveal Power in Collaborative Governance – An Illustrative Application to Resource Industry Dominated Processes”. World Development, 120, 159-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.02.017

Clement, Floriane (2010). Analysing Decentralised Natural Resource Governance: Proposition for a “Politicised” Institutional Analysis and Development Framework. Policy Sciences, 43(2), 129-156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-009-9100-8

Cole, Daniel H.; Epstein, Graham; McGinnis, Michael D. (2019). The Utility of Combining the IAD and SES Frameworks. International Journal of the Commons, 13(1), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.864

Emerson, Kirk; Nabatchi, Tina; Balogh, Stephen (2012). An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur011

Fontana, Alejandro (2012). La gobernanza en las políticas de la cooperación internacional para el desarrollo: Análisis y modelo de aplicación al Perú (Tesis Doctoral, ETSI Agrónomos [UPM]). Madrid. http://oa.upm.es/10834/1/ALEJANDRO_FONTANA_PALACIOS.pdf https://doi.org/10.20868/upm.thesis.10834

Fontana, Alejandro; Yagüe, José Luis (2010). Hacia un modelo que describa el impacto de los proyectos de cooperación internacional en la gobernanza. XIV Congreso internacional de ingeniería de proyectos, 1677-1685. https://www.aeipro.com/es/repository/func-startdown/2885/lang,es-es/ https://doi.org/10.1787/888934073189

Hajer, Maarten A. (1995). The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/75.3.1138

Huxham, Chris; Vangen, Siv (2000). Leadership in the Shaping and Implementation of Collaboration Agendas: How things Happen in a (not quite) Joined-upWorld. Academy of Management Journal, 43(6), 1159-1175. https://doi.org/10.2307/1556343

Imperial, Mark T.; Ospina, Sonia; Johnston, Erik; O’Leary, Rosemary; Thomsen, Jennifer;Williams, Peter; Johnson, Shawn (2016). Understanding Leadership in aWorld of Shared Problems: Advancing Network Governance in Large Landscape Conservation. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 14(3), 126-134. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1248

McGinnis, Michael D. (2016). Updated Guide to IAD and the Language of the Ostrom Workshop: A Simplified Overview of a Complex Framework for the Analysis of Institutions and their Development, Indiana University,Work Paper n° 2. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228287038_An_Introduction_to_IAD_and_the_Language_of_the_Ostrom_Workshop_A_Simple_Guide_to_a_Complex_Framework_for_the_Analysis_of_Institutions_and_Their_Development https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00401.x

Merino, Leticia (2014). Perspectivas sobre la gobernanza de los bienes y la ciudadanía en la obra de Elinor Ostrom. Revista Mexicana de Sociología, 76(SPE), 77-104. https://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/rms/v76nspe/v76nspea4.pdf https://doi.org/10.29298/rmcf.v3i11.513

Ostrom, Elinor (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90400-9_93

Ostrom, Elinor (2005). Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-007-9157-x

Ostrom, Elinor (2011). El gobierno de los bienes comunes. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica. https://doi.org/10.22201/cimsur.18704115e.2010.10.155

Ostrom, Vincent (1986). The Constitutional Level of Analysis: A Challenge, Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis. Bloomington: Indiana University.

Pérez López, Juan Antonio (1991). Teoría de la acción humana en las organizaciones: la acción personal. Madrid: Rialp. https://doi.org/10.15581/002.opi-2747

Pérez López, Juan Antonio (2006). Fundamentos de la dirección de empresas. Madrid: Rialp.

Vatn, Arild (2015). Environmental Governance: Institutions, Policies and Actions. Cheltenha: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Whaley, Luke (2018). The Critical Institutional Analysis and Development (CIAD) Framework. International Journal of the Commons, 12(2), 137- 161. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.848

Whaley, Luke;Weatherhead, Edward K. (2014). An Integrated Approach to Analyzing (Adaptive) Comanagement using the “Politicized” IAD Framework. Ecology and Society, 19(1), artículo 10. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271296635_An_Integrated_Approach_to_Analyzing_Adaptive_Comanagement_Using_the_Politicized_IAD_Framework/citation/download https://doi.org/10.5751/es-06177-190110


Métricas

Search GoogleScholar





Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Sección

Artículos