«‘Being’, Said in Isolation, is Nothing». Hermeneutics on an Aristotelian Enigma in the Light of a Contrast of Methods
Article Sidebar
22)
Main Article Content
Authors
Abstract
91
This article compares the Polian abandonment of the mental limit with the analogy of Thomas Aquinas, offering a global description of the latter, in order to determine the meaning and epistemological status of the notion of being. It also examines in both respective approaches the value and scope of potency, abstract articulation of time, and “entelécheia”.
Keywords
References
AMMONIUS, In Aristotelis 'De interpretatione' comentarius, A. BUSSE (Ed.), Berlín, 1897. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112361023
ARISTÓTELES, Opera, ex recensione Inmanuelis Bekkeri, edidit Academia Regia Borussica, Berlin, 1831-1870; V. GARCÍA YEBRA (Ed. y Trad.), Metafísica, Madrid, 1982; M. CANDEL (Ed. y Trad.), Sobre la interpretación, en Tratados de lógica (Organon) II, Gredos, Madrid, 1995.
AUBENQUE, P., Le problème de l' etre chez Aristotle, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, 1962; V. PEÑA (Ed. y Trad.), El problema del ser en Aristóteles, Taurus, Madrid, 1987.
BRENTANO, F., Von der mannigfachen Bedeutung des Seiendes nach Aristoteles, Herder, Freiburg im Breisgau, 1862; edición castellana de M. ABELLA (Ed. y Trad.), Sobre los múltiples significados del ente en Aristóteles, Encuentro, Madrid, 2007.
GARAY, J., Los sentidos de la forma en Aristóteles, Eunsa, Pamplona, 1987.
GILBERT, P., Metafísica. La paciencia de ser, Sígueme, Salamanca, 2008.
GONZÁLEZ, Á. L., Teología Natural, Eunsa, Pamplona, 1985.
HAYA, F., Tomás de Aquino ante la crítica. La articulación trascendental de conocimiento y ser, Eunsa, Pamplona, 1992; El ser temporal. Doctrina del método, UMA, Málaga, 2017.
LLANO, A., Metafísica y Lenguaje, Eunsa, Pamplona, 1984.
MARTÍ, M., "El conocimiento habitual como condición de posibilidad de la metafísica", en J. CHOZA (Ed.), La intelección. Homenaje a Leonardo Polo, Themata, nº 50, julio-diciembre 2014, 295-302. https://doi.org/10.12795/themata.2014.i50.14
MURILLO, J. I., Operación, hábito y reflexión. El conocimiento como clave antropológica en Tomás de Aquino, Eunsa, Pamplona, 1998.
PODHORSKI, J., "Negación y prosecución: una propuesta respecto a la vía generalizante", en Studia Poliana, 25 (2023), 167-181. https://doi.org/10.15581/013.25.167-181
POLO, L., Evidencia y realidad en Descartes, OC, A, v. I. I, Eunsa, Pamplona, 2015; El acceso al ser, OC, A, v. II, Eunsa, Pamplona, 2015; Curso de Teoría del conocimiento II, OC, A, v. V, Eunsa, Pamplona, 2016; Curso de Teoría del conocimiento IV, OC, A, v. VII, Eunsa, Pamplona, 1994; Nominalismo, idealismo y realismo, OC, A, v. XIV, Eunsa, Pamplona, 2016; Antropología trascendental I, Eunsa, Pamplona, 1999.
SOTO BRUNA, M. J., "La criatura como distinción", en Studia Poliana, 4 (2002), 141-165. https://doi.org/10.15581/013.26107
S. THOMAE AQUINATIS, Opera omnia, E. ALARCÓN (Ed.), Automato electronico ad Universitatis Studiorum Navarrensis, Pamplona, 2000.
YEPES, R., La doctrina del acto en Aristóteles, Eunsa, Pamplona, 1992.
Metrics
|
|
Details
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
RIGHTS TRANSFER
By submitting the article for evaluation and subsequent publication in Studia Poliana, the AUTHOR exclusively assigns the rights of public communication, reproduction, distribution and sale for commercial exploitation to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, for the maximum legal term in force -the entire life of the author and seventy years after his death or declaration of death-, in any country, and in any of the current and future edition modalities, both in print and electronic versions.
In the event that the article is not accepted for publication , this transfer of rights lapses with the communication of the refusal to the AUTHOR.
The AUTHOR affirms that the article is unpublished, that it has not been sent simultaneously to another publication medium and that the rights have not been transferred exclusively previously. He is responsible to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service for the authorship and originality of his work, as well as for all pecuniary charges that may arise for the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, in favor of third parties due to actions, claims or conflicts arising from the breach of obligations by the AUTHOR.
