Legitimation of hate and political violence through memetic images: the Bolsonaro campaign
Article Sidebar
286)
Main Article Content
Authors
Abstract
543
The federal elections were held in Brazil in 2018. The ballot resulted in a victory for the far-right candidate, Jair Messias Bolsonaro. The question that arose after the victory of the far-right was: How could this have happened? One of the instruments that undoubtedly contributed to this unexpected victory was a peculiar aspect of his political campaign: memetic communication. Through the use of memes in the social media (above all WhatsApp), Bolsonaro’s project transformed these violent discourses against political opponents, feminism, racialised persons and poverty into a series of discourses legitimised through humour and irony. It was a simplification through the memes affecting the static system of cognitive and metaphorical frameworks. During the pre-election period in 2018, we carried out digital ethnographic research in the WhatsApp groups of supporters of Bolsonaro’s project (“Bolsonarism”). In this period, we collected a sample of 132 memes belonging to WhatsApp groups composed of up to 256 members, who did not know each other and were geographically dispersed. The analysis we carried out demonstrates the trivialisation and legitimisation of violence against political opponents and other social groups. Much of this legitimisation was camouflaged under the mask of supposed humour and irony, which in reality was insulting, prejudicial and dehumanising.
Keywords
References
Alarcón Zayas, V. (2017). Humorismo como creación y fortalecimiento de los vínculos en la sociedad red: el caso de los memes sobre filósofos. Revista de comunicación, 16, 122–146. Retrieved from https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6015158
Ballesteros Doncel, E. (2015). Debajo del burka: Discursos visuales sobre las múltiples formas de violencia ejercidas sobre las mujeres afganas. Arenal: Revista De Historia De Mujeres, 22(1), 157-187. https://www.doi.org/10.30827/arenal.vol22.num1.157-187
Beard, F. (2008). Advertising and Audience Offense: The Role of Intentional Humor. Journal of Marketing Communications, 14(1), 1-17. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/13527260701467760
Cesarino, L. (2019). Fractal identity and representation in bolsonarism: The king’s digital body, conservantism-neoliberalism bivalence, and fractal personhood. Revista De Antropologia, 62(3), 530-557. https://www.doi.org/10.11606/2179-0892.ra.2019.165232
Chilton, P. (2003). Manipulation. In J. Verschueren, J-O. Östman, J. Blommaert & C. Bulcaen (Eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics (pp. 1-16). John Benjamins. https://www.doi.org/10.1075/hop.8.man1
Dean, J. (2019). Sorted for Memes and Gifs: Visual Media and Everyday Digital Politics. Political Studies Review, 17(3), 255-266. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1478929918807483
Fernández Villanueva, C., Domínguez, R., Revilla, J. C. &Anagnostou, A. (2004). Formas de legitimación de la violencia en TV. Política Y Sociedad, 41(1), 183-199. Retrieved from https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/POSO/article/view/POSO0404130183A
Fernández Villanueva, C., Revilla, J. C. & Domínguez, R. (2015). Psicología social de la violencia. Madrid: Síntesis. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282857600_Psicologia_Social_de_la_Violencia
Gaertner, S. &Dovidio, J. (2005). Understanding and Addressing Contemporary Racism: From Aversive Racism to the Common Ingroup Identity Model. Journal of Social Issues, 61(3), 615-639. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2005.00424.x
Glick, P. & Fiske, S. T. (2001). Ambivalent stereotypes as legitimizing ideologies: Differentiating paternalistic and envious prejudice. In J. T. Jost& B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp. 278–306). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haslam, N. (2006). Dehumanization: An Integrative Review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(3), 252-264. https://www.doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_4
Hochschild, A. & ProQuest (2016). Strangers in their own land: Anger and mourning on the American right/Arlie Russell Hochschild. New York: The New Press.
Horst, H. & Miller, D. (2012). Normativity and materiality: A view from digital anthropology. Media International Australia, Incorporating Culture & Policy, 145, 103–111. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1329878X1214500112
Huntington, H. E. (2016). Pepper Spray Cop and the American Dream: Using Synecdoche and Metaphor to Unlock Internet Memes’ Visual Political Rhetoric. Communication Studies, 67(1), 77-93. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2015.1087414
Förster, K. & Brantner, C. (2016) Masking the Offense? An Ethical View on Humor in Advertising. Journal of Media Ethics, 31(3), 146-161. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/23736992.2016.1188013
Kien, G. (2019). Communicating with Memes: Consequences in Post-truth Civilization. Lexington books. Rowman & Littlefield Washington. Retrieved from https://dokumen.pub/communicating-with-memes-consequences-in-post-truth-civilization-1498551335-9781498551335.html
Kuiper, N. A. (2014). Investigating the role of humor in psychological health and well-being. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 10(3), 464-479. https://www.doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v10i3.809
Mey, G. & Dietrich, M. (2016). From Text to Image—Shaping a Visual Grounded Theory Methodology. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 17(2), Art. 2. https://www.doi.org/10.17169/fqs-17.2.2535
Moreira, A. (2019). Racismo recreativo. São Paulo: Sueli Carneiro.
Mortimer, K., Pascoe, K. & Ogilvie Johns, G. (2010). Is it funny or just offensive: an examination of the relationship between humour and offence in UK advertising. In Transformational Marketing: Proceedings of Academy of Marketing Conference (9781846000317). Coventry: Academy of Marketing. Retrieved from http://nectar.northampton.ac.uk/3628/1/Mortimer20103628.pdf
Potter, W. & Warren, R. (1998). Humor as camouflage of televised violence. Journal of Communication, 48(2), 40-57. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1998.tb02747.x
Rodríguez Pérez, A. (2007). Nosotros somos humanos, los otros no. El estudio de la deshumanización y de la infrahumanización en Psicología. Revista IPLA, 1(1), 28-39. Retrieved from https://docplayer.es/169140-Nosotros-somos-humanos-los-otros-no.html
Ross, A. & Rivers, D. (2017). Digital cultures of political participation: Internet memes and the discursive delegitimization of the 2016 U.S Presidential candidates. Discourse, Context & Media, 16, 1-11. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2017.01.001
Serrano Pascual, A. (2008). El análisis de materiales visuales en la investigación social: el caso de la publicidad. In A. J. Gordo López & A. Serrano Pascual (Coords.), Estrategias y prácticas cualitativas de investigación social (pp. 245-286). Madrid: Pearson Prentice Hall. Retrieved from http://biblioteca.hegoa.ehu.eus/downloads/20427/%2Fsystem%2Fpdf%2F3862%2FEstrategias_y_practicas_cualitativas_de_investigacion_social.pdf
Serrano, A. & Zurdo, A. (2012). Investigación social con materiales visuales. Metodología de la investigación social: técnicas innovadoras y sus aplicaciones. Madrid: Síntesis. Retrieved from https://eprints.ucm.es/48842/1/Uso_de_materiales_visuales%20Araceli_serrano_y_Angel_Zurdo%20libro%20sintesis.paginado.pdf
Shabbir, H. & Thwaites, D. (2007). The Use of Humor to Mask Deceptive Advertising: It’s No Laughing Matter. Journal of Advertising, 36(2), 75-85. https://www.doi.org/10.2753/JOA0091-3367360205
Shifman, L. (2014). Memes in digital culture. Vol. MIT Press Essential Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Shifman, L. & Thelwall, M. (2009). Assessing global diffusion with web memetics: The spread and evolution of a popular joke. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(12), 2567–2576. https://www.doi.org/10.1002/asi.21185
Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology. Handbook of qualitative research, 273-285. Retrieved from http://www.depts.ttu.edu/education/our-people/Faculty/additional_pages/duemer/epsy_5382_class_materials/Grounded-theory-methodology.pdf
Wiggins, B. (2019). The Discursive Power of Memes in Digital Culture. In The Discursive Power of Memes in Digital Culture: Ideology, Semiotics, and Intertextuality (1st ed., pp. 21-36). New York: Routledge. https://www.doi.org/10.4324/9780429492303-2
Metrics
|
|
Details
Article Details
RIGHTS TRANSFER
By submitting the article for evaluation and subsequent publication in Communication & Society, the AUTHOR exclusively assigns the rights of public communication, reproduction, distribution and sale for commercial exploitation to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, for the maximum legal term in force -the entire life of the author and seventy years after his death or declaration of death-, in any country, and in any of the current and future edition modalities, both in print and electronic versions.
In the event that the article is not accepted for publication , this transfer of rights lapses with the communication of the refusal to the AUTHOR.
The AUTHOR affirms that the article is unpublished, that it has not been sent simultaneously to another publication medium and that the rights have not been transferred exclusively previously. He is responsible to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service for the authorship and originality of his work, as well as for all pecuniary charges that may arise for the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, in favor of third parties due to actions, claims or conflicts arising from the breach of obligations by the AUTHOR.
