Multiple Authorship: The Collaborative Production of Knowledge in the Shinkenchiku Residential Design Competition (1965–2020)

Cathelijne Nuijsink
291

Abstract

This paper challenges the notion of the heroic genius as driver of invention and development in architectural culture. It considers the production of architectural ideas prior to design as an integral part of the production of architectural projects and takes the Shinkenchiku Residential Design Competition (1965–2020), a yearly housing ideas competition from Japan, as a tangible case study for exploring notions of multiple authorship. The paper focuses on the editions of the competition judged by Toyo Ito, Rem Koolhaas, and Kazuyo Sejima–who respectively set the provocative themes of “Comfort in the Metropolis” (1988), “House with No Style” (1992), and “The Possibilities of Non- Movement” (1996)–to illustrate how this ideas competition functions as a fruitful dialogue between judge and contestants that produces architectural knowledge collaboratively. At the same time, by de-mystifying the genius of the single “star architect” judge, this paper aims to contribute to the ongoing quest to write a more inclusive global history of architecture that reveals voices hitherto silenced.

Keywords:
Multiple Authorship, Shinkenchiku Residential Design Competition, Discussion Platform, Multicultural Responses, Collaborative Production of Knowledge

Authors

Cathelijne Nuijsink

References

DANIEL, Thomas, “The Fugitive,” in Toyo Ito, Tarzans in the Media Forest, vol. 8. Architecture Words, Architectural Association, London, 2011.

GARGIANI, Roberto, and KOOLHAAS, Rem, Rem Koolhaas/OMA: The Construction of Merveilles, EPFL Press, Lausanne, 2019.

ITO, Toyo, Competition Announcement, “The Shinkenchiku Residential Design Competition 1988,” The Japan Architect, March 1988, pp. 6–7.

ITO, Toyo, “Comfort in the Metropolis: In the Narrow Defile Between Reality and Fiction,” The Japan Architect, March 1989, 383, pp. 30–33.

KOOLHAAS, Rem, “The Shinkenchiku Residential Design Competition 1992,” The Japan Architect II, 1992, pp. 2–3.

KOOLHAAS, Rem, “About the Results,” The Japan Architect I, 1993, Annual, pp. 6–7.

KOOLHAAS, Rem, “Why I Wrote Delirious New York and Other Textual Strategies,” Architecture New York, May/June 1993, Writing in Architecture, pp. 42–43.

LEUPEN Bernard, and KOOLHAAS, Rem, Hoe Modern is de Nederlandse Architectuur?, 010 Publisher, Rotterdam, 1990.

NUIJSINK, Cathelijne, Interview with Azby Brown, September 19, 2019.

NUIJSINK, Cathelijne, Interview with Jean- Philippe Lanoire, July 9, 2020.

NUIJSINK, Cathelijne, Interview with Jos Roodbol, April 25, 2019.

NUIJSINK, Cathelijne, Interview with Jurgen Mayer, June 19, 2020.

NUIJSINK, Cathelijne, Interview with Kirsten Wittle, June 15, 2020.

NUIJSINK, Cathelijne, Interview with Krešimir Rogina, June 6, 2020.

NUIJSINK, Cathelijne, Interview with Mitsugo Okagawa, June 20, 2020.

NUIJSINK, Cathelijne, Interview with Peter Wilson, July 7, 2019.

NUIJSINK, Cathelijne, Interview with Toshikazu Ishida, July 26, 2019.

NUIJSINK, Cathelijne, Interview with Yosuki Fujiki, June 24, 2020.

NUIJSINK, Cathelijne, Interview with Pornchai Boonsom, June 20, 2020.

SEJIMA, Kazuyo, “The Possibilities of Non-Movement . . . ,” The Japan Architect II, Summer 1996, pp. 2–3.

SEJIMA, Kazuyo, “Judge’s Comments,” The Japan Architect IV, Winter 1996, pp. 224–25.


Metrics

Search GoogleScholar





Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Section

Articles