Concepción Fernández-Villanueva e-mail(Login required) , Gabriel Bayarri-Toscano e-mail(Login required)

Main Article Content


Concepción Fernández-Villanueva e-mail(Login required)
Gabriel Bayarri-Toscano e-mail(Login required)



The federal elections were held in Brazil in 2018. The ballot resulted in a victory for the far-right candidate, Jair Messias Bolsonaro. The question that arose after the victory of the far-right was: How could this have happened? One of the instruments that undoubtedly contributed to this unexpected victory was a peculiar aspect of his political campaign: memetic communication. Through the use of memes in the social media (above all WhatsApp), Bolsonaro’s project transformed these violent discourses against political opponents, feminism, racialised persons and poverty into a series of discourses legitimised through humour and irony. It was a simplification through the memes affecting the static system of cognitive and metaphorical frameworks. During the pre-election period in 2018, we carried out digital ethnographic research in the WhatsApp groups of supporters of Bolsonaro’s project (“Bolsonarism”). In this period, we collected a sample of 132 memes belonging to WhatsApp groups composed of up to 256 members, who did not know each other and were geographically dispersed. The analysis we carried out demonstrates the trivialisation and legitimisation of violence against political opponents and other social groups. Much of this legitimisation was camouflaged under the mask of supposed humour and irony, which in reality was insulting, prejudicial and dehumanising.


Communication, Brazil, far-right, humour, memes, violence, digital Anthropology


Alarcón Zayas, V. (2017). Humorismo como creación y fortalecimiento de los vínculos en la sociedad red: el caso de los memes sobre filósofos. Revista de comunicación, 16, 122–146. Retrieved from

Ballesteros Doncel, E. (2015). Debajo del burka: Discursos visuales sobre las múltiples formas de violencia ejercidas sobre las mujeres afganas. Arenal: Revista De Historia De Mujeres, 22(1), 157-187.

Beard, F. (2008). Advertising and Audience Offense: The Role of Intentional Humor. Journal of Marketing Communications, 14(1), 1-17.

Cesarino, L. (2019). Fractal identity and representation in bolsonarism: The king’s digital body, conservantism-neoliberalism bivalence, and fractal personhood. Revista De Antropologia, 62(3), 530-557.

Chilton, P. (2003). Manipulation. In J. Verschueren, J-O. Östman, J. Blommaert & C. Bulcaen (Eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics (pp. 1-16). John Benjamins.

Dean, J. (2019). Sorted for Memes and Gifs: Visual Media and Everyday Digital Politics. Political Studies Review, 17(3), 255-266.

Fernández Villanueva, C., Domínguez, R., Revilla, J. C. &Anagnostou, A. (2004). Formas de legitimación de la violencia en TV. Política Y Sociedad, 41(1), 183-199. Retrieved from

Fernández Villanueva, C., Revilla, J. C. & Domínguez, R. (2015). Psicología social de la violencia. Madrid: Síntesis. Retrieved from

Gaertner, S. &Dovidio, J. (2005). Understanding and Addressing Contemporary Racism: From Aversive Racism to the Common Ingroup Identity Model. Journal of Social Issues, 61(3), 615-639.

Glick, P. & Fiske, S. T. (2001). Ambivalent stereotypes as legitimizing ideologies: Differentiating paternalistic and envious prejudice. In J. T. Jost& B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp. 278–306). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Haslam, N. (2006). Dehumanization: An Integrative Review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(3), 252-264.

Hochschild, A. & ProQuest (2016). Strangers in their own land: Anger and mourning on the American right/Arlie Russell Hochschild. New York: The New Press.

Horst, H. & Miller, D. (2012). Normativity and materiality: A view from digital anthropology. Media International Australia, Incorporating Culture & Policy, 145, 103–111.

Huntington, H. E. (2016). Pepper Spray Cop and the American Dream: Using Synecdoche and Metaphor to Unlock Internet Memes’ Visual Political Rhetoric. Communication Studies, 67(1), 77-93.

Förster, K. & Brantner, C. (2016) Masking the Offense? An Ethical View on Humor in Advertising. Journal of Media Ethics, 31(3), 146-161.

Kien, G. (2019). Communicating with Memes: Consequences in Post-truth Civilization. Lexington books. Rowman & Littlefield Washington. Retrieved from

Kuiper, N. A. (2014). Investigating the role of humor in psychological health and well-being. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 10(3), 464-479.

Mey, G. & Dietrich, M. (2016). From Text to Image—Shaping a Visual Grounded Theory Methodology. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 17(2), Art. 2.

Moreira, A. (2019). Racismo recreativo. São Paulo: Sueli Carneiro.

Mortimer, K., Pascoe, K. & Ogilvie Johns, G. (2010). Is it funny or just offensive: an examination of the relationship between humour and offence in UK advertising. In Transformational Marketing: Proceedings of Academy of Marketing Conference (9781846000317). Coventry: Academy of Marketing. Retrieved from

Potter, W. & Warren, R. (1998). Humor as camouflage of televised violence. Journal of Communication, 48(2), 40-57.

Rodríguez Pérez, A. (2007). Nosotros somos humanos, los otros no. El estudio de la deshumanización y de la infrahumanización en Psicología. Revista IPLA, 1(1), 28-39. Retrieved from

Ross, A. & Rivers, D. (2017). Digital cultures of political participation: Internet memes and the discursive delegitimization of the 2016 U.S Presidential candidates. Discourse, Context & Media, 16, 1-11.

Serrano Pascual, A. (2008). El análisis de materiales visuales en la investigación social: el caso de la publicidad. In A. J. Gordo López & A. Serrano Pascual (Coords.), Estrategias y prácticas cualitativas de investigación social (pp. 245-286). Madrid: Pearson Prentice Hall. Retrieved from

Serrano, A. & Zurdo, A. (2012). Investigación social con materiales visuales. Metodología de la investigación social: técnicas innovadoras y sus aplicaciones. Madrid: Síntesis. Retrieved from

Shabbir, H. & Thwaites, D. (2007). The Use of Humor to Mask Deceptive Advertising: It’s No Laughing Matter. Journal of Advertising, 36(2), 75-85.

Shifman, L. (2014). Memes in digital culture. Vol. MIT Press Essential Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Shifman, L. & Thelwall, M. (2009). Assessing global diffusion with web memetics: The spread and evolution of a popular joke. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(12), 2567–2576.

Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology. Handbook of qualitative research, 273-285. Retrieved from

Wiggins, B. (2019). The Discursive Power of Memes in Digital Culture. In The Discursive Power of Memes in Digital Culture: Ideology, Semiotics, and Intertextuality (1st ed., pp. 21-36). New York: Routledge.


Search GoogleScholar


Article Details

Special Issue: Articles: Visual motifs and representations of power in the public sphere