Framing EU trade policy online: the case of @NoAlTTIP on Twitter
Main Article Content
Abstract
Keywords
References
Alonso-Muñoz, L., Miquel-Segarra, S. & Casero-Ripollés, A. (2016). Un potencial comunicativo desaprovechado. Twitter como mecanismo generador de diálogo en campaña electoral. Obra Digital, 11, 39-58. Retrieved from https://repositori/uji.es/xmlui/handle/10234/165180
Aruguete, N. (2017). The agenda setting hypothesis in the new media environment. Comunicación y Sociedad, 28, 35-58. Retrieved from https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=5774166
Ausserhofer, J. & Maireder, A. (2013). National Politics on Twitter: Structures and Topics of a Networked Public Sphere. Information, Communication & Society, 16(3), 291–314. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2012.756050
Barisione, M. & Ceron A. (2017). A Digital Movement of Opinion? Contesting Austerity Through Social Media. In M. Barisione & A. Michailidou (Eds.), Social Media and European Politics (pp. 77-104). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Barisione, M. & Michailidou, A. (Eds.) (2017). Social Media and European Politics: Rethinking Power and Legitimacy in the Digital Era. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Benford, R. D. & Snow, D. A. (2000) Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual review of sociology, 26(1), 611-639. https://www.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611
Bentivegna, S. (2015). A colpi di Tweet: la politica in prima persona. Bolonia: Il Mulino.
Bimber, B. (2014). Digital Media in the Obama campaign of 2008 and 2012: Adaptation to the personalized political communication environment. Journal of Information, Technology & Politics, 11(2), 130-150. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2014.895691
Blumler, J. & Kavanagh, D. (1999). The Third Age of political communication: Influences and Features. Political Communication, 16(3), 209-230. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/105846099198596
Bouza, L. & Oleart, A. (2018). From the 2005 Constitution’s ‘Permissive Consensus’ to TTIP’s ‘Empowering Dissensus’: The EU as a Playing Field for Spanish Civil Society. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 14(2), 87-104. https://www.doi.org/10.30950/jcer.v14i2.862
Bouza, L. & Tuñón, J. (2018). Personalización, distribución, impacto y recepción en Twitter del discurso de Macron ante el Parlamento Europeo el 17/04/18. El profesional de la información, 27(6), 1239-1247. https://www.doi.org/10.3145/epi.2018.nov.07
Bruns A. & Enli G. (2018). The Norwegian Twittersphere, Nordicom, 39, 1-20. https://www.doi.org/10.2478/nor-2018-0006
Caiani, M. & Guerra, S. (Eds.) (2017). Euroscepticism, Democracy and the Media: Communicating Europe, Contesting Europe. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Campos-Domínguez, E. (2017). Twitter y la comunicación política. El profesional de la información, 26(5), 785-793. https://www.doi.org/10.3145/epi.2017.sep.01
Canel, M.-J. & Sanders, K. (2012). Government Communication: An emerging field in Political Communication Research. In H. Semetko & M. Scammell (Ed.), Political Communication. London: SAGE.
Casero-Ripollés, A. (2015). Estrategias y prácticas comunicativas del activismo político en las redes sociales en España. Historia y comunicación social, 20(2), 533-548. http://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/HICS/article/view/51399
Casero-Ripollés, A. (2018). Research on political information and social media: Key points and challenges for the future. El profesional de la información, 27(5), 964-974. https://www.doi.org/10.3145/epi.2018.sep.01
Chadwick, A. (2013). The hybrid media system. Politics and power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chaudhry, I. (2014). #Hashtags for change: Can Twitter promote social progress in Saudi Arabia? International Journal of Communication, 8, 943-961. http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2362
Coger, K. (2006). Public Relations Research at the Crossroads. Journal of Public Relations Research, 18(2), 177-190. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1207/s1532754xjprr1802_6
De-Wilde, P., Michailidou, A. & Trenz, H.-J. (2015). Converging on Euroscepticism: Online polity contestation during European Parliament elections. European Journal of Political Research, 53(4), 766-783. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12050
Díez Medrano, J. (2003). Framing Europe. Attitudes to European Integration in Germany, Spain, and the United Kingdom. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Duggan, M. (2015). Mobile messaging and social media 2015. Pew Research Centre. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/08/19/mobile-messaging-and-social-media-2015/
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
Entman, R. M., Matthes, J. & Pellicano, L. (2009). Nature, sources, and effects of news framing. In K. Wahl-Jorgensen & T. Hanitzsch (Eds.) (2009). The handbook of journalism studies (pp. 175-190). London: Routledge.
Eom, Y-H., Puliga, M., Smailović, J., Mozetič, I. & Caldarelli, G. (2015). Twitter-Based Analysis of the Dynamics of Collective Attention to Political Parties. PLOS ONE, 10(7), 1-17. https://www.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131184
Fielding, N., Lee, R. & Blank, G. (Eds.) (2008). The Handbook of Online Research Methods. London: SAGE.
Fligstein, N. & McAdam, D. (2012). A theory of Fields. New York: Oxford University Press.
Fuchs, C. (2014). Social media and the public sphere. TripleC, 12(1), 57-101. Retrieved from http://www.triple-c.at/index.php/tripleC/article/view/552
Gainous, J. & Wagner, K. (2014). Tweeting to power: The social media revolution in American politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://www.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199965076.0010001
Gamson, W. & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructionist Approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1-37. https://www.doi.org/10.1086/229213
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame Analysis. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
Graham, T., Jackson, D. & Broersma, M. (2014). New platform, old habits? Candidate´s use of Twitter during the 2010 British and Dutch general elections campaigns. New Media and Society, 18(5), 765-783. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1461444814546728
Hänska M. & Bauchowitz S. (2018). #ThisIsACoup: The Emergence of an AntiAusterity Hashtag across Europe’s Twittersphere. In L. Basu, S. Schifferes & S. Knowles (Eds.), The Media and Austerity: Comparative Perspectives (pp. 248-260). London: Routledge.
Hine, C. (2004). Etnografía Virtual. Barcelona: UOC.
Hine, C. (2005). Virtual Methods: Issues in Social Research on the Internet. Oxford: Berg Publishers.
Jackson, N. & Lilleker, D. (2011). Microblogging, constituency service and impression management: UK MPs and the use of Twitter. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 17(1), 86- 105. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2011545181
Jivkova-Semova, D., Requeijo-Rey, P. & Padilla-Castillo, G. (2017). Usos y tendencias de Twitter en la campaña a elecciones generales españolas del 20D de 2015: hashtags que fueron trending topic. El profesional de la información, 26(5), 824-837. https://www.doi.org/10.3145/epi.2017.sep.05
Jones S. (1998). Doing Internet Research. Critical Issues and methods for examining the net. London: SAGE.
Jost, J. T., Barberá, P., Bonneau, R., Langer, M., Metzger, M., Nagler, J., Sterling, J. & Tucker, J. A. (2018). How social media facilitates political protest: Information, motivation, and social networks. Political Psychology, 39, 85-118. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/pops.12478
Karamichas, J. (2007). Key Issues in the Study of New and Alternative Social Movements in Spain: The Left, Identity and Globalizing Processes. South European Society and Politics, 12(3), 273–293. https://www.doi.org/10.4324/9781315762494
Karlsen, R. & Enjolras, B. (2016). Styles of social media campaigning and influence in a hybrid political communication system: Linking candidate survey data with Twitter data. International Journal of Press/Politics, 21(3), 338-357. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1940161216645335
Kreiss, D. (2016). Seizing the moment: The presidential campaigns’ use of Twitter during the 2012 electoral cycle. New Media & Society, 18(8), 1473–1490. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1461444814562445
Kozinets, R. (2009). Netnography: Doing Ethnographic Research Online. London: SAGE.
Larsson, A. & Kalsnes, B. (2014). Of course we are on Facebook: Use and non-use of social media among Swedish and Norwegian politicians. European Journal of Communication, 29(6), 653–667. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0267323114531383
Liebert, U. (2011). Exit, Voice or Loyalty? The New Politics of European Civil Society. In U. Liebert & H-J. Trenz (Eds), The New Politics of European Civil Society (pp. 95-122). London; New York: Routledge.
López-García, G. (2016). New vs ‘old’ leaderships: the campaign of Spanish general elections 2015 on Twitter. Comunicación y Sociedad, 29(3), 149-168. https://www.doi.org/10.15581/003.29.3.149-168
López-Meri, A. (2016). Twitter-retórica para captar votos en campaña electoral. El caso de las elecciones de Cataluña de 2015. Comunicación y hombre, 12, 97-118. http://repositori.uji.es/xmlui/handle/10234/163569
López-Meri, A., Marcos-García, S. & Casero-Ripollés, A. (2017). What do politicians do on Twitter? Functions and communication strategies in the Spanish electoral campaign of 2016. El profesional de la información, 26(5), 795-804. https://www.doi.org/10.3145/epi.2017.sep.02
Maireder, A. & Schlögl, S. (2014). 24 Hours of #Outcry: The Networked Publics of a Socio- Political Debate. European Journal of Communication, 29(6), 687-702. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0267323114545710
Markhan, A. & Baym, N. (2008): Internet Inquiry: Conversations about Method. London: SAGE.
Meraz, S. (2011). Using time series analysis to measure intermedia agenda-setting influence in traditional media and political blog networks. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 88(1), 176-194. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/107769901108800110
Oleart, A. & Bouza, L. (2018). Democracy at Stake: Multipositional Actors and Politicization in the EU Civil Society Field. Journal of Common Market Studies, 56(4), 870-887. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12687
Pan, Z. & Kosicki, G. M. (1993). Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse. Political Communication, 10(1), 55-75. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/10584609.1993.9962963
Pan, Z. & Kosicki, G. M. (2005). Framing and understanding of citizenship. In S. Dunwoody, L. B. Becker, D. M. McLeod & G. M. Kosicki (Eds.), The evolution of key mass communication concepts: Honoring Jack M. McLeod (pp. 165-204). New York: Hampton Press.
Papacharissi, Z. & Oliveira, M. F. (2012). Affective news and networked publics: The rhythms of news storytelling on #Egypt. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 266-282. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01630.x
Papagianneas, S. (2017). Rebranding Europe. Fundamentals for leadership communication. Brussels: ASP editions.
Parmelee, J. & Bichard, S. (2012). Politics and the Twitter revolution. How tweets influence the relationship between political leaders and the public. Lanham, MD. Lexington Books.
Peña-López, I., Congosto, M. & Aragón, P. (2014). Spanish Indignados and the evolution of the 15M movement on Twitter: towards networked para-institutions. Journal of Spanish Cultural Studies, 15(1-2), 189-216. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/14636204.2014.931678
Pérez-Curiel, C. & García-Gordillo, M. (2018). Política de influencia y tendencia fake en Twitter. Efectos postelectorales (21D) en el marco del Procés en Cataluña. El profesional de la información, 27(5), 1030-1040. https://www.doi.org/10.3145/epi.2018.sep.07
Pérez Orozco, A. (2018). Oleada de tratados contra la vida: no son los impactos, es el sistema. El Salto Diario, 14. Retrieved from https://www.elsaltodiario.com/vidas-precarias/oleada-de-tratados-contra-la-vida-no-son-los-impactos-es-el-sistema
Poloni-Staudinger, L. (2008). The Domestic Opportunity Structure and Supranational Activity: An explanation of environmental group activity at the European Union Level. European Union Politics, 9(4), 531-558.
Poynter, R. (2010). The Handbook of Online and Social Media Research. Sussex: Wiley.
Popping, R. (2017). Online tools for content analysis. In N. Fielding, R. Lee & G. Blank (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Online Research Methods. London: SAGE.
Rahimi, B. (2011). The agonistic social media: Cyberspace in the formation of dissent and consolidation of state power in postelection Iran. Communication Review, 14(3), 158-178. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2011.597240
Rodríguez-Andrés, R. & Ureña-Uceda, D. (2011). Diez razones para el uso de Twitter como herramienta de comunicación política y electoral. Comunicación y Pluralismo, 10, 89-115.
Ruiz-Soler, J. (2018). The Last Will Be the First. A Study of European Issue Publics on Twitter. Partecipazione e conflitto, 11(2), 423-447. https://www.doi.org/10.1285/i20356609v11i2p423
Sampedro, V. & Martínez-Avidad, M. (2018). The digital public sphere: An alternative and counterhegemonic space? The case of Spain. International Journal of Communication, 12, 23-44. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/anti.12189
Scherpereel, J., Wohlgemuth, J. & Schmelzinger, M. (2016). The adoption and use of Twitter as a re- presentational tool among members of the European Parliament. European Politics and Society, 18(2), 111-127. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2016.1151125
Siles-Brügge, G. & De Ville, F. (2015). TTIP: The Truth about the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership. Cambridge: Polity.
Sloan, L. & Quan-Haase, A. (2017). Introduction to the Handbook of Social Media Research Methods: Goals, Challenges and Innovations. In L. Sloan & A. Quan-Haase, Social Media Research Methods. London: SAGE.
Snow, D. A., Rochford Jr., E. B. Burke, Worden, S. K. & Benford, R. D. (1986). Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation. American Sociological Review, 51(4), 464-481. https://www.doi.org/10.2307/2095581
Spitulnik Vidali, D. & Peterson, M. (2012). Ethnography as Theory and Method in the Study of Political Communication. In H. Semetko & M. Scammell, The SAGE Handbook of Political Communication. London: SAGE.
Statham, P. (2008). Making Europe news: How journalists view their role and media performance. Journalism, 9(4), 398-422. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1464884908091292
Steward, B. (2017). Twitter as method: Using Twitter as a tool to conduct research. In H. Semetko & M. Scammell, The SAGE Handbook of Political Communication. London: SAGE.
Theocharis, Y., Lowe, W., Van Deth, J. W. & García-Albacete, G. (2015). Using Twitter to mobilize protest action: Online mobilization patterns and action repertoires in the Occupy Wall Street, Indignados, and Aganaktismenoi movements. Information, Communication and Society, 18(2), 202-220. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.948035
Tuñón, J. (2017). Comunicación Internacional. Información y desinformación global en el siglo XXI. Madrid: Fragua.
Van-Aelst, P., Sheafer, T. & Stanyer, J. (2012). The personalization of mediated political communication: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings. Journalism, 13(2), 1-18. https://www.doi.org/10.10177/1464884911427802
Veerger, M., Hermans, L. & Sams, S. (2013). Online social networks and micro-blogging in political campaigning: The exploration of a new campaign tool and a new campaign style. Party Politics, 7(3), 477-501. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/1354068811407580
Wallsten, K. (2007). Agenda setting and the blogosphere: An analysis of the relationship between mainstream media and political blogs. Review of Policy Research, 24(6), 567-587. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2007.00300.x
Details
Article Details
RIGHTS TRANSFER
By submitting the article for evaluation and subsequent publication in Communication & Society, the AUTHOR exclusively assigns the rights of public communication, reproduction, distribution and sale for commercial exploitation to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, for the maximum legal term in force -the entire life of the author and seventy years after his death or declaration of death-, in any country, and in any of the current and future edition modalities, both in print and electronic versions.
In the event that the article is not accepted for publication , this transfer of rights lapses with the communication of the refusal to the AUTHOR.
The AUTHOR affirms that the article is unpublished, that it has not been sent simultaneously to another publication medium and that the rights have not been transferred exclusively previously. He is responsible to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service for the authorship and originality of his work, as well as for all pecuniary charges that may arise for the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, in favor of third parties due to actions, claims or conflicts arising from the breach of obligations by the AUTHOR.