Netflix in Web of Science: a bibliometric approach
Article Sidebar
175)
Main Article Content
Authors
Abstract
261
Netflix has shaken up audiovisual industry, but what about academic research? This bibliometric analysis focuses on 210 papers indexed in Web of Science that address this issue. We examine the author, university of affiliation, language, journal, keywords, year of publication, citations received, and categories covered in WoS. We also conducted a quantitative analysis of abstracts and papers to identify the most recurrent methodologies, themes, and samples. Our results highlight a rise in Netflix studies in recent years and their tendency to analyse specific audiovisual works. There are many qualitative analysis of specific Netflix hits, but none of the shows particularly stands out. It also shows a rise in “Communication” and “Film, Radio & Television” papers (40% of them), although academic interest relies on Netflix corporate culture, business, and algorithm. These studies are mainly carried out using a qualitative methodology (83%). More than half of the articles focus on one of the Netflix series and, among them, the greatest interest lies in the representation of specific issues; gender, race and sexuality are present in 25% of the works in the sample (n=210). At the same time, among the 367 authors signing these research papers, the parity between men (51%) and women (49%) is almost absolute. It appears that the geographical and linguistic variety of papers is related to Netflix’s global expansion and that the sheer number of titles covered reveals a fleeting attention due to Netflix’s trademark: swift and concentrated consumption.
Keywords
References
Buonanno, M. (2018). Widening landscapes of TV storytelling in the digital media environment of the 21st century. Anàlisi, 58, 1-12. https://www.doi.org/10.5565/rev/analisi.3133
De la Torre-Espinosa, M., Repiso, R. & Montero Díaz, J. (2019). Factor de Impacto y comportamiento bibliométrico de las revistas de “Film, Radio & Television” de Web of Science. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 42(3), e243. https://www.doi.org/10.3989/edc.2019.3.1630
Carrillo Vera, J. A., Aguado Terrón, J. M. & Gómez García, S. (2018). Following the Trail of eSports: The Multidisciplinary Boom of Research on the Competitive Practice of Video Games. International Journal of Gaming and Computer-Mediated Simulations, 10(4), 42-61. https://www.doi.org/10.4018/IJGCMS.2018100103
Castro, D. & Cascajosa Virino, C. (2020). From Netflix to Movistar+: How Subscription Video-on-Demand Services Have Transformed Spanish TV Production. JCMS: Journal of Cinema and Media Studies, 59(3), 154-160. https://www.doi.org/10.1353/cj.2020.0019
Delgado, E. & Repiso, R. (2013). El impacto de las revistas de comunicación: comparando Google Scholar Metrics, Web of Science y Scopus. Comunicar, 21(41), 45-52. Retrieved from http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=15828675006
Dwyer, T., Shim, Y., Lee, H. & Hutchinson, J. (2018). Comparing Digital Media Industries in South Korea and Australia: The Case of Netflix Take-Up. International Journal of Communication, 12, 4553-4572. https://www.doi.org/1932-8036/20180005
Escalona Fernández, M. I., Lagar Barbosa, P. & Pulgarín Guerrero, A. (2010). Web of Science vs. SCOPUS: un estudio cuantitativo en Ingeniería Química. In Anales de documentación (vol. 13, pp. 159-175). Facultad de Comunicación y Documentación y Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia. Retrieved from https://revistas.um.es/analesdoc/article/view/107121
Fernández-Ramírez, L. & Díaz-Campo, J. (2021). La investigación sobre montaje cinematográfico en Web of Science en communication, film, radio & television, psichology y neuroscience & neurology. Arte, Individuo y Sociedad, 33(4), 1369-1394. https://www.doi.org/10.5209/aris.72167
García Leiva, M. T. (2019). Plataformas en línea y diversidad audiovisual: desafíos para el mercado español. CIC. Cuadernos de Información y Comunicación, 24, 73-93. https://www.doi.org/10.5209/ciyc.64639
Gómez-Crisóstomo, R. & Romo-Fernández, L. M. (2017). Producción científica sobre cine indexada en la Web of Science en la categoría “Film, Radio & Television”: 2000-2016. Cuadernos de Documentación Multimedia, 28(1), 62-72. https://www.doi.org/10.5209/cdmu.55626
Gomez-Uribe, C. A. & Hunt, N. (2015). The Netflix Recommender System: Algorithms, Business Value, and Innovation. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems, 6(4), 1-19. https://www.doi.org/10.1145/2843948
Greer, C. F. & Ferguson, D. A. (2015). Tablet computers and traditional television (TV) viewing: Is the iPad replacing TV? Convergence, 21(2), 244-256. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1354856514541928
Hadida, A. L., Lampel, J., Walls, W. D. & Joshi, A. (2020). Hollywood studio filmmaking in the age of Netflix: a tale of two institutional logics. Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer, 1-26. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s10824-020-09379-z
Hallinan, B. & Striphas, T. (2016). Recommended for you: The Netflix Prize and the production of algorithmic culture. New Media and Society, 18(1), 117-137. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1461444814538646
Holt, J. (2003). Vertical Vision: Deregulation, Industrial Economy and Prime-time Design. In M. Jancovich & J. Lyons (Eds.), Quality popular television: cult TV, the industry and fans (pp. 11-31). British Film Institute.
Jenner, M. (2014). Is this TVIV? On Netflix, TVIII and binge-watching. New Media and Society, 18(2), 1-17. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1461444814541523
Lichtenthaler, U. (2018). The world’s most innovative companies: a meta-ranking. Journal of Strategy and Management, 11(4), 497-511. https://www.doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-07-2018-0065
Lobato, R. (2018). Rethinking International TV Flows Research in the Age of Netflix. Television & New Media, 19(3), 241-256. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1527476417708245
Lobato, R. & Lotz, A. D. (2020). Imagining Global Video: The Challenge of Netflix. Journal of Cinema and Media Studies, 59(3), 132-136. https://www.doi.org/10.1353/cj.2020.0034
Lotz, A. D. (2018). Evolution or revolution? Television in transformation. Critical Studies in Television, 13(4), 491-494. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1749602018796757
Lotz, A. D. (2019). Teasing apart television industry disruption: consequences of meso-level financing practices before and after the US multiplatform era. Media, Culture and Society, 41(7), 923-938. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0163443719863354
Mateos-Pérez, J. & Sirera-Blanco, R. (2021). Taxonomía de las series de televisión españolas en la era digital (2000-2020). Profesional de la información, 30(6), 1-15. https://www.doi.org/10.3145/epi.2021.nov.08
McDonald, K. & Smith-Rowsey, D. (2016). Introduction. In K. McDonald & D. Smith-Rowsey (Eds.), The Netflix Effect. Technology and Entertainment in the 21st Century (pp. 1-11). Bloomsbury Academic.
Mittell, J. (2015). Complex TV: The Poetics of Contemporary Television Storytelling. NYU Press.
Montero-Díaz, J., Cobo, M.-J., Gutiérrez-Salcedo, M., Segado-Boj, F. & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2018). A science mapping analysis of “Communication” WoS subject category (1980-2013). Comunicar, XXVI(55), 81-91. Retrieved from https://www.scipedia.com/public/Montero-Diaz_et_al_2018a
Naranjo, A. & Fernández-Ramírez, L. (2020). Cambios en la estructura narrative de las series de Netflix. El caso de Mindhunter. In R. Álvarez & M. Rajas (Eds.), Paradigmas de la Narrativa Audiovisuales. ASRI, 18 (pp. 137-153). Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3mhVnjn
Navarrete-Cortes, J., Fernández-López, J. A., López-Baena, A., Quevedo-Blasco, R. & Buela-Casal, G. (2010). Global psychology: A bibliometric analysis of Web of Science publications. Universitas Psychologica, 9(2), 553-567. Retrieved from http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1657-92672010000200021&lng=en&tlng=en
Pierce-Grove, R. (2017). Just one more: How journalists frame binge watching. First Monday, 22(1). https://www.doi.org/http://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v22i1.7269
Piñeiro-Otero, T. (2016). La radio en la investigación comunicativa en España: una línea minoritaria para un medio mayoritario. Signo y Pensamiento, 35(69), 30-48. https://www.doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.syp35-69.rice
Quevedo-Blasco, R. & López-López, W. (2010). Análisis bibliométrico de las revistas multidisciplinares de psicología recientemente incorporadas en la Web of Science (2008-2009). Psicologia: Reflexão e crítica, 23(2), 384-408. https://www.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-79722010000200021
Repiso, R., Torres-Salina, D. & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2013). La investigación científica sobre Cine en España a partir de sus tesis doctorales: análisis de redes sociales (1978-2007). Revista ICONO14. Revista Científica de Comunicación y Tecnologías Emergentes, 11(2), 385-404. https://www.doi.org/10.7195/ri14.v11i2.530
Rigby, J. M., Brumby, D. P., Gould, S. J. J. & Cox, A. L. (2018). “I Can Watch What I Want”: A Diary Study of On-Demand and Cross-Device Viewing. Proceedings of the 2018 ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video (TVX ‘18), 69-80. https://www.doi.org/10.1145/3210825.3210832
Rodríguez García, A. M., Raso Sánchez, F. & Ruiz Palmero, J. (2019). Competencia digital, educación superior y formación del profesorado: un estudio de meta-análisis en la Web of Science. Pixel-Bit, 54, 65-81. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11162/180507
Santa, S. & Herrero-Solana, V. (2010). Cobertura de la ciencia de América Latina y el Caribe en Scopus vs Web of Science. Investigación bibliotecológica, 24(52), 13-27. Retrieved from http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0187-358X2010000300002&lng=es&tlng=es
Santa Soriano, A., Lorenzo Álvarez, C. & Torres Valdés, R. M. (2018). Bibliometric analysis to identify an emerging research area: Public Relations Intelligence –a challenge to strengthen technological observatories in the network society. Scientometrics, 115(3), 1591-1614. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2651-8
Segado-Boj, F. (2020). Research on social media and journalism (2003-2017): A bibliometric and content review. Transinformação, 32(e180096). https://www.doi.org/10.1590/1678-9865202032e180096
Segado-Boj, F., Gómez-García, S. & Díaz-Campo, J. (2022). Intellectual and thematic structure of Communication research in Scopus (1980-2020). A comparative perspective among Spain, Europe, and Latin America. El Profesional de La Información, 31(1), 1-17. https://www.doi.org/10.3145/epi.2022.ene.10
Segado-Boj, F., Grandío, M. del M. & Fernández-Gómez, E. (2015). Social media and television: A bibliographic review based on the web of science. El Profesional de La Información, 24(3), 227-234. https://www.doi.org/10.3145/epi.2015.may.03
Segado-Boj, F., Martín-Quevedo, J. & Fernández-Gómez, E. (2022). Research on Television Series: A Bibliometric Analysis. The Serials Librarian, 81(3-4), 265-281. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2021.2011820
Steiner, E. & Xu, K. (2018). Binge-watching motivates change: Uses and gratifications of streaming video viewers challenge traditional TV research. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 26(1), 1-20. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1354856517750365
Zych, I. & Buela-Casal, G. (2010). Internacionalidad de las revistas de psicología multidisciplinar editadas en Iberoamérica e incluidas en la Web of Science. Universitas Psychologica, 9(1), 27-34. Retrieved from http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1657-92672010000100003&lng=en&tlng=es
Metrics
|
|
Details
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
RIGHTS TRANSFER
By submitting the article for evaluation and subsequent publication in Communication & Society, the AUTHOR exclusively assigns the rights of public communication, reproduction, distribution and sale for commercial exploitation to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, for the maximum legal term in force -the entire life of the author and seventy years after his death or declaration of death-, in any country, and in any of the current and future edition modalities, both in print and electronic versions.
In the event that the article is not accepted for publication , this transfer of rights lapses with the communication of the refusal to the AUTHOR.
The AUTHOR affirms that the article is unpublished, that it has not been sent simultaneously to another publication medium and that the rights have not been transferred exclusively previously. He is responsible to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service for the authorship and originality of his work, as well as for all pecuniary charges that may arise for the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, in favor of third parties due to actions, claims or conflicts arising from the breach of obligations by the AUTHOR.
