Science, finality, and existance of God
Main Article Content
Abstract
To demonstrate this, there is an exposure, first of all, of all the «evidence of order» as found in the different texts of Saint Thomas Aquinas. These complement and clarify each other. The reach of the evidence is analysed.
After that, the objections stated are examined. On the one hand, the «methodological naturalism» is examined. This denies the evidence value, basing itself on the analisis of experimental science methods. On the other hand, the denial of the natural finality which resorts to the evolutionist hypothesis.
As regards, the methodological naturalism, the ideological implications are analysed with special reference to the positivism. Some of the current formulations are criticized. There is an explanation as to how scientific progress and the method which makes it possible have ontological presupposition which, in actual fact, amplify the base of the evidence of order.
Then the naturalistic meaning which some authors give to the evolutionist hypotheses, are analysed. In order to do this, reference is made of the role which the finality of Biology plays and to the character of the scientific laws used by evolutionism. The fact that scientific evolutionist theories are compatible with divine creation and providence and cannot deny them, is showed. Also, that as long as these hypotheses are accepted, they would lead to a far-reaching plan which suggests a strengthening of the evidence of order and in no way does it contradict it. Incidentally, the relevance of ontogenesis as a means of verifying natural finality, it is examined.
Details
Article Details
RIGHTS TRANSFER
By submitting the article for evaluation and subsequent publication in Scripta Theologica, the AUTHOR exclusively assigns the rights of public communication, reproduction, distribution and sale for commercial exploitation to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, for the maximum legal term in force -the entire life of the author and seventy years after his death or declaration of death-, in any country, and in any of the current and future edition modalities, both in print and electronic versions.
In the event that the article is not accepted for publication , this transfer of rights lapses with the communication of the refusal to the AUTHOR.
The AUTHOR affirms that the article is unpublished, that it has not been sent simultaneously to another publication medium and that the rights have not been transferred exclusively previously. He is responsible to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service for the authorship and originality of his work, as well as for all pecuniary charges that may arise for the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, in favor of third parties due to actions, claims or conflicts arising from the breach of obligations by the AUTHOR.