The Inclusionary Populist Communication Style on Facebook: The Case of Ada Colau in Barcelona
Article Sidebar
389)
Main Article Content
Authors
Abstract
466
Communication is one of the core elements of populism, especially in social media. Through such digital platforms, political leaders can communicate directly with citizens and build both their discourse and their political leadership. Although the literature has so far identified the existence of a populist political communication style, the expansion of populism and its connection with social media are extending and diversifying the concept, as well as adding new repertoires. In order to analyse this, we propose a study of the communication strategy of the mayor of Barcelona, Ada Colau who, with a background of citizen activism, became mayor of the city in 2015 thanks to a political organisation situated as left populist. The methodology is based on quantitative and qualitative analysis of the content of Colau’s Facebook profile. A total of 226 posts between 2015 and 2017 are analysed. The results make it possible to identify a new specific modality within the populist style of political communication, namely the inclusionary populist type. This focuses on issues related to defense of the rights of the weakest social groups and works within a framework of social justice and solidarity with others. Likewise, the study confirms how Facebook is configured as a preferred platform for the construction of political leadership.
Keywords
References
Aalberg, T., Esser, F., Reinemann, C., Stromback, J. & de Vreese, C. (Eds.) (2016). Populist Political Communication in Europe. New York/London: Routledge. https://www.doi.org/10.4324/9781315623016
Alonso-Muñoz, L. (2019). The ‘More is More’ Effect: A Comparative Analysis of the Political Agenda and the Strategy on Twitter of the European Populist Parties. European Politics and Society, 1-15. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2019.1672921
Alonso-Muñoz, L. & Casero-Ripollés, A. (2016). La influencia del discurso sobre cambio social en la agenda de los medios. El caso de la Plataforma de Afectados por la Hipoteca. OBETS: Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 11(1), 25-51. https://www.doi.org/10.14198/OBETS2016.11.1.02
Alonso-Muñoz, L. & Casero-Ripollés, A. (2018). Communication of European Populist leaders on Twitter: Agenda Setting and the “More is Less” Effect. El profesional de la información, 27(6), 1193-1202. https://www.doi.org/10.3145/epi.2018.nov.03
Bernhard, L. & Kriesi, H. (2019). Populism in Election Times: A Comparative Analysis of 11 Countries in Western Europe. West European Politics, 42(6), 1188-1208. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2019.1596694
Block, E. & Negrine, R. (2017). The Populist Communication Style: Toward a Critical Framework. International Journal of Communication, 11, 20. https://www.doi.org/1932–8036/20170005
Blumler, J. G. & Kavanagh, D. (1999). The Third Age of Political Communication: Influences and Features. Political Communication, 16(3), 209-230. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/105846099198596
Bobbio, N. (1987). The Future of Democracy. Cambridge: Polity.
Bracciale, R. & Martella, A. (2017). Define the Populist Political Communication Style: The Case of Italian Political Leaders on Twitter. Information, Communication & Society, 20(9), 1310-1329. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1328522
Calvo, K., Gómez-Pastrana, T. & Mena, L. (2011). Movimiento 15M: ¿quiénes son y qué reivindican? Zoom Político, 4, 4-17.
Canovan, M. (1999). Trust the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy. Political studies, 47(1), 2-16. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00184
Casero-Ripollés, A., Feenstra, R. A. & Tormey, S. (2016). Old and New Media Logics in an Electoral Campaign: The Case of Podemos and the Two-Way Street Mediatization of Politics. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 21(3), 378-397. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1940161216645340
Casero-Ripollés, A., Sintes-Olivella, M. & Franch, P. (2017). https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0002764217707624
Castells, M. (2009). Communication Power. New York: Oxford University Press.
Castells, M. (2015). Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age. Cambridge: Polity.
Chadwick, A. (2017). The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://www.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199759477.001.0001
CIS (2015). Postelectoral Elecciones Municipales 2015. Barcelona. Study Number. 2259. Retrieved from http://www.cis.es/cis/opencm/ES/1_encuestas/estudios/ver.jsp?estudio=14203
De Vreese, C. H., Esser, F., Aalberg, T., Reinemann, C. & Stanyer, J. (2018). Populism as an Expression of Political Communication Content and Style: A New Perspective. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 23(4), 423-438. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1940161218790035
Diamanti, I. (2010). Populismo: una definizione indefinita per eccesso di definizioni. Italiani Europei, 4. Retrieved from https://www.italianieuropei.it/it/italianieuropei-4-2010/item/1806-sommario-4/2010.html
Engesser, S., Ernst, N., Esser, F. & Büchel, F. (2017). Populism and Social Media: How Politicians Spread a Fragmented Ideology. Information, Communication & Society, 20(8), 1109-1126. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1207697
Ernst, N., Engesser, S. & Esser, F. (2017). Bipolar Populism? The Use of Anti-Elitism and People-Centrism by Swiss Parties on Social Media. Swiss Political Science Review, 23(3), 253-261. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12264
Ernst, N., Blassnig, S., Engesser, S., Büchel, F. & Esser, F. (2019). Populists Prefer Social Media over Talk Shows: An Analysis of Populist Messages and Stylistic Elements across Six Countries. Social Media+ Society, 5(1). https://www.doi.org/10.1177/2056305118823358
Feenstra, R. A., Tormey, S., Casero-Ripollés, A. & Keane, J. (2017). Refiguring Democracy: The Spanish Political Laboratory. New York: Routledge. https://www.doi.org/10.4324/9781315160733
Freeden, M. (1996). Ideologies and Political Theory: A Conceptual Approach Oxford: Clarendon Press. https://www.doi.org/10.1093/019829414X.001.0001
García-Carretero, L. & Díaz-Noci, J. (2018). From Social Movements to Political Parties. Barcelona en Comú’s Electoral Message, Uses and Limitations on Twitter during 2015 City Council Election. OBETS. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 13(2), 515-545. https://www.doi.org/10.14198/OBETS2018.13.2.03
García-Carretero, L. & Pérez-Altable, L. (2017). Barcelona en Comú on Twitter. Analyzing the Electoral Communication of the Confluence during 2015 Council Election. El profesional de la información, 26(5), 871-883. https://www.doi.org/10.3145/epi.2017.sep.09
Haller, A. (2015). How to Deal with the Black Sheep? An Evaluation of Journalists’ Reactions towards Intentional Selfscandalization by Politicians. Journal of Applied Journalism & Media Studies, 4(3), 435-451. https://www.doi.org/10.1386/ajms.4.3.435_1
Jacobs, K. & Spierings, N. (2016). Social Media, Parties, and Political Inequalities. London: Palgrave McMillan. https://www.doi.org/10.1057/9781137533906
Karlsen, R. & Enjolras, B. (2016). Styles of Social Media Campaigning and Influence in a Hybrid Political Communication System: Linking Candidate Survey Data with Twitter Data. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 21(3), 338-357. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1940161216645335
Krämer, B. (2017). Populist Online Practices: The Function of the Internet in Right-Wing Populism. Information, Communication & Society, 20(9), 1293-1309. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1328520
Kriesi, H. (2014). The Populist Challenge. West European Politics, 37(2), 361-378. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2014.887879
Laclau, E. (2009). “Populismo: ¿Qué nos dice el nombre?”. In F. Panizza (Ed.), El populismo como espejo de la democracia (pp. 9-49). Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Mazzoleni, G. & Bracciale, R. (2018). Socially Mediated Populism: The Communicative Strategies of Political Leaders on Facebook. Palgrave Communications, 4(1), 50. https://www.doi.org/10.1057/s41599-018-0104-x
Mény, Y. & Surel, Y. (2002). The Constitutive Ambiguity of Populism. Democracies and the Populist Challenge, 1-21. London: Palgrave MacMillan. https://www.doi.org/10.1057/9781403920072_1
Micó, J. L. & Casero-Ripollés, A. (2014). Political Activism Online: Organization and Media Relations in the Case of 15M in Spain. Information, Communication & Society, 17(7), 858-871. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.830634
Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Quality Data Analysis. An expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage.
Moffitt, B. & Tormey, S. (2014). Rethinking Populism: Politics, Mediatisation and Political Style. Political Studies, 62(2), 381-397. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12032
Mudde, C. (2004). The Populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 541-563. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x
Mudde, C. & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2013). Exclusionary vs. Inclusionary Populism: Comparing Contemporary Europe and Latin America. Government and Opposition, 48(2), 147-174. https://www.doi.org/10.1017/gov.2012.11
Rooduijn, M. (2014). The Mesmerising Message: The Diffusion of Populism in Public Debates in Western European Media. Political Studies, 62(4), 726-744. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12074
Schmitt, C. (2008). The Concept of the Political: Expanded Edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Sorice, M. (2013). Web Democracy between Participation and Populism: Crisis, Political Parties and New Movements in the Italian Public Sphere. Working Paper. Roma: Libera Università Internazionale degli Studi Sociali Guido Carli.
Stockemer, D. & Barisione, M. (2017). The ‘New’ Discourse of the Front National under Marine Le Pen: A Slight Change with a Big Impact. European Journal of Communication, 32(2), 100-115. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0267323116680132
Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage.
Taggart, P. (2000). Populism (Concepts in the Social Sciences). Buckingham (PI): Open University Press.
Weyland, K. (2001), Clarifying a Contested Concept. Populism in the Study of Latin America Politics, Comparative Politics, 34(1), 1-22.
Wodak, R. (2015). The Politics of Fear: What Right-Wing Populist Discourses Mean. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage. https://www.doi.org/10.4135/9781446270073
Zulianello, M., Albertini, A. & Ceccobelli, D. (2018). A Populist Zeitgeist? The Communication Strategies of Western and Latin American Political Leaders on Facebook. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 23(4), 439-457. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1940161218783836
Metrics
|
|
Details
Article Details
RIGHTS TRANSFER
By submitting the article for evaluation and subsequent publication in Communication & Society, the AUTHOR exclusively assigns the rights of public communication, reproduction, distribution and sale for commercial exploitation to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, for the maximum legal term in force -the entire life of the author and seventy years after his death or declaration of death-, in any country, and in any of the current and future edition modalities, both in print and electronic versions.
In the event that the article is not accepted for publication , this transfer of rights lapses with the communication of the refusal to the AUTHOR.
The AUTHOR affirms that the article is unpublished, that it has not been sent simultaneously to another publication medium and that the rights have not been transferred exclusively previously. He is responsible to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service for the authorship and originality of his work, as well as for all pecuniary charges that may arise for the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, in favor of third parties due to actions, claims or conflicts arising from the breach of obligations by the AUTHOR.
