Andrea Pavón-Guinea e-mail(Login required)

Main Article Content


Andrea Pavón-Guinea e-mail(Login required)



Public diplomacy, despite its numerous and varied definitions, is essentially a communications process. By engaging the academic literature of public diplomacy with Lasswell’s model of communication and Braddock’s rearticulation of his model, this paper proposes an integrated framework that allows for the systematization of public diplomacy research. The framework is composed of the independent variable of context, which influences a set of dependent variables: the actors, publics, messages, objectives and tools of public diplomacy. Accordingly, this paper argues that public diplomacy research has been traditionally approached from an agent-centric perspective, and despite its obvious significance, the influence of context has been understudied. In order to test the utility of the model, the paper applies it to the case study of the European Union’s public diplomacy during two different settings. First, it will expose the main characteristics of the EU’s public diplomacy during times of globalization, where the EU’s public diplomacy was characterized by its normativity. Subsequently, the current context of deglobalization and de-europeanization will be introduced and analyzed through the following research question: what happens to the EU’s public diplomacy when the founding myth upon which it is constructed is under threat? By altering the context, one can easily see an emerging but clear transformation of the characteristics of the EU’s public diplomacy. By analyzing official, policy, and legal documents, and engaging with the academic literature on the topic, the paper concludes that the main objective of the EU’s public diplomacy in a changing world should be to provide for ontological security through (emotional) strategic metanarratives.


Public diplomacy, European Union, communicaton, context, ontological security


Adler, E. & Drieschova, A. (2021). The Epistemological Challenge of Truth Subversion to the Liberal International Order. International Organization, 75(2), 359-386.

Angell, S. I. & Mordhorst, M. (2015). National Reputation Management and the Competition State: The cases of Denmark and Norway. Journal of Cultural Economy, 8(2), 184-201.

Barbé, E. & Morillas, P. (2019). The EU global strategy: The dynamics of a more politicized and politically integrated foreign policy. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 32(6), 753-770.

Bean, H. & Comor, E. (2017). Data-Driven Public Diplomacy: A Critical and Reflexive Assessment. All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace, 0, 1-16.

Bødker, H. & Anderson, C. (2019). Populist Time: Mediating Immediacy and Delay in Liberal Democracy. International Journal of Communication, 13, 5948-5966. Retrieved from

Börzel, T. A. & Zürn, M. (2021). Contestations of the Liberal International Order: From Liberal Multilateralism to Postnational Liberalism. International Organization, 75(2), 282-305.

Braddock, R. (1958). An Extension of the “Lasswell Formula”. Journal of Communication, 8(2), 88-93.

Brown, R. (2013). The Politics of Relational Public Diplomacy. In R. S. Zaharna, A. Arsenault & A. Fisher (eds.), Relational, Networked and Collaborative Approaches to Public Diplomacy (chapter 3). New York: Routledge.

Buarque, D. (2015). One Country, Two Cups—The International Image of Brazil in 1950 and in 2014: A Study of the Reputation and the Identity of Brazil as Projected by the International Media During the Two FIFA World Cups in the Country, International Journal of Communication, 9, 1300-1318. Retrieved from

Carr, E. H. (1962). The Twenty Years’ Crisis 1919-1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations. London: MacMillan.

Castells, M. (2008). The New Public Sphere: Global Civil Society, Communication Networks, and Global Governance. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 78-93.

Chang, T.-K. & Lin, F. (2014). From propaganda to public diplomacy: Assessing China’s international practice and its image, 1950-2009. Public Relations Review, 40(3), 450-458.

Cox, R. (1981). Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory, Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 10(2), 126-155.

Cross, M. K. D. (2013). Conceptualizing European Public Diplomacy. In M. K. D. Cross & J. Melissen (Eds.), European Public Diplomacy: Soft Power at Work (pp. 1-11). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Cull, N. J. (2006). “Public Diplomacy” Before Gullion: The Evolution of a Phrase. USC Center on Public Diplomacy. Retrieved from

Cull, N. J. (2009). Public diplomacy: Lessons from the past. Los Angeles: Figueroa Press.

Dodd, M. D. & Collins, S. J. (2017). Public relations message strategies and public diplomacy 2.0: An empirical analysis using Central-Eastern European and Western Embassy Twitter accounts. Public Relations Review, 43(2), 417-425.

Duke, S. (2013). The European External Action Service and Public Diplomacy. In M. K. D. Cross & J. Melissen (Eds.), European Public Diplomacy: Soft Power at Work (pp. 113-136). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

European Commission, Directorate-General for Communication, Juncker, J., State of the Union 2016, Publications Office, 2016. Retrieved from

European Council (2003). A Secure Europe in a Better World. European Security Strategy. Retrieved from

European External Action Service (2022). Public Diplomacy: Building Bridges between the European Union and the rest of the world, Strategic Communications. Retrieved from

European Union (2016). Shared Vision, Common Action: A Stronger Europe. A Global Strategy for the European Union’s Foreign and Security Policy. Retrieved from

Fitzpatrick, K. (2007). Advancing the New Public Diplomacy: A Public Relations Perspective. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 2(3), 187-211.

Fukuyama, F. (1992). The end of history and the last man. New York. Free Press.

Gallie, W. B. (1955). Essentially Contested Concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 56, 167-198. Retrieved from

Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and Self-Identity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Gilboa, E. (2008). Searching for a Theory of Public Diplomacy. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 55-77.

Goertz, G. (1992). Contextual theories and indicators in world politics. International Interactions, 17(4), 285-303.

Golan, G. J. (2014). The Advertorial as a Tool of Mediated Public Diplomacy. International Journal of Communication, 8, 1268-1288. Retrieved from

Golan, G. J. & Viatchaninova, E. (2013). Government Social Responsibility in Public Diplomacy: Russia’s strategic use of advertorials. Public Relations Review, 39(4), 403-405.

Goodman, M. B. (2006). The role of business in public diplomacy. Journal of Business Strategy, 27(3), 5-7.

Graham, S. E. (2014). Emotion and Public Diplomacy: Dispositions in International Communications, Dialogue, and Persuasion. International Studies Review, 16(4), 522-534.

Gregory, B. (2011). American Public Diplomacy: Enduring Characteristics, Elusive Transformation. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 6(3-4), 351-372.

Habermas, J. (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and the Rationalization of Society (Vol. 1). Boston: Beacon Press.

Hall, I. (2012). India’s New Public Diplomacy. Asian Survey, 52(6), 1089-1110.

van Ham, P. (2003). War, Lies, and Videotape: Public Diplomacy and the USA’s War on Terrorism. Security Dialogue, 34(4), 427-444.

van Ham, P. (2010). Social Power in International Politics. New York: Routledge.

Hartig, F. (2015). Communicating China to the World: Confucius Institutes and China’s Strategic Narratives. Politics, 35(3-4), 245-258.

Hayden, C. (2009). Applied Public Diplomacy: A Marketing Communications Exchange Program in Saudi Arabia. American Behavioral Scientist, 53(4), 533-548.

Hayden, C., Waisanen, D. & Osipova, Y. (2013). Facilitating the Conversation: The 2012 U.S. Presidential Election and Public Diplomacy Through social media. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(11), 1623-1642.

Hobolt, S. B. (2016). The Brexit vote: A divided nation, a divided continent. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(9), 1259-1277.

d’Hooghe, I. (2008). Into High Gear: China’s Public Diplomacy. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 3(1), 37-61.

Huysmans, J. (1998) Security! What do you mean? From concept to thick signifier. European Journal of International Relations 4(2), 226-255.

Ikenberry, G. J. (2018). The end of liberal international order? International Affairs, 94(1), 7-23.

Johansson-Nogués, E. (2018). The EU’s ontological (in)security: Stabilising the ENP area… and the EU-self? Cooperation and Conflict, 53(4), 528-544.

Johns, G. (2006). The Essential Impact of Context on Organizational Behavior. Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 386-408.

Kaarbo, J. & Beasley, R. K. (1999). A Practical Guide to the Comparative Case Study Method in Political Psychology. Political Psychology, 20(2), 369-391.

Kovala, U. (2014). Theories of Context, Theorizing Context. Journal of Literary Theory, 8(1), 158-177.

Kunczik, M. (1997). Images of Nations and International Public Relations. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Lake, D. A., Martin, L. L. & Risse, T. (2021). Challenges to the Liberal Order: Reflections on International Organization. International Organization, 75(2), 225-257.

Lasswell, H. D. (1948). The structure and function of communication in society. In L. Bryson (Ed.), The communication of ideas: A series of addresses (pp. 37-51). New York, NY: Institute for Religious and Social Studies.

Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H. & Cook, J. (2017). Beyond Misinformation: Understanding and Coping with the “Post-Truth” Era. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6(4), 353-369.

Macnamara, J. (2012). Corporate and organisational diplomacy: An alternative paradigm to PR. Journal of Communication Management, 16(3), 312-325.

Mälksoo, M. (2016). From the ESS to the EU Global Strategy: External policy, internal purpose. Contemporary Security Policy, 37(3), 374-388.

Manners, I. (2002). Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms? JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(2), 235-258.

Mattern, J. B. (2005). Why `Soft Power’ Isn’t So Soft: Representational Force and the Sociolinguistic Construction of Attraction in World Politics. Millennium, 33(3), 583-612.

Melki, J. & Jabado, M. (2016). Mediated Public Diplomacy of the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria: The Synergistic Use of Terrorism, Social Media and Branding. Media and Communication, 4(2), 92-103.

Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: JosseyBass.

Morillas, P. (2019), Strategy-Making in the EU. From Foreign and Security Policy to External Action. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

Moss, J., Robinson, E. & Watts, J. (2020). Brexit and the Everyday Politics of Emotion: Methodological Lessons from History. Political Studies, 68(4), 837-856.

Nye, J. (2004) Soft Power. The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: Public Affairs.

Ordeix-Rigo, E. & Duarte, J. (2009). From Public Diplomacy to Corporate Diplomacy: Increasing Corporation’s Legitimacy and Influence. American Behavioral Scientist, 53(4), 549-564.

Pamment, J. (2014). Strategic Narratives in US Public Diplomacy: A Critical Geopolitics. Popular Communication, 12(1), 48-64.

Parekh, B. (1992). The Cultural Particularity of Liberal Democracy. Political Studies, 40(1), 160-175.

Pavón-Guinea, A. (2021). Conflict, power, and difference in dialogue: A conversation between public diplomacy and positioning theory. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy.

Platt, J. R. (1964). Strong Inference: Certain systematic methods of scientific thinking may produce much more rapid progress than others. Science, 146(3642), 347-363.

Potter, E. & Copeland, D. (2008). Public Diplomacy in Conflict Zones: Military Information Operations Meet Political Counter-Insurgency. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 3(3), 277-297.

Public Diplomacy Alumni Association. (2008). What is public diplomacy? Public Diplomacy Alumni Association, Washington, DC. Retrieved from

Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Rashid, Y., Rashid, A., Warraich, M. A., Sabir, S. S. & Waseem, A. (2019). Case Study Method: A Step-by-Step Guide for Business Researchers. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18.

Rasmussen, S. B. (2010). The Messages and Practices of the European Union’s Public Diplomacy. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 5(3), 263-287.

Rawnsley, G. D. (2015). To Know Us is to Love Us: Public Diplomacy and International Broadcasting in Contemporary Russia and China. Politics, 35(3-4), 273-286.

Reuters Institute (2022). Digital News Report. Retrieved from

Roselle, L., Miskimmon, A., & O’Loughlin, B. (2014). Strategic narrative: A new means to understand soft power. Media, War & Conflict, 7(1), 70-84.

Ruggie, J. G. (1982). International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order. International Organization, 36(2), 379-415. Retrieved from

Rule, P., & John, V. M. (2015). A Necessary Dialogue: Theory in Case Study Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 14(4).

Sapienza, Z. S., Iyer, N., & Veenstra, A. S. (2015). Reading Lasswell’s Model of Communication Backward: Three Scholarly Misconceptions. Mass Communication and Society, 18(5), 599-622.

Sevin, E., Metzgar, E.T. & Hayden, C. (2019). The Scholarship of Public Diplomacy: Analysis of a Growing Field. International Journal of Communication, 13, 4814-4837. Retrieved from

Sheafer, T., Shenhav, S. R., Takens, J., & van Atteveldt, W. (2014). Relative Political and Value Proximity in Mediated Public Diplomacy: The Effect of State-Level Homophily on International Frame Building. Political Communication, 31(1), 149-167.

Snow, N. (2020). Public Diplomacy. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies.

Snow, C. (2006). Public diplomacy practitioners: A changing cast of characters. Journal of Business Strategy, 27(3), 18-21,

Subotić, J. (2016). Narrative, Ontological Security, and Foreign Policy Change, Foreign Policy Analysis, 12(4), 610-627.

Sun, H. H. (2008). International political marketing: A case study of United States soft power and public diplomacy. Journal of Public Affairs, 8(3), 165-183.

Suri, N. (2011). Public Diplomacy in India’s Foreign Policy. Strategic Analysis, 35(2), 297-303.

Stake, R. E. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 443-466). London: Sage.

Terzi, Ö., Palm, T., & Gürkan, S. (2021). Introduction: Emotion(al) norms in EUropean foreign policy. Global Affairs, 7(2), 93-102.

The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) (1949). The North Atlantic Treaty. Retrieved from

The Treaty of Lisbon (2007). Retrieved from

Tocci, N. (2017). Framing the EU global strategy. A stronger Europe in a fragile world. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

Tuch, H. N. (1990). Communicating with the world: U.S. public diplomacy overseas. New York: St. Martins.

United Nations (UN) (1945). United Nations Charter. Retrieved from

Vela, J. de S. E., & Xifra, J. (2015). International representation strategies for stateless nations: The case of Catalonia’s cultural diplomacy. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 11(1), 83-96.

Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146-1151.

de Vreese, C. H., Esser, F., Aalberg, T., Reinemann, C., & Stanyer, J. (2018). Populism as an Expression of Political Communication Content and Style: A New Perspective. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 23(4), 423-438.

Wang, J. (2006). Public diplomacy and global business. Journal of Business Strategy, 27(3), 41-49.

Wastnidge, E. (2015). The Modalities of Iranian Soft Power: From Cultural Diplomacy to Soft War. Politics, 35(3-4), 364-377.

Weber, M. (1947). The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. New York: Oxford University Press.

Weber, M. (1949). The Methodology of the Social Sciences. New York: Free Press.

White, C. L. (2015). Exploring the role of private-sector corporations in public diplomacy. Public Relations Inquiry, 4(3), 305-321.

Wodak, R. (2015). The Politics of Fear. What Right‐Wing Populist Discourses Mean. London: Sage.

Wu, H. (2019). Three dimensions of China’s “outward-oriented” higher education internation¬alization. Higher Education, 77(1), 81-96.

Yang, A., & Taylor, M. (2014). Public diplomacy in a networked society: The Chinese government-NGO coalition network on acquired immune deficiency syndrome prevention. International Communication Gazette, 76(7), 575-593.

Yin, R. K. (1989). Case study research: Design and methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Zaharna, R. S. (2015). Culture posts: What about the public diplomacy context? USC Center on Public Diplomacy. Retrieved from

Zhang, J. (2013). A Strategic Issue Management (SIM) Approach to Social Media Use in Public Diplomacy. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(9), 1312-1331.

Zöllner, O. (2006). A quest for dialogue in international broadcasting: Germany’s public diplomacy targeting Arab audiences. Global Media and Communication, 2(2), 160-182.


Search GoogleScholar


Article Details

Special Issue: Articles: Public diplomacy: Strategic narratives for a changing world