The fallacy of interactivity on Twitter: the case of Andalusian political parties in 2020
Article Sidebar
0)
Main Article Content
Authors
Abstract
0
The advent and spread of social networking sites have been the object of study of most of the research performed on political communication over the past 25 years. However, more recent inquiries have indicated that the political establishment still has not fully exploited the interactive potential of these media. Against this backdrop, this paper presents the results of a systematic study of the communication between the main political parties in Andalusia (the most populous region in Spain) and the citizenry on Twitter, with the aim of confirming whether or not it is really interactive and participatory. To this end, the spotlight is placed here on those parties most active online and on the way in which they foster interactivity, the subjects that they broach and the functions of their messages. The data were obtained from a content analysis of the tweets (n = 10,729) posted on the official profiles of the main Andalusian parties in 2020. The results indicate that there was no interactive communication with the citizenry, despite the fact that they were in much need of reassurance owing to the unprecedented situation to which the COVID-19 pandemic had given rise. The Andalusian political parties still use social networking sites for the one-way dissemination of information, which shows that they are not, in practice, horizontal and participatory spaces of communication, as the cyber-optimists, defending the innovation hypothesis, predicted.
Keywords
References
Abd-Alrazaq, A., Alhuwail, D., Househ, M., Hamdi, M. & Shah, Z. (2020). Top Concerns of Tweeters During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Infoveillance Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(4). https://www.doi.org/10.2196/19016
Aladro Vico, E. & Requeijo Rey, P. (2020). Discurso, estrategias e interacciones de Vox en su cuenta oficial de Instagram en las elecciones del 28-A. Derecha radical y redes sociales. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 77, 203-229. https://www.doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2020-1455
Alonso-Muñoz, L., Miquel-Segarra, S. & Casero-Ripollés, A. (2016). Un potencial comunicativo desaprovechado. Twitter como mecanismo generador de diálogo en campaña electoral. Obra Digital, 11, 39-59. https://www.doi.org/10.25029/od.2016.100.11
Aragón, P., Kappler, K. E., Kaltenbrunner, A., Laniado, D. & Volkovich, Y. (2013). Communication dynamics in twitter during political campaigns: The case of the 2011 Spanish national election. Policy & Internet, 5(2), 183-206. https://www.doi.org/10.1002/1944-2866.POI327
Barberá, P. & Rivero, G. (2015). Understanding the Political Representativeness of Twitter Users. Social Science Computer Review, 33(6), 712-729. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0894439314558836
Barko Germany, J. (2009). The online revolution. In D. W. Johnson (Ed.), Campaigning for President 2008 (pp. 147-159). New York: Routledge.
Bellido-Pérez, E., Liberia Vayá, I., Hermida, A. & Pineda, A. (2021). Comunicación política e interactividad en Twitter: expectativas, realidades y retos del diálogo online con la ciudadanía. In M. I. Menéndez & E. De La Cuadra (Eds.), Análisis de la comunicación aplicada: artes, narrativas y medios en España y Latam (pp. 320-336). Madrid: Fragua.
Bennett, W. L. & Manheim, J. B. (2006). The one-step flow of communication. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 608(1), 213-232. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0002716206292266
Bustos Díaz, J. & Ruiz del Olmo, F. J. (2016). Del tweet a la fotografía, la evolución de la comunicación política en Twitter hacia la imagen. El caso del debate del estado de la nación en España (2015). Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 71, 108-123. https://www.doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2016-1086
Bustos Díaz, J. & Ruiz del Olmo, F. J. (2020). Comunicar en tiempos de crisis en las redes sociales. Estrategias de verificación e intermediación informativa en los casos de Facebook, Instagram y Twitter durante la COVID-19. Hipertext.net, 21, 115-2. https://www.doi.org/10.31009/hipertext.net.2020.i21.10
CAA (2020) Barómetro audiovisual de Andalucía 2020. Report. Retrieved from https://consejoaudiovisualdeandalucia.es/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/barometro_2020-digital.pdf
Cantijoch, M., Cutts, D. & Gibson, R. (2016). Moving Slowly up the Ladder of Political Engagement: A ‘Spill-over’ Model of Internet Participation. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 18(I), 26-48. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/1467-856X.12067
Cartes Barroso, M. J. (2018). El uso de Instagram por los partidos políticos catalanes durante el referéndum del 1-O. Revista de la SEECI, 47, 17-36. https://www.doi.org/10.15198/seeci.2018.0.17-36
Castro Martínez, A. & Díaz Morilla, P. (2021). La comunicación política de la derecha radical en redes sociales. De Instagram a TikTok y Gab, la estrategia digital de Vox. Dígitos. Revista de Comunicación Digital, 7, 67-89. https://www.doi.org/10.7203/rd.v1i7.210
Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas (2019). Estudio n.º 3242. Macrobarómetro de Marzo 2019. Preelectoral Elecciones Generales 2019. Retrieved from http://datos.cis.es/pdf/Es3242mar_A.pdf
Choi, S. (2015). The Two-Step Flow of Communication in Twitter-Based Public Forums. Social Science Computer Review, 33(6), 696-711. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0894439314556599
Enli, G. S. & Skogerbø, E. (2013). Personalized campaigns in party-centered politics: Twitter and Facebook as arenas for political communication. Information, Communication and Society, 16(5), 757-774. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.782330
Evans, H., Habib, J., Litzen, D., San Jose, B. & Ziegenbein, A. (2019). Awkward Independents: What Are Third-Party Candidates Doing on Twitter? Political Science & Politics, 52(1), 1-6. https://www.doi.org/10.1017/S1049096518001087
Fazekas, Z., Popa, S. A., Schmitt, H., Barberá, P. & Theocharis, Y. (2021). Elite-public interaction on twitter: EU issue expansion in the campaign. European Journal of Political Research, 60(2), 376-396. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12402
Fernández, C. (2012). Twitter y la ciberpolítica. Anuario Electrónico de Estudios en Comunicación Social, 5(1), 9-24. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3NZwsAf
Fontenla Pedreira, J., Conde Vázquez, E. & Máiz-Bar, C. (2019). Uso de Twitter durante los debates electorales televisados en los comicios andaluces de 2018. Ámbitos, 4, 213-240. https://www.doi.org/10.12795/Ambitos.2019.i46.12
García Ortega, C. & Zugasti Azagra, R. (2014). La campaña virtual en Twitter: análisis de las cuentas de Rajoy y de Rubalcaba en las elecciones generales de 2011. Historia y Comunicación Social, 19, 299-311. https://www.doi.org/10.5209/rev_HICS.2014.v19.45029
Gibson, R. & Cantijoch, M. (2013). Conceptualizing and Measuring Participation in the Age of the Internet: Is Online Political Engagement Really Different to Offline? The Journal of Politics, 75(3), 701-716. https://www.doi.org/10.1017/S0022381613000431
Graham, T., Broersma, M., Hazelhoff, K. & Van’t Haar, G. (2013). Between broadcasting political messages and interacting with voters: the use of Twitter during the 2010 UK general election campaign. Information, Communication & Society, 16(5), 692-716. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.785581
Greer, J. & LaPointe, M. (2005). Cyber-campaigning grows up: a comparative content analysis of websites for US Senate and gubernatorial races, 1998-2000. In R. Gibson, A. Römmele & S. Ward (Eds.), Electronic Democracy (pp. 116-132). New York: Routledge.
Guerrero-Solé, F. & Philippe, O. (2020). La toxicidad de la política española en Twitter durante la pandemia de la COVID-19. Hipertext.net, 21, 133-139. https://www.doi.org/10.31009/hipertext.net.2020.i21.12
Guerrero-Solé, F., Mas-Manchón, L. & Aira, T. (2022). El impacto de la ultraderecha en Twitter durante las elecciones españolas de 2019. Cuadernos.info, 51, 223-245. https://www.doi.org/10.7764/cdi.51.27471
INE (2020). Cifras oficiales de población resultantes de la revisión del Padrón municipal a 1 de enero. Retrieved from https://www.ine.es/jaxiT3/Tabla.htm?t=2853&L=0
INE (2022). Encuesta sobre equipamiento y uso de tecnologías de información y comunicación en los hogares 2022. Report. Retrieved from https://www.ine.es/dynt3/inebase/index.htm?padre=8921&capsel=8923
Jungherr, A. (2016). Twitter use in election campaigns: A systematic literature review. Journal of Information, Technology & Politics, 13(1), 72-91. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2015.1132401
Katz, E. & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1955). Images of the mass communications process. In E. Katz & P. F. Lazarsfeld (Eds.), Personal influence: The part played by people in the flow of communication (pp. 15-42). Section I. New York: Free Press.
Kim, C. & Lee, S. (2020). Innovation vs. Normalization: Politicians’ Twitter use at the early majority stage of its diffusion in the Korean assembly. The Social Science Journal. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/03623319.2020.1782634
Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Lilleker, D. (2015). Interactivity and branding: Public political communication as a marketing tool. Journal of Political Marketing, 14(1-2), 111-128. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2014.990841
López Abellán, M. (2012). Twitter como instrumento de comunicación política en campaña: Elecciones Generales de 2011. Cuadernos de Gestión de Información, 2, 69-84. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3DXnoY5
López-Meri, A., Marcos-García, S. & Casero-Ripollés, A. (2017). ¿Qué hacen los políticos en Twitter? Funciones y estrategias comunicativas en la campaña electoral española de 2016. El Profesional de la Información, 26(5), 795-804. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3hEBwhu
López-Rabadán, P. & Mellado, C. (2019). Twitter as a space for interaction in political journalism. Dynamics, consequences and proposal of interactivity scale for social media. Communication & Society, 32(1), 1-18. https://www.doi.org/10.15581/003.32.37810
Lorenzo Rodríguez, J. & Garmendia Madariaga, A. (2016). Going public against institutional constraints? Analyzing the online presence intensity of 2014 European Parliament election candidates. European Union Politics, 17(2), 303-323. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1465116515618252
Mateo-Toscano, A., Marín-Dueñas, P. P. & Gómez Carmona, D. (2022). Political Communication in Pandemic: The use of Twitter by Spanish regional presidents. VISUAL REVIEW. International Visual Culture Review/Revista Internacional De Cultura Visual, 9(4), 1-15. https://www.doi.org/10.37467/revvisual.v9.3542
Medina Serrano, J. C., Papakyriakopoulos, O. & Hegelich, S. (2020). Dancing to the Partisan Beat: A First Analysis of Political Communication on TikTok. WebSci ‘20: Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Web Science, 257–266. https://www.doi.org/10.1145/3394231.3397916
Mirer, M. & Bode, L. (2015). Tweeting in defeat: How candidates concede and claim victory in 140 characters. New Media & Society, 17(3), 453-469. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1461444813505364
Painter, D. (2015). Online political public relations and trust: Source and interactivity effects in the 2012 U.S. presidential campaign. Public Relations Review, 41(5), 801-808. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2015.06.012
Pérez-Curiel, C. & García-Gordillo, M. (2019). Formato televisivo y proyección en Twitter de las elecciones en Andalucía. In E. Conde Vázquez, J. Fontenla Pedreira & J. Rúas Araújo (Eds.), Debates electorales televisados: del antes al después (pp. 257-283). La Laguna: Sociedad Latina de Comunicación Social.
Pérez Gómez, D. J. & Mahou Lago, X. M. (2020). Participación ciudadana online. Una aproximación a los mecanismos de participación en Andalucía. Fundación Pública Andaluza Centro de Estudios Andaluces. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3hBiRTF
Pineda, A., Bellido-Pérez, E. & Barragán-Romero, A. I. (2022). “Backstage moments during the campaign”: The interactive use of Instagram by Spanish political leaders. New Media & Society, 24(5), 1133-1160. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1461444820972390
Quevedo-Redondo, R. & Portalés-Oliva, M. (2017). Imagen y comunicación política en Instagram. Celebrificación de los candidatos a la presidencia del Gobierno. El profesional de la información, 26(5), 916-927.
Ramos-Serrano, M. & Selva Ruiz, D. (2005). La comunicación below the line. In J. D. Fernández Gómez (Ed.), Aproximación a la Estructura de la Publicidad (pp. 224-248). Salamanca: Comunicación Social Ediciones y Publicaciones.
Ramos-Serrano, M., Fernández Gómez, J. D. & Pineda, A. (2018). ‘Follow the closing of the campaign on streaming’: The use of Twitter by Spanish political parties during the 2014 European elections. New Media & Society, 20, 122-140. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1461444816660730
Rauchfleisch, A. & Metag, J. (2020). Beyond normalization and equalization on Twitter: Politicians’ Twitter use during non-election times and influences of media attention. Journal of Applied Journalism & Media Studies, 9(2), 169-189. https://www.doi.org/10.1386/ajms_00021_1
Schweitzer, E. (2008). Innovation or Normalization in E-Campaigning? A Longitudinal Content and Structural Analysis of German Party Websites in the 2002 and 2005 National Elections. European Journal of Communication, 23(4), 449-470. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0267323108096994
Small, T. A. & Giasson, T. (2020). Political Parties: Political Communication in the Digital Age. In T. A. Small & H. Jansen (Eds.), Digital Politics in Canada: Promises and Realities (pp. 136-158). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Theocharis, Y., Barberá, P., Fazekas, Z., Popa, S. A. & Parnet, O. (2016). A Bad Workman Blames His Tweets: The Consequences of Citizens' Uncivil Twitter Use When Interacting with Party Candidates. Journal of Communication, 66(6), 1007–1031. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12259
Theocharis, Y., Boulianne, Sh., Koc-Michalska, K. & Bimber, B. (2023). Platform affordances and political participation: how social media reshape political engagement. West European Politics, 46(4), 788-811. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2022.2087410
Thorson, K. & Wells, C. (2012). From two-step to one-step to curated flows: Technology, social change and contingent information exposure. Paper presented at the conference of the International Communication Association in Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Túñez López, J. M. & Sixto García, J. (2011). Redes sociales, política y Compromiso 2.0: la comunicación de los diputados españoles en Facebook. Revista Latina de Comunicación, 66, 210-246. https://www.doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-66-2011-930-210-234
Vázquez-Barrio, T. & Campos Zabala, M. V. (2020). El contra debate de VOX en Twitter: boicot, ninguneo y mensajes antisistema. Sphera Pública, 2(20), 51-72. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3DXTwdX
Vergeer, M., Hermans, L. & Sams, S. (2011). Online social networks and micro-blogging in political campaigning: The exploration of a new campaign tool and a new campaign style. Party Politics, 19(3), 399-419. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1354068811407580
Verón Lassa, J. J. & Pallarés Navarro, S. (2017). La imagen del político como estrategia electoral: el caso de Albert Rivera en Instagram. Mediatika: cuadernos de medios de comunicación, 16, 195-217. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3TCWtGU
Metrics
|
|
Details
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
RIGHTS TRANSFER
By submitting the article for evaluation and subsequent publication in Communication & Society, the AUTHOR exclusively assigns the rights of public communication, reproduction, distribution and sale for commercial exploitation to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, for the maximum legal term in force -the entire life of the author and seventy years after his death or declaration of death-, in any country, and in any of the current and future edition modalities, both in print and electronic versions.
In the event that the article is not accepted for publication , this transfer of rights lapses with the communication of the refusal to the AUTHOR.
The AUTHOR affirms that the article is unpublished, that it has not been sent simultaneously to another publication medium and that the rights have not been transferred exclusively previously. He is responsible to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service for the authorship and originality of his work, as well as for all pecuniary charges that may arise for the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, in favor of third parties due to actions, claims or conflicts arising from the breach of obligations by the AUTHOR.
