Concha Pérez-Curiel e-mail(Login required) , Pilar Limón-Naharro e-mail(Login required)

Main Article Content

Authors

Concha Pérez-Curiel e-mail(Login required)
Pilar Limón-Naharro e-mail(Login required)

Abstract

3165
The personality of a political candidate, above and beyond governments and parties, is understood increasingly more as a brand image. The new political influencers are making a clean sweep of social networks and it is the media that reproduce an information model that, far from being grounded in transparency and quality, promotes a post-truth discourse, halfway between provocation and spectacle. This initial hypothesis focuses on Donald Trump’s profile, first as a presidential candidate and later on as US President. In parallel, Twitter users have swiftly succumbed to the leader’s appeal. Thus, this paper studies the impact of Trump’s tweets on the US reference press during the first 100 days of his presidency. More specifically, it analyses the correspondences between the tweets posted on his personal Twitter account (@realDonaldTrump, with more than 45 million followers) and the front page news in USA Today, The Boston Globe, The Wall Street Journal and The New York Times. Regarding public response, digital prosumer metrics (“likes,” retweets and comments) have been quantified in order to verify the degree of influence exerted by Trump on public opinion. The method employed here includes a quantitative and qualitative content analysis based on three categories: the politician’s tweets, front page news and online user metrics. The results confirm Trump’s empowerment on Twitter as both a main source of news and a political influencer as regards the media and the citizenry.

Keywords

Influencer, political communication, Trump, Twitter, the media, agenda setting, online users.

References

Adamic, L. A. &Glance, N.S. (2005). The political blogosphere and the 2004 presidential election. Retrieved from http://goo.gl/XhkSIO

Allcott, H. & Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31, 211-236.

Aruguete, N. (2017). The agenda setting hypothesis in the new media environment. Comunicación y Sociedad, 28, 35-58. Retrieved from https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=5774166

Barthel, M. et al. (2016). Many Americans Believe Fake News Is Sowing Confusion. Retrieved from http://www.journalism.org/2016/12/15/many-americans-believe-fake-news-issowing-confusion/

Bentivegna, S. (2014). “Beppe Grillo’s dramatic incursion into the Twittersphere: Talking politics in 140 characters”. Contemporary Italian politics, 6(1), 73-88. https://doi.org/10.1080/23248823.2014.884377

Bruns, A. & Burguess, J. (2011). “#ausvotes: How Twitter covered the 2010 Australian federal election communication”. Politics & culture, 44(2), 37-56. Retrieved from http://snurb.info/files/2011/CPC2011V044N02_037.pdf

Callejo, J. (2010). Introducción a las técnicas de investigación social. Madrid: Universitaria Ramón Areces.

Campos-Domínguez, E. (2017). Twitter y la comunicación política. El profesional de la información, 26(5), 785-793. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2017.sep.01

Campos-Domínguez, E. & Calvo, D. (2017). La campaña electoral en Internet: planificación, repercusión y viralización en Twitter durante las elecciones españolas de 2015. Comunicación y Sociedad, 29, 93-116.

Casero-Ripollés, A. (2017). Producing political content for web 2.0: Empowering citizens and vulnerable populations. El Profesional de la Información, 26(1), 13-19. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2017.ene.02

Casero-Ripollés, A. (2015). Estrategias y prácticas comunicativas del activismo político en las redes sociales en España. Historia y Comunicación Social, 20(2), 533–548. http://doi.org/10.5209/rev_HICS.2015.v20.n2.51399

Dader, J. L (Ed.) (2017). La búsqueda digital del voto. Cibercampañas electorales en España 2015- 16. Valencia: Tirant lo blanch.

De Aguilera, M. (2014). Cambian las comunicaciones, cambian los conceptos con que entenderlas. Necesidad de nuevas categorías. Telos, 98, 10-12. https://doi.org/10.7195/ ri14.v16i1.1162

De las Heras Pedrosa, C., Paniagua Rojano, F. J., Jambrino Maldonado, C. & Iglesias Sánchez, P. (2017). La imagen de los candidatos en las elecciones presidenciales de los Estados Unidos. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 72, 975- 997. Retrieved from http://www.revistalatinacs.org/072paper/1203/53es.html

Doherty, C, Killey, J. & Johnson, B. (2016). As Election Nears, Voters Divided Over Democracy and ‘Respect’. Retrieved from http://www.people-press.org/2016/10/27/as-electionnears-voters-divided-over-democracy-and-respect/

Enli, G. (2017). Twitter as arena for the authentic out-sider: exploring the social media campaigns of Trump and Clinton in the 2016 US presidential election. European journal of communication, 32(1) 50-61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323116682802

Enguix Oliver, S. (2017). Impacto político e informativo de las redes sociales: esferas de actuación y comparación con los medios. Anàlisi. Quaderns de comunicació i cultura, 56, 71–85. Retrieved from http://analisi.cat/article/view/n56-enguix

Gainous, J. & Wagner, K. M. (2014). Tweeting to power: The social media revolution in American politics. Oxford studies in digital politics. Edición Kindle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Giansante, G. (2015). La comunicación política online: Cómo utilizar la web para construir consenso y estimular la participación. Edición Kindle. Barcelona: Editorial UOC.

Gómez-Calderón, B. et al. (2017). La campaña en 140 caracteres. Uso de Twitter por los candidatos de los partidos mayoritarios antes de las elecciones generales de 2016 en España. El profesional de la información, 816-823. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2017.sep.04.

Gottfried, J., Barthel, M., Shearer, E. & Mitchell, A. (2016). The 2016 Presidential Campaign –a News Event That´s Hard to Miss. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://goo.gl/cSEzMN

Greenwood, S., Perrin, A. & Duggan, M. (2016). Social Media Update 2016. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://goo.gl/ihSriH

Johnson, D. W. & Brown, L. M. (2017). Campaigning for President 2016: Strategy and Tactics. Edición Kindle. New York: Routledge.

Jürgens, P. & Jungherr, A. (2015). The use of Twitter during the 2009 German national election. German politics, 24(4), 469-490. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2015.1116522

López García, G. (2016). ‘New’ vs ‘old’ leaderships: the campaign of Spanish general elections 2015 on Twitter. Comunicacion y Sociedad, 29(3), 149-168.

Karaduman, I. (2013). The effect of social media on personal branding efforts of top level executives. Procedia. Social and behavioral sciences, 99(6), 465-473. https://doi.org/110.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.515

Kreiss, D. (2016). Seizing the moment: The presidential campaigns’ use of Twitter during the 2012 electoral cycle. New media and society, 8(8), 1473-1490. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814562445.

Krane, M. (2010). The socially filtered media agenda: a study of Agenda Setting among news outlets on Twitter. Columbia: University of Missouri.

MacAllister, I. (2007). The personalization of Politics. In R. Dalton & H.-D. Kinglemann (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199270125.001.0001/oxfor dhb-9780199270125-e-030

McCombs, M. (2005). Look at Agenda Setting: past, present and future. Journalism Studies, 6(4), 543-557. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/14616700500250438

McCombs, M. & Evatt, D. (1995) Los temas y los aspectos: explorando una nueva dimensión de la agenda-setting. Comunicación y Sociedad, 8(l), 7-32. Retrieved from http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=4323749

Mancera Rueda, A. & Helfrich, U. (2014). La crisis en 140 caracteres: el discurso propagandístico en la red social Twitter. Cultura, Lenguaje y Representación, 12, 59–86.

Marcos Recio, J. C. et al. (2017). La enorme mentira y la gran verdad de la información en tiempos de la postverdad. Scire, 23(2), 13-23.

Marshall, J. (2016). Washington Post’s ‘Bandito’ Tool Optimizes Content For Clicks, The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from https://www.wsj.com/articles/washington-posts-bandittool-optimizes-content-for-clicks-1454960088

Meraz, S. (2011). Using time series analysis to measure intermedia agenda-setting influence in traditional media and political blog networks. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 88(1), 176-194. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769901108800110

Mitchell, A. & Holcomb, J. (2016). State of the News Media 2016. Pew Research Center, 29.

Montoya, P. & Vandehey, T. (2009). The brand called you. Create a personal branding that wins attention and grows your business. London: McGraw-Hill.

Nocetti, O. (1990). Falacias y Medios de Comunicación. El discurso como arma. Buenos Aires: Editorial Humanitas.

Pérez Ortega, A. (2014). Marca personal para dummies [Personal branding for dummies]. Barcelona: PAPF.

Rampersad, H. K. (2009). Authentic personal branding: A new blueprint for building and aligning a powerful leadership brand. San Bernardino, CA: IAP.

Reese, S. D. (2007). The framing project: A bridging model for media research revisited. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 148-154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00334.x

Rego-Rey, S. & Romero-Rodríguez, L. M. (2016). Representación discursiva y lenguaje de los youtubers españoles: estudio de caso de los gamers más populares. Index comunicación 6(1), 197-224. https://doi.org/10.1145/1749603.1749606

Roberts, M., Wanta, W. & Dzwo, T. (2002). Agenda setting and issue salience online. Communication Research, 29(4), 452-465.

Rovira, G. (2017). Activismo en red y multitudes conectadas. Barcelona: Icar.

Rúas Araújo, X., Mazaira, A. & Rodríguez Vázquez, A. I. (2018). Nuevos medios y medios tradicionales en la red. Espacios de opinión e interacción política en la era Trump. Icono 14, 16(1), 86-113.https://doi.org/10.7195/ri14.v16i1.1118.

Rubio García, R. (2014): Twitter y la teoría de la Agenda Setting: mensajes de la opinión pública digital. Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico, 20(1), 249 264.

Salvador Benítez, A & Sánchez Vigil, J. M. (2016). La fotografía como documento informativo en las webs de los Ministerios Españoles: Acceso, visibilidad, funcionalidad y políticas de uso. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 39(2), 134.

Scott, D. T. (2005). Tempests of the blogosphere: Presidential campaign stories that failed to ignite mainstream media. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/messages/downloadsexceeded.html.

Simon, J. (2016). Why journalists should be afraid of Trump’s media strategy. Retrieved from https://www.cjr.org/first_person/why_journalists_should_be_afraid_of_trumps_media_strategy.php

Sung-Tae, K. & Young-hwan, L. (2007). New functions of Internet mediated agenda-setting.Korea Journalism Review, 1(2), 3-29.

Thelwall, M. & Cugelman, B. (2017). Monitoring Twitter strategies to discover resonating topics: The case of the UNDP. El profesional de la información, 26(4), 649-661. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2017.jul.09

Thompson, M. (2017). Sin palabras: ¿Qué ha pasado con el lenguaje de la política? Edición Kindle. Barcelona: Penguin Random House Grupo Editorial, S.A.U.

Túñez, M. & Sixto, J. (2011). Redes sociales, política y Compromiso 2.0: La comunicación de los diputados españoles en Facebook. Revista latina de comunicación social, 66, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-66-2011-930-210-246

Vallés, V. (2017). Trump y la caída del imperio Clinton. Actualidad. Madrid: La esfera de los libros.

van Dijk, J. (2015). Critical discourse studies. A sociocognitive Approach. Methods of Critical Discourse Studies, 3(1), 63-74.

Vázquez Sande, P. (2017). Personalización de la política, narración de historias y valores transmitidos. Communication & Society. 30(3), 275-291. http://doi.org/10.15581/003.30.3.275-291

Wallsten, K. (2007). Agenda setting and the blogosphere: An analysis of the relationship between mainstream media and political blogs. Review of Policy Research, 24(6), 567-587.

Wang, S. (2017). Shan Wang. Getting to the root of the “fake news” problem means fixing what’s broken about journalism itself. Retrieved from http://www.nieman-lab.org/

Metrics





Search GoogleScholar


Details

Article Details

Section
Special Issue: Credibility and Trust in Post-Truth Times and the Network Society