Emiliano Acosta e-mail(Login required)

Main Article Content

Authors

Emiliano Acosta e-mail(Login required)

Abstract

381
In this text, I argue that what we call the relationship between Kant and Fichte is actually Fichte’s reception of Kant’s philosophy. There are three main concepts for defi ning this reception: radicalisation, continuity and rupture. I fi rstly explain these concepts in the context of Fichte’s reception of Kant’s philosophy in general. Then I analyse them in the case of the categories’ deduction of both German philosophers. Finally, I present the content of the present issue according to the three mentioned concepts.

Keywords

Kant, Fichte, radicalisation, continuity, rupture

References

E. ACOSTA, La transformación de la tabla kantiana de las categorías en el Fundamento de toda la doctrina de la ciencia de J. G. Fichte de 1794/95, “Anales del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofía” 33/1 (2016) 103-135.

CHR. ASMUTH (ed.), Kant und Fichte – Fichte und Kant. Número monográfi co: “Fichte-Studien” 33 (2009).

CHR. ASMUTH, Von der Urteilstheorie zur Bewusstseinstheorie. Die Entgrenzung der Transzendetalphilosophie, “Fichte-Studien” 33 (2009) 221-249.

J. KLOC-KONKOLOWICZ, Beati possidentes? Eigentum und Freiheit bei Kant und Fichte, “Fichte-Studien” 33 (2009), 127-143.

T. ROCKMORE (ed.), Revista de Estud(i)os sobre Fichte (on line) vol. 16 invierno 2018. URL: https://journals.openedition.org/ref/793.

T. ROCKMORE, (ed.), Revista de Estud(i)os sobre Fichte (on line) vol. 17 verano 2018. URL: https://journals.openedition.org/ref/869.

F. SCHWEMBER AUGIER, Libertad, derecho y propiedad. El fundamento de la propiedad en la fi losofía del derecho de Kant y Fichte (Olms, Hildesheim/Zürich/New York, 2013).

Metrics

Search GoogleScholar




Details

Article Details

Section
Presentation
Author Biography

Emiliano Acosta, Department of History, Archeology, Philosophy and Ethics

1050, Brussels