María-Teresa Mercado-Sáez e-mail(Login required) , Fernando Sahuquillo-Verdet e-mail(Login required) , Manuel Chavez e-mail(Login required)

Main Article Content


María-Teresa Mercado-Sáez e-mail(Login required)
Fernando Sahuquillo-Verdet e-mail(Login required)
Manuel Chavez e-mail(Login required)


The granting of hydrocarbon exploration permits in the Gulf of Valencia in 2010 brought thousands of citizens of the Valencian Community and the Balearic Islands to the streets until 2015 when the beneficiary company renounced to carry out the project. As in other cases of citizen protests, different concerns and positions were expressed in the media. Knowing the media frameworks around these projects is the main objective of this research. Specifically, the research looks to identify the presentation of positions for or against the risks and potential benefits, and to determine the presence of social mobilization as an information source in the coverage of the three reference newspapers in the affected area: Levante-EMV (Valencia), Mediterráneo (Castellón) and Diario de Ibiza. From the theoretical perspective of framing, the frames used in reporting are revealed in terms of the definition of the problem. The results of the analysis of 1,258 texts have made it possible to identify frames of benefit and risk, much more frequent on the latter, focusing on the economic risk for tourism and fishing, and above all, on environmental risk. The frame of benefit referred to the economic advantages that would reduce the dependence on energy, occupies a discreet place since, in this case, the main actors in the conflict -politicians and civil society- coincided in their arguments, both becoming protagonists of media discourse in their role as sources.


Framing, social movements, oil surveys, journalistic sources, energy


Brüggemann, M. (2014). Between Frame Setting and Frame Sending: How Journalists Contribute to News Frames. Communication Theory, 24, 61–82.

Brugué, Q., Font, J. & Gomà, R. (2003). Participación y democracia. Asociaciones y poder local. In M. J. Funes & R. Adell (Eds.), Movimientos sociales: cambio social y participación (pp. 109-132). Madrid: UNED.

De Vreese, C. H. & Boomgaarden, H. (2003). Valenced news frames and public support for the EU. Communications, 28, 361-381.

De Vreese, C. H. (2004). The Effects of Frames in Political Television News on Issue Interpretation and Frame Salience. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 81(1), 36-52.

De Vreese, C. H. (2005). News framing: Theory and typology. Information Design Journal, 13(1), 51-62.

Dunwoody, S. & Peters, H. (1992). Mass media coverage of technological and environmental risks. Public Understanding of Science, 1(2), 199-230.

Dunwoody, S. & Neuwirth, K. (1991). Coming to terms will the impact of communication technological risk judgements. In L. Wilkins & P. Patterson (Eds.), Risky business: Communication science, risk and public policy (pp. 11-30.). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Towards Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43, 51-58.

Entman, R. M. (2003). Cascading activation: contesting the White House’s frame after 9/11. Political Communication, 20, 415–432.

Espluga, J., Farré, J., Gonzalo, J. & Prades, A. (2014). Factors Inhibiting the Social Mobilization: the Case of the Petrochemical Area of Tarragona. REIS. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 146, 191-216.

European Commission (2017). Especial Eurobarómetro 459. Apoyo de los ciudadanos a la acción por el clima. Retrieved from

Farré, J. (2005). Comunicación del riesgo y espirales del miedo. Comunicación y Sociedad, 3, 95-119.

Farré, J. (2006). Las lógicas institucionales en el proceso de comunicación de riesgo petroquímico en Tarragona. Sphera Pública, 6, 59-75 Retrieved from

Farré, J. & Gonzalo, J. L. (2009). Discursos y prácticas en el proceso de comunicación de riesgo petroquímico. In C. Moreno Castro (Ed.), Comunicar los riesgos. Ciencia y tecnología en la sociedad de la información (pp. 115-132). Madrid: Bilioteca Nueva.

Gamson, W. A. & Wolfsfeld, G. (1993). Movements and Media as Interacting Systems. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 528(1), 114-125.

Heath, R., Lee, J. & Lemon, L. L. (2018). Narratives of risk communication: Nudging community residents to shelter-in-place. Public Relations Review, 45, 128-137.

Heath, R., Lee, J., Palenchar, M. J. & Lemon, L. L. (2019). Risk Communication Emergency Response Preparedness: Contextual Assessment of the Protective Action Decision Model. Rysk Analysis, 38(2), 333-344.

Horning, S. (1992). Framing risk: Audience and reader factors. Journalism Quaterly, 69(3), 679- 690.

Igartua, J. J. (2006): Métodos cuantitativos de investigación en comunicación. Barcelona: Bosch Comunicación.

Jackson, S. & Dutton, J. (1988). Discerning threats and opportunities. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33, 370-387.

Jaspal, R. & Nerlich, B. (2014). Fracking in UK press: threat dynamics in an unfolding debate. Public Understanding of Science, 23(3), 348–363.

Kosicki, G. M. & McLeod, J. M. (1990). Learning from political news. Effects of media images and information-processing strategies. In S. Kraus (Ed.), Mass communication and political information processing (pp. 69-83.) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Lundgren, R. & McMakin, A. (2018). Risk Communication: A Handbook for Communicating Environmental, Safety and Health Risks. Wiley-IEEE Press.

Mercado, M. T., Álvarez, Á. & Herránz, J. M. (2014). The fracking debate in the media: The role of citizens platforms as sources of information. Essachess. Journal for Communication Studies, 7(31), 45–62. Retrieved from

Mercado, M. T., Sánchez, S. & Álvarez, Á. (2014). Los científicos como actores y fuentes en el discurso mediático sobre la energía nuclear. Prisma Social, 12, 544-580. Retrieved from

Mercado, M. T., Sahuquillo, F. & Sánchez, S. (2016). El encuadre del riesgo en la cobertura de la política energética en España. In M. T. Mercado & M. Chavez (Eds.), La comunicación en situaciones de riesgo y crisis (pp. 305-322). Valencia: Tirant Humanidades.

Mercado, M. T., Marco, E. & Álvarez, A. (2019). Exploring News Frames, Sources and Editorial Lines on Newspaper Coverage of Nuclear Energy in Spain. Environmental Communication, 13(4), 546-559.

Nisbet, M., Brossard, D. & Kroepsch, A. (2003). Framign Science: The Stem Cell Controversy in an Age of Press/Politics. Harvard International Journal Press/politics, 8(2), 36–70.

Nisbet, M. (2008). Agenda building.

Pan, Z. & Kosicki, G. (2001): Framing as a Strategic Action in Public Deliberation. In S. Reese, O. Gandy & A. Grant (Eds.), Framing Public Life. Perspectives on Media and Our Understanding of the Social World (pp. 35-65). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Peterson, T. & Thompson, J. (2009). Environmental Risk communication: Responding to Challenges of Complexity and Uncertainty. In R. L. Heath & D. O’Hai (Eds.), Handbook of Risk and Crisis Communication (pp. 591-606). NY: Routledge.

Prades, J., Gonzalo, J. L., de la Varga, A. & Farré, J. (2015). Participación pública en la gestión de residuos radiactivos. El emplazamiento del ATC. Papers, 100(4), 493-526. Retrieved from

Rodríguez, I. & Bezunartea, M. J. (2015). El medio ambiente supeditado a la conveniencia de la economía y la política. Zer, 20(39), 85-100. Retrieved from

Sádaba, T. (2001). Orígenes, aplicación y límites de la ‘teoría del encuadre’ (framing) en comunicación. Comunicación y Sociedad, 14(2), 143-175. Retrieved from

Sádaba, M. T., La Porte, M. T. & Rodríguez, J. (2008). La teoría del framing en la investigación en comunicación política. In M. J. Canel & M. J. Gurrionero (Eds.), Estudios de comunicación política (pp. 15-21). Madrid: Asociación Comunicación Política (ACOP).

Sahuquillo, F. (2017). Periodistas ante un conflicto energético. El caso de las prospecciones petrolíferas en el Mediterráneo. In M. Mercado (Ed.), El debate energético en los medios (pp. 147-164). Barcelona: Ed. UOC.

Sahuquillo, F. & Mercado, M. T. (2018). La movilización social contra los proyectos de prospecciones petrolíferas en el Golfo de Valencia en la prensa local. In H. Aznar, M. Pérez, A. Alonso & Aurora Edo (Eds.), El derecho de acceso a los medios de comunicación II. Participación ciudadana y sociedad civil (pp. 359-374). Valencia: Tirant Humanidades.

Sampedro, S. (1997). The Media Politics of Social Protest. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 2(2), 185-205. Retrieved from

Sandman, P., Sachsman, D., Greenberg, M. R. & Gochfield M. (2017). Environmental Risk and the Press. New York: Routledge.

Scheufele, D. A. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 4, 103- 122.

Shoemaker, P. & Reese, S. (1996). Mediating the Message. London: Longman.

Schuck, A. & De Vreese, C. (2006). Between Risk and Opportunity. News Framing and its Effects on Public Support for EU Enlargement. European Journal of Communication, 21(1), 5-32.

Snow, D., Soule, S. & Kriesi, H. (2006). Mapping the Terrain. In D. Snow, S. Soule & H. Kriesi (Eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements (pp. 3-16.). New Jersey: Blackwell Publishing.

Tarrow, S. (2011). Power in movement. Social Movements and Contentious Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Taylor, V. & Van Dyke, N. (2006). Get up, Stand up: Tactical Repertoires of Social Movements. In D. Snow, S. Soule & H. Kriesi (Eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements (pp. 262-293). New Jersey: Blackwell Publishing.

Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453-458.

Tuchman, G. (1981). The symbolic annihilation of women by the mass media. In S. Cohen & J. Young (Eds.), The manufacture of news: Deviance, social problems and the mass media (pp. 169-185). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Valera, L. (2016). El sesgo mediocéntrico del framing en España: una revisión crítica de la aplicación de la teoría del encuadre en los estudios de comunicación. Zer. Revista de Estudios de Comunicación, 21(41), 13-31. Retrieved from

Van Gorp, B. (2007). The constructionist approach to framing: Bringing culture back in. Journal of Communication, 57, 60-78.

Vliegenthart, R. & Van Zoonen, L. (2011). Power to the frame: Bringing sociology back to frame analysis. European Journal of Communication, 26(2), 101-115.

Vliegenthart, R. & S. Walgrave, S. (2012). The interdependency of Mass Media and Social Movements. In H. A. Semetko & M. Scammell (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Political Communication. London: Sage.

Wakefield, S. & Elliot, S. (2004). Constructing the News: The Role of Local Newspapers in Environmental Risk Communication. The Professional Geographer, 55(2), 216-226.


Search GoogleScholar


Article Details

Special Issue: Activism, Communication and Social Change in the Digital Age
Author Biographies

María-Teresa Mercado-Sáez, CEU Universities. Luis Vives 1


Manuel Chavez, Michigan State University. 04 Wilson Rd. Room 385 Comm. Arts Bld. East Lansing