Josep-Juan Moreso e-mail(Login required)

Main Article Content

Authors

Josep-Juan Moreso e-mail(Login required)

Abstract

240
As a comment on Francesco Viola’s work about the future of Law and his insistence in the necessity of legal adjudication takes into account the circumstances of the particular case, I shall intend to show the reasons that led to a view of rules as general and abstract norms, almost algorithmically applicable to individual cases. After I shall refer to the well-known crisis that this idea generated and the introduction of the principles in the law’s image. Arguing, as conclusion, that this image of Law as a two storey building (with two floors one for rules, another for principles is not adequate and it should be substituted with the image of a single storey building (with only the ground floor), in where rules and defeaters live together, defeaters being something like gargoyles<7i>, that can modify, alter and make more accurate the rules through allowing the use of moral considerations and moral argument.

Keywords

rules, principles, legal adjudication, defeaters

References

Alchourrón, C.E.; Bulygin, E., Normative Systems, Springer, Nueva York-Viena, 1971.

Alexy, R., Theorie der Grundrechte, Surkhamp, Frankfurt A.M, 1986.

Atienza, M.; Ruiz Manero, J., Las piezas del Derecho, Ariel, Barcelona, 1996.

Atienza, M.; Ruiz Manero, J., A Theory of Legal Sentences, trad. de Zimmerling, R., Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1998.

Atria, F., On Law and Legal Reasoning, Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2002.

Atria, F., La forma del Derecho, Marcial Pons, Madrid, 2016.

Bayón, J.C., «Principios y reglas: legislación y jurisdicción en el Estado constitucional», Jueces para la democracia, 27 (1996), pp. 41-49.

Dworkin, R., Taking Rights Seriously, Duckworth, London, 1977.

Dworkin, R., Law’s Empire, Harvard University Press, Cambridge (Mass.), 1986.

Dworkin, R., «Hart’s Posthumous Reply», New York University Law School Colloquium on Legal, Political, and Social Philosophy; 1994; ahora en Harvard Law Review, 130 (2017), pp. 2096-2121.

Dworkin, R., Justice in Robes, Harvard University Press, Cambridge (Mass.), 2006.

Dworkin, R., Justice for Hedgehogs, Harvard University Press, Cambridge (Mass.), 2011.

Farnsworth, W., The Legal Analyst. A Toolkit for Thinking about the Law (Chicago University Press, Chicago, 2007.

Farrell, M.D., «Positivismo jurídico: dejen que herede Palmer», Lecciones y Ensayos, 93 (2014), pp. 63-84.

Hart, H.L.A., The Concept of Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1961.

Hart, H.L.A., Punishment and Responsibility, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1968.

Hart, H.L.A., «Commands and Authoritative Legal Reasons’ en H.L.A. Hart», Essays on Bentham. Studies in Jurisprudence and Political Theory, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1982, pp. 243-268.

Hart, H.L.A., «Postscript» en The Concept of Law, Bulloch, P.; Raz, J. (eds.), Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1994, 2ª ed.

Günther, K., The Sense of Appropiateness, trad. de Farrell, J., State University of New York, Albany (NY), 1993.

Laporta, F.J., El imperio de la ley. Una visión actual, Trotta, Madrid, 2007.

Moore, M., Placing Blame, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1997.

Moore, M., Educating Oneself in Public: Critical Essays in Jurisprudence, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000.

Moore, M., «Legal Reality: A Naturalist Approach to Legal Ontology», Law and Philosophy, 21 (2002), pp. 619-705.

Moreso, J.J., «Come far combaciare i pezzi del Diritto». Analisi e Diritto, 7 (1997), pp. 79-118.

Moreso, J.J., «Principio de legalidad y causas de justificación (sobre el alcance de la taxatividad)», Doxa, 24 (2001), p. 525-546.

Moreso, J.J., La Constitución: modelo para armar, Marcial Pons, Madrid, 2009.

Moreso, J.J., «Legal Defeasibility and the Connection between Law and Morality», en Ferrer Beltran, J.; Ratti, G.B. (eds.), The Logic of Legal Requirements. Essays on Defeasibility. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2012, pp. 225-237.

Moreso, J.J., «Con la plomada de Lesbos. Celano sobre Rule of Law y particularismo», Revista iberoamericana de argumentación, 13 (2016), p. 1-23.

Moreso, J.J., Es gibt noch Richter in Berlin. Comentarios sobre La forma del Derecho de Fernando Atria, inédito, 2018.

Peczenick, A., On Law and Reason, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1989.

Peczenick, A., «Los principios jurídicos según Manuel Atienza y Juan Ruiz Manero», Doxa, 12 (1992), pp. 327-332.

Prieto Sanchís, L., Sobre principios y normas. Problemas del razonamiento jurídico, Centro de Estudios Constitucionales, Madrid, 1992.

Prieto Sanchís, L., «Dúplica a los profesores Manuel Atienza y Juan Ruiz Manero», Doxa, 13 (1993), pp. 315-327.

Rawls, J., «Two Concepts of Rules», Philosophical Review, 64 (1955), pp. 3-32. Ahora en Rawls, J.; Freeman, S.(ed.), Collected Papers, Harvard University Press, Cambridge (Mass.), 1999, cap. 2.

Raz, J., «Legal Limits and the Principles of Law», The Yale Law Journal, 81 (1972), pp. 823-854.

Raz, J., Practical Reason and Norms, Hutchinson, London, 1975.

Ross, A., «El concepto de validez y el conflicto entre el positivismo jurídico y el Derecho Natural», trad. de Carrió, G.R.; Paschero, O., en El concepto de validez y otros ensayos, Centro Editor de América Latina, Buenos Aires, 1969, p. 18.

Ross, D., The Right and the Good, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1930.

Savigny, F.K., System des heutigen römischen Rechts, Band I, Berlin, 1840. Disponible en <http://dlib-pr.mpier.mpg.de/m/kleioc/0010/exec/books/%22199236%22> [Consultado: 12/06/2018].

Schauer, F., «The Jurisprudence of Reasons (reviewing Law’s Empire by Ronald Dworkin) », Michigan Law Review, 85 (1987), pp. 847-878.

Schauer, F., Playing by the Rules, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1991.

Schauer, F., «Constitutional Invocations», Fordham Law Review, 65 (1997), pp. 1205-1312.

Suárez, F., De legibus ac Deo legislatore. Liber VI: De interpretatione, cessatione et mutatione legis humanae [1612], Baiero, C.; Soto, J.M. (eds.), CSIC, Madrid, 2012.

Trujillo, I.; Viola, F., Human Rights Are Not (Or Not Only), Nova Science Publishers, New York, 2014.

Viola, F., Le ragioni del diritto, Il Mulino, Bologna, 2003.

Viola, F., «Il futuro del diritto», Persona y Derecho, 79 (2018, II) [en este mismo número], pp. 9-36.

Viola, F.; Zaccaria, G., Diritto e interpretazione. Lineamenti di teoria ermeneutica del diritto, Roma-Bari, Laterza, 1999.

Wright, G.H., Norm and Action. A Logical Enquiry, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, 1963.

Metrics

Search GoogleScholar


Details

Article Details

Section
Articles: The Future of Law