Active audience?: interaction of young people with television and online video content
Article Sidebar
371)
Main Article Content
Authors
Abstract
1028
References
Ardevol, E., Roig, A., Gomez-Ruiz, E. & San Cornelio, G. (2010). Prácticas creativas y participación en los nuevos media. Quaderns del CAC 34, XIII(1), 27-38.
Arango-Forero, G. (2013). Fragmentación de audiencias juveniles en un ambiente comunicativo multimedial: el caso colombiano. OBS 7(4), 091-111. (http://goo.gl/EiO26E) (09-21-2015).
Askwith, I. (2007). Television 2.0: reconceptualizing television as an engagement medium. [Doctoral dissertation]. Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Ballano, S., Uribe, A.C. & Munté-Ramos, R.-A. (2014). Young users and the digital divide: readers, participants or creators on Internet? Communication & Society 27(4), 147-155. DOI: 10.15581/003.27.4.147-155.
Bardoel, J. (2007). Public service broadcasting in a multimedia environment. In N.
Carpentier, P. Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt et al. (Eds.), Media technologies and democracy in an enlarged Europe (pp. 41-54). Tartu: Tartu University Press.
Barkhuus, L. (2009). Television on the Internet: new practices, new viewers. CHI‘09, ACM, (http://goo.gl/JYBIYW) (09-21-2015).
Berrocal, S., Campos-Domínguez, E. & Redondo, M. (2014). Prosumidores mediáticos en la comunicación política: el «politainment» en YouTube. Comunicar 43(XXII), 65-72. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3916/C43-2014-06
Bolin, G. (2007). Media technologies, transmedia storytelling and commodification. In T.
Storsul & D. Stuedahl (Eds.), Ambivalence towards convergence: digitalization and media change (pp. 237-248). Nordicom: University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg.
Bolin, G. (2010). Digitization, multiplatform texts, and audience reception. Popular Communication 8, 72-83, DOI: 10.1080/15405700903502353.
Bolin, G (2012). The labour of media use, Information, Communication & Society 15(6), 796-814 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.677052
Bolin, G. & Westlund, O. (2009). Mobile generations: the role of mobile technology in the shaping of Swedish media generations. International Journal of Communication 3, 108- 124.
Bondad-Brown, B. (2011). Examining traditional television and online video use in the new media environment: understanding the role of audience activity, media orientation, generational cohort, and contextual age [Doctoral dissertation]. Santa Barbara: University of California.
Bruns, A. (2008). Blogs, Wikipedia, second life, and beyond: from production to produsage. New York: Peter Lang.
Bruns, A. & Schmidt, J.H. (2011). Produsage: a closer look at continuing developments, New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia 17(1), 3-7. DOI: 10.1080/13614568.2011.563626.
Burgess, J. & Green, J. (2009). YouTube. Online Video and Participatory Culture. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bury, R. & Li, J. (2015). Is it live or is it timeshifted, streamed or downloaded? Watching television in the era of multiple screens. New Media & Society 17(4), 592-610. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461444813508368.
Butsch, R. (2000). The making of American audiences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carpentier, N. (2011). The concept of participation. If they have access and interact, do they really participate? In N. Carpentier & P. Dahlgren (Eds.). Interrogating audiences: theoretical horizons of participation. Communication Management Quarterly 21, 13-36.
Carpentier, N. & Dahlgren, P. (2011). Introduction: Interrogating audiences – theoretical horizons of participation. In N. Carpentier & P. Dahlgren (Eds.). Interrogating audiences: theoretical horizons of participation. Communication Management Quarterly 21, 7-12.
Carpentier, N. & De Cleen, B. (2008). Introduction: Blurring participations and convergences. In N. Carpentier & B. De Cleen (Eds.), Participation and media production. Critical reflections on content creation (pp. 1-12). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Carpentier, N., Schrøder, K., & Hallet, L. (2014). Audience/society transformations. In N.
Carpentier, K. Schrøder, & L. Hallet (Eds.), Audience transformations. Shifting audience positions in late modernity (pp. 1-12). New York: Routledge.
Castells, M. (2009). Comunicación y poder. Madrid: Alianza.
Costello V. & Moore B. (2007). Cultural outlaws: an examination of audience activity and online television fandom. Television & New Media 8(2), 124-143. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1527476406299112.
Curtin, M. (2009). Matrix media. In G. Turner & J. Tay (Eds.), Understanding television in the post-broadcast era (pp. 9-19). Oxon: Routledge.
Eustat (2014). Encuesta sobre la sociedad de la información en familias de la C.A. de Euskadi, 2014 (http://goo.gl/tkJ9qQ) (09-21-2015).
Evans, E. (2011). Transmedia television. Audience, new media and daily life. New York: Routledge.
Flores-Ruiz, I. & Humanes-Humanes, M.L. (2014). Hábitos y consumos televisivos de la generación digital desde la perspectiva de los usos y gratificaciones. Estudio de caso en la Universidad Rey Juan Carlos. Revista Mediterránea de Comunicación 5(1), 137-155. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14198/MEDCOM2014.5.1.06
Foehr, U. (2006). Media multitasking among American youth. Prevalences, predictors and pairings. Washington: Kaiser Family Foundation.
García, M.C. & Valdivia, A. (2014). Prosumidores mediáticos. Cultura participativa de las audiencias y responsabilidades de los medios. Comunicar 43(XXII), 10-13. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3916/C43-2014-a2
García-Avilés, J.A. (2012). Roles of audience participation in multiplatform television: from fans and consumers to collaborators and activists. Participations: Journal of Audience & Reception Studies 9(2), 429-447 (http://goo.gl/CxmQ9V) (21-09-2015).
Gauntlett, D. (2015). Making media studies. The creativity turn in media and communications studies. New York: Peter Lang.
Gray, J. & Lotz, A.D. (2012). Television studies. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Green, D. & Patel, M. (2013). Deepening engagement for lasting impact. A framework for measuring media performance & result. Learning for Action.
Griffen-Foley, B. (2004). From tit-bits to big brother. A century of audience participation in the media. Media, Culture & Society 26(4), 533-548. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0163443704044216
Hargittai, E. & Walejko, G. (2008). The participation divide: content creation and sharing in the digital age. Information, Communication & Society 11(2), 239-256. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13691180801946150
Hassoun, D. (2014). Tracing attentions: Toward an analysis of simultaneous media use. Television & New Media 15(4), 271-288. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1527476412468621
Hess, J., Ley, B., Ogonowski, C., Reichling, T., Wan, L., & Wulf, V. (2012). New technology @ home: Impacts on usage behavior and social structures. 10th European Conference on Interactive Tv and Video, Berlin, 185-194.
INE (2015). Encuesta sobre equipamiento y uso de tecnologías de la información y comunicación en los hogares (http://goo.gl/Z8Uaz0) (09-21-2015).
Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: where old and new media collide. New York: New York University Press.
Jenkins, H. (2013). Textual poachers. Television fans and participatory culture (20th anniversary edition). Oxon: Routledge.
Jenkins, H., Ford, S. & Green, J. (2013). Spreadable media. New York: New York University Press.
Jensen, K. (2012). Introduction. In K.B. Jensen (Ed.), A Handbook of Media Communication Research. Qualitative and Quantitative methodologies. (pp. 1-19). 2nd edition. Oxon: Routledege.
Kim, P. & Sawhney, H. (2002). A machine-like new medium: theoretical examination of interactive TV. Media, Culture & Society 24(2), 217–233 Lee, H.J. & Andrejevic, M. (2014). Second-screen theory. From the Democratic surround to the digital enclosure. In J. Holt & K. Sanson (Ed.), Connected viewing. Selling, streaming & sharing media in the digital era (pp. 40-61). New York: Routledge.
Li, C. (2007). Mapping the participation in activities forms the foundation of a social strategy (http://goo.gl/U03txm) (09-21-2015).
Livingstone, S. (1999). New media, new audiences? New Media & Society 1(1), 59-66. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461444899001001010
Livingstone, S. (2004). The challenge of changing audiences: or what is the researcher to do in the age of the Internet? European Journal of Communication 19(1), 75-86. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0267323104040695
Livingstone, S. (2013). The participation paradigm in audience research. The Communication Review 16(1-2), 21-30. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2013.757174.
Napoli, P.M. (2010). Audience evolution. New technologies and the transformation of media audiences. New York: Columbia University Press.
Noguera Vivo, J.M; Villi, M.; Nyiró, N.; De Blasio, E.; Bourda, M. (2014). The role of the Media Industry When Participation is a Product. In N. Carpentier, K. Schroder & L. Hallet (Eds.), Audience Transformation (pp. 172-187). New York: Routledge.
O’Neill, B., Gallego-Pérez, I. & Zeller, F. (2014). New perspectives on audience activity. ‘Prosumption’ and media activism as audience practices. In N. Carpentier, C. Shrøder & L. Hallet (Eds.), Audience Transformation (pp. 157-171). New York: Routledge.
Ofcom (2014). Communications Market Report 2014. London: Ofcom. (http://goo.gl/7InmW8) (21-09-2015).
Pavón-Arrizabalaga, A. (2014). Audiovisual teen and peer group consumption in 2011: a case study from Gipuzkoa [Doctoral dissertation]. Aretxabaleta: Mondragon Unibertsitatea.
Quintas, N., González, A. (2014). Audiencias activas: participación de la audiencia social en la televisión. Comunicar 43(XXII), 83-90. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3916/C43-2014-08
Sánchez Martínez, M., Ibar, R. (2015). Convergencia e interacción en los nuevos medios: tipologías de prosumidores entre los estudiantes universitarios. Communication & Society 28(2), 87-99. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15581/003.28.2.sp.87-99
Schrøder, K., Drotner, K., Kline, S., & Murray, C. (2003). Researching audiences. London: Arnold.
Scolari, C.A. (2008). Hacia la hipertelevisión. Los primeros síntomas de una nueva configuración del dispositivo televisivo. Diálogos de la Comunicación 77, 1-9. (http://goo.gl/lVqit6) (09-21-2015).
Scolari, C.A. (2013). Narrativas transmedia. Cuando todos los medios cuentan. Barcelona: Deusto.
Siapera, E. (2004). From couch potatoes to cybernauts? The expanding notion of the audience on TV channels’ websites. New Media & Society 6(2), 155-172. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461444804041446.
Simons, N. (2014). Audience reception of cross- and transmedia TV drama in the age of convergence. International Journal of Communication (8), 2220-2239.
Strangelove, M. (2011). Watching YouTube. Extraordinary videos by ordinary people. London: University of Toronto Press.
Svoen, B. (2007). Consumers, participants, and creators: young people’s diverse use of television and new media, ACM - Computers in Entertainment, 5, 2, Art. 5, 1-16. OI=10.1145/1279540.1279545.
Toffler, A. (1980). The third wave. New York: Bantam Books.
Vainikka, E., Herkman, J. (2013). Generation of content-produces? The reading and media production practices of young adults. Participation. Journal of Audience & Reception Studies 10(2), 118-138. (http://goo.gl/HW6TLt) (09-21-2015).
Van Dijck, J. (2009). Users like you? Theorizing agency in user-generated content. Media, Culture & Society 31(1), 41-58. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0163443708098245
Van Es, Karin (2016). The Perks and Perils of Social TV: On the Participation Dilemma in NBC’s The Voice. Television & New Media 17(2), 108-123. First published on November 30, 2015. DOI: 10.1177/1527476415616191.
Venturini, F., Mishra, B. & Carlier, B. (2013). Multitasking and taking control. Video internet consumer survey 2013. Accenture (https://goo.gl/8iXm6v) (09-21-2015).
Wilson, S. (2015). In the living room: second screen and TV audiences. Television & New Media, 1-8. DOI: 10.1177/1527476415593348.
Metrics
|
|
Details
Article Details
RIGHTS TRANSFER
By submitting the article for evaluation and subsequent publication in Communication & Society, the AUTHOR exclusively assigns the rights of public communication, reproduction, distribution and sale for commercial exploitation to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, for the maximum legal term in force -the entire life of the author and seventy years after his death or declaration of death-, in any country, and in any of the current and future edition modalities, both in print and electronic versions.
In the event that the article is not accepted for publication , this transfer of rights lapses with the communication of the refusal to the AUTHOR.
The AUTHOR affirms that the article is unpublished, that it has not been sent simultaneously to another publication medium and that the rights have not been transferred exclusively previously. He is responsible to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service for the authorship and originality of his work, as well as for all pecuniary charges that may arise for the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, in favor of third parties due to actions, claims or conflicts arising from the breach of obligations by the AUTHOR.
