Accountability of the media as seen by Spanish citizens
Article Sidebar
190)
Main Article Content
Authors
Abstract
317
This article analyses the opinions of citizens on the core values of the so-called Media accountability: truthfulness, independence, transparency, public participation and respect for peoples’ rights. It also analyses citizens’ perceptions of various deontological instruments to measure the effectiveness of compliance with these ethical values. The qualitative methodology used to carry out this analysis is part of the R+D+I research project “Accountability and Journalistic Cultures project in Spain. Impact and proposal of good practices in the Spanish media” (MediaACES), which has been achieved through six focus groups in different Spanish cities. The results of the analysis reflect the critical spirit of citizens towards the media due to the following factors: the absence of objectivity, the mixture of economic interests with their editorial line and an ambiguous participation of the public, which requires a better definition of their role within the information process. The conclusions derived from this analysis allow us to reflect on several aspects: among others, the competition in a deregulated market leads to infotainment and affects the quality of information, as well as the rights of people affected by the news. At the same time, the excess of information channels leads to greater disinformation, under the appearance of a spontaneous pluralism that is superfluous. Ethics, therefore, seems to be a necessary requirement to differentiate professional journalism from other inappropriate information channels and to guarantee the right to information of citizens.
Keywords
References
Alsius, S. & Salgado, F. (Eds.) (2010). La ética informativa vista por los ciudadanos. Contraste de opiniones entre los periodistas y el público. Barcelona: UOC.
Center for Internet Studies and Digital Life. Universidad de Navarra. http://www.digitalnewsreport.es/
Chaparro-Domínguez, M. A., Suárez-Villegas, J. C. & Rodríguez-Martínez, R. (2019). Media Accountability and Journalists: To Whom Do Spanish Professionals Feel Responsible? Journalism Practice. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2019.1655470
Council of Europe (2015a). Media responsibility and ethics in a changing media environment. 2015 – Rec. 2075.
Council of Europe (2015b). Media responsibility and ethics in a changing media environment. 2015 – Res. 2066.
Craft, S., Vos, T. P. & Wolfgang, D. (2016). Reader Comments as Press Criticism: Implications for the Journalistic Field. Journalism, 17(6), 677–693. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1464884915579332
Cruz-Álvarez, J. & Suárez-Villegas, J. C. (2017). Pautas deontológicas para el Periodismo Digital. El profesional de la información, 26(2), 249-254.
Eberwein, T., Fengler, S., Philipp, S. & Ille, M. (2014). Counting Media Accountability –the Concept and Methodology of the MediaAcT Survey. In S. Fengler, T. Eberwein, G. Mazzoleni & C. Porlezza (Eds.), Journalists and Media Accountability: An International Study of News People in a Digital Age (pp. 65-79). New York: Peter Lang.
Eberwein, T., Fengler, S., Lauk, E. & Leppik-Bork, T. (Eds.) (2011). Mapping media accountability – in Europe and beyond. Köln: Herbert Von Halem Verlag.
Fengler, S. et al. (2015). How Effective is Media Selfregulation? Results from a Comparative survey of European Journalists. European Journal of Communication, 30(3), 249-266. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0267323114561009
Frost, C. (2011). Journalism ethics and regulation. London: Longman.
Gil de Zúñiga, H. & Hinsley, A. (2013). The press versus the public: What is “good journalism”? Journalism studies, 14(6), 926-942. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2012.744551
Hallin, D. C. & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Herrera Damas, S. & Maciá Barber, C. (2010). Periodistas y ciudadanía ante la mixtura de información y opinión en los mensajes periodísticos. Investigación de campo en la Comunidad de Madrid (2007-2009). Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico, 16, 185-208.
Karlsson, M. & Clerwall, C. (2019). Cornerstones in journalism: According to citizens. Journalism Studies, 20(8), 1184-1199. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2018.1499436
Kovach, B. & Rosenstiel, T. (2001). The elements of journalism: What news people should know and the public should expect. New York: Three Rivers.
Lunt, P. & Livingstone, S. (1996). Rethinking the focus group in media and communications research. Journal of Communication, 46(2), 79-98.
Maciá-Barber, C. (2014). La sostenibilidad ética de la empresa periodística: la percepción y el discurso de los directivos de los medios. Dilemata año 6, 14, 19-35.
Mauri-Ríos, M. & Ramon-Vegas, X. (2015). Nuevos sistemas de rendición de cuentas de la información periodística. Una exploración del escenario online español. El profesional de la información, 24(4), 380-389. https://www.doi.org/10.3145/epi.2015.jul.04
Ojala, M., Pantti, M. & Laaksonen, S. M. (2018). Networked Publics as Agents of Accountability: Online Interactions between Citizens, the Media and Immigration Officials during the European Refugee Crisis. New Media & Society, 21, 279-297. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1461444818794592
Ramon, X., Mauri-Ríos, M. & Díaz-Campo, J. (2020). Instrumentos de rendición de cuentas impulsados por los medios de comunicación: percepción de los periodistas y ciudadanos españoles. Revista de Comunicación, 19(1), 221-241. https://www.doi.org/10.26441/RC19.1-2020-A13
Rodríguez-Martínez, R., Mauri-De los Ríos, M. & Fedele, M. (2017). Criticism in Journalism as an Accountability Instrument: The Opinion of Spanish Journalists. Communication & Society, 30(1), 57-72. https://www.doi.org/10.15581/003.30.1.57-72
Roses, S. & Gómez-Calderón, B. (2015). Credibilidad de los medios en España: divergencias de percepción y caracterización de los escépticos. El profesional de la información, 24(4), 432-439. https://www.doi.org/10.3145/epi.2015.jul.10.
Serrano-Puche, J. (2017). Credibilidad y confianza en los medios de comunicación: un panorama de la situación en España. In M. González & M. Valderrama (Coords.) (2017), Discursos comunicativos persuasivos hoy (pp. 427-438). Madrid: Tecnos.
Suárez-Villegas, J. C. (2011). Ética periodística y ciudadanía. Estudio sobre la ética de los medios de comunicación analizados por los periodistas y por la ciudadanía andaluza. Madrid: Dykinson.
Suárez-Villegas, J. C., Rodríguez-Martínez, R., Mauri-Ríos, M. & López Meri, A. (2017). Accountability y culturas periodísticas en España. Impacto y propuesta de buenas prácticas en los medios de comunicación españoles (MediaACES). Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 72(3), 321-330. https://www.doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2017-1167
Van der Wurff, R. & Schönbach, K. (2014). Audience Expectations of Media Accountability in the Netherlands. Journalism Studies, 15(2), 121-137. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2013.801679
Zalbidea Bengoa, B., Pérez Fuente, J. C., Urrutia Izaguirre, S. & López Pérez, S. (2010). Valoración profesional y social de los códigos éticos del periodismo en Euskadi. II Congreso Internacional Latina de Comunicación Social. Retrieved from http://www.revistalatinacs.org/10SLCS/actas_2010/36Karlos.p
Details
Article Details
RIGHTS TRANSFER
By submitting the article for evaluation and subsequent publication in Communication & Society, the AUTHOR exclusively assigns the rights of public communication, reproduction, distribution and sale for commercial exploitation to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, for the maximum legal term in force -the entire life of the author and seventy years after his death or declaration of death-, in any country, and in any of the current and future edition modalities, both in print and electronic versions.
In the event that the article is not accepted for publication , this transfer of rights lapses with the communication of the refusal to the AUTHOR.
The AUTHOR affirms that the article is unpublished, that it has not been sent simultaneously to another publication medium and that the rights have not been transferred exclusively previously. He is responsible to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service for the authorship and originality of his work, as well as for all pecuniary charges that may arise for the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, in favor of third parties due to actions, claims or conflicts arising from the breach of obligations by the AUTHOR.
