The illegal exploitation of a state's natural resources in the light of the judgement of the International Court of Justice on the armed activities in the territory of Congo (2005)
Main Article Content
Abstract
![](https://revistas.unav.edu/social-icons/view.png)
On December 19, 2005, the International Court of Justice (case on Armed activities in the territory of the Congo) condemned Uganda for the illegal exploitation of the Democratic Republic of the Congo’s natural resources. Its conclusions were not as extensive as desirable, since although the Court affirmed the consuetudinary character of the principle of permanent sovereignty on natural resources, it finally decided on the basis of Humanitarian International Law. This article focuses on the Court reasoning and its reluctance to clarify and consolidate the principle.
Details
Article Details
RIGHTS TRANSFER
By submitting the article for evaluation and subsequent publication in Anuario Español de Derecho Internacional, the AUTHOR grants exclusive economic and/or exploitation rights: reproduction, distribution, public communication, transformation/translation/creation of derivative works, and commercialisation to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, for the maximum legal period in force -the author's lifetime and seventy years after his or her death or declaration of death-, in any country, and in any of the current and future publishing modalities, both in print and electronic versions.
In the event that the article is not accepted for publication , this transfer of rights lapses with the communication of the refusal to the AUTHOR.
The AUTHOR affirms that the article is unpublished, that it has not been sent simultaneously to another publication medium and that the rights have not been transferred exclusively previously. He is responsible to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service for the authorship and originality of his work, as well as for all pecuniary charges that may arise for the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, in favor of third parties due to actions, claims or conflicts arising from the breach of obligations by the AUTHOR.