The concept of power and its representation in television seriality. The case of «House of Cards»
Article Sidebar
129)
Main Article Content
Authors
Abstract
258
To study how power is configured, this article analyzes the first and second seasons of the TV Series House of Cards. The behavior patterns of the main character, Frank Underwood, were tracked to analyze his foundations, the means used, the scope and the type of power he wields. The theoretical approaches of Dahl (1957) and French and Bertram (1959) were used for constructing a group of categories that served as a guide in the search for index units. Therefore, the methodology is based on units (Barthes, 1970) identified within the dialogues, the iconic composition, and the actions of the character. The results obtained reveal that in the first season argumentation as a means to exercise power predominates, and manipulation predominates in the second season. Also, the media repertoire is much broader in the first season when the main character builds the scenarios to achieve his goals. These findings contribute to the construction of a broader understanding of power and its exercise.
Keywords
References
Barthes, R. et al. (1972). Análisis estructural del relato. Buenos Aires: Tiempo Contemporáneo.
Bordwell, D. (1985). La narración en el cine de ficción. Barcelona: Paidós.
Carrillo Bernal, J. (2019). Paradigma Netflix, el entretenimiento del algoritmo. Barcelona: UOC (Oberta UOC Publishing SL).
Curtis, N. (2015). ‘The subject of House of Cards is not politics, it’s power with a capital ‘P’’: Beau Willimon on the new series of Netflix’s hit drama. Evening Standard. 22. Fe. 2015. Retrieved from https://www.standard.co.uk/lifestyle/london-life/the-subject-of-house-of-cards-is-not-politics-it-s-power-with-a-capital-p-beau-willimon-on-the-new-10075308.html
Corner, J. & Richardson, K. (2008). Political culture and television fiction: The Amazing Mrs. Pritchard. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 11(4), 387-403. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1367549408094979
Dahl, R. (1957). The concept of power. Behavioral science, 2(3), 201-215 https://www.doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830020303
Donstrup, M. (2017). House of Cards: ideología y poder en la serie de Netflix. Ruta Comunicación, 8, 45-64. Retrieved from https://idus.us.es/bitstream/handle/11441/86376/16-156-1-PB.pdf
Donstrup, M. (2019). Liderazgo y género en la ficción: un análisis comparativo en la serie House of Cards (Netflix, 2013), Área abierta. Revista de comunicación audiovisual y publicitaria, 19(2). 237-251. https://www.doi.org/10.5209/ARAB.58496
El País. (2014, 14 febrero). Obama se confiesa rendido admirador de ‘House of Cards’. Retrieved from https://elpais.com/elpais/2014/02/14/gente/1392384047_507272.html
French, J., Raven, B. & Cartwright, D. (1959). The bases of social power. Classics of organization theory, 7, 311-320. Mexico: CENGAGE Learning.
Garin, M. (2017). Heridas infinitas, estructura narrativa y dinámicas seriales en la ficción televisiva, Làtalante, 24, jul.-dic. Universidad Politécnica de Valencia. Retrieved from http://diccionarioaudiovisualvalenciano.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/544-1977-1-SM.pdf
García-Catalán, S., Sorolla-Romero, T. & Martín-Núñez, M. (2019). Reivindicar el detalle: sutilezas y catálisis barthesianas en la ficción televisiva. Palabra Clave, 22(3). https://www.doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2019.22.3.3
García Landa, J. Acción, relato, discurso (1998). Estructura de la ficción narrativa. Salamanca: Universidad de Salamanca.
Genette, G. (1979). Figuras III. Buenos Aires: Lumen.
Igartua, J. & Muñiz, C. (2008). Identificación de los personajes y disfrute ante los personajes de ficción. Una investigación empírica. Comunicación y Sociedad, XXI(1), 25-52. Retrieved from https://dadun.unav.edu/bitstream/10171/8472/1/20090630140131.pdf
Klarer, M. (2014). Putting television ‘aside’: Novel narration in House of Cards. New Review of Film and Television Studies, 12(2), 203-220. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/17400309.2014.885818
Hackett, J. E. (2015a). House of Cards and Philosophy: Underwood’s Republic. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Hackett, J. E. (2015b). Existential Freedom, Self-Interest, and Frank Underwood’s Underhandedness. “House of Cards” and Philosophy: Underwood’s Republic, 219-226.
Kotsko, A. (2016). ¿Por qué nos encantan los sociópatas? Madrid: Melusina
Lizarazo, D. (2004). La fruición fílmica. Estética y semiótica de la interpretación cinematográfica. México: UAM Xochimilco.
Lukes, S. (2015). Robert Dahl on power. Journal of Political Power, 8(2), 261-271.UK: Taylor and Francis online. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/2158379X.2015.1057988
Lukes, S. (1974). Power: A radical view. New York: Macmillan International Higher Education.
Martínez Lucena, J. (2015). El imaginario social del psicópata en la serialidad televisiva actual: el caso de House of Cards. Imagonautas: revista Interdisciplinaria sobre imaginarios sociales, 5(6), 27-37. Retrieved from https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=5562272
Martínez Lucena, J. & Cigüela, J. (2015). Entre el psicópata y el político en House of Cards. In A. Tous Rovirosa & J. Carrión (Comps.), La política en las series de televisión (pp. 21-36). Barcelona: Oberta UOC publishing. Retrieved from https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=8117400
Matamoro, B. (2009). La verosimilitud, historia de un pacto. Alicante: Biblioteca virtual Miguel de Cervantes.
Metz, C. (1964). Ensayos sobre la significación del cine. Barcelona: Paidós.
Mittell, J. (2015). Complex TV. The poetics of contemporary television storytelling. New York: New York University Press.
Murolo, L. & Aon, L. (2018). Maratón en Netflix: House of Cards, entre la narrativa de la televisión y la Web, Tram[p]as de la comunicación y la cultura, 82, e023, octubre-marzo, Universidad Nacional de la Plata. https://www.doi.org/10.24215/2314xe023
Olson, G. (2008). De las neuronas espejo a la neuropolítica moral en Polis, Revista Panamericana, 20. Retrieved from http://journals.openedition.org/polis/3559
Padilla, G. & Sosa Sánchez, R. (2018). Ruptura de los estereotipos de género en la ficción televisiva sobre el poder político: el caso Borgen. Vivat Academia. Revista de Comunicación, 145, 73-95. https://www.doi.org/10.15178/va.2018.145.73-95
Pilipets, E. & Winter, R. (2017). House of Cards-House of power: political narratives and the cult of social sociopaths in narrative politics in American quality dramas in the digital age on Politics and Politicians in Contemporary US Television: Washington as Fiction. B. Kaklamanidou & M. Tally (Eds.). London: Routledge.
Rampton, R. (2015). Fictional TV presidents more popular than Obama, Reuters-Ipsos poll. Reuters. MARCH 22, 2015. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-presidents-poll-idUSKBN0MJ0AJ20150323
Sorlin, S. (2016). Language and Manipulation in “House of Cards”: A Pragma-Stylistic Perspective. New York: Springer.
Spang, K. (1984). Mímesis, ficción y verosimilitud en la creación literaria. Anuario Filosófico, 17(2), 153-157. Retrieved from https://dadun.unav.edu/bitstream/10171/2205/1/09.%20KURT%20SPANG,%20M%C3%ADmesis,%20ficción%20y%20verosimilitud%20en%20la%20creación%20literaria.pdf
Todorov, T. et al. (1970). Lo verosímil. Colección Comunicaciones. Buenos Aires: Nueva Imagen.
Tunç, A. (2020). Claire Underwood: Feminist Warrior or Shakespearean Villain? Re-visiting Feminine Evil in House of Cards. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56100-0_6
Valdivieso, M. (2014). The Political Science in House of Cards. IAPSS International Association for Political Science Students. Retrieved from https://www.iapss.org/2014/07/22/the-political-science-in-house-of-cards/
Metrics
|
|
Details
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
RIGHTS TRANSFER
By submitting the article for evaluation and subsequent publication in Communication & Society, the AUTHOR exclusively assigns the rights of public communication, reproduction, distribution and sale for commercial exploitation to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, for the maximum legal term in force -the entire life of the author and seventy years after his death or declaration of death-, in any country, and in any of the current and future edition modalities, both in print and electronic versions.
In the event that the article is not accepted for publication , this transfer of rights lapses with the communication of the refusal to the AUTHOR.
The AUTHOR affirms that the article is unpublished, that it has not been sent simultaneously to another publication medium and that the rights have not been transferred exclusively previously. He is responsible to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service for the authorship and originality of his work, as well as for all pecuniary charges that may arise for the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, in favor of third parties due to actions, claims or conflicts arising from the breach of obligations by the AUTHOR.
