Minority ethnic older adults’ perception and behaviour towards COVID-19 public health campaigns in the UK”¯

Abstract
In the UK, minority ethnic groups were reported to face the greatest risk from COVID-19. Yet, little is known about their perception and behaviour towards COVID-19 campaigns. This study used 35 semi-structured, in-depth interviews with minority ethnic adults aged 60 or over in England and Wales to explore their motivations for complying with or disregarding official guidance and their evaluations of various campaign content and channels used early in the pandemic. Using Template Analysis, key themes in the interviewees’ discourse were identified, which were subsequently analysed using the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB). This study found that the predominant motivations for non-compliant behaviour included fatigue from information overload, government- and socially-induced distrust, as well as self-reported personality traits. In contrast, compliant individuals emphasised community-based obligations and their trust in official communications. Although participants recognised the pandemic as a challenging time, they were generally unsatisfied with the credibility, consistency, and accessibility of public health messaging. This investigation contributes to health communications studies by adopting a qualitative approach and providing insights into an under-researched demographic.
References
Adolphs, S., McAuley, D., Vilar-Lluch, S. et al., (2023). Communicating health threats: Linguistic evidence for effective public health messaging during the COVID-19 pandemic. University of Nottingham. Retrieved from 8911_UoN_COVID_Discourse_Communicating Health Threats_A4_V10.pdf (worktribe.com)
Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behaviour. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Process, 50, 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Ajzen, I. (2012). The theory of planned behaviour. In P. A. M. Lange, A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 1) (pp. 438–459). London: Sage.
Ajzen, I. & Schmidt, P. (2020). Changing Behaviour Using the Theory of Planned Behaviour. In M. Hagger, L. Cameron, K. Hamilton, N. Hankonen & T. Lintunen (Eds.), The Handbook of Behaviour Change (Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology) (pp. 17-31). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108677318.002
AL-Jalabneh, A. A. (2023). Health Misinformation on Social Media and its Impact on COVID-19 Vaccine Inoculation in Jordan. Communication & Society, 36(1), 185-200. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.36.1.185-200
Allington, D., McAndrew, S., Duffy, B. & Moxham-Hall, V. (2022). Trust and experiences of National Health Service healthcare do not fully explain demographic disparities in coronavirus vaccination uptake in the UK: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open, March 18, https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053827
Barbería, A. M., Attree, M. & Todd, C. (2008). Understanding eating behaviours in Spanish women enrolled in a weight-loss treatment. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 17(7), 957-966. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02073.x
Van Bavel, J. J. V., Baicker, K., Boggio, P. S. et al., (2020). Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. Natural Human Behaviour, 4, 460-471. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0884-z
Bhopal, R. (2004). Glossary of terms relating to ethnicity and race: for reflection and debate. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 58, 441-445. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2003.013466
Bora, K., Das, D., Barman, B. & Borah, P. (2018). Are internet videos useful sources of information during global public health emergencies? A case study of YouTube videos during the 2015-16 Zika virus pandemic. Pathogens and Global Health, 112(6), 320-328. https://doi.org/10.1080/20477724.2018.1507784
Bosnjak, M., Ajzen, I. & Schmidt, P. (2020). The Theory of Planned Behaviour: Selected Recent Advances and Applications. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 16(3), 352-256. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v16i3.3107
Bouman, T., Steg, L. & Dietz, T. (2021). Insights from early COVID-19 responses about promoting sustainable action. Nature Sustainability, 4, 194-200. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-00626-x
Budd, J., Miller, B. S., Manning, E. M. et al. (2020). Digital technologies in the public-health response to COVID-19. Nature Medicine, 26, 1183-1192. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-1011-4
Calvo, D., Cano-Orón, L. & Llorca-Abad, G. (2022). COVID-19 vaccine disinformation on YouTube: analysis of a viewing network. Communication & Society, 35(2), 223-238. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.35.2.223-238
Gibson, L. P., Magnan, R. E., Kramer, E. B. & Bryan, A. D. (2021). Theory of Planned Behaviour Analysis of Social Distancing During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Focusing on the Intention-Behaviour Gap. Annals of Behavioural Medicine, 55, 805-812. https://doi.org/10.1093/abm/kaab041
Gov.uk (2021). Factors influencing COVID-19 vaccine uptake among minority ethnic groups. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/factors-influencing-covid-19-vaccine-uptake-among-minority-ethnic-groups-17-december-2020
Gov.uk (2022). New advertising drive calling on young people to Get Boosted Now. [Online] Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-advertising-drive-calling-on-young-people-to-get-boosted-now
Guliashvili, N. (2022). Invader or Inhabitant? –Competing Metaphors for the COVID-19 Pandemic. Health Communication, March. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2022.2054101
Halvorsrud, K., Shand, J., Weil, L. G. et al. (2023). Tackling barriers to COVID-19 vaccine uptake in London: a mixed-methods evaluation. Journal of Public Health, 45(2), 393-401. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdac038
Hernández-García, I. & Giménez-Júlvez, T. (2021). YouTube as a Source of Influenza Vaccine Information in Spanish. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(2), 727. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020727
Hodson, J., Veletsianos, G. & Houlden, S. (2021). Public responses to COVID-19 information from the public health office on Twitter and YouTube: implications for research practice. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 19(2), 156-164. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2021.1945987
Islentyeva, A. & Scheffler, T. (2023). ‘Arm your community’. Ideology in vaccine advertising campaigns across countries. Discourse & Communication, 18(2). Published online 21-10-2023. https://doi.org/10.1177/17504813231205010
Kalocsányiová, E., Essex, R. & Poulter, D. (2021). Risk and Health Communication during Covid-19: A Linguistic Landscape Analysis. Health Communication, 38(6), 1080-1089. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2021.1991639
King, N. (2012). Doing template analysis. In G. Symon & C. Cassell (Eds.), Qualitative Organizational Research: Core Methods and Current Challenges (pp. 426-250). London: Sage.
King, N. & Brooks, J. M. (2017). Template Analysis for Business and Management Students. London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473983304
Kurten, S. & Beullens, K. (2021). #Coronavirus: Monitoring the Belgian Twitter Discourse on the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Pandemic. Cyberpsychology, Behaviour & Social Network, 24(2), 117-122. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2020.0341
Lewis, C., Phillipson, C., Yarker, S. & Lang, L. (2023). Covid-19, Inequality and Older People. Everyday Life during the Pandemic. Bristol: Policy Press.
Luzón, M. (2022). Coronavirus explainers’ for public communication of science: Everything the public needs to know. In A. Musolff, R. Breeze, K. Kondo et al. (Eds.), Pandemic and Crisis Discourse: Communicating COVID-19 and Public Health Strategy (pp. 97-114). London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Madden, T. J., Ellen, P. S. & Ajzen, I. (1992). A comparison of the theory of planned behaviour and the theory of reasoned action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 3-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167292181001
Magee, K. (2021). Will the government’s new emotive Covid ad make people obey the rules? Campaign, January 27, [Online]. Retrieved from https://www.campaignlive.co.uk/article/will-governments-new-emotive-covid-ad-people-obey-rules/1705634
McClaughlin, E., Vilar-Lluch, S., Parnell, T., Knight, D., Nichele, E., Adolphs, S., Clos, J. & Schiazza, G. (2023). The Reception of Public Health Messages during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Applied Corpus Linguistics, 3(1), 100037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acorp.2022.100037
Nielsen, S. S. & Krasnik, A. (2010). Poorer self-perceived health among migrants and ethnic minorities versus the majority population in Europe: a systematic review. International Journal of Public Health, 55, 357-371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-010
ONS - Office for National Statistics (2020). Updating ethnic contrasts in deaths involving the coronavirus (COVID-19), England and Wales: deaths occurring 2 March to 28 July 2020.
ONS - Office for National Statistics (2022). Coronavirus (COVID-19) related deaths by ethnic group, England and Wales. London: ONS.
ONS - Office for National Statistics (2023). Coronavirus (COVID-19) latest insights: Vaccines. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/conditionsanddiseases/articles/coronaviruscovid19latestinsights/vaccines#vaccination-rates
Parsons Leigh, J., Moss, S. J., Mizen, S. J. et al., (2023). Exploring the influence of behavioural, normative and control beliefs on intentions to adhere to public health guidelines during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview-based study. BMC Public Health, 23, 464. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15344-0
Rutherford, L. G. & DeVaney, S. A. (2009). Utilizing the Theory of Planned Behaviour to Understand Convenience Use of Credit Cards. Journal of Financial Counselling and Planning, 20(2), 48-63. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2224051
Semino, E. (2021). Not Soldiers but Fire-fighters” –Metaphors and Covid-19. Health Communication, 36(1), 50-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1844989
Shanka, M. S. & Kotecho, M. G. (2023). Combining rationality with morality –integrating theory of planned behaviour with norm activation theory to explain compliance with COVID-19 prevention guidelines. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 28(2), 305-315. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2021.1946571
Shmueli, L. (2021). Predicting intention to receive COVID-19 vaccine among the general population using the health belief model and the theory of planned behavior model. BMC Public Health, 21, 804. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10816-7
Vilar-Lluch, S., McClaughlin, E., Knight, D., Adolphs, S. & Nichele, E. (2023). The language of vaccination campaigns during COVID-19. Medical Humanities, 49, 487-496. https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2022-012583
Zoellner, J., Krzeski, E., Harden, S., Cook, E., Allen, K. & Estabrooks, P. A. (2012). Qualitative Application of the Theory of Planned Behaviour to Understand Beverage Consumption Behaviours among Adults. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 112(11), 1774-1784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2012.06.368
Zubair, M. & Norris, M. (2015). Perspectives on ageing, later life and ethnicity: ageing research in ethnic minority contexts. Ageing & Society, 35(5), 897-916. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X14001536
Section
RIGHTS TRANSFER
By submitting the article for evaluation and subsequent publication in Communicaton & Society, the AUTHOR grants exclusive economic and/or exploitation rights: reproduction, distribution, public communication, transformation/translation/creation of derivative works, and commercialisation to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, for the maximum legal period in force -the author's lifetime and seventy years after his or her death or declaration of death-, in any country, and in any of the current and future publishing modalities, both in print and electronic versions.
In the event that the article is not accepted for publication, this transfer of rights lapses with the communication of the refusal to the AUTHOR.
The AUTHOR affirms that the article is unpublished, that it has not been sent simultaneously to another publication medium and that the rights have not been transferred exclusively previously. He is responsible to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service for the authorship and originality of his work, as well as for all pecuniary charges that may arise for the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, in favor of third parties due to actions, claims or conflicts arising from the breach of obligations by the AUTHOR.