María Luengo e-mail(Login required)

Main Article Content

Authors

María Luengo e-mail(Login required)

Abstract

130
To what extent is journalism autonomous from spheres of power in society? In journalism studies, it is widely accepted that political, economic, and professional interests constrain journalists and frustrate independent reporting. Drawing upon previous research on media independence, this article proposes a set of analytical categories to enrich and strengthen the theoretical argument for journalistic autonomy. The proposed categories are in line with Jeffrey Alexander’s cultural sociology. While interests inevitably influence journalists, from a cultural-sociological perspective any journalistic narrative can be interpreted as indicative of cultural values that transcend particular groups, sections, or parties. The categories proposed in this article are applied to media coverage of the 2004 Madrid bombing to illustrate the way in which media narratives that are strongly overshadowed by ideological power spheres may reflect autonomous cultural values that are common to all civil society.

References

ADORNO, Theodor W. & HORKHEIMER, Max, Dialectic of Enlightenment, Verso, London, 1997.

ALEXANDER, Jeffrey C., “On the Interpretation of The Civil Sphere: Understanding and Contention in Contemporary Social Science”, The Sociological Quarterly, nº 48, 2007, pp. 641-659.

ALEXANDER, Jeffrey C., The Civil Sphere, Oxford University Press, Oxford / New York, 2006.

ALEXANDER, Jeffrey C. & SMITH, Philip, “The strong program in sociology: Elements of a structural hermeneutics”, in ALEXANDER, Jeffrey C. (ed.), The Meanings of Social Life: A Cultural Sociology, Oxford University Press, Oxford / New York, 2003.

ALEXANDER, Jeffrey C. & JACOBS, Ronald N., “Mass communication, ritual and civil society”, in LIEBES T., Media, Ritual, and Identity, Routledge, London, 1998, pp. 23-41.

ALTHAUS, Scott, “When News Norms Collide, Follow the Lead: New Evidence for Press Independence”, Political Communication, nº 20, 2003, pp. 381-414.

ANTONIO, Robert J., “Locating the civil Sphere”, The Sociological Quarterly, nº 48, 2007, pp. 601-613.

ARCHETI, Cristina, “Comparing international coverage of 9/11: Towards an interdisciplinary explanation of the construction of news”, Journalism, vol. 11, nº 5, 2010, pp. 567-588.

ARENDT, Hannah, Between Past and Future. Eight Exercises in Political Thought, Penguin Books, New York, 1977.

BENNETT, Lance W., LAWRENCE, Regina. G. & LIVINGSTON, Steven, When the Press Fails. Political Power and the News Media From Iraq to Katrina, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2007.

BENSON, Rodney, “What makes news more multiperspectival? A field analysis”, Poetics, 37, 2009, pp. 402-418.

BREESE, Elizabeth Butler, “Reports from ‘Backstage’ in Entertainment News”, Society, 47, 2010, pp. 396-402.

CANEL, María José & SANDERS, Karen, “Crisis Communication and Terrorist Attacks: Framing a Response to the 2004 Madrid Bombings and 2005 London Bombings”, in COOMBS, W. Timothy and HOLLADAY, Sherry J. (eds.), The Handbook of Crisis Communication, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, 2010.

COLLINS, Richard, “Walling Germany with brass: Theoretical paradigms in British studies of television news”, Media, Culture and Society, nº 6, 1984, pp. 27-44.

CONLEY, Donovan and DICKINSON, Greg “Textural Democracy”, Critical Studies in Media Communication, vol. 27, nº 1, 2010, pp. 1-7.

CRAIG, Robert T, “Communication Theory as a Field”, Communication Theory, vol. 9, nº 2, 1999, pp. 119-161.

DELEUZE, Marc, “What is Journalism? Professional identity and ideology of journalists reconsidered”, Journalism, vol. 6, nº 4, 2005, pp. 442-464 ELMELUND-PRÆSTEKÆR, Christian & WIEN, Charlotte, “What’s the Fuss About? The Interplay of Media Hypes and Politics”, The International Journal of Press/Politics, vol. 13, nº 3, 2008, pp. 247-266.

FRYE, Northrop, Anatomy of Criticism, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1957.

HAAS, Tanni & STEINER, Linda, “Public journalism as a journalism of publics: Implications of the Habermas–Fraser debate for public journalism”, Journalism, nº 2, 2001, pp. 123-147.

HABERMAS, Jurgen, LENNOX, Sara & LENNOX, Frank, “The public Sphere: An Encyclopedia Article”, New German Critique, nº 3, 1974, pp. 49-55.

HALLIN, Daniel. C., The ‘Uncensored War’. The Media and Vietnam, University of California Press, Berkely, 1986.

HALLIN, Daniel C. & MANCINI, Paolo, Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge / New York, 2004.

HALLIN, Daniel & PAPATHANASSOPOULOS, C. Stylianos, “Political clientelism and the media: southern Europe and Latin America in comparative Perspective”, Media, Culture & Society 24, 2002, pp. 175-195.

JACOBS, Ronald, “Culture, the Public Sphere, and Media Sociology: A Search for a Classical Founder in the Work of Robert Park”, American Sociology, nº 40, 2009, pp. 149-166.

JACOBS, Ronald N., Race, Media and the Crisis of Civil Society. From Watts to Rodney King, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000.

PATTERSON, Thomas E. & DONSBACH, Wolfgang, “News Decisions: Journalists as Partisan Actors”, Political Communication, nº 13, 1996, pp. 455-468.

POLETTI, Monica & BRANTS, Kees, “Between partisanship and cynicism: Italian journalism in a state of flux”, Journalism, vol. 11, nº 3, 2010, pp. 329-346.

PRESTON, Paschal, Making the News: Journalism and News Cultures in Europe, Routledge, New York / London, 2009.

REDONDO, Javier, “Identidades mediáticas y adhesiones políticas”, in VARA, A. (et. al.), Cobertura informativa del 11-M, Eunsa, Pamplona, 2006.

RONEN, Ruth, Possible Worlds in Literary Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge / New York, 1994.

SAMPEDRO, Víctor F. (ed.), 13-M Multitudes on line, Catarata, Madrid, 2005.

SCHUDSON, Michael, Why Democracies Need an Unlovable Press, University of California, San Diego, 2008.

SCHUDSON, Michael, “How Culture Works: Perspectives from Media Studies on the Efficacy of Symbols”, Theory and Society, vol. 18, nº 2, 1989, pp. 153-180.

SHEHATA, Adam, “Marking Journalistic Independence: Official Dominance and the Rule of Product Substitution in Swedish Press Coverage”, European Journal of Communication, vol. 25, nº 2, 2010, pp. 123-137.

SOFFER, Oren, “The Competing Ideals of Objectivity and Dialogue in American Journalism”, Journalism, vol. 10, nº 4, 2009, pp. 473-491.

STATHAM, Paul, “Making Europe News: How Journalists View their Role and Media Performance”, Journalism, vol. 9, nº 4, 2008, pp. 398-422.

THOMPSON, John B., The media and the modernity. A social theory of the media, Stanford University Press, Stanford, 1995.

TUCHMAN, Gaye, Making news: A study in the construction of reality, Free Press, New York, 1978.

VARA, Alfonso, RODRÍGUEZ, Jordi, GIMENEZ, Elena, & DIAZ, Montserrat (eds.), Cobertura informativa del 11-M, Eunsa, Pamplona, 2006.

WHITE, Hayden, The Content of the Form. Narrative Discourse and the Historical Representation, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore / London, 1987.

WOLFSFELD, Gadi, Media and the Path to Peace, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004.

WOLFSFELD, Gadi & SHEAFER, Tamir, “Competing Actors and the Construction of Political News. The Contest Over Waves in Israel”, Political Communication, nº 23, 2006, pp. 333-354.

Metrics

Search GoogleScholar


Details

Article Details

Section
Articles